The Strongest Argument for the Existence of God

  Рет қаралды 78,400

OnePath Network

OnePath Network

2 жыл бұрын

In this episode of Destroying Doubts we are joined with Mohammed Hijab to discuss the contingency argument. Full episode to be released later this week.
🔔 Subscribe to our KZfaq to help us reach our 𝟏 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 subscriber goal.
If you enjoy OnePath content, please consider supporting us to grow! ►onepathnetwork.com/dollar-a-d...
Download the OnePath Network App for access to the latest and exclusive videos:
onepath.onelink.me/mJxr/3de973bd
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @onepathnetwork
Facebook ►: / onepathnetwork
Instagram ►: / onepathnetwork
Patreon ►: / onepathnetwork

Пікірлер: 685
@OnePathNetwork
@OnePathNetwork 2 жыл бұрын
Full Destroying Doubts episode: onepathnetwork.com/the-contingency-argument-for-gods-existence/
@Just_A_Stranger
@Just_A_Stranger 2 жыл бұрын
📜 Qur'an 52:35-36 : *﴾ Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]? ٣٥۝ Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain. ﴿* 📜 Quran 39:45 : *﴾ And when Allāh is mentioned alone, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter shrink with aversion, but when those other than Him are mentioned, immediately they rejoice. ﴿*
@unclegardener
@unclegardener 2 жыл бұрын
@@Just_A_Stranger This is the best argument for the existence of Allah; it is much better than this weak contingency argument. To label ‘Ilm-ul-Kalām as strong is disrespectful to al-Qurān, let alone as the strongest argument.
@absquereligione5409
@absquereligione5409 2 жыл бұрын
@@Just_A_Stranger Don’t worry, we are very certain. - Theists have never demonstrated that their preferred actually god exists. - All they have are speculations, assertions and gullibility (blind faith).
@ILoveLuhaidan
@ILoveLuhaidan 2 жыл бұрын
now delete the other embarrassing episode with the idiotic sheikh he did not know anything and simply gave rationality rules a chance to embarrass muslims.
@absquereligione5409
@absquereligione5409 2 жыл бұрын
@@ILoveLuhaidan Correction. It is Muslims that are embarrassing Muslims.
@truthinknowledge8312
@truthinknowledge8312 2 жыл бұрын
May Allah swt reward brother Mohammed Hijab for empowering the youth and intellectually defending Islam.
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
May Allah guide us and Hijab to the way of the Salaf
@unclegardener
@unclegardener 2 жыл бұрын
@@Moath1277 Āmīn.
@truthinknowledge8312
@truthinknowledge8312 2 жыл бұрын
@@Moath1277 in what way exactly does his views differ from the salaf?
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
@@truthinknowledge8312 Dear brother, it is not the way of the prophets or the way of the Salaf to philosophize arguments for the existence of God. Using philosophy to prove God’s existence is exactly why the Salaf called Ahlul Kalaam deviants.
@notyourhabibi6473
@notyourhabibi6473 2 жыл бұрын
@@Moath1277 🤦‍♂️
@ajustman7535
@ajustman7535 2 жыл бұрын
Actually muhd hijab bro needs to reduce technicalities explain things in layman's terms it will reach even wider audiences
@noorkhadim844
@noorkhadim844 2 жыл бұрын
Watch 'arguing God from being' by seyyed hossein nasr. Same argument, easier terms
@ajustman7535
@ajustman7535 2 жыл бұрын
@@noorkhadim844 i understood the concept also watched the Londoniyah series.. was referring it would help for for people with lesser understanding of concepts..
@noorkhadim844
@noorkhadim844 2 жыл бұрын
@@ajustman7535 ah OK. Allah bless and reward you in these blessed days and nights, my brother
@faz7814
@faz7814 2 жыл бұрын
Agreed, it’s abit hard to follow
@celestialsatheist1535
@celestialsatheist1535 11 ай бұрын
If everything has a cause, except your god, you are committing a special pleading fallacy. You set a rule, only to exclude something from that rule, in order to have an argument. You also automatically destroy your argument, because if your god doesn’t have to have a cause, then you are admitting that some things can exist without having a cause. Now using Ockhams Razor (meaning that we should be searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements), we can eliminate the element of your god and simply say the universe was uncaused and existed eternally in some form. Logic 1 - Theism still 0
@rahmaabdi7868
@rahmaabdi7868 2 жыл бұрын
Also thanks one path for the subtitles because I was struggling to understand for a minute but reading the subtitles made it a lot easier so jazakallahu for that ❤️❤️
@rivaldioctora
@rivaldioctora 2 жыл бұрын
british accent..
@themercifulguard3971
@themercifulguard3971 2 жыл бұрын
BRI ISH
@rahmaabdi7868
@rahmaabdi7868 2 жыл бұрын
@@rivaldioctora it’s not the accent that was hard to understand for me In fact I love the British accent it’s the high quality vocabulary he was using my vocabulary is very limited. But I’m not surprised at all know that I know he graduated from Oxford University mashallah.
@rathernot6660
@rathernot6660 2 жыл бұрын
@@rahmaabdi7868 atheism don't make sense. Don't worry it's not your English. The atheists use these words to make it seem they intelligent by not believing. Hijab just counters that more efficiently than most theists.
@NatureCanvas488
@NatureCanvas488 2 жыл бұрын
Learn Hadith In English completely .Jazakullah
@Jule-mm4dr
@Jule-mm4dr 2 жыл бұрын
I memtion how Quran recitation heals people. How Islamic exorcism (ruqyah) helps people. That's quite a proof in my opinion.
@polite.cat.has.playlists
@polite.cat.has.playlists 2 жыл бұрын
Ohh yes!
@maryamgg2481
@maryamgg2481 2 жыл бұрын
Yes sister thats so true. You know someone im my family has been suffering with jinn posession and wallahi sometimes when my dad recites on her when she has fainted the jinn screams and says no when we mention allah. He says no out of anger becuase it really hurts him. So seeing this all is the certainty of the eye Alhamdulillah allah has guided May he keep us steadfast
@jb_4379
@jb_4379 2 жыл бұрын
@@maryamgg2481 Indeed, Allah azze we jelle really guides to Right Path whom ever He wills (if those want to accept the Truth with their hearts) and left in delusion and misguidance whom ever He wills ( if those dont want to accept the Thruth with their hearts).
@ahmed-music-prod
@ahmed-music-prod 2 жыл бұрын
@@maryamgg2481 does that actually happen, maybe check if he has a mental disorder (not being rude just incase it could be the case)
@nour.mp4
@nour.mp4 3 ай бұрын
@@jb_4379i believe it but i dont feel anything in my heart. What does this mean, i am devastated im afraid my heart is going blind
@sambuwalda1330
@sambuwalda1330 9 ай бұрын
It is so important to make these videos where you break down our religion step by step, and make it easy to understand for the broad audience. Especially in this age of time, where many people think religion is some sort of fairy tale for people that lost their hope. We have to spread awareness of the fact the islam is based on the truth. So please keep up the good work! ❤️☪️ May Allah guide those who are lost. Ameen. 🤲🏼
@junodonatus4906
@junodonatus4906 8 ай бұрын
It isn't based on truth but strong indoctrination with no exposure to outside thoughts or critique of the faith. Religious people FIRST believe, and AFTERWARDS compile evidence and reasoning using confirmation bias. Tell me I'm wrong!
