When you spit facts, you can't just go full rhetorical, meaning as an educational presenter spitting facts you'll have to use body language for the tonal communication.

Like Ronaldo taking a free kick.

Not that it matters one way or the other, but are you a gay man by chance? I can't picture a woman using the phrase "wide, athletic stance," because it's something a PE coach (or gay man) would say to describe another man's pose. But you're totally right in that observation - and now I can't not notice how wide his stance is. He looks like he's getting ready to drop a duke in a port-o-pottie.

Physics talk requires the Kung fu HORSE stance.

Would you call his stance. . . Physical?

The shit moves at maximum speed c

😂😂😂😂

Only if the shit has not mass. so farts move at the speed of light?

good question, I wondered that myself.

Whats Up If i recall correctly from my recollection of useless knowledge. When talking about the act of smelling, like a fart, were talking about the nerves in our nose is picking up particles attached to air molecules. In other words, we're smelling the air, which is not massless and travels at the speed of sound at sea level. If something requires a medium to reach you (ie smell and sound), then you already know it can't travel at light speed. And air molecules (doesn't travel in a straight line) bounces around other molecules before the scent travels to your nose, which is why there's a time delay between gas leaving underwear and you smelling a$$. Someone please correct me if I remember / described anything wrong.

There are 7 years of these vids? I've got some binging to do...

I can't believe he didn't used to have facial hair

Matt's accent has gone from Australia to London in that time.

​@@elijahlupe8he? Jlnñl❤q on

phuturephunk but seriously though the derivation of lorentz transformation doesn't really require higher order maths once you know how 2 reference frame communicates

It's a bit depressing when people have to downplay content containing algebra. It's like everybody what taught that everybody hates it, it's like algebra is a punchline

I thought it did look a bit like tiger style...

Looks like an 80's pop star pose. Rick Astley or someone. Edit: Freddie Mercurie

@@tylerdurden3722 Ha, you said Rick Astley first! Talk about obscure. Never gonna leave you, babe...

@Eddie Turbine As you wish...

I suppose he is instead uber-famous like Eddie Raven or perhaps Eddie Rabbit? How about Edie for obscure? Enya? I know, the New Bohemians. Rick Astley was a Jordache wearing pre-George Michael wannabe with only one hit during the worst era ever to be a charting musician. A veritable nobody on the 'billboard' of history. In other words: yes, obscure...

This perspective is interesting to me, because I work in particle physics and would say the same thing, except I'd say massless particle instead of wave because that's the way I end up thinking about light and gravity more often.

Yes, but empty space is not limited by the speed of light and can expand faster, that is why far away cosmic objects are moving away from us faster than the speed of light (because the expanding space in between). The light coming from those objects will never reach us..

how about u stop being dumb believe man made bs , thankfull thers still ppl like me who have common sense that know that light is not actually moving its made up idea , for example a candle 🕯has light in it and its not traveling to ur eyes when u see it , if u see a light it means u are inside of the area that the light is being emitted , why do yall think that the light is traveling to our eyes 🤣

@@joostdriesens3984 the only way "speed of light " could make sense is if u holding a light a something like a flashlight and u move it while the light is on , in that situation then u could say the light is moving but even in that situation the light is not actually moving

I came to this realization from thinking about how a video game is made. The programmer is God and maybe aka the Universe. The light you see is the End Result of the Video game. But the hardware and code behind the scenes must make that light must move faster than light or before the light moves. In fact, they have measured some sort of weird delay between what actually happens and what you see. Almost like when your screen refresh on your monitor to catch up with the computer calculations... maybe that is like quantum information signals can finalize where the waves intersect to create atoms.

@@joostdriesens3984 Something that really blows me away is the concept of overlapping light cones. Like you can see 1 light year further to your "right" than someone 1 light year to your "left". That means that things in that light year of space exist casually to you, but not to that person 1 light year outside of that light cone. Screw uncertainty, it is certain that points in space can exist and not exist at the same time depending on your point of reference.

His name might be will hunting

haha😂😂

Much more than that, after spending half an hour writing some math on a napkin while drinking coffee, he'll unlock the secrets of FTL propulsion.

