My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available! Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680 Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680 Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023 Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495 Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e

My favorite series

This is EPISODE 69. Nice. Which Supreme Court case should I cover for this series next?

man i love how this series explains these cases so simply these cases are very important in American history, and it takes a lot to unravel how these cases happened and how they affect us today

Mr. Beat, you should tackle the recent Supreme Court Case, in which a girl was suspended from her school, after making a Snapchat post criticizing it.

Glad to see this series back. I hope it shows up more often. Sticking with the Marshall court, I suggest Laidlaw v Organ. It's an obscure case about contract law, a subject the Supreme Court rarely talks about. I would suggest Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, which is a personal favorite of mine, but I'm afraid it might tank your channel.

While I agree that the infrastructure modifications didn't "take away" any private property that belonged to Barron in this case, it did still result in irreversible damage that could have been avoided if workers were more careful. He still deserved compensation, just not for the reason he argued in court.

In 1792, Aaron Burr was offered a seat on the New York Supreme Court, but declined the appointment.

I can't tell you how much I appreciate your videos Mr. Beat. I'm currently working towards being a social studies teacher, currently in my undergraduate degree. My attention span is rather short with books so listening and watching your videos helps me get a basic grasp of a topic and than go into a further deep dive

I'm absolutely obsessed with your Supreme Court Breifs series. Thank you for making them. Lawrence v. Texas