Lectures for Transport Phenomena course at Olin College This lecture describes what the stress tensor is.
Пікірлер: 222
@MrDaanjanssen8 жыл бұрын
1:41 my reaction when I saw the mechanics exam
@guitarttimman8 жыл бұрын
+Daan Janssen mechanics was so easy bro! Multivariate Calculus was a MONSTER! LOL
@guitarttimman7 жыл бұрын
crni195 All you do is start by examining the upward and downward forces. Then you start on the torques. (The force times the perpendicular distance from the axis of rotation to the line of action of the force.) Then you set all the forces equal to zero for the purpose of making sure their sums are zero so that nothing is moving. That means equilibrium BRO. Tensile forces work on the same principle. Many years ago, I was an expert in vector calculus, but I've been out of it for a long time. I think I can still do it though. I started as a mathematics major. I wasn't a pee wee either. I tested out of many of those courses and earned A's in advanced mathematics. I have a list of some of my grades posted on google. Although math was my first love, I ended up with a degree in Biology Education. It might sound like I am bragging, but that is only because I didn't even learn how to read until I was 19 years old. Anyway, there's another great thing I did. I designed the first program that straightened out the "ghost" parking ticket dilemma in the City of Chicago way back in the 80's, and that was without any prior knowledge of computer programming. I was naive, and the guy who ran the business, Michael Tellerino, ripped me off big time. I think he should come clean about that and clear his conscience.
@devvv46167 жыл бұрын
are you fr?
@carnsoaks17 жыл бұрын
y y y
@TheJokeKiller7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the chuckle.
@antoniobautista63008 жыл бұрын
Your explanation is just great !! it is simple, elegant, smooth and flawless. Great job, I have been looking for so long to understand this concepts. Thanks + Regards
@cr7rulz976 жыл бұрын
that was so lucidly explained and drawn. cant thank you enough for color coding the directions. thank you so much Brian
@ozzyfromspace6 жыл бұрын
I don't have a college education and even I found this highly intuitive. Thanks Brian, your explanation was a really helpful primer.
@oceane23010 ай бұрын
I can't thank you enough - you answered all the questions I had on this topic in the first 3 minutes! My teacher has been trying to explain these concepts for the last 4 lessons.
@mireksoja90635 жыл бұрын
Great Job! The concept of the stress tensor is explained in a very simple and intuitional way.
@dastardlyexpressions7 жыл бұрын
What a great video to understand not only the stress tensor, but tensors in general. They're rarely taught in application.
@1946Dmitri4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation! Clear and interesting! Very glad I found your site!
@edroberts19433 жыл бұрын
This is the best explanation of the stress tensor I have found. Thank you!
@sdh852048 жыл бұрын
Hello,Your explanation is the BEST I have encountered. I wish the other lecturers had been as good !
@LucasMartins-el7kn6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, sir! Now I finally understood what a tensor is.
@TheGranolaForce9 жыл бұрын
Thank you for posting this video, it was very helpful. Keep up the good work and best wishes!
@mark_fingerhuth8 жыл бұрын
great video! thanks for explaining this topic in such a simple way!
@MrSaleh1019 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Explained very well. :)
@saptarshisikder97074 жыл бұрын
Great sir...great...so nicely explained...now it became clear..thank you
@sudha46747 жыл бұрын
i was struggling to under the concepts of tensor. now I am clear. lots of thanks
@azuleno178 жыл бұрын
Magnificent video. Somehow I got interested into this, but it is really helpful as part of my major.
@guneet60655 жыл бұрын
Ultimate explanation hats off to you sir :)
@FZIFzi6 жыл бұрын
Wow!! Thank you, you make it look so simple.. I'm so grateful!
@SheepEditionStream7 жыл бұрын
he keeps writting Tzz for Tzy lol, he did it again at 8:12. BUt honestly thank you so much for this. Clear, concise, straight to the point, and everything was relevant to what I needed to know for my exam. Your help was much appreciated
@adamfattal96025 жыл бұрын
Great video! The information obtained to time ratio in this video is tremendously high. Thanks a lot Prof. Storey. Not bad for an engineer (Just joking. It's based on a joke that's going around the internet).