But he is not stupid and keeps his mouth shut.

@@yourname6054 a characteristic many of us should adopt

I fastforwarded...

@Brian Landers Same here but I stuck it out just in case I absorbed some of it accidentally..!!!

What is he saying🤔

Wär halt praktisch, wenns das in mehreren Sprachen geben würde :D

If you'd paid attention in your secondary school science classes you would be able to understand the concepts, maybe not the math. Lose the video games, close your social media apps and start reading.

If you want to keep your sanity, I suggest forgetting Leonard Susskind and going with Lynyrd Skynyrd. Quantum is getting stranger and stranger, and the math is starting to reflect this. It's almost as if quantum theory, or even the universe itself, perhaps, is reacting to the math, which is reacting to quantum theory. The universe is behaving like it isn't real, like it's an illusion, that changes according to what we say it should be.

Thank youuu I’ll watch them when i get a good understanding of classical mechanics😂🙏

Susskind? Idk sounds kinda suss

@@jamesaritchie1 Dis Earth be FLAT you American dum-dum! Americans always so drama full and not thinking, at all times yah!

Thanks for recommending Susskind! I hope to get lost in some of his playlists, he seems to be an excellent lecturer.

It is! And you can show actually show the neat result he mentions with high school tools (derivatives, affine functions, a bit of physics), so it's not quite as out of reach as some people might think

@@ChaineYTXF Agreed. I first learnt Newtonian physics at school, with v=u+at and equations like that and it all made sense step by step. Im always on the lookout for a description just as simple for relativity. And this video is nearly there for me. It seems the best way to approach it is forget about light, forget about weird spooky shrinking spaceships, just go back to how space and time works. Im going to watch this a few more times and try working through the maths. The aim being showing Lorentz transformations with meaningful diagrams. Something my brain can hang on to all the way through.

speed of light is made up bs , for example lets say thers no living being that have eyes that can look the light , lets say when u turn on a light the light doesnt move , all the area that is being iluminated by the light is the area where the light source has enough power to reach the more powerful the light the larger the area it will iluminate and be seen in case thers eyes to look at that light , this is why u point a laser in one direction lets say u point it forward but someone who is in back direction will still see the light

its a constant guy

Is the pony a virtual photon?

Then it could produce four dimensional divergence in an anti semetron that produces zero which ,in quantum mechanics, is called light

Otherwise the stuff it produces cannot be identified.

hahahaaaaha!! trick question though, right?? man im getting good at this

Hehehe... You spelled 'bare' wrong. :-) After all, it was as fleety as a streak of light... do not peer between the legs of that wide stance... one may miss his meaning...

Some of us have more Neanderthal DNA than others--check out those eyebrows.

If "Heavy" Physics are Newtonian and then "Light" Physics must be Einstienian.

Right....?

@@sndgrpr6633 That explains everything!!!

Peter Gabriel did. (He sang _Shock the Monkey_ ) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Y9dgd5CSmL-vgYU.html

The electric monkey certainly didn't

@@tarmaque No surprise there.

SO THAT'S WHY HE LOOKED WEIRD! lol thank you, I couldn't figure out why he looked so funny to me, it's 100% the clean shave.

@@idontwantahandlethough this was filmed years ago too

He had a beard?