@KryptonKr
@KryptonKr 7 ай бұрын
I agree, we should spread this awareness. Education is the solution to ignorance
@junodonatus4906
@junodonatus4906 7 ай бұрын
@@KryptonKr Education usually squashes religion though.
@KryptonKr
@KryptonKr 7 ай бұрын
@@junodonatus4906 Other religions than Islam yes.
@junodonatus4906
@junodonatus4906 7 ай бұрын
@@KryptonKr That's what they all say. Yet when science speaks you reinterpret what Islam says to fit that.
@talksense6648
@talksense6648 2 жыл бұрын
ما شاء الله These are the videos which we need. Top quality, simplified which everyone can understand. 🌻
@farahpocoyo5027
@farahpocoyo5027 2 жыл бұрын
Great job! Logical 💯
@rahmaabdi7868
@rahmaabdi7868 2 жыл бұрын
I love Mohammed hijab very smart mashallah and the way he organises arguments and expresses them is beautiful ❤️❤️
@lewis72
@lewis72 Жыл бұрын
He's the idiots' genius.
@proslayer3233
@proslayer3233 10 ай бұрын
@@lewis72yeah sure, he doesn’t look like you.
@lewis72
@lewis72 10 ай бұрын
@@proslayer3233 What he or I looks like is irrelevent. Mohammed Hijab is the idiots' genius. He sounds all loud and confident but when you scrutinise what he says, it's utter rubbish; as is most of islam.
@sebastianag2966
@sebastianag2966 10 ай бұрын
@@proslayer3233You had to make it racial.
@bloomony
@bloomony 25 күн бұрын
@@lewis72 you said that. and then said absolutely nothing after. didnt elaborate on your statement. called the population of muslims idiots and then left. elaborate .
@ilm8865
@ilm8865 24 күн бұрын
Brillant explanation brother
@irfangull1461
@irfangull1461 2 жыл бұрын
May Allah guide and bless everyone
@ea5307
@ea5307 2 жыл бұрын
Ameen
@zainabzuhasarafdeen4873
@zainabzuhasarafdeen4873 2 жыл бұрын
Aameen aameen yarabbal aalameen
@BeastBoiz
@BeastBoiz 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for these amazing videos ma’sha’allah keep up the good work!! 👍🏼
@exa3909
@exa3909 2 жыл бұрын
Please write Allah with a capital ♥️
@homtanks7259
@homtanks7259 2 жыл бұрын
JazakAllahu khairan
@SigmaMale7868
@SigmaMale7868 2 жыл бұрын
Great video and also I love school diaries please make more videos on school dairies😍
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ 3 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 5:11
@m.ahachani8573
@m.ahachani8573 2 жыл бұрын
جزاكم الله خيرا
@angeldust7591
@angeldust7591 2 жыл бұрын
Background music distracting and unecessary.
@talksense6648
@talksense6648 2 жыл бұрын
جزاكم الله خيرًا ❤️
@ibnadam9790
@ibnadam9790 Жыл бұрын
Allahumma barik!
@Just_A_Stranger
@Just_A_Stranger 2 жыл бұрын
📜 Qur'an 52:35-36 : *﴾ Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]? ٣٥۝ Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain. ﴿* 📜 Quran 39:45 : *﴾ And when Allāh is mentioned alone, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter shrink with aversion, but when those other than Him are mentioned, immediately they rejoice. ﴿*
@RustyWalker
@RustyWalker 2 жыл бұрын
_"Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]?"_ Neither. That's a false dichotomy. Why does the Qu'ran have logical fallacies in it?
@RustyWalker
@RustyWalker Жыл бұрын
.. ant that's an argument from ignorance
@BobTrikob-pr2ts
@BobTrikob-pr2ts 8 ай бұрын
​@@RustyWalkerby they the whole universe and Gods Creation so its saying did the Creation of God meaning the universe cause itself its shown in the video to br logical fallacy that you cant have infinite causes the Quran has a solid argument.
@apurpose8614
@apurpose8614 16 күн бұрын
​@@RustyWalker How come that's logical fallacy There are only three possibilities Either we are created out of nothing (by itself) Or we created ourselves Or God created ourselves So God mentions the first two Third one is obvious if first two are false
@RustyWalker
@RustyWalker 15 күн бұрын
@@BobTrikob-pr2ts It *isn't* a logical fallacy to have an infinite regress. It's just not intuitive to us as short-lived temporal beings. The video was wrong.
@yusufdawood3018
@yusufdawood3018 2 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this collab for too long
@faisalalabbasi969
@faisalalabbasi969 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of the night and the day are signs for those of understanding. SURAH AL-IMRAN AYAT 190 (3:190 QURAN)
@jb_4379
@jb_4379 2 жыл бұрын
And agnostics and atheists think that kind of verse and there are so many like those in the QUr'an, can be imagined and written by bunch of human primitive 7th century arabs!!????!?
@cnault3244
@cnault3244 2 жыл бұрын
" in the creation of the heavens and the earth" You skipped the step where it is proved the heavens and the earth were created.
@killerbee6484
@killerbee6484 Жыл бұрын
​@@cnault3244 then they came from nothing it doesn't make sense all the universe depends on God if God doesn't exist the universe would not exist
@celestialsatheist1535
@celestialsatheist1535 11 ай бұрын
If everything has a cause, except your god, you are committing a special pleading fallacy. You set a rule, only to exclude something from that rule, in order to have an argument. You also automatically destroy your argument, because if your god doesn’t have to have a cause, then you are admitting that some things can exist without having a cause. Now using Ockhams Razor (meaning that we should be searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements), we can eliminate the element of your god and simply say the universe was uncaused and existed eternally in some form. Logic 1 - Theism still 0
@celestialsatheist1535
@celestialsatheist1535 11 ай бұрын
​@@jb_4379well the creation account given in the Quran is completely wrong
@sohrab4497
@sohrab4497 2 жыл бұрын
This is the problem with philosophy that Hijab is using, it's getting more and more complicated instead of making it simple
@felreizmeshinca7459
@felreizmeshinca7459 Жыл бұрын
Truly, the paths towards God is with A LOT of knowledge. There many logical ways people came to understand, from simple logic to needing well-established arguments. No matter what it is, if a person is sincere, he will put his time into it.
@quranchannel4622
@quranchannel4622 2 жыл бұрын
Nice
@longjunior7638
@longjunior7638 5 ай бұрын
*Key questions* How do you know something is dependent? What if everything was just a rearrangement/changes of particles? How do you prove the fundamental particles cannot be necessary? Can you prove the necessary existence isn't a necessary thing but a necessary being?