@deniz.72004 жыл бұрын
Great explanation, thank you. 1 small addition, the normal vectors which you premultiplied are better noted as transposed imo.
@ingGS4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful explanation. Thank you!
@fernandb.61624 жыл бұрын
3:24 I felt that :D Great video sir, thanks a lot :)
@isabeln.936 жыл бұрын
this is so good. thank you so much! precious help
@fanruihu3304 жыл бұрын
This is so great!!
@bhangrafan44804 жыл бұрын
Really clear. A concrete approach to explanation usually works best.
@tonyzahtila92174 жыл бұрын
Great explanation Brian!
@RahulSharmaSingularity2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic !!!
@eamonnsiocain64546 жыл бұрын
Excellent! Very clear.
@kl-nc5rc6 жыл бұрын
Superb Video!!!!
@dimitarstoyanov99325 жыл бұрын
How do you calculate the normal vector of the hypotenuse of the triangle to be as shown
@manaoharsam42113 жыл бұрын
Yes explanation is good.
@sabamalik17988 жыл бұрын
Excellent video thanks !
@amanravan9795 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir Good explanation
@alikarimi-langroodi54022 жыл бұрын
Excellant. Thank you
@johnspivack652010 ай бұрын
Good and clear. Thanks.
@luk45ful2 жыл бұрын
Really good explanation!
@diemitdenententanzt8 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Your explanation is great! I just wondered if the origin of the Txy force should be on the edge of the cube since you placed the origin of the coordinate system in the lower left corner or doesn't it matter? Sorry, I am quite new to this topic
@Ulas_Aldag3 жыл бұрын
Wow that was amazing
@IceyJunior5 жыл бұрын
I'm cool with the governing equations for CFD, which can be written in integral (conservation of mass, linear momentum, angular momentum, and energy) or differential (conservation of mass, linear momentum, and energy) form. But I'm not quite sure about the governing equation(s) for CSM. Is this stress tensor the governing equations for CSM? Is it the only one used in CSM?
@user-fh4cd5up8d4 жыл бұрын
That’s amazing! Thank you!!
@verygood66255 жыл бұрын
nice job mate... thanks
@Madmetroid997 жыл бұрын
Thanls a lot, great explanation
@odijiechrisobhione2 жыл бұрын
Brian, thanks a lot.
@prashikbhagat8 жыл бұрын
Great explanation
@bsp64966 ай бұрын
Hoooly molly, didn't expect that at the end. I can get why tensors are used in mechanics now.
@rahulsharma-wi7xn5 жыл бұрын
great explanation
@Tuba6729 жыл бұрын
very good ... thank you!!
@jackal50964 жыл бұрын
At 03:25, you said "the normal vector is a column vector", but wrote it on your whiteboard as a row vector (horizontally). I was watching more of what you wrote, and less of what you said, and became totally confused. Went through 3 of my old textbooks, looking for dot product of vector and tensor, which all showed writing the vector as a standard vector, i.e., a column vector. Finally, I went back and listened to the video. Very, very frustrating. But otherwise, a great tutorial. I saw Bruce's comment below while I was writing this
@dannyboy123577 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the stress-energy tensor that has 16 components ie. the space-time components.
@harleyspeedthrust40134 жыл бұрын
This has applications in machine learning. The backpropagation algorithm can be vectorized and tensors can be used to represent the weight gradients between two layers
@rares604 жыл бұрын
Could you elaborate a bit?
@suryakarla86282 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Very helpful!
@RTD5536 жыл бұрын
Excellent.
@Guthans099 жыл бұрын
Question about the normal vector in the triangle example. Wouldn't the components of the normal vector, i.e, 1/2 and sqrt(3)/2 be switched since the cosine is in the x-direction (thus making it first) and the sine is in y-direction (making it second)? Assuming we are defining a vector as v = [x , y , z] ? EDIT: I SCREWED UP Ayyy lmao, nevermind. I just did the geometry. Carry on. Thanks for this video!
@rawanalharbi62672 жыл бұрын
I have a question! Why used the partial derivatives ?
@science_105233 жыл бұрын
very nice and simple explanation. very good sir. can u make a video on "elastic constants ( C11, C12 etc.)"?
@hawraaraheem2449 Жыл бұрын
How u supposed these values in normal vector n please
@user-fn9go5xb9l3 жыл бұрын
Базар жоқ. Мықты мықты.
@fatkraken31404 жыл бұрын
why there are only forces on the 3 faces ?
@zizili79177 жыл бұрын
super nice!
@anomalyanomaly9 жыл бұрын
Fucking smooth to understand. Thank you.
@alwysrite7 жыл бұрын
at 3:25 did you mean a 'row' vector rather than 'column' vector?
@marquez23905 жыл бұрын
No. He means column vector. As dot product of A and B is defined as (A^T)(B) so what you thought was row vector was just the transpose of the column vector he was referring to.
@ejijojo4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@-ul7lh10 ай бұрын
Excellent
@bijoybasumatary46514 жыл бұрын
You are great
@reup6943 Жыл бұрын
I've seen in other documents: S = -T .n (S: surface stress, n: normal) with 'T' the 1st Piola Kirchhoff stress. Where does the sign difference and multiplication inversion stems from? (in the video we have S = n.T)
@danpoles28645 жыл бұрын
how do u know when the n vector matrix is a column or row
@brianstorey78305 жыл бұрын
Yeah, this is always one of the most confusing things. It is always a row vector, but since the tensor is symmetric - it is OK if you mix it up. If you work through an example or two yourself with the sketch of what the components are with simple normal vectors (like [1 0 0]) you'll see how symmetry saves you!
@jeanpaul42943 жыл бұрын
please answer me for 0:46 is the 2d tensor both forces or just one?
@brianstorey78303 жыл бұрын
The 2D pictures are just easier to draw. Everything is conceptually the same for 2 and 3D. For 2D, we are just working in the plane of the paper you are drawing on. Here at the beginning I was just trying to explain that for stress the direction of the force and the direction of the face upon which it acts are both important.
@lopezb4 жыл бұрын
Nice! (at 3:25 the vector n is a ROW not a column vector).
@teymourtb9 ай бұрын
Hello, thank you for this video. One question: why did you call the back face Txx in the second drawing when it was on the opposite face for the previous drawing? 9:09
@twinaibots55497 жыл бұрын
Great video sir..
@AfirSraftGarrier7 жыл бұрын
Great, thx.
@BoZhaoengineering4 жыл бұрын
can we use column vector form to describe both tensor matrix and normal vector? that will be consistent with vector form/notation in linear algebra.
@AntoninKrovina4 жыл бұрын
Just transpose the vector And matrix and change the order of multiplication.
@manikhorajina26622 жыл бұрын
How is the value for normal vector obtained at 4.48?
@mediwise2474 Жыл бұрын
Tell me tooo
@akamaor4 жыл бұрын
good one!
@gaiuspliniussecundus1455 Жыл бұрын
What if your object under deformation is a parametric function of two variables, u and v, producing a vector in x,y,z? So f(u,v):R^2->R^3. Doesn't the tensor needs to be symmetric? What to do, and how to compute the magnutude of the deformation between a undeformed and deformed object in this case?
@darthnegativehunter86593 жыл бұрын
this is a really good video (although requires some self calculation to figure out how divergance of tensor has meaning)
@00PedroM7 жыл бұрын
Great video! I'd like to start recording lessons like you do, but I'm stuck with some technical problems... I don't know how I can support the device I'm going to use for recording (camera or cell phone) at a good distance while I write... Can you tell me how you did this and what tools did you use? Thanks!!!
@brianstorey78307 жыл бұрын
I just used one of these document cameras - really no different than a standard web cam but has a stand for writing under. www.ipevo.com/prods/point-2-view-usb-camera An external mic is usually needed to get better sound quality (rather than the built in laptop mic I had anyway) A desk lamp and play around with the lighting. That's about it. Pretty minimal.
@robertbrandywine5 ай бұрын
So is the answer to a stress tensor problem a simple vector?
@chandrahasam8366 жыл бұрын
nice helped lot
@Farzan1World6 жыл бұрын
Very well explained. Thank you. Can you refer me somewhere on the web that makes practical use of this with numbers generated, say in fluid dynamics or stress analysis?
@mediwise2474 Жыл бұрын
Tell me too
@wulphstein5 жыл бұрын
Does a stress energy event update spacetime at the speed of light?
@dieselguitar14405 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if I know exactly what that is, but I would guess that it would be at the speed of sound of the material in question. If I'm assuming correctly, sound would actually be a stress energy event in constant oscillation. Here's a link where if I remember right they talk about tension in a slinky released into free fall moving at the speed of sound, or if it wasn't the speed of sound, it definitely wasn't light speed. The comment section is also filled with people's own theories, but I'm pretty sure the contents of the video are known facts: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m6l9oNB2qt-zf2Q.html
@armins17529 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@bens44466 жыл бұрын
Great video. Net force per unit volume--so, basically the net force density? But then there are three (x, y, z) components. How to think intuitively about the ith component of density? Density in the ith direction? What's that?
@brianstorey78306 жыл бұрын
Ah, I think maybe this is just confusion over the word "density". Usually when we use the word density, we mean "mass density" - mass per unit volume. That is a scalar and thus has no direction. By force density, we just mean the force (vector) divided by the volume over which that force acts. So ho g is the force density due to gravity. It has a component only in the direction of the g vector. Does this actaully answer your question?
@khaledplus10214 жыл бұрын
Thanks 💯
@aniken1845 жыл бұрын
i think at 8:00 minute see divergence of stress tensor gives components in terms of (del T ij / del xi )j so it might be right only in case of stress symmetry. But if stress tensor represented as column vector combination of stress on each plane then first column will give stress on plane perpendicula to x and so divergence of it gives del Tij / del xj ) i in general . is it correct or not?
@brianstorey78305 жыл бұрын
So the order of things is always easy to confuse and something I tend to screw up a lot. Is it Tij or Tji? It is a common mistake, and one I have trouble with. The good thing is that in the case of stress, T is ALWAYS symmetric. So it doesn't matter.... As you note, using index notation is a better way to be clear about which components you are talking about, but that was not something I wanted to introduce here.
@user-fz2ir8kc6z3 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@slowsatsuma32144 жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@Harsh.Parekh6 жыл бұрын
scalar also has 3 component in x,y and z component?
@brianstorey78306 жыл бұрын
Scalar just has a single value. Temperature is an example of a scalar. It has no directional components. A vector, like velocity, has x, y, and z components.
@kindintiudaykiran24263 жыл бұрын
Thanks 🙂🙂
@VikiJoker1924 Жыл бұрын
sorry, @ 4:43 how is normal vector equal to what is shown? I understand sin30 =1/2 and cos30= sqrt3/2, but where's the 0 from?
@jeffreychavey41617 жыл бұрын
Great stuff ... but where'd you learn to write so fast?
@quocanhnguyen72758 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot
@aminegc93534 жыл бұрын
hello sir , i just would like to tell you that i speak and understand french cours more better that english , but your cours is too much well explained than in french , i understood more better what you explain for us, i would like too to give us more cours about elasticity and FEM to beguinner untel to the advenced level, thank you sir another time. :)
@DiceMaster7404 жыл бұрын
Maybe you could use the knowledge that you gained from this video, and your ability to speak french, and make a better French video to explain it
@Amr-hb2wh8 жыл бұрын
sir you are a masterpiece .
@MrCooldude41725 жыл бұрын
Hi there, I am confused about one thing: Does it matter if you do n . T or T . n, i.e. the order of the dot product of the tensor with the normal vector? I get 2 different results. I know with a vector, it does not matter.
@brianstorey78305 жыл бұрын
So it is different if you think of the 3x3 tensor multiplying a column vector, n or a row vector n multiplying the 3x3 tensor. However, the stress tensor is always symmetric (from angular momentum considerations) therefore for the symmetric tensor you get the same result! If you do much more with tensors, it is usually better to work in index notation, but that opens up more complexity than I wanted here.
@pandas8963 жыл бұрын
Thank
@tehlolzfactor6 жыл бұрын
I know this video is old but I just wanted to point out that at 8:00, the y component of the vector shouldnt be partial of Tzz with respect to z it should be Tzy with respect to z