@@idontwantahandlethough THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL PROOF THAT E=MC2 IS DIMENSIONALLY CONSISTENT WITH ONE AND WHAT IS A TWO DIMENSIONAL SURFACE OR SPACE ON BALANCE, THEREBY PROVING THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY PROVEN TO BE GRAVITY (ON/IN BALANCE): This also clearly proves ON balance that E=mc2 is directly taken from F=ma. Magnificent. Gravity is a property of SPACE ON BALANCE. It involves adherence or cohesion. So, BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Consider what is the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground (ON BALANCE). What is the blue sky ON BALANCE? This IS the blue EARTH AS this is expressed on balance WITH (or equivalently by) what is the eye. The translucent AND blue sky is consistent with what is BALANCED BODILY/VISUAL (AND electromagnetic/gravitational) EXPERIENCE ON BALANCE, as touch AND feeling BLEND; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). GREAT. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE !! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND necessarily) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). The tides are CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be electroMAGNETIC/gravitational ON BALANCE. I have also CLEARLY explained (ON BALANCE) why THE PLANETS move away very, very, very, very slightly in relation to WHAT IS THE SUN !! I have explained why WHAT IS THE EYE beholds what is then (ON BALANCE) WHAT IS THE BLUE EARTH. Notice the associated black “space” AND DOME regarding what is the eye. Again, the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Very carefully consider what is THE SUN ON BALANCE !! E=mc2 IS F=ma. Again, I have proven AND explained why the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Gravity cannot be shielded (or blocked) ON BALANCE. What is quantum gravity is CLEARLY fundamental ON BALANCE. Gravity is CLEARLY fundamental ON BALANCE. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental ON BALANCE. Define “mass". You cannot. BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !! Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. GREAT. You have to CLEARLY AND fully understand what E=mc2 means and represents ON BALANCE. We want to understand the dimensions in a seamless (or balanced) fashion in relation to gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (including what is E=mc2). Consider one AND three dimensional SPACE ON BALANCE. Consider what is the fourth dimension ON BALANCE. NOW, consider all of the following. Consider what is E=mc2. CLEARLY, you have to understand what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE. c squared CLEARLY represents BALANCED acceleration in conjunction WITH what is NECESSARILY a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE, AND consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Carefully consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Great. Consider what is gravity AND E=mc2 ON BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. By Frank DiMeglio

I know right? With the beard, he looks like a professor. Without, he looks like a grad student. I guess he suffers from Will Riker Syndrome, aka Baby Face Disease.

Richard Cassel I’m stealing that line!

But he dumbed it down by wearing jeans and a t shirt.

r/boooom?

Richard Cassel and he stands wired,

That's underrated

Best comment so far!

Which adds to the idea that the universe is a very messy place and the existence of a potential "designer" very unlikely.

@@irokosalei5133 What you perceive as messy is simply unknown to you. A built-in uncertainty always keeps the creator hidden from inspection.

Mathematics is not physics. It's not even close. Not that a bachelor in mathematics is worth anything. Even my high school math teachers all had a masters degree. ;-)

​@@schmetterling4477 so a degree in math is worthless? Lol

@@kbanghart A bachelor's degree is worthless, whether it's in math or hair styling. What employers are looking for in the job market is people with experience. That requires four to ten years of study and active work in the field, at the very least.

@@schmetterling4477 thank goodness that was not the case for me and many others.

@@kbanghart They hired you freshly washed out from high school as a hairdresser? Good for you! :-)

Do elementary algebra for 2 weeks and you will be ready.

@@stefgori306 ml m0okn. K.

lol Rebecca

Drink when you DON'T understand one of his explanations.

@Rebecca Whip Ovin the thing that matters most is that you haven’t given up yet. We commend you!

I understood every word of what he said. And TRUST ME, THIS IS, AS EASY AS IT GETS !! I mean you're trying to understand how the blood and bones of the UNIVERSE works !! Trying to tear it's flesh and skin apart !! (Even though just conceptually not really, I know) Frankly, it'd be tough to do a better job than this in simplifying/trivializing this concept for the masses !!

yeah the guy used the worst possible example to explain this, plus a thousand moving objects in the video distracts from whatever he is talking about

Good 🐒

Society of Physics Students -- UCLA has now given the following writing the thumbs up on their page: THE TRUE AND THE ULTIMATE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS/PHYSICAL EXPERIENCE IS NOW MATHEMATICALLY PROVEN: Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL resistance, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. ACCORDINGLY, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. This explains why objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. INDEED, time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY; AS E=mc2 is DIRECTLY and fundamentally derived from F=ma. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. Ultimately and truly, time is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. E=mc2 IS F=ma. This CLEARLY and truly explains c4 from Einstein's equations. THE FOURTH DIMENSION IS THUS CLEAR, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. BALANCE and completeness go hand in hand. I have mathematically unified physics/physical experience. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. E=mc2 IS F=ma. Time DILATION proves that electromagnetism/ENERGY IS GRAVITY, AS E=mc2 IS F=ma. GREAT !!! IT IS CLEARLY PROVEN. INSTANTANEITY is thus CLEARLY FUNDAMENTAL to what is the FULL and proper understanding of physics/physical experience. (Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black.) By Frank DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 not sure i understood all that, from what i understand, 'gravity' is not a force but the curvature of spacetime warped by mass, not necessarily caused by electromagentism, but either you are a misunderstood genius, or offbase, thanks

because it's the only one you can see?

