BECOME MY PATRON! www.patreon.com/angelapuca ONE-OFF DONATIONS paypal.me/angelasymposium JOIN MEMBERSHIPS kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iMWid5qh07HVh30.html

I find the concept of a Meta-Divine Realm interesting, and I hope you can explore it more in the future. That being said, I think Kaufmann's definition of Monotheism to be quite flawed. His description may hold for rigid Deists but not for the Monotheism practiced by most theists. I wonder how Kaufman would classify mystics within monotheistic religions since, in his view, something like achieving unity with God would be impossible. Anyway hope the rest of your day goes well.

Dr angela, i sincerely hope you dont stop making videos. I discovered you just two days ago and your videos are incredibly informative and entertaining, as well. Thank you for this amazing content!

As a practitioner, in my own personal experience and gnosis this theory is correct.

Great video Angela! I think Kaufman might be missing the bigger picture about polytheism, in some cases at least. If you look at Hinduism there is only one God, which exists in all things and in which all things exist, but there are numerous deities in the All. Even though these deities have different qualities they are all part of the One, essentially. And it was indeed possible to appeal them individually while still understanding that only Brahman exists. It's the same principle in many belief systems, even in Gnostic Christianity which has hierarchies and other deities apart from the Godhead. It's the same principle in Alchemy where the different planets/metals have various aspects and powers but are all part of the One, and again the same in Kabbalah with the Sephiroth. If you look at the pantheon of Gods in any polytheistic religion it's obvious they correlate to different powers, and on others levels, aspects of the self and the divine. Although they can be appealed to separately there is no contradiction in believing in only one God. Initiates and priests of ancient Egypt, Greece etc would have been well aware of this. Oh, happy Valentine's by the way!

I have always thought of Yeshua's intervention to save Humanity (Salvation) as a 'magical operation'. I must disagree with Kaufmann's assessment of monotheism. I feel he may be unduly influenced by modern Judaism, with its rigorous adherence to the 'One God' concept. For instance, in Genesis 1:1, the original Hebrew word for God is 'Elohim,' which is plural and should be translated 'the gods'. The word used for 'created' also means 'organized pre-existing material' which is not creation from nothing (creatio ex nihilo) as most Christians insist. All modern monotheistic religions seem to embrace polytheism to one degree or another, which they also deny. Simply the concept of the 'Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit' itself espouses three gods. While many modern Christians insist this is a part of the 'mystery' of the Trinity, we are still speaking about three gods ACTING as ONE. Even the most diehard adherent to the monotheistic philosophy must admit that prayer, whether for forgiveness (confession), gratitude or intervention is a type of 'magick.' As far as humans tapping into the meta-divine realm, this is mysticism by definition. All religions, even monotheistic ones, have mysticism as their source, no matter how much of that mysticism has been stripped away in modern times. Fascinating and thought provoking video Angela! Thank you so much. 😁

This is fascinating. I liked the point you made about “in theory v practice.” Liked but is mashed!

Thank you. This puts things in a very different light. It seems to cede more responsibility to the person rather than to mere Fate

It's very encouraging to see others familiar with Kaufman's work.

I'm a born again Christian and I believe that the God of Israel is the one true God, through his son Jesus Christ. I found out about your KZfaq channel from Religion for Breakfast, when Andrew was talking about demons and Happy Valentine's Day beautiful Dr. Angela Puca.

I really like this one. By the way, Happy Valentines Day Angela! I love you ❤️

I love listening, the way you present your work is so fantastic 💕

Superb work on a theme that is one of my personal beliefs

great video, i love the aesthetic and makeup choices you've made as well

Just now seeing this video, very informative and well done. Keep up the good work!

Filip sent me! Love the info! Ancient religions and Spiritual Traditions are my primary fascination. Helping the poor, mentally ill and homeless usually competes for that primary position as well. Both are of utmost importance to me. I'm glad you're doing what you do! ❤️🖤💙

I would say that the paradigm that allows for the occult is henotheism which would see monotheism and polytheism to coexist. This is hinted at in the Book of Pacts and Black Magick. Fantastic work you do.

