Saty Vachan manyvar

🙏 Peace ✌️☮️

❤❤❤❤

Ye bate to bhabisya malika me saikdo sal pahle kah diya. Wahi se padker oso ne bola.

Right 👍

Jay osho❤

Osho ne sabhi shastra ko jivit kar diya hai, Jo bhagyvan hai wo Osho ke sanidhya me jayenge.

He is milestone in history of religion, like Krishna, Kabir, ramkrishna Param Hans,etc

Do not compare lord Krishna to anyone.​@@dr.triloknimavat8967

Sachin Beta padhai Par Dhyan Do...😂😂

Link please or descourse name plz

@@Seriouslyfunny2021 ia601605.us.archive.org/26/items/all-osho-books-39883p/Beware%20of%20Socialism%20-%20Osho.pdf

Discerning the Bh. Gita - Inhuman, irreligious text ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ श्रेयान्स्वधर्मो विगुणः परधर्मात्स्वनुष्ठितात्। स्वधर्मे निधनं श्रेयः परधर्मो भयावहः॥ - गीता 3/35 śreyansvadharmo viguṇaḥ paradharmātsvanuṣṭhitāt svadharme nidhanaṁ śreyaḥ paradharmo bhayāvaḥ Better one's own dharma though imperfectly carried out than the dharma of another carried out perfectly. Better death in one's own dharma for to follow another's dharma is perilous. Saying that I have my religion and others have their religions, be they religious traditions such as Shaiva, Vaishnava, Jain, Vedic, Quranic, Biblical etc., or that I have my profession, others have theirs, such as farming, carpentry, arts, medicine, trading etc., or that we all have different characters, personalities this seems to be advocating that we should stay stuck with our traditions, professions or characters. However, to accept staying stuck to a tradition in the name of religion, to fix oneself in some profession, or to accept the impossibility of a change of one's nature or character, all this is basically wrong, and shows no wisdom. You may change your profession at any time, may adopt any livelihood, which you are free to do. However, to say that a profession or tradition is somebody's religion is socially polluted, it's a social fraud. The Gita is a text for upholding ideas of varnāshrama and the Vedic tradition! If some keywords from the Buddha, for example, such as pashyanti or observing, vipashyanā or pure look, prajñā or intelligence are found in the Gita, or some partial insights are noticed therein, it does not mean that there is right understanding about these things in the Gita. You may analyze it, study it, but in the light of bodhi or intelligence you may see and understand it clearly. Religion has its own existence, religion is universal, religion is not separated into mine and yours it is a matter of common sense to understand this. In the mirror of relationship, i.e. contact with a sensory object using any of the contact mechanisms (vigyān or vinnān), such as eye, ear etc., recognition and evaluation by the cognition mechanism (sanjñā) on the basis of recordings in the consciousness from the past, and accordingly the arising of sensations and feelings (vedanā) in the body-mind this process is universal, it truly is part of religion as such, and is nothing to do with being Indian, Chinese, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or a farmer, doctor etc.. Thus, whether conscious or unconscious, attraction or repulsion towards those feelings and sensations is one thing, which is becoming and sorrow. On the other hand, observation of the same sensations and feelings with freedom from the known, with the alakh sense, coming to observation again and again, this is the art of living in this moment, which is the universality of religion, the order of religion in timelessness. Thus, with insight into observation, the way of unfolding of religion, of life, is open. What is the feeling of "I"ness or of the observer, what are fear, affection etc.or the observed, the awareness in time, in samādhi or suspended time, what is emptiness, what is the awakening of bodhi in the fire of observation and the emptying of the consciousness, what is it to be in time and sorrow and what is the ending of sorrow - such universality is the matter of religion. Look, understanding is not a man or woman; nor does a sadhu or a gentleman belong to any caste, varnāshram, or tradition that goes in the name of religion. If some people are dividing human society into varnāshram, Brahmin and Shudra etc., carrying on business in the name of religion, making false