Haha...try watching the video about the Turbo Encabulator.

@@freddieh5539 No, I understood that one. It is literally made to convey nonsense in a sophisticated manner.

Imagine, how insane is an idea to use this video to improve my English))

Much this video is going much faster then the Speed Of Light But is an Okay Sets of Rules by Great Mathmaticans and Great Videos

I thought it was just me having been on a 3 day alcohol binge, and not being able to pay attention, LOL :P

lmao

This episode was as accurate PBS news or documentaries have become since 2016. making their name stands for pure something or other ... WHY should everyone's CLOCKS reconcile off the speed of light ..? whether they're travelling 99.99% the speed of light -- and shoot a laser in front of them (or turn on their headlights) ... only for their clocks to slow concomitant to their relativistic speed, such that they perceive the speed of that light to simply be "C" despite their speed also being indistinguishable from C ..? WHAT OTHER than light is demanding this reconciliation. This claim is PURE POOP. (Much like the 10 hit pieces they did on orange man. Pure dookey of a MALE-COW ... which are words this channel is just TOO insecure to endure ... as if they knew they were true!? lol. Talk about reconciliation!

@@trumanhw Time dilation is not something PBS made up. Ever heard of Einstein and his theory of relativity? That theory has been proven accurate again and again through experiments. If you want a real life everyday example, read about satellites in orbit around Earth where time dilation occurs exactly as predicted by that theory and therefore we can compensate for it.

@@knapret maybe he hasn’t ever heard of GPS before 😂

those responsible to answer are visiting the shrinks.

While today they are too far away for new information to reach us, the gravitational effect information of today left long ago when we were still reachable, it just took until now to reach us. While there is the gravitational effect of the past versions of those galaxies, there will never be such a gravitational effect from those galaxies as they actuallly are right now. Just like we see them now the way they were long ago, but will never see them the way they actually are right now.

@@OzoneTheLynx well said

@@OzoneTheLynx yes indeed, well said.

How could the universe be bigger in size than it is in age? Dosent that prove expansion is faster than the speed of light?

I would just use "Lorentz Transformation" for every answer.

Id probably answer only one question, the correct spelling of LiGHT 😂😂😂

I'm so glad there is an end to this univ--er, video.

+Rahul pandey :-) I could say that my brain produced as much heat that my left half welded to the right half, so I should be smarter now, but it seems to have zero effect… :-/ :-)

Human beings are maybe wonders of nature - no other intelligent life form in the universe can understand how they did so far with such small brains and almost no intelligence… :-D :-P

+Rahul pandey Don't worry about that. That was the only thing in all of that which they will admit is ficticious.

+Rahul pandey jajaja no eres el unico, aunque entendi mucho, se me dificulta un poco el hecho de que no sea de habla inglesa.

+Dennis Magee not Levi-oh-SAH

I'm not sure how they could have improved the clarity, if that's what you mean. But they did get a bit hand-wavey at a couple points, so maybe you mean they've gotten better about going into relevant details while still keeping the videos digestible.

@@DrCorndog1 I meant what I said

Yeah OK

Perspective, I liked the more straight forward explainations, surely less funny, of the previous host. (he's called Dave and the current one is Matt)

lmao dude this keeps cracking me up for some reason

That literally make me laugh too hard for a min 😂😂😂😂

He gonna need hip replacement afore he's fifty.

Well he can't be going too fast.

@@JohanKrugerHaglert at the speed of light

me neither, his lack of beard is scary

Keep it up. I'm 65. Still LEARNING. These lectures are worth 100 thousand a year.

GeekJokes

Nicolas Fredette I'd reccomend reading the book before watching the series, although the series is great too and I agree with your views on Sagan vs Tyson.