I'm not familiar with Kaufman or his theory of a meta divine realm but i have done years of independent study and I am part of very old oral tradition based on Norse mythology and we are based like the Egyptian mystery school in Hermetic philosophy. Thus magick to us work's around the 7 principles. It is never specifically said in the kyballion "these are the 7 principles in which magick work's" but it certainly alludes to it when it states that "all the doors to the temple will fly open at your command" The divine .. the "all" everything. The entirety of the universe..exists in the mind of the creator. The creation exists inside the mind of the all thus the all is mind... What science and the occult both tell us is that the universe is fractal in nature and therefore we are a fractal part of the divine having the same ability to create with our mind that the creator does. That is what we are taught about why magick work's as for the gods. The elohim who famously said "let us make man in our image" were 7 in number. They are also know as "the 7 churches" 7 Angel's 7 seals etc and they are the 7 planets of antiquity. Just like the 12 tribes of Israel, the 12 apostles, the 12 imans of Islam, the 12 trials of Hercules etc are all the zodiac. To the uninitiated they were thought to be real. To the initiated we are taught that mount Olympus, asgard Solomon's temple or the "home of the gods" is the mind. The "God's" are complex symbols each one corresponding to an aspect of the mind. Thor for example is Mars and symbolizes the raw Will that needs to be tempered by wisdom which of course is Odin. I'm sure you've probably heard all that before..or maybe not as I said i learned from a completely oral tradition. The myths were written down..what the symbols meant never was. I know how history looks at monotheism being a progression from polytheism but what it should do is find the thing that makes them both true.. If you can't separate things like creation vs evolution or nature vs nurture then instead of arguing over which one is true instead see how they are both true

A fantastic summary! Agrippas (who was christian) ideas on the faculties of the mind that give us access to this meta-divine realm via our soul/will are super interesting and perhaps relevant to this conversation.

Fascinating explanation

I found this informative, thanks for sharing.

Excellent presentation. The concept of the Metadivine realm is similar to what I understand through my own research, particularly through Shamanistic journeys, meditation, and dream recollections. I think of it as the Divine- or Source, outside creation, but the Spirit is immanent in it, through us and everything. The gods I see as different- Self-created beings, some at the beginning of the Emergence of Light from the Primordial Chaos.

Outstanding video.

wow! Love this!

This is my favorite video yet

Hey that was awesome! Loving your insights and you. Only discovered your channel couple days or so ago, Your content is what I was looking for with more... All things I live to absorb Practice and share. I like your great, DAV Scotland UK

I was born a warlock, but realized it later. I'm happy I met you.

Great video Dr. Puca😃. As a child I was always wandering how mankind learned about which herbs are poisonous and wihich are edible (I was always askinkg how many people must have been poisoned before anyone found out), how they discovered that they can make clothes from animal fur etc. And when we read Greek Myths with my mum and in elementary school, another question popped up in my mind: Did these beings (Greek Pantheon) helped us to understand to world around us and how to survive? There was also another question in my mind, are they really highest Deities, according to how is their behavior described in Greek and other Mythologies (arguing, conflicts, treason etc.) Just personal wiew, hope you have a great day😄. Thank you for your videos😄🍀

I have to wonder where, as you mentioned, Saints and also otherworldly creatures like angels and demons fit into Kaufmann's hypothesis. For the life of me, I cannot think of a monotheistic religion, there are lots though, that do not have some form of spiritual beings that are neither gods nor man but have semi-divine powers and some level of autonomy. If they do not occupy a meta-divine realm, where are they then?

From what I've seen so far: Great Channel! Nice to see someone who's also interested in subjects most people seem to run away from. Personally I would describe Judaism and Christianity as Monolatry as this means the belief in many gods but the worship of only One. Take Psalm 82 or Pslam 97 for example. The existance of other gods is confirmed but they are not very highly esteemed.

Great video! Thank you so much! I struggle to see though why the meta-divine realm, the source of everything in polytheist systems, would not translate to God in monotheist traditions...when perceived in a manner that is not too antropomorphic. I mean, to me they seem very similar when presented this way. Especially in Christian mysticism when God is compared to the source of everything. So I wonder whether the system you presented does not make polytheists to hidden monotheists... And thanks again! Really enjoying your content.