@MalekUiop
@MalekUiop 5 ай бұрын
1. Based on empirics 2. It’s not, bcs we have trailing present 3. If they are, then you are accepting their divinity, bcs if it wasn’t necessary for other changes to happen from it, but they happened - then they(fundamental particles) have free will(initiating smth when it’s not necessary), in other words u become deist(saying god is everything and in everything). 4. I have already explained that, it’s being bcs it has will - property of a soul or a living. What else?)
@longjunior7638
@longjunior7638 5 ай бұрын
@@MalekUiop Perfect
@D3nchanter
@D3nchanter Жыл бұрын
yeah the problem is even IF you accept it (which isn't needed)... you still don't get to a god, but just some necessary thing. its STILL a logical leap to just call that thing a god. just like it was a logical leap to invoke god in any other area of existence like thor and lightning used to be, the only difference is now its literally pushed back SO far, that its at the origin of the universe now instead of in everything like the wind and lightning.
@uthman2281
@uthman2281 2 ай бұрын
How so?
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ 3 ай бұрын
One version of this argument has a hidden conclusion in the premise, when they say “uncaused cause “ they are secretly meaning god, so the conclusion is hidden in the premise.
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ 3 ай бұрын
And it makes more sense for the independent thing to be the basic building blocks of matter and energy like quantum waves
@ayeshayasir8665
@ayeshayasir8665 2 ай бұрын
No. They are by DEFINITION contingent actually as their form VARIES and certain circumstances and factors DETERMINE their form. And their behavior is also dependant upon them.
@FireinHair
@FireinHair 2 жыл бұрын
I love school diaries
@shairShoukat
@shairShoukat 2 жыл бұрын
Wow!
@M_J_TN
@M_J_TN 2 жыл бұрын
Nicely elaborated ! Mashallah !
@nt1905
@nt1905 2 жыл бұрын
Allah (swt) is the most great of the world.
@serventofallah7355
@serventofallah7355 2 жыл бұрын
ﺍﻟﻠَّﻬُﻢَّ ﺻَﻞِّ ﻋَﻠَﻰ ﻣُﺤَﻤﺪٍﷺ,ﻭَﻋَﻠَﻰ ﺁﻝِ ﻣُﺤَﻤَّﺪٍﷺ
@snuckel4
@snuckel4 2 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I say "innalilahi wa innalilahi rojiun" to non-muslim that has passed away, in fact, I always say it to everyone who has passed away. But, some muslim stopped me from saying it for them.. why?
@MuhammadAhmed-lc1op
@MuhammadAhmed-lc1op 2 жыл бұрын
You shouldn't believe everything a person or even multiple people say just because they say it
@apurpose8614
@apurpose8614 16 күн бұрын
You cannot supplicate for disbelievers after they die Only while they are alive you can pray for their guidance
@YourLordIsOne
@YourLordIsOne 2 жыл бұрын
I advise you check Hadith 5590 in Sahih Al-Bukhari and it’s explanation + exceptions in regards to musical instruments’ prohibition may Allah bless you
@mzs9090
@mzs9090 2 жыл бұрын
Salam
@lamis983
@lamis983 27 күн бұрын
It's like the beginning of the proof of Ibn Sina, Ibn Sina's proof is very interesting
@thehauntedstream7206
@thehauntedstream7206 11 ай бұрын
Prove the will of Allah, that is the main point. The necessary independent existence point is incomplete on it’s own.
@razagamerofficial1859
@razagamerofficial1859 8 ай бұрын
Well if we believe that independent necessary existance don't have will mean first cause than we will have to believe that universe is eternal because if cause is there than effect must be there like the cause of water freezing is temperature below 0c
@purplelove3666
@purplelove3666 3 ай бұрын
I wish thry didn't have music in the background
@AjejeB
@AjejeB Жыл бұрын
Even if one agreed with this logic, why would the “independent” thing be God? Makes much more sense that the independent thing is something akin to a quantum field or whatnot…
@ItsMeSoloDolo
@ItsMeSoloDolo Жыл бұрын
What do you mean “if one agreed?” Majority of scientist believe that this a dependent universe and there must be something it depends on. What that independent variable is will always be argued upon.
@AjejeB
@AjejeB Жыл бұрын
@@ItsMeSoloDolo sure, and my point is that the independent factor is more likely to be an abstract thing rather than an emotional human-like personal-god like Allah. It is evident from science that humans evolved like other animals and weren’t created from scratch by god. We are dependent on our ancestors, not god. We know life is dependent on nature, and we know that this world formed by gravitational accretion, wasn’t created on day 1 by God, it’s just dependent on stars, which are more powerful yet simpler than planets. Stars are then dependent on hidrogen, which again is more simpler. Eventually hydrogen is dependent on atoms, which depend on elementary particles, which are even simpler, till we go down to space itself and the individual forces of nature, etc… you see, as we god deep down the “dependent” chain we go down to more simpler and fundamental, abstract, albeit stronger things. So it’s unlikely that at the end of the chain all of a sudden there is a super powerful man with human emotions! The independent thing is more likely a fundamental space/time/waive sort of fabric/essence that we haven’t yet discovered (and maybe would never discover), but it makes no sense that is a man like creature.
@musaaziri3568
@musaaziri3568 Жыл бұрын
well, a quantum field is a limited existence, it is defined by it's limited propreties. now, it is more retional to argue that an independent being would not have arbitrarily limited propreties. and there would be also the problem of explaining the teleology required for the complexity necessary for life ( what is known as the fine tuning of the universe ) if you argue that such a field created the universe, then it would be a random process, but is it rational to argue that all the variables upon which life is contingent, just happen to be the right ones, randomlly? I mean, I don't have enough faith to believe something like this.
@celestialsatheist1535
@celestialsatheist1535 11 ай бұрын
If everything has a cause, except your god, you are committing a special pleading fallacy. You set a rule, only to exclude something from that rule, in order to have an argument. You also automatically destroy your argument, because if your god doesn’t have to have a cause, then you are admitting that some things can exist without having a cause. Now using Ockhams Razor (meaning that we should be searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements), we can eliminate the element of your god and simply say the universe was uncaused and existed eternally in some form. Logic 1 - Theism still 0
@Enigmatic_philosopher
@Enigmatic_philosopher 11 ай бұрын
@@ItsMeSoloDolo Here is a philosophical critique of the contingency argument as summarized: The contingency argument aims to prove the existence of a necessary being (i.e. God) by arguing that the existence of contingent beings requires the existence of a necessary being. However, the argument makes several questionable assumptions: 1. The distinction between necessary and contingent beings is unclear. Defining necessary beings as "self-sufficient" and contingent beings as "dependent" is imprecise. Further work is needed to clearly define what makes a being "necessary" rather than just labeling God as such. 1. The impossibility of an infinite regress is asserted but not proven. The argument claims there cannot be an infinite chain of contingent/dependent beings, but does not give a reason why this is impossible. An actual proof is needed to establish this key premise. 1. The argument makes a questionable leap from an unspecified necessary being to the God of classical theism. Even if a necessary being is proven, it is a further step to conclude this being has all the traditional divine attributes. The argument does not bridge this gap. 1. The argument relies heavily on intuition and a priori philosophical reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Some may find pure logic insufficient for establishing something as significant as the existence of God. In summary, while the contingency argument is thought-provoking, it has some gaps that need shoring up. The key concepts need more clarity, the premises require further support, and the reasoning from a necessary being to God is a significant leap. Stronger arguments and empirical evidence may be needed to convince skeptics of God's existence.