I saw Cosmos when it first was presented by Sagan, and later saw the series hosted by Tyson. Thanks.

stuart woodings Same!

Make notes!

Thanks, Stuart. Thought I might be alone on that. Cheers :)

Bullshit

Same

barbies pony at that

I like that. Bless you.

I have one for females too, its why do female put a ring thru there clitoris,? its so they have a hitching post for that string

just wanted to try another on you, you heard about edible pantys I have something for older folkes , cotton candy filled edible depends with chocolate spots its a meal for both. that's all folks im the comedy commentor

They're rhinoceros'!

@Antonio Lewis Whoa there fella. Didn't you see that wide stance? A virtual "hug" is not on the program.

You're no "physicist" Antonio if you took any of that BULLSHIT seriously!

@@aethervortex Can you elaborate?

@@ihsahnakerfeldt2765 Are you kidding? Tesla's face shows he's just anonter fanatic who thinks that everything is a huge conspiracy. They cannot support their idea but they are always willing to slander a scientific theory.

The universe makes sense. He just can't make sense of it.

@@tomgreen1779 so profound.

@Geo Thomas The universe doesn't make sense because every observer measures the universe differently. Somebody in motion will have a velocity and his time would be slower than your time if you are at rest. So technically your past is that person's present. Hence there's no reference frame to describe reality. We perceive reality through reference frames. The only thing that you and that guy in motion can agree upon is space time interval or space time. That's the only thing which every single observer can agree upon and that is the only reality. The universe the way you perceive it is only real to you and you only. But only space time is real for everyone

@@tomgreen1779 I don't think you understood what he said.

how is the greater energy of a UV photon expressed ? is it bigger , faster ? it must be one or the other ! my theory is that low energy photons travel like this \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ while higher energy photons have a longer path like WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW the cover the distance as the crow flies in the same time but the actual speed of the photons is different .

Yuk, you are so embarrassing... Get real. This is NEVER how these ideas are taught in hs/ap physics and even into college level physics. To suggest otherwise is totally disingenuous. You aren't brilliant or special; else u wouldn't feel the need to lie on KZfaq comments. This is such try hard gibberish... it just hurts me at my core. Also, let's just address that this video has been proven totally wrong, not just mathematically, but experimentally through quantum entanglement experiments just to name one of several other things.... heres a few low hanging otbers: *string theory/ holographic universe/ conservation of information. Yuk sir, yuk.

Ariel Lopez I've heard this explained much simpler. He speaks too fast and convoluted.

its like he is rushing to take a shit.

I used to be smart, and then I watched Space Time.

Sewer Man beats being a fucking douche bag P.S it's You're, fucking dumbass

Ariel Lopez and elnubnub=nice people (and funny). Jacob Turnbaugh and Sewer Man=mean people (and a bummer).

Knitwit...lol

Lol for real. I was lost immediately.

😄😂

A knitting tutorial in mandarin? You would probably learn something about knitting even from THAT!:D

I dont LOL very often, but you did the trick (o:

Great commentary!

The big bang tells us that you can not standstill completely in the universe , the expansion triggered by that moment of the big bang in getting faster and faster.

@@vume7722 | Well, spacetime is increasing, that doesn't mean that you move. You do move because of gravity, though. And the heat in your body.

LOL im crying

Random Guy - No, Vu is correct in a literal sense. We are always in motion because the Earth is in motion and we are on it, the Earth is spinning at around 1000mph in addition to that movement, the galaxy is moving, and everything else in space is moving along with expanding empty space. The consequence is the inability to truly be still and a Universe without a center point.

+brianpso Your search is over. It's me. JK.

The new genius is 001nietsnyef

TLK Dragon Who is that?

Flip the name

TLK Dragon Oh. Thanks for believing in me. :D

neutrinos rock

@@nmarbletoe8210fr fr neutrinos are lit af

I just got here, and I agree. lol

No worries, we're keeping it alive breh

The youtube algorithm is keeping this series timeless

It feels fantastic and we're, still alive!

yup

I imagine you would need to be a lot smarter than Einstein to be able to understand all this concepts just by watching a 12 min video...