propaganda in the name of religion based on books that are considered authoritative, such as the Vedas, and pursuing their desire to become a Kshatriya, or finding pleasure in boosting their ego, then all this is getting deluded in the name of religion and society. Our thoughts can design many so-called ways in the name of religion, can try to justify violence, killings, wars, but all this is rubbish in the name of religion. Likewise, look into theory of karma in the Gita: कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन। मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भुर्मा ते संगोऽस्त्वकर्मणि।। (2/47) karmanyevādhikāraste mā phaleṣu kadācana, mā karmaphalaheturbhurmā te sango’stvakarmaṇi. To action alone have you a right and never at all to its fruits, Let not the fruits of action be your motive, Neither let there be in you any attachment to inaction. When you do some work or follow a profession for your livelihood, you plan for its returns, which is associated with what you do, it is not separate. Put another way, any work we do, depends on many things or forces, even when there is no 100% guarantee of returns, or expectation of a return in daily life. There are two things to understand in this: 1. Having an ideal of desiring nothing in your daily life, or denying your right to a return for what you do, means that you are talking about remaining in an ideal or imaginary state. 2. Psychologically, being open to explore and learn about what the feeling of "I" ness and desire for what you do implies observing the feeling of “I”ness and the associated greed, fear, affection, envy etc., which go together, and learning about it with the clarity of insight. These two points indicate the fundamental difference between ignorance and intelligence, and there is no insight into this in the Gita, the Vedas, Vedānta and so on. They treat the “I”ness or observer as separate from fear, anger, affection etc. or the observed, they see the observer as permanent, timeless, and attaching ideas of the ātmā and Paramātmā to it, place the observer on a high pedestal with ideas of its being the unattached, non-doer etc., but they do not see that the observer is a part of the observed, that the observer is the observed, and so they cannot gain insight into observation, emptiness and the ending of time and sorrow. To expose those things or texts that delude in the name of religion, to highlight which is wrong, is always needed. Being serious but mentally at ease, enquire into truth or the way, observation itself is enquiry, and help to keep it awake among people. Therefore, sādhus and the wise don't involve themselves in debate or shāstrārtha, instead, they favour dialogue or satsang. Views on high and low births in the Gita: मां हि पार्थ व्यपाश्रित्य येऽपि स्युः पापयोनयः। स्त्रियो वैश्यास्तथा शुद्रास्तेऽपि यान्ति परां गतिम्।। 9/32 For those who take refuse in me, O Partha, though they are lowly born, women, vaishyas as well as shudras, they also attain to the highest goal. (9/32) * Gorakh Sabadi 69: hindū dhyāve rāma kū͂, musalamāna khudāya, jogī dhyāve alakha kū͂, kahai kauna patiyāya. (69) The Hindu meditates on Ram, the Muslim on God, The yogi meditates on the alakh, free from the known, Tell me, who will believe what I say? (69) Thus we say, "Āge āge Gorakh jāge!" "Let us keep the way of intelligence awake!" - Yogi Surajnath. 🌾

Master of the master my love

@@yogisurajnathgurubudhnathj8457 It is always , everybody drags Krishna to their level, so misunderstood.usually nobody raise their level . Krishna is the highest level of expression in terms of religion and Avtar. Nobody is as versatile as him. He is best in every thing. That's why he's PURNA PURUSHOTAM. SWADHARM IS MISUNDERSTOOD. ASRAY TO HIM ALSO MISUNDERSTOOD . So I can't drag Krishna to my level. Consciousness or samaadhi is beyond mind and intellect not below If anyone has some glimpses of samadhi than can understand what Krishna wanted to persuade

Bhai ye osho ka bhai hai

sir aapki age kya hai

@@zomatotrader 🙏67 years 🙏

He is not philosopher (because philosopher is not enlightned)...Osho has enlightnment...Only Guru has enlightnment...so he Only knows future..Osho borned with full knowlege

osho ke bhai hain❤

Ye unke bhai hain.

Good thanks