@trapped-inlife1914
@trapped-inlife1914 3 ай бұрын
my argument is: this sentence has a creator ,the creator of this sentence must know everything for this sentence to be true ,DOES HE?
@sammy-pg7bg
@sammy-pg7bg 2 жыл бұрын
ma cha Allah, qu’Allah vous récompense pour votre travail, est-ce qu’il est possible d’avoir les sous-titres en français, baarakAllahoufikum.
@christianmartinez8621
@christianmartinez8621 2 жыл бұрын
Do you guys read the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible?
@gabrielleangelica1977
@gabrielleangelica1977 Жыл бұрын
Read it was n Hebrew.
@fizaaal
@fizaaal 2 ай бұрын
*The contingency argument posits that there cannot be an infinite chain of dependent things. *Dependency is distinct from causation, as dependent entities rely on something else for existence but don't necessarily cease to exist if the source is removed. *Independent entities are self-sufficient and are necessary for the existence of dependent ones. *While the argument doesn't directly prove specific attributes of God, it aims to move individuals from atheism or agnosticism to deism or theism. *Establishing a need-based relationship with the necessary existence leads to the recognition of submission and sets the stage for further arguments, including the authenticity of the Quran and the prophethood of Muhammad.
@al-quran8349
@al-quran8349 2 жыл бұрын
The issue with this argument,as shaykh al islam ibn taymiyyah explained, is that it proves Allah has names but no characteristics which is how some of deviants explained Allah. Allah has characteristics and names which suit.his majesty, this is a good way of proving God exists however with this argument you deny the characteristics of Allah. May Allah keep us away from Ilm al kalam and make us strong upon the Qur'an and sunnah only,ameen
@unclegardener
@unclegardener 2 жыл бұрын
Someone pointed it out! 😎
@mdabullais2114
@mdabullais2114 2 жыл бұрын
I believe when we give this argument we keep non Muslims in our mind in order to bring them closer to concept of God since they don’t believe in revelation but when a person testifies shahadah, he/she will get to know more about Allah and Tauheed with the help of revelation. We must differentiate between believing in Ilme kalam and using it sometimes for the sake of arguments. People who give Dawah they know it Alhamdulillah. May Allah keep us steadfast on deen.
@aseeker2269
@aseeker2269 2 жыл бұрын
Because it's a separate argument that requires a separate video, I think. It would be interesting to see how that would play out.
@unclegardener
@unclegardener 2 жыл бұрын
@@mdabullais2114 Why can’t we prove the existence of Allah using the arguments from al-Qurān instead?
@al-quran8349
@al-quran8349 2 жыл бұрын
@@mdabullais2114 yeah I understand that using logic to prove the existence of God can be used as some scholars have said, but at a very minimum level. Kalaam is very dangerous and it can lead to kufr.
@CloutFlow
@CloutFlow 8 ай бұрын
Should’ve added subtitles for those that can’t understand British accent.
@DrWoofOfficial
@DrWoofOfficial 8 ай бұрын
Turn on the KZfaq subtitles
@Sporeta
@Sporeta 7 ай бұрын
I'm gonna use this argument for not pay child support.
@marknieuweboer8099
@marknieuweboer8099 10 ай бұрын
As a staunch atheist I begin to like you more and more. Before I could complain that the independent entity on which everything else depends is not necessarily a creator god you mention itself. So I'll give you a fun fact. Physicists have identified a few candidates. My current favourite is quantum fields. They can be said to be a manifestation of a creator god. And this is where the debates ends in a stalemate.
@hamsam789
@hamsam789 8 ай бұрын
Quantum fields do not have intelligence though… how can an unintelligent thing be the first cause?
@MalekUiop
@MalekUiop 7 ай бұрын
Quantum fields just an attempt to not call it god, to say that it just “randomly” does it, when you for sure know that it doesn’t, universe isn’t a loop, the expansion continues to grow, that’s a rejection of Big Crunch theory. They just call it random, but the probability says different things
@marknieuweboer8099
@marknieuweboer8099 7 ай бұрын
@ Malek: you're not even wrong.
@ayeshayasir8665
@ayeshayasir8665 2 ай бұрын
quantum field can be considered contingent in the context of the contingency argument. Quantum fields are part of the natural world and are subject to various conditions, interactions, and probabilities. Their properties and behaviors depend on factors such as energy levels, particle interactions, and spacetime conditions. Therefore, quantum fields exhibit characteristics of contingency as they are not inherently necessary but contingent upon specific conditions and interactions within the universe.
@marknieuweboer8099
@marknieuweboer8099 2 ай бұрын
@ Ayes: they can be but don't need to be contingent. They set the conditions, interactions and probabilities. Energy levels, particle interactions and spacetime conditions depend on quantum fields.
@tahaali2732
@tahaali2732 3 ай бұрын
I understand that contingency is different from causation. But I'm so familiar with the argument from causation and I want to be able to prove God's existence from contingency. So how do we prove that God needs to continue existing in order for the universe to exist?
@ayeshayasir8665
@ayeshayasir8665 2 ай бұрын
Lemme make it easy for you by giving you certain analogies which would be fundamentally helpful, get this. If someone says, raises an objection to causation, you would say okay fine. For the sake of arguement, let's agree to this, or even an INFINITE regress of universes, or a multiverse. Or the cosmos whatever, ETERNALITY OF SOMETHING. OR ITS INFINITUM DOES NOT UNDERNINE ITS "DEPENDANCY". How? Here is an analogy Let's say for the sake arguement. We have an eternal sun with its eternal or infinite sun rays. Are both eternal? Yes. Are the rays still DEPENDANT upon the sun? YES. Therefore. If the sun was not. It would not have been. And by this you could even argue CAUSATION on a priori grounds, but that's another discussion Another analogy. We have the eternal pillow with the eternal ball. Both are eternal? Yes. However THE INDENTATION UPON THE PILLOW FROM THE BALL IS STILL DEPENDANT UPON THE BALL BEING THERE. AND IS STILL CAUSES APRIORI ETERNALLY Also by definition. Energy and fundamental particles are also by DEFINITION contingent as they DEPEND UPON CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES FOR THEIR FORM. Or they VARY in form. Hope this was helpful!jazakallah.