Like Neo in the Matrix :)

When you get your PhD in physics you will understand all this very easily. In the meantime is just words.

dpactootle i am at the last class of highschool and i am understand the majority of what he is saying.

I've wondered about the inverse square (gravity, light, etc) vs the inverse cube (magnetism). What if gravity and light were inverse cube while magnetism was jumped up to inverse quad (-x⁴)?

no i dont wish you to cure your headache i want you to suffer

Thanks, it helped

Now I’m wondering what effect cranking the speed of causality up would have on gravity and the passage of time

LOL

and if you don't pay it they will cut you off at the speed of light

you are a genius

🤣

Yeah...I had the impression that he was doing his Dr Strange impression

underrated comment!

The cause comes before the effect. That is how we an relate causality to time.

yes, the kind of causality you are thinking about is what most people have in their heads, as a general sort of common sense notion. However, this notion is not well understood and it is not even clear that it is a real "thing" - it could well be that the universe gets by without any sort of cause and effect, and it is just a thing we made up having evolved as primates solving everyday problems. By contrast, the casualty we talk about in physics is a much more restricted concept with a precise mathematical circumscription. The relationship between these two kinds of causality is that the more precise one places bounds on how the more general one could act.

@@narfwhals7843 You can only claim that cause precedes effect if you have made precise what cause and effect actually _are_ . That is not at all clear to me!

@@DrWhom You're right, it isn't just as clear cut. If you're interested, physicist Sean Carroll has a podcast on the topic talking to computer scientist Judea Pearl kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b7yjh9OkqcXIgGQ.html

MrManerd read this as i was about to click off lol

Yeah, it was kinda like a "Reads Mean Tweets" segment.

Was worth it lol. I always forget this guy has a good long end segment

that's what she said

me too... except that then he started to speak... I get the feeling that even HE understands F/A of his own drivel.

@@johnkelly6809 It does make sense if you have taken physics classes. The fact that moving charges generate forces is something you learn fairly early on. The monkey pony thing is just demonstrating different reference frames and perspectives.

@@marcustrevor1883 No matter how many physics classes we've done, this video doesn't give ANY reasons why causality has a maximum speed nor why the speed of causality = c. I mean you don't have any reasons do you?

@@alwaysdisputin9930 from what I can tell, it doesn't go into why causality has a limit, just that it does and why it's important, and why that means light moves at that speed.

​@@alwaysdisputin9930 Yeah. I wish they would have gone deeper into actually explaining _why_ that is the case; it's pretty interesting stuff and this would have been a great video to explain it. I bet there's another video on this channel somewhere where he goes into it in more depth, but it would have fit well into this video and it's confusing enough that it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to repeat it in multiple videos!

I'm 12 seconds into the video and I wholeheartedly agree.

Right? So weird 😂

HE NEED THE HAIRCUT NOT BEARD 😄🤣😋

Yeah, he can't be a real physicist. With that lack of a paunch, the reason he's wearing that t shirt can only be to show off his physique. I know of no real physicists who are into that sort of thing.

He was way hotter with the beard.

Clear as mud more like. This video is a waste of time. Nobody learnt anything. Nobody here can say why 'The speed of light is not about light'. It is possible in 13 minutes but the YT videos don't exist yet

@@alwaysdisputin9930 just admit you didn't understand it and move on

"existence is resistance" I mean, doesn't that cover it?

@@alwaysdisputin9930 He literally said it does describe light but its the speed of causality first. did you watch the video?

@Music:Zerg Yeah you're right. There is no proof that there is a speed of causality so it's not possible to prove in 13 minutes

man that's funny, it's exactly 4 am for me right now ... what are the odds !

Coincidence 😂

@@omarlua8831 I think not😂

Mr W that is soooo funny, was thinking exactly that when your comment came up.

Aaaaaand it's tomorrow...

It was made electric though.

@@prakjain well he is lost, so...

@@eirikhgmoekjelsnes9752 😂😂

That part was covered in Physics I

Since when did incompetency become a thing to be bragged about?