Interesting.

Nice video.

I see the gods as beings to be worked with rather than worshipped. much like a wise relative, or the love I have for my grandmother, or the honor I give to my mother. and some of them as my siblings. they are much the same as angels and the saints who are spiritual ancestors. so for me this in no way interfers with my faith in the christian Trinity. there is room for the One and the Many. there is many bible verses that speak of the "God of gods. " I take that to mean that there is One Ultimate Source and Many gods. this is one way I am able reconcile these seemingly opposing views.

This is an excellent presentation on the subject, Dr. Puca! Thanks very much for it! What is your view, then, on--say--Marvin Meyer's book Ancient Christian Magic? (Did you do a video on that already?) Obviously, you did account for the differences between institutional theological concepts and practical lived religions, but I'd love to hear your further thoughts on that!

YES! This is the video I have been looking for! Thank you so much. This reminds me of Goetia and Theurgy, channeling the meta-divine "energy" or asking a deity to do things for you. Is there an information in Kaufman's theory how people learned to "tap" the meta-divine realm? Is there a logic to doing ritual X (saying certain words, doing certain deeds...) to achieve effect Y?

Very interesting presentation and I am intrigued by this concept of a meta-divine world. However I would take issue with Kaufmann claims about monotheism, which is clearly his own interpretation and is not constant with the ontology of those faiths. How would he explain away mysticism and the performance of miracles? In essence in monotheism God is arguably the meta-divine world. What we can say about monotheistic religion is that any magic performed can not be by virtue of the will of the practitioner alone in that it must conform to the divine will and thus must invoke God eg faith healing, prayer, etc. This alas gives rise to the idea that anything that is not from the divine source must be from Satan and therefore magic can be seen as satanic - an unclear distinction which has lead to great injustices. Never the less it is clear that mysticism (unity with divine) and magic(miracles, faith healing, etc) is very much part of monotheism but varies widely as to its accepted practice. I am probably stating the obvious in the above. Sorry for that.

Hi Angela. I love the content. Came here via Let's Talk Religion and Esoterica channels. I disagree with Kaufmann as you stated. A monotheistic view would allow all magic to be a channel from the realm of God through the believer. Plus the belief of God in all things and beyond all things allows the believer access to magic should they contemplate and believe it.

I could write a research paper on why I only practice beastality;)

Hey thank you for helping me clarify terms and understanding. I learned alot in this lecture thank you :) how do you feel personally about monotheism and magic? There were many devout Christian ceremonial mages for example some whom you have lectured on.

Just watched your interview with Jeffrey Mishlove on New Thinking Allowed, and I just had to come check out your channel! Your work sounds fascinating, and as a fellow PhD student, I can appreciate all the hard work you have put into it. I'll definitely be checking out more of your videos. I do have to disagree with one point in particular that you made about monotheism, at least in the Christian religion, namely that God is not "directly accessible". This was largely true in the old testament- God would only occasionally select a few people with whom he would communicate and perform "magic" through (or as modern Christians say, "miracles"), such as Moses, Abraham, etc. But in the new testament, Jesus says that after he returns to heaven, he would send down the "Holy Spirit", so that any believer could have direct access to God for communication and magic/miracles. While Jesus performed many miracles, he told his disciples that they would also be able to perform miracles in his name, and the extent and power of these miracles could be even greater than his. (And of course, many of these are documented in the New Testament as well.) The Christian belief is that Jesus came to pay for sins so that ultimately we could have direct access to God. The New Testament also mentions that the veil (that prevented most people from entering the part of the temple were God was able to meet with priests) tore in half, symbolically showing that access to God was no longer restricted. I grew up going to a private Christian school, and they basically put us through a degree in Biblical theology lol. While I am still a Christian, my beliefs definitely don't line up 100% with the church I grew up in (and even farther from Catholicism). I honestly rationalize most of my differences as an interpretation issue- if something in the Bible seems to not line up with science or observation, maybe it was interpreted incorrectly (usually interpreted too literally- such as a 7 day creation or Noah's flood). Over the past year I have become very interested in parapsychology, which has opened my mind alot. I've always believed in miraclulous actions through the Holy Spirit and spiritual entities, but I hadn't considered the possibility of psychic abilities as an inherent human property. Who's to know if God enables every act of magic and psychic nature, or if we all have this ability and perhaps in certain situations God enhances our ability or channels through us? I really liked the point you made about the concept of miracles (from your other video on the New Testament), and how are they actually different from magic? In the church I grew up in, topics of magic, witchcraft, and the occult were very taboo and condemned, which seems so ironic to me given their belief in miracles and gifts of the Holy Spirit. The typical assumption was if a miracle was not performed in the name of Jesus, then it was caused by the devil. Or in many cases, even if it was in the name of Jesus, and the person or miracles wasn't liked, it was the devil then too, trying to trick us. (Personally I've seen many videos of churches getting "drunk in the Holy Spirit" that seem rather dark and evil. Some pastors seem like scam artists, not everyone who claims Jesus is honest.) tldr- if there is only one God, then either he individually enables certain people to perform magic, or he created humans to all have the potential to cultivate psychic or magical skills.

Thank you for your interesting videos. If I’m not mistaken during the late Egyptian kingdoms, it was the pharaoh Ahtkenaten who broke with their tradition of polytheism and even built a new city in Amarna dedicated to a new theocratic order banning multiple gods in favour of one god notably RA. Would this earlier shift be influential in Judaism’s shift to our current Christian monotheistic paradigm?

Mrs Angela! Can you comment on the shem manphresh and the Tetragrammaton in paganism and other beliefs. And there eytomolgy and influences on religions?

Great work and an excellent video! Still, I believe there is an error when saying that monotheism is incompatible with a magical view -- if this were so why would there be such strong condemnations of magic in the monotheistic traditions? You don't put the death penalty on the books for make-believe. Also, in the Christian view of the world there is a way to access the metadivine realm. That method is called 'theosis', which is like apotheosis except you're joining with the Trinity as opposed to becoming a god in your own right. It is this connection which allows humans to be thaumaturgos -- wonder-workers -- and there is at least one Christian saint (Gregory Thaumaturgos) with exactly that title. Finally, I think you will find that there is not such a diametric opposition between monotheism and polytheism as one might think. Neoplatonism is one attempt to bridge this gap; another is the understanding that at least some polytheism posit a higher being or beings than the gods with which humans interact -- creatures so high and infinite they are beyond human conception; the only way to deal with them is through the gods or angels which are closer to earth and able to dialog with humans. This is where the image of the Jacob's ladder in the Old Testament comes from -- a transfinite being beyond comprehension with whom angels interact , bringing down messages to humans and taking humans words back up. So in third century Rome you could have a "polytheist" who believes that the gods are either servants of something greater or perhaps images, shadows, of this reality. This "polytheist" would rub shoulders with a "monotheist" who believes in one God served by angels and saints , transcended humans, who also are the visible image of the invisible God. Their viewpoints are almost identical, except for minor differences in terminology over which they would kill each other.

It's my favourite academic occultist hi sweetie me love your work and dedication to the left hand path if only I had your knowledge I would be a magnus.

Angela I have a question. Several times I saw you wearing crescents. Are they just designs or symbolic of something, and what, if any?

I was thinking you might find some links between these two belief structures within Platonic emanation theory. I don't actually believe that polytheism and monotheism are a completely stark boundary in the context of traditions that center around a series of steps and hierarchies between humankind and the ultimate, singular divine reality. They are polytheistic in the sense that they involve multiple entities that are considered "divine" in relation to humans, but they remain subordinate to an ultimate, singular deity which could be considered the only actual God within those systems, thus warranting the label of monotheism. I think this applies in many esoteric sects of all three Abrahamic faiths.

More colleges should teach metaphysics. It gives a great alternate view of the world

Of course, you COULD have both if you do like Tolkien's legendarium and have a transcendent creator god who creates the pantheon of immanent deities, some of whom... are literally wizards and do magic!