@PioneeringPhilosophy
@PioneeringPhilosophy 8 ай бұрын
Contingency argument is indisputable 🎉
@hitman5782
@hitman5782 7 ай бұрын
Oh, is it? "Nobody knows X therefore my god is real". Applause, what a great argument. And this childish nonsense makes which of the endless amounts of gods we humans invented any more real? I really don´t get it.
@generalhenrystickmin
@generalhenrystickmin 6 ай бұрын
​@@hitman5782what else would it be? A self sufficient being is classified as a god. Humans names for god do not matter
@hitman5782
@hitman5782 6 ай бұрын
@@generalhenrystickmin It´s not about names. Most gods are exclusive. Can you answer my question?
@sebastianwilliams5060
@sebastianwilliams5060 6 ай бұрын
​@@generalhenrystickmin How do you know that out of the (at least) 18,000 gods in our history and the countless religions that Islam is the truth? 😂
@rebeuoriginel
@rebeuoriginel 6 ай бұрын
@@sebastianwilliams5060 first of all there aren't 18 000 gods, second of al islam is the only true religion because if we put every scripture to test science, the qu'ran is the only one that would pass the test and other scriptures would fail
@JohnSmith-gt3be
@JohnSmith-gt3be 2 ай бұрын
This argument is weak. Using human logic to gauge an incomprehensibly complex topic that itself defies all laws of physics and human interpretation.
@chrishemswortth2669
@chrishemswortth2669 17 күн бұрын
Do you think humans invented logic?
@Izzy_loves20
@Izzy_loves20 15 күн бұрын
So did you create yourself? Did you create all the laws of physics or did it just happen, and then a super advanced alien species came and breaded and left ancient texts and were all reptilians. Cuz you’re laughing at us but realistically we should be laughing at you
@zaeemk8897
@zaeemk8897 3 ай бұрын
Can someone explain 2:40 onwards? What was the point he made to transition from 'there being a necessary existence' to 'that necessary existence is Allah'?
@lewis72
@lewis72 25 күн бұрын
Sleight of hand. AKA 'bollox'.
@samw2996
@samw2996 Жыл бұрын
This is literally the first cause argument in other words
@dwsdd0851
@dwsdd0851 Жыл бұрын
it’s not causation!!!! it’s dependency
@BeastBoiz
@BeastBoiz 2 жыл бұрын
I’m early
@NatureCanvas488
@NatureCanvas488 2 жыл бұрын
Learn Hadith In English completely .Jazakullah
@wassimjaoui4441
@wassimjaoui4441 Жыл бұрын
Then why would one say that we depend on God and not just caused by Him, which would apply that God doesn't necessarily exist **anymore** ? I don't see an argument for that in the video.
@wassimjaoui4441
@wassimjaoui4441 Жыл бұрын
I'd like an answer if possible to my first question first. And if we make that argument... And if we say that we depend on God and not caused by Him, why should we believe that God created us (caused us) ? And not something else (that also is necessary). For instance if my father raises a ball (*causing* a potential energy) and gives the ball to me, then the potential energy *depends* now on me (dropping the ball or holding it), but I didn't cause that energy.
@mohamedinshafjihath4626
@mohamedinshafjihath4626 2 жыл бұрын
May Allah reward you all, aameen
@rebelgordo2339
@rebelgordo2339 Ай бұрын
Big words and no argument on gods existents
@farhanbutt3355
@farhanbutt3355 23 күн бұрын
Big words you don't understand 😂😂😂
@ibnhussain3300
@ibnhussain3300 2 жыл бұрын
We don't need such arguments to give dawah.
@D3nchanter
@D3nchanter Жыл бұрын
the rays of the sun is a pretty bad example, because the farther you are away... you can still receive light from that star, long after its death. even on earth if the sun vanished this instant, itd be 8 minutes before we stopped receiving sunlight. NEW rays can't exist without the sun, but you can still see stars long after they've died.
@hermes112
@hermes112 11 ай бұрын
ok but over time it will eventually die out. which still meansits dependent.
@ziyadshafeek
@ziyadshafeek 2 ай бұрын
well he means it is basic "dependancy". our life is dependent on earth, earth on sun and sun is dependent on the universe, laws of physics. Ultimately someone independent must be assumed as per this argument. this is my understanding
@ahmedkarim5618
@ahmedkarim5618 2 жыл бұрын
Allah reward him and guide him and the world the right path
@yourstruly5706
@yourstruly5706 Жыл бұрын
Tell me you read Ashari and Maturidhi works without telling me you read Ashari and Maturidhi works
@stainxfalcon
@stainxfalcon 11 ай бұрын
whats that
@yourstruly5706
@yourstruly5706 11 ай бұрын
@stainxfalcon books by Ulema explaining aqeeda of ahlus sunnah via reason. The intellect is the ultimate source of understanding, which is why it's universally accepted. There is a sect that goals logic and reasoning a biddah, even though Allah ta'ala uses the Qawaid in the Qur'an when he gives mithal.
@ScarredRomeo
@ScarredRomeo Жыл бұрын
Hijab is effectively distinguishing between the argument from causation and the argument from contingency. He explains aspects of the former by mentioning a type of causation, of which in Scholastic terminology there are two: an accidentally ordered series of causation and an essentially ordered series of causation. The example of the father and son is the former, where the son does not depend upon the existence of the father to cause his children. An example of the latter would be a locomotive pulling a bunch of carriages. The cause of motion in the latter is derived concurrently and only because of the existence of the former. Take away the locomotive and the motion eventually stops for the carriages. The contingency argument has to do with an infinite regress of contingently dependent existences being impossible because you’re always pushing off the explanation for the contingent existence. Therefore, there must be one necessary being that has started that chain of contingent existences. Now, the latter may not still exist and the contingency argument doesn’t prove that it does, but the argument from causation based on the aforementioned second type of causation (essential) argues that it does as all matter is effectively a composition of form and other levels of matter “all the way down” and so some being must be existing in the here and now maintaining such causal structural relationships at the fundamental level of material existence.
@pegaferno4429
@pegaferno4429 11 ай бұрын
Appreciate the explanation!
@sebastianwilliams5060
@sebastianwilliams5060 6 ай бұрын
His analogy is garbage though. God is not a parent or a locomotive. He is according to theists an omnipotent omnibenevolent omnipresent omniscient god. A contradictory man-made concept.
@ScarredRomeo
@ScarredRomeo 6 ай бұрын
@@sebastianwilliams5060All of the Omni-terms are plagued with contradictions. “If God is all powerful, can He create a rock that He cannot lift?” Assume two contradictory premises and it’ll result in a contradictory conclusion. None of those terms apply to God Who is the highest being in the hierarchy of being and the possessor of the highest forms of those attributes in such a way. As for the examples, they are analogies to explain the principles.
@abdulmoiz2242
@abdulmoiz2242 Жыл бұрын
what would you say to non Muslims who say that you've claimed that god is independent without proof , what if the singularity that the universe originates from is independent , what if we're in a multiverse and the other universe that created us is independent .