👏🏻👽

Wouldn't energy and matter be the information itself though? It's just slow moving information, not an impediment to information

uh

So in other words...humans aren't meant to go anywhere...since we have mass. And as we all know, as speeds approach C, mass approaches infinity. Light can go this fast because it has no mass.

@@digitalfootballer9032 Depends on how you measure and define mass.

Less is more.

LOL

HAHAHA!!!

XD

amazing

I m stiil laughing at the term of "total monkey speed"

lol

okay i just laughed really hard at that

First before I talk to you about Karen in accounts, let me take you back 10 years to when I graduated university. That will relate to her attitude when I ask her to make me coffee. The two timelines converge. Also before I get to my graduation, I have to include my relationship with my mother. And also that I saw a cute cat on the way home.

@Russ Gallagher did you get the" your'e not listening to me" senario?

LOL RUSS I feel you

MANY MORE Science KZfaqr? Professor Dave, Sci Man Dan, Joe Scott, Sci Show, Seeker; theres so many more to check out. Waiting for you.

It is possible to check the speed of light!!! You need to put two split electrons within distance of 299,792,458 meters away from each other. They change straight away if you change one. You change one at the very same time you switch laser on and check on the other side where other electon is placed what is the time from electron change to receiving laser light. So deam simple. Sorry my english is crap, can i get nobel prize now?

Were all sub atomic particles, doing our part without knowing to keep a greater "whole" going with a sense of individuality. Time cannot truly play a part in anything considering it is a common denominator created by man. I love how we revert back to old people who are dead and use old shit math to attempt to make sense of anything we experience. There is no universe and this isn't real. You will "die" its a perceivable common denominator and a system created. Solipsism is real. Your are the center of life. Look around and see that you truly can do anything. All you have to do is make a move and break free from the system you've been forced to believe in and stay original.

I believe Neil DeGrasse Tyson is fond of the quote: "The universe is under no obligation to make sense."

@@trollin456 I looked around and saw a wall. I made a move, ouch! that hurt. The system forced me to believe I'm still locked in. I can't get through that damn wall.

@@JaxMerrick I think the concept that the universe is somehow coherent doesn't mean it has to make sense to each of us personally.

Like it! LOL!! NOW...put some Grout in it!!!

Phew, the really hard questions!

Me too...hahahahaha

That's what I'm doing right now

Ha Ha and me to

player2030 same😂

Me too!!!

Hows progress

This video is a huge jump for people not accustomed to the math he is talking about. Mathematics is a series of stepping stones after all, can't jump multiple steps at a time. There's really no way around it other than study up and maybe one day this video will be crystal clear.

Simply think that WE are the weirdos, travelling at speed different from the default speed of the universe, only because we are always slowed down by the Higgs field. Pure matter in the form of energy doesn't move at those shameful speeds ! 😂

***** Not at all

But I'm left with thinking the pony gets it.

well said

Or why it more believable

dont worry, this is not that far off!

That's why I don't believe in supernatural 😂😂. Because I don't like easier tasks

Person: Why does all this happen? Other person: cuz god said so. Person: ok. 🌝

in short they where all gettign their numbers wrong due to different hypotheses based on current numbers and assumptions . having observed light at a cetain speed does mean its the only speed, and then they base all their calculation on this constant that might be a fluctuating pulse . Imagine if the speed of light was 10 times faster at the start of the univers , that will make the universe 10 time younger than previous thought.

so from their reference frame, nothing exists :O

Nick Patella if you define "exist" as the time in between creation and annihilation, then no, they don't exist at all from their own perspective. from our perspective (or the perspective of any 3-dimensional being) however, they exist. both conclusions are valid. and this fact also accidentally fits photons' behaviour described by quantum mechanics - they can simultaneously be in two completely opposite/mutually exclusive states.

Terry Foldy Holes "objects with mass", it doesn't aply to photons and other massless particles.

Nicolás Cortés A. what doesn't apply?

Yeah, that was my understanding of the speed of light, you add velocities but they only work up to a point because as you reach the speed of light, the time-space transforms and therefore in relation to the target where the light shines the speed doesn't change, but I kind of like his no velocity theory too, never hear of it, but it does make sense​ to me. What do you think?