I believe that we can become like the DEMIGODS, but not like THE SUPREME CREATOR. This is, in my opinion, why magick works in some ways, but doesn't in others (i.e. you can't shoot lighting bolts out of your fingertips). To put it simply, THE SUPREME CREATOR doesn't want us to be too powerful.

I really do think the Yoruba concept of monotheism is not in line with Kaufman's theory. They olodumare, the Irish as and the irunmoles that vary amongst each other. Check it out

You can totally call on the one true God to empower your rituals; not to mention angelic and demon rituals. Monotheism can and usually does include lower level spiritual beings with certain levels of usefulness and agency

Is the one god a impostor a trickster I change my mind alot on the subject of God. I'm Christian but lean towards the gnostic mindset.

What do you make of Psalms 82:1

Meta is such a buzz word these days. Apotheosis is not necessary. We are already all god and gods, just, sometimes we choose to forget this.

Is the finger pointing at the camera in the end supposed to have me pointing on the monitor as a kind of goodbye?

Thanks Doc. What do you think about people using the book Psalms from the Bible for magic?

I've just recently delved into this subject and feel one must believe in God to interact with creatures he created like angels and demons. If a person doesn't believe in the source of these entities how can there be a connection?

I would like to hazard a few conjectures at the great disadvantage of not actually having read the work you so expertly summarized -- which if I can I will remedy and if I am entirely out to sea and missed the point my apologies in advance. It seems to me that Kaufman has slipped into a strict monergistic Deism theoretically. But this view is entirely outside of the Hebrew theism he is purporting to represent -- if this turns out to be the case. The hierarchy of being involving ascent/decent, that he seems to have rejected and which you underscored, is precisely the vehicle that Iamblicus took up to resolve the tensions between sacrament (a type of magic) and the infinite omnipotence of the One/HE WHOSE NAME WE DO NOT SAY. It makes no sense to have a Temple and sacrifices to be able to come before G-d on the Deistic view to be sure. (I am using these indirect references in deference to Orthodox Jewish sensibilities). And yet the Hebrews had (and have in a different mode) such a practice and much more. Iamblicus as a correction to Plotinus does seem to open up a way for beings of a deeper decent to have beings/emanations of a higher one “come down” so to speak and interact in a view that rectifies the seeming paradox of monotheism/polytheism. Such a view makes sense out of how a people worshiping the one true G-d would and could perform sacrifices, observe laws of spiritual hygiene, and effect various feasts according to times etc. If there is no theoretical way to make sense of this then I think your recognition of practices that contradict theory (theology) is correct. But then the debate turns into polytheism vs. monotheism in zero/sum polemic. If this understanding of “deistic” monotheism is correct, assuming I understood it properly, it is quite difficult to explain why G-d would have created whatever this -- our realm of existence is. It is also rather odd the He would institute practices while fundamentally ignoring them or require homage of any sort at all because it simply is negated by His “distance” so to speak. Messengers of G-d, dreams, visions, theophanies, and revelations are standard fare in the Torah. If this deistic reduction is correct the author will have as much difficulty explaining the Hebrew faith as a polytheist would in explaining what they do.

It's an interesting concept, but it does seem quite flawed when I think about monotheism. How does Kaufman's idea of monotheism deal with Solomonic and Faustian magickal traditions? Moreover, how would it be applied by someone like a chaos magician, who might work with Saturn for something, then turn around and invoke the names of the Abrahamic god? In any case, I love your channel!

You should look into orthodox christianity.

What would Kaufman consider rites like the exorcism, blessing of water, or the eucharist(where catholics literally believe they turn wine into the blood of Christ) to be then? Aren't they basically magic rituals?

Given this is an academic channel, I will quote from a primary source. Psalm 82.1:" God(Hebrew /elohim) has taken his place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods( Heb. elohim) he holds judgment." Given that the word for "god" shows up twice, " the first elohim must be singular , since the Hebrew grammar has the word as the subject a singular verbal form"(has taken his place). The second elohim must be plural, since the prepositiion in front of it (in the midst of) requires more than one...the preposition calls for a group..." (Michael S. Heiser. Ph.d , The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible, page 27). the term monotheism is a relatively modern word and does not do adequacy to what the Hebrew Bible actually says about the divine realm. I believe in a transcendent and immanent Deity that created all things, even other divine beings, or elohim. I believe that prayer is one way of interacting in this Divine Realm to the Creator. And I believe in miracles. So I would have to disagree with Kaufman on this point. But I do enjoy your channel and your approach :) Thanks for all the academic fun!!

Unsaid is perhaps best expression ever! Ever consider hosting a monthly course for us on magick? I have struggled at times with this issue, at young age I was educated in the greco roman gods plus saw spirits/studied magick young. I landed in the choosing one god over the others then said yes this is God the Creator the all powerful, the others are beneath. As an adult I attempt to avoid being a mono practicing poly by one communicating with God as a Trinitarian/Modern Gnostic. Downgrade everything else to angels, demons and spirit beings. Now any "god" for me is only title not level. Magicians are allowed to ascend yet there exists a ceiling by the one God which is confusing since 3 personalities are experienced very differently. Maybe this is all cheating but it works for me lol.

What about religions that believe in multiple gods as different aspects of one god?

Apotheosis. That's what that is. Ok thanks. I'll be researching that theory.

What does "meta divine" mean?

Wouldn't it depend on what magic is meant to be? If magic is a just special kind of manipulation of one's environment, it could be possible in a monotheistic reality. Or it could be the employment of powers that such a god grants to created beings.

IF that's true, and monotheistic faiths can't, by kaufman's standards, tap into the meta divine realm, then what is going on with the Goetia Key of Solomon?

My opinion is that to some degree, there's a difference in semantics but not substance. The beings that a polytheistic belief system would call gods, are called saints or angels by christians. Now fundamentals protestant christians talk about angels little and saints not at all, but still believe in miracles. The acts of Jesus that make a change to the physical world outside of physical laws, like turning water into wine, controlling the weather, walking on water, healing the sick, and feeding multitudes, are always called miracles and never called magic. So, is there a practical difference between polytheistic gods and saints, between magic and miracles? Or is the distinction only semantic?

The Bible speaks of many Gods. There just can’t be any before the One. Judaism speaks of magic in the Kabbalah. In Abrahamic religion God asked for incense, herbs, woods, stones, sacrifice. There are seers, prophets..everything from hair that gives you strength, to healing, to spiritual gifts. Angels and demons that have dominion and power, an accesible Kingdom of God inside of them. Jesus says in biblical scripture “did I not say ye are gods”. There is worship, prayer, miracles, intercession of saints, sacraments, and immortality. It’s hard to not view that as a highly accessible supernatural influence that is brought on by belief or rituals… magic. Are Christians against shamanism since it’s more about practice or technique than religion? Is it the practice of magic they are against, because they obviously believe in it. Also I was very curious to see what you thought about witches who claim to be born as one. I understand there isn’t a way to technically prove that but I would love to hear your viewpoint because I have heard some witches say they were born a witch. Although they may come from a line of witches, it’s difficult for me to understand how if it’s based on practice or belief. It’s like saying someone is born Buddhist, or born a doctor. But with magic, I guess anything is possible. I apologize for my many questions, I have been binging on your channel for days lol. Thank You so much for your brilliant work!

Do you no any laws that govern yhe craft?

My comparisons with witches and low church evangelicals indicates a vast similarity in thinking: God/the Universe exhibiting signs that the believer/magic practitioner can read and adapt to and prayers/magic spells being effective. So this Kaufmann statement makes me somewhat skeptical. UPDATE, when having listened to Kaufmann's explanations: he doesn't really describe monotheism in principle, but the inherent logical consequences of it if developed to its extreme. Except in real religions, logic is not an issue, dogma is. And dogma ís just what another patriarch says. And still, he is factually wrong: monotheism was not a "revolution", monotheism developed in two steps: the deuteronomic reform, when the Israelite religion was monopolized to a small section of the priesthood, and secondly during the Babylonian captivity, in order to keep the Jewish community intact. It wasn't a revolution, it was a purge and an application of endogamy to keep the group intact.

Couldn't everything, positive or negative, proceed from a single source? Maybe a Polytheistic worldview just simplifies magicking, and the understanding of magic.

Kauffman should've studied Maimonides.

Another fine analysis but I disagree at some points. In monotheim you may have some semi-deities als angels or demons with the possibility to interact with and, thus, practise magic. In fact, monotheism is in this case not so far that paganism.

Hello mam.... I have a question.... How did Lilith became a demon when she was created a human equal to Adam.? Can this be possible that lucifer turned her to demon after twisting her soul in hell?

I find his view extremely limiting and contradictory with both Jewish and Christian mysticism. “In G’d we are, we move and exist” Acts 17:28. Therefore we exist within G’d, who contains but it is not contained within nature.

Um,. I'm not sure if we are the same species,. Same dimension, same size, micro macro, origin, upbringing, or have access to the same kind of environment and energy. But I didn't feel anything like magic or God unless catholic guilt counts , until the Kundalini shot from my ass out my head and then I feel all of it and protect it, as a really traumatic life and feeling all the feeling that the spirits experienced too,. It's not something that you misuse or let anyone else misuse when you are aware of what it contains and the path attuned for it to trust you. So I personally don't think anyone that follows anyone blindly should have access to this source. It was likely being trafficked and contains the concentration of traumatized suffering in a donut. And a sexual encounter with a narcissist triggered it. And I've been attacked nonstop by beings without discernment and empathy since 2017, but probably longer TBH. With magic and spiritual practices I didn't even know we're possible. I'm still trying to figure it out, they should not have access to anything that can do whatever they been trying to do

Perneabilty? Does he know Kabbalah or even the basics of Catholic Saints?

Pantheonism and Totem Magic I used this year as a New years Resolution. Here is a video of my totem animal (for emulating and being like): kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bqlkn65llrm8XYU.html Mother Theresa is the same type of imperfect toughness. She is as dark as anyone and yet her way is sturdy as can be while vulnerable. Good Luck, everyone!

Polytheism is Monotheism as Mohammed had conveyed so clearly early on, but then his efforts were reworked and the concept is still there to be comprehended and surely the concept of Buddha and Allah as the same limitless expanse of all as divine/sacred/worth guarding and protecting/rescuing, in the end Satan rescues God I say and to the end it's endless, God became possessed by expanse I think.

Under theism, from the Bible, God and humans have a relationship. As for the ancient Jews, God had a covenant. This is how that great gulf between God and humans is overcome. In Christianity, the great gulf between God and humans is overcome in the God-man Jesus, who is fully man, fully God. The afterlife is not Heaven but rather Earth and Heaven becoming one in which humans participate in this coming about. God interacts with Abraham, Moses, Job, etc. God causes miracles. The God described in the video is more like the philosopher's God or a deistic God. On the other hand, even under the concept of the God I described, true, there is little if no room for magic.

why not just calling them djinns? powerful jinn kings and queens idk if they're creations then they're not gods... god is the infinite creator

It's interesting that you were not able to address Jesus and the Holy Spirit in your analysis. Jesus and the Holy Spirit are key to the religion. You jumped from a Judaic religion to the unbiblical practices of the catholic church without addressing Jesus or the Holy Spirit. Christians do interact in the spiritual realms. Our authority is the highest in the spiritual realm. The trouble is when we turn away from God to our own ways we open ourselves up to the spiritual consequences, we open ourselves up to attacks from evil spirits, and fallen angels. Some people see fallen angels as gods. The fallen angels saw themselves as gods. They offer hidden knowledge and secrets of power to entice. Satan told Eve she could become like a god if she listened to him and turned from God. She would have secret knowledge. It lead to death. Satan leads to death. The "mystery secrets" lead to death. Jesus Christ leads to light. If you're on a dark path and suddenly you find you need to escape it, turn to Jesus. He's there for you even in the darkest times. No matter how deep you think your covenants are with the darkness, Jesus is stronger and can set you free. Call on his name. Satan hates mankind. Satan is destined for the lake of fire. He knows that. Don't let him drag you there with him.

I'm Atheistic Satanist but I tried enn chant invocation and a spirit accualy kind of visited. Now I kind of believe spirits.