@amalegendoffortnite3861
@amalegendoffortnite3861 9 ай бұрын
Ok but brother obviously even if there is a multi universe than who created the first universe in the multi universe? Obviously there must be a universe to create another universe and creating a multi universe so the question again is who created that first universe?
@abdulmoiz2242
@abdulmoiz2242 9 ай бұрын
the universe might be necessary. or maybe existence monism is true and the whole ( dot ) is the necessary being. existence monism : The dot is the only concrete thing. Everything else are abstractions of it itself. The dot abstractly duplicates itself (referring to Oppy's 'Branching Theory of Modality'), resulting in universals. These can also be called "Modes" (taken from Spinoza) or this is what I call "virtual parts".... they are all 'modes' of the One It duplicates itself by method of abstraction similar to how we can express "1" as "2-1" or "3-2", all meaning the same thing
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 8 ай бұрын
What is the strongest argument for the existence of my mother ? The reason I've asked that question is to illustrate a point. No argument could convince you that she exists.
@se20se20
@se20se20 4 ай бұрын
Its quite a simple argument actually. You are the strongest argument that your mother exists/existed. No where in our reality do we observe humans being brought into existence without emerging from a female. So with that fact in mind your existence is proof your mother existed at some point during which you were born.
@abuzaynab1805
@abuzaynab1805 2 жыл бұрын
This “contingency argument” approach in dawah will at the most only make someone affirm a “dhat” or essence for Allah. Will it make someone a Muslim in and of itself? Nope. Will it make someone accept Muhammad ﷺ as the final Messenger for mankind? Nope. Will it make someone affirm tawheed for Allah in His right of worship and belief in His beautiful names and attributes? Nope. Is it the manner that Allah’s Messenger called to Islam ? Nope People will now say “oh but we’re dealing with the reality of atheism” . If you can accept that dawah is worship and Allah’s Messenger did not leave us without notifying us of anything that will benefit or harm our religion AND all details in the acceptable acts of worship you must then accept to call to the Quran and Sunnah FROM the Quran and Sunnah. This use of “kalam” or speculative theology was detested by the scholars of Ahlul Sunnah wal Jammah. Imām Ash-Shāfi’i (d. 204H) stated: “My judgment upon the people of rhetoric (Ahlul-Kalām) is that they should be beaten with palm branches, placed on the back of a camel and paraded among the people and it be announced: ‘This is the punishment for the one who abandons the Book and Sunnah and takes to Kalām (theological rhetoric).” (Al-Baghawi reported it in Sharhus-Sunnah, 1/218) These philosophical approaches to dawah will fail because Allah’s Messenger would have informed us of them if their was good in them. These philosophical arguments for Islam based on the aql (which is subjective from person to person) will falter under the most simple of shubahat and this is undeniable. And Allah and His Messenger know best
@MohammedAlSharif2002
@MohammedAlSharif2002 Жыл бұрын
Correct may Allah bless you.
@OCEAN-fc9wl
@OCEAN-fc9wl 9 ай бұрын
Correct
@walid.Z
@walid.Z Жыл бұрын
Ibn Sina argument.
@junodonatus4906
@junodonatus4906 8 ай бұрын
Call "The Atheist Experience" and you'll get debunked immediately.
@hitman5782
@hitman5782 7 ай бұрын
No need to do that. Every theist can talk to literally every atheist and see his childish delusions debunked. That´s the problem theists have. You can´t talk an imaginary being into existence.
@DeconvertedMan
@DeconvertedMan 2 жыл бұрын
hahaha if that is the strongest argument, I guess you have nothing much then. This argument is so broken.
@rayeesabdulla1916
@rayeesabdulla1916 Ай бұрын
I have a doubt. Universe as a whole is independent. there is no requirement of a necessary existance.
@hitman5782
@hitman5782 7 ай бұрын
So the fact that NOBODY knows how the universe came into existence is somehow evidence for...which god again? One qustion: In all the history of mankind, literally every single time we humans haven´t known the answer to a question, there have always been people screaming "That was my god", what has this ever been good for?
@anthonyesin7630
@anthonyesin7630 7 ай бұрын
Disprove Islam. Produce a verse like the Quran
@bladexpower534
@bladexpower534 3 күн бұрын
But In Islam the necessary existence or being is God
@greencoolmoss
@greencoolmoss Жыл бұрын
@destiny look at this carefully
@fastng
@fastng 2 жыл бұрын
is this the Prophetic means of Dawah? simple question.
@ishmammohammadadnan1525
@ishmammohammadadnan1525 2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bK-JfsJ-mKeneH0.html
@wanderingtraveler71
@wanderingtraveler71 2 жыл бұрын
No it’s not. This link is all the problems with the contingency argument
@wanderingtraveler71
@wanderingtraveler71 2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qb-SqtJ1zp-WeI0.html
@oayysz8909
@oayysz8909 2 жыл бұрын
Watch the entire video in the beginning he clearly mentions it's only for certain individuals for general masses they don't need such technicalities stick to basic arguments in Qur'an
@purplearrow3790
@purplearrow3790 2 ай бұрын
I’m an agnostic who struggles with god actually existing, and I didn’t really understand how what was said proves the existence of God. Am I missing something? I’d appreciate some help because I want to believe god exists but I need a logical base to believe.
@uthman2281
@uthman2281 2 ай бұрын
What do you mean by logical?
@purplearrow3790
@purplearrow3790 2 ай бұрын
@@uthman2281 proof, basically something that actually shows that god exists instead of being vague evidence that can be explained by a logical continuation of events unrelated to god.
@uthman2281
@uthman2281 2 ай бұрын
@@purplearrow3790 What do you mean by proof exactly? Can you show me an example of how you come to such conclusions that something is proven?
@purplearrow3790
@purplearrow3790 2 ай бұрын
@@uthman2281sure, due to observational evidence from cases such as Genie Wiley we understand that core language development takes place at 0-3 years old. There’s a lot of evidence that supports this conclusion from observable evidence to biological mechanics we can observe in the brain, there are cases of children learning unique languages as long as they are exposed to language from 0-3. To me this is evidence, if you like I can go find said evidence but it’s just a bunch of psychological structures that explain how children develop based on what we have observed.
@uthman2281
@uthman2281 2 ай бұрын
@@purplearrow3790 Did I understand you correctly? You consider something proven if it is observable?
@navedian739
@navedian739 2 жыл бұрын
Healthy Clean living starts with👉🏻 heart & soul st👉🏻 then the body 🙏🏻O God guide us all to the True religion and Your Right Path, Amen🙏🏻Athentic Bible of Jesus is the one we should believe in, NOT the false one that's altered by people centuries ago that is in people's hands nowadays👉🏻isn't the real deal🙏🏻why don't people make a slight effort seek for the trurh🔎Guide your hearts 💕 Find out for yourself The ONE TRUE GOD, your CREATOR of the universe is GOD-ALLAH😇Read the Quran, the last chapter at least ❤️Much Love & Peace
@erenmette
@erenmette 2 жыл бұрын
What are laws of physics dependent on?
