I like this best.

O tak!! Polska ⭐🇵🇱

Yes!!!

​@@dominika1247Poland plays piano🇵🇱

@wadahabbasher In what way has Chopin changed the world with that exciting piece of music? I didn't see anyone dancing.

This was the quickest I heard it played at a funeral.

​@@paulmcmahon6275you should listen to the the US Navy band's rendition. We like it fast and loud

@@paulmcmahon6275Same. But I don’t think it is some sort of arrangement. I think it just needed to be “a tempo” with the pace of the military to create atmosphere

0:21 it sounds like the. Batman 2022 theme

@@kodesh1674it was based on funeral march

​@@laytonrobinson-gr5qpChopin copied from batman ofc

​@@mrmaxboypvp5097lmao 😂

Yes they did. It seemed to me that they played it forever…I really don’t directly remember anything except Chopin and the muffled drums. But they seemed to go on and on. We only had two channels on our TV so whichever channel you went to there was the drums

Plus Leonid Brezhnev

It was sped up because us Americans don’t do the 70 pace per minute funeral march so it was at normal marching speed. The pitch was also raised as well.

Yes, but it still sounds mournful, and being played by a live marching band makes it very visceral I think.

i’m thinking that they’ve had to have practiced this piece for years, just in case. it was definitely intentional

The USA played it at JFK's funeral slower

Exactly very too fast. La rapidité fait perdre le ton de la cérémonie. D’autant plus que leur pas n’est pas adapté au rythme. Dommage.

It's fast because the band has to march hence the music's tempo should be fast as well.

2 billion? Wtf are you talking about 😂

@@FrankDaBank25 isnt that how years are numbered aka after or before christ? What dont u get? Are u that thick?? Year 2023 after christ or year 2076528353 after christ, is that clear enough for you?

lmao what

He means this will be this good, in the year 2 billion. But why understand the comment when you can just berate him.

@@marcoeire44 But why know the human race will never survive this long?

This isn't the whole piece. It is much longer.

And yet man's will still endures thru the ages.

Everything and everyone does eventually fade away. Be it people or empires, eventually it’s gone, no matter how certain their existence was

Even I feel if the tempo is halved but the march doesn't change, it would be epic.

The Royal commentators talked through several bars of the London drill which was distracting for us TV viewers. However, as the coffin proceeded along the long walk to Windsor they became absolutely silent. The beat of the drums was magnificent. Tremulous...

They don't need them it is just part of the show and pageantry ,they could play with their eyes shut,all brilliant musicians.

Idiot it wasn’t expected

These bandsmen play hundreds of marches in a different order every time, and they are kept to a far greater standard than your school band.

Difference between your school band and these musicians are countless. They don't get months to practice, they're playing near enough every other day, different marches each time.

@@thegame2797 I get that, but the vast repertoire of music we were required to memorize, especially for university, just makes this look out of place.

The Tudors are gone though?

@@sileikalaimonas yes you are right

In fact, it was, in an orchestrated version. Not wished for by the dying Chopin, though. He never intended this piece to be a funeral march, it's a movement of his 2nd Sonata. He wished for Mozart's Requiem and got it. He was quoted from his deathbed: "Play Mozart and I will hear you!" They had trouble making it possible, the priests didn't approve (female voices were not permitted to sing in Cath. Churches in those days in France), but they managed in the end. Some of Chopins own music was played because some of his friends couldn't resist.

They actually march through it

They do not. Actually? Wtf?

@@caracowman3954 they really do. Look it up. Few years back there was a documentary where they were talking about preparations for the Queen's birthday party in the whole process that the guardsman go through and they were talking about how you're all sweaty and whatnot afterwards and from marching through the horse poop you have to get undressed get out of the sweaty clothes clean your boots pretty much immediately than get your shirt and what not to the laundry and the rest of the dress uniform cleaned up and stored

@@RabidNemo holy crap bro

They march straight through it.

Im from poland and im love queen elizabeth. Im just so proud because our polish music was played on queen funeral (sorry for my spelling error)

you rest in hell

Long live the King!

​@@twumwaa319ha kings coming to run your house....😅

Literally what has this to do with the empire? You gonna comment that on any video you see of British culture?

@@Dryhten1801 1. It has everything to do with the empire. 2. Yes. 3. What does the form of government has to do with the people's culture? 4. You mad, bro?

@@Niklas.the.13th. 1. No, it has nothing to do with the Empire. The actions carried out by the government of a constitutional monarchy rarely reflect the thoughts and opinions of the monarch, and even when they do, the monarch would never express their opinion. It's bizarre to assume that a funeral regarding the monarch of these nations has anything to do with the Empire. The Commonwealth Realms (members of the Commonwealth that retain the monarchy) do so purely by choice and not by any form of authoritarian connection to the United Kingdom. The territories of the United Kingdom retain status as British subjects also by choice---see the referendum results in the Falklands, for instance. There is no British Empire in the modern day---there is only a conglomeration of nations with shared histories that DECIDE to retain a connection even today. There is no valid reason for that to be torn down, given that the entire reason for it's existence is the people's will. 2. Yes, you're going to comment it on every video you see of British culture and then have no fair discourse because you don't want anyone to change your mind---you're far too close-minded for that. 3. The form of government may have been the cause of this event, but you're assuming that a) the form of government cannot affect popular culture and b) the constitutional monarchy does NOT affect the people's culture. That's just bizarre. Estimates range wildly, so I'm not going to quote tourist money from the Monarchy or anything, but even without that statistical evidence, it's pretty obvious that the Monarchy has had a profound effect on British culture---ask an American what the first thing they think of when they think of Britain and a large amount will say something regarding the monarchy. I believe it's what brought the whole culture of manners and tea and whatnot (though a large simplification of what British culture entails, at least it's not negative) to the world stage. It avoids a wholly negative view of Britain on the world stage. Anyhow, royal figures have had a great impact on the people's culture with their actions, words, and whatnot. 4. Yes. It is entirely reasonable to be mad when someone with a presumably subpar education regarding history, government, and politics makes a bold and unreasonable claim, is questioned on it, then refuses to elaborate anything beyond a few sentences that only further confusion. That's ridiculous.