@lightningbolt321
@lightningbolt321 2 жыл бұрын
He actually gets asked this in this discussion (maybe part 2 or 3 though): kzfaq.info/get/bejne/adepdNKW0JfSpIE.html
@scyldscefing3913
@scyldscefing3913 6 ай бұрын
Did I miss something? I heard assertion after assertion, but no real argument.
@RonvirBilkhu
@RonvirBilkhu 4 ай бұрын
The initial postulate cannot be proved. Things could depend on things as infititum why not? Infinite singularities exist in the universe we know that from Black Holes.
@killermoon635
@killermoon635 9 ай бұрын
So you need to make many speculations/assumptions to believe in God ??
@addtyu6176
@addtyu6176 Жыл бұрын
Why is there music in this? and why is there also pictures? DId the Salaf do this?
@simonw.1223
@simonw.1223 8 ай бұрын
probably as they dont belief everything what the book says
@charlievaughan1308
@charlievaughan1308 3 ай бұрын
""" I HAVE TO ADMIT AS A PHILOSOPHER YOU'D BE CRAZY TO BELIEVE ANYTHING OF ULTIMATE SIGNIFICANCE ON THE BASIS OF A PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMEMENT""". PETER VAN INWAGEN, EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME.
@Mobeenismail
@Mobeenismail 21 күн бұрын
Ibn e sina
@vishnuv2734
@vishnuv2734 Жыл бұрын
There's non-contigent and non-dependant things in universe! Simple!!
@Muslim-df6kr
@Muslim-df6kr 2 жыл бұрын
Please bring sheikh Uthman too. Please please
@areebr6888
@areebr6888 Жыл бұрын
Brother, im just wondering, doesn't the establishment of such arguments take away from the concept that that Islam is a clear message? Ie, you just need to look around you to see the design of Allah. Isn't it and shouldn't it already be obvious enough that there is a creator?
@quasarsaad12344
@quasarsaad12344 Жыл бұрын
Islam is clear because anyone who observes the universe knows that a creator exists as long as they are not brainwashed, indoctrinated or lying to themselves, these are there to give the benefit of the doubt.
@Fanboy1222
@Fanboy1222 Жыл бұрын
We are indoctrinated not to think like that in the west they wanted to get rid of god in the head of the people
@yeh2319
@yeh2319 Жыл бұрын
why are you so sure thats only one creator? Why are you thinking it must be an omnipotent creator? Maybe its an Alien? Maybe we live in a computer simulation? Maybe there isnt really a God like Allah? Why are you so sure it must be Allah from the Quran?
@adisinani
@adisinani 8 ай бұрын
people are just crazy
@adamdiallo7142
@adamdiallo7142 2 жыл бұрын
Our prophet Muhammad Sallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam did NOT bring the contingency arguments and majority of Muslims did not accept Islam because of this argument. All humans believe in Allah naturally including the so called atheists.
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
Even the Mushrikeen of Quraish believed in Allah. It is not the duty of the Daiee to propose theories to prove that God exists. That is NOT the way of the Sunnah
@lentinnurman7144
@lentinnurman7144 2 жыл бұрын
But this is a different time from the prophet and atheists still like to come up with this argument anyway in order to prove us theism, specifically Islam, wrong. I think Hijab is alright in making the contigency arguement, and he is still careful not to tread beyond ilm kalam. Had it still been the time of prophet, the signs that god existed would easily be brought to atheists through miracles.
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
@@lentinnurman7144 Dear brother, I highly recommend you watch this series by Sheikh Abul Feda’ bin Massoud, as it demonstrates the errors in Hijab’s methodology, may Allah guide us all kzfaq.info/sun/PLX3yMQTyU8CUoAB0nMnisDCWFOny-zFsC
@archivejr
@archivejr 2 жыл бұрын
@@lentinnurman7144 your existence is a miracle
@MuhammadAhmed-lc1op
@MuhammadAhmed-lc1op 2 жыл бұрын
@@lentinnurman7144 exactly, for example: the splitting of the moon
@mohdarshad-mn4cc
@mohdarshad-mn4cc 2 жыл бұрын
First
@ejigubest-ek3zc
@ejigubest-ek3zc 3 ай бұрын
Where is God exicest before the world?
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
Brothers, it is not the way of the prophets or the way of the Salaf to philosophize arguments for the existence of God. Using philosophy to prove God’s existence is exactly why the Salaf called Ahlul Kalaam deviants.
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
@Ahmed Thank you dear brother. May Allah bless you too
@wanderingtraveler71
@wanderingtraveler71 2 жыл бұрын
Glad to find like minded brothers that don’t like kalam. Share this link to expose the contingency arguments kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qb-SqtJ1zp-WeI0.html
@oayysz8909
@oayysz8909 2 жыл бұрын
You need to watch the entire video he done with Hijab he clearly states for the general masses he sticks to main Quranic arguments as for some individuals they require logical and reason arguments even Ibn taymiya mentions this hijab gave references so please don't entirely dismiss logical arguments
@Moath1277
@Moath1277 2 жыл бұрын
@@oayysz8909 brother, please watch this series and you will know that Hijab is not correct on this matter kzfaq.info/sun/PLX3yMQTyU8CUoAB0nMnisDCWFOny-zFsC
@TebogoMotlhale
@TebogoMotlhale 2 ай бұрын
why did you guys waste time trying to define the word "in-dependent" when the spelling of this word clearly FORCES us to negatively associate it with the word "dependent" because "in-dependent" is a word essentially and necessarily DERIVED from the word "dependent". You guys want to turn our heads "grey" with skewed definitions 🙄🙄🙄
@SushilBk-jr6gy
@SushilBk-jr6gy 7 ай бұрын
Show me your god in front of my eyes then I will silently believe yeah there is god 🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫🤫
@shahfaisal-yt4dr
@shahfaisal-yt4dr 5 ай бұрын
And that will be the day of judgment
@ShahzadAhmad-nb6si
@ShahzadAhmad-nb6si Ай бұрын
You know that eternal hellfire is for those who knowingly denies Truth. That means they knew the Truth.
@hmzzrg5045
@hmzzrg5045 2 жыл бұрын
The strongest argument for Allah comes from philosophy?? Really? Didn't know that was the Dawah the prophet ﷺ came with.
@oayysz8909
@oayysz8909 2 жыл бұрын
I think he should change the title to "the strongest logical argument" because clearly it is not the most powerful are mentioned in Qur'an
@zaraki942
@zaraki942 2 жыл бұрын
Why would he argue something they don’t even believe in
@hmzzrg5045
@hmzzrg5045 2 жыл бұрын
@@zaraki942 then why did the prophet ﷺ preach to the people with something they initially didn't believe in?
@zaraki942
@zaraki942 2 жыл бұрын
@@hmzzrg5045 You’re right but these atheists and agnostics nowadays are so anti religious, you tell them anything religious they get offended. All they care about is their beloved science, even logic they throw out the window when you try reasoning with them.
@oayysz8909
@oayysz8909 2 жыл бұрын
@@zaraki942 don't straw man I didn't say he should use the Qur'an to atheists to prove the Qur'an because the Qur'an sais so as that would be circular reasoning I said the strongest arguments are from the Qur'an and can be used regardless of source which doesn't have to be mentioned that's all. The title is a little misleading
@kotlianz
@kotlianz 2 жыл бұрын
Quran constantly calls for us to use our intellect and reasoning....Below I shared some verses there's many many more......please have a read and reflect And those who have no knowledge say: "Why does not Allah speak to us (face to face) or why does not a sign come to us?" So said the people before them words of similar import. Their hearts are alike, We have indeed made plain the signs for people who believe with certainty. 2:118 Indeed, in the alternation of the night and the day and [in] what Allah has created in the heavens and the earth are signs for a people who fear Allah 10:6 It is He who made for you the night to rest therein and the day, giving sight. Indeed in that are signs for a people who listen. 10:67 Say, "Observe what is in the heavens and earth." But of no avail will be signs or warners to a people who do not believe 10:101 And We gave them Our signs, but from them they were turning away. 15:81 Do they not see the birds controlled in the atmosphere of the sky? None holds them up except Allah. Indeed in that are signs for a people who believe. 16:79 [Allah] will say, "Thus did Our signs come to you, and you forgot them; and thus will you this Day be forgotten." 20:126 And of His signs is that He created for you from yourselves mates that you may find tranquillity in them; and He placed between you affection and mercy. Indeed in that are signs for a people who give thought. 30:21 And of His signs is the creation of the heavens and the earth and the diversity of your languages and your colors. Indeed in that are signs for those of knowledge. 30:22 And He shows you His signs. So which of the signs of Allah do you deny? 40:81 And of His signs is that you see the earth stilled, but when We send down upon it rain, it quivers and grows. Indeed, He who has given it life is the Giver of Life to the dead. Indeed, He is over all things competent. 41:39 And in the creation of yourselves and what He disperses of moving creatures are signs for people who are certain [in faith]. 45:4
@Ayesha______
@Ayesha______ Жыл бұрын
Jazak Allahu Khairan. May Allah increase you
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 Жыл бұрын
Everything that exists has a cause. God does not have a cause.
@razagamerofficial1859
@razagamerofficial1859 8 ай бұрын
Whatever began to exist has a cause
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 8 ай бұрын
@@razagamerofficial1859 The pain in my left foot began to exist. Therefore it had a cause. I wonder what it was.
@razagamerofficial1859
@razagamerofficial1859 8 ай бұрын
@@tedgrant2 average Richard Dawkins fan with dead brain cell Whatever began to exist has a cause not everything that exist has a cause if some being is eternal than we don't need cause to say something came into being without cause from absolute nothing is worse than magic in magic when magician pulls the rabbit out of hat at least you got the magician
@adempc
@adempc 8 ай бұрын
Monkey intellect thinks too highly of itself and its ability to understand. What arrogance to think you can reason out how it works, to think you can understand. All you can do is experience the light, be, and become what you are. But to believe that you understand, that is blasphemy.
@wq5dz
@wq5dz 3 ай бұрын
This is such a jump. I think Hijab is started to know it but not admit it just yet. He has too many followers. This is a weak argument. Very weak. Just because the universe couldn’t start by itself and is depending on something else doesn’t mean it has a to ‘God’. And theres no link. You can say you think it is, but you can’t know. You’re fooling yourself acting like it’s a fact. You can say you belief this is the case. But even then, there is very little reason to believe that is true at this modern day. Back in the day when we couldn’t explain anything fair play, but now we have answers for so much there’s little say ‘it must be God’.
@mittato2135
@mittato2135 2 жыл бұрын
Just because you've established that an independent thing exists doesn't say anything about the nature of the thing; it could be God or it could be mud for all you know
@Samreyna1
@Samreyna1 2 ай бұрын
So the strongest argument isn’t so strong
@StrangeAayanumariii
@StrangeAayanumariii 2 ай бұрын
And your Strong Deny Doesn't Make you Strong About what you Think isn't So Strong
@ShahzadAhmad-nb6si
@ShahzadAhmad-nb6si Ай бұрын
​@@StrangeAayanumariii😂
@hoolio5659
@hoolio5659 Ай бұрын
@@StrangeAayanumariiiwhat
@StrangeAayanumariii
@StrangeAayanumariii Ай бұрын
@@hoolio5659 so simple Strong Deny Never Make A Man Strong About What He Deny
@hoolio5659
@hoolio5659 Ай бұрын
@@StrangeAayanumariii what
@jaja9081
@jaja9081 2 жыл бұрын
that the earth is flat and that the sun set in murky water to wait under the throne of allah to rise again from the west. 🤣
@jaja9081
@jaja9081 3 ай бұрын
@@hahaloser3914 yeah... islam is satire... really sad satire
Challenging the Existence of God by Nouman Ali Khan
20:35
877-Why-Islam
Рет қаралды 356 М.
The Ultimate Answer to Proving the Quran is From God
18:57
OnePath Network
Рет қаралды 119 М.
Khó thế mà cũng làm được || How did the police do that? #shorts
01:00
你们会选择哪一辆呢#short #angel #clown
00:20
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
تجربة أغرب توصيلة شحن ضد القطع تماما
00:56
صدام العزي
Рет қаралды 32 МЛН
LOVE LETTER - POPPY PLAYTIME CHAPTER 3 | GH'S ANIMATION
00:15
GOD EXISTS - PROVE ME WRONG | MUSLIM CHALLENGES ATHEISTS IN UNIVERSITIES
10:53
The Review of Religions
Рет қаралды 35 М.
The Bosnian Grandfather Who Saved Islam In Europe
23:46
OnePath Network
Рет қаралды 53 М.
Shaykh casually DEBUNKS denier of Quran Preservation 🙄
6:16
OnePath Network
Рет қаралды 100 М.
Can This Man PROVE That God Exists? Piers Morgan vs Stephen Meyer
33:05
Piers Morgan Uncensored
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Does God Exist? Reply by Shaikh Ahmed Deedat
7:12
Bukhari Records
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Oxford Mathematician DESTROYS Atheism (15 Minute Brilliancy!)
16:24
Daily Dose Of Wisdom
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Atheist Unintentionally Proves The Accuracy Of The Quran! Muhammed Ali
19:06
The Muslim Lantern
Рет қаралды 208 М.
🚓КОПЫ явно такого НЕ ЖДАЛИ🫣#shorts
0:19
Поймал редкий кадр🤨
0:22
FERMACHI
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
DEFINITELY NOT HAPPENING ON MY WATCH! 😒
0:12
Laro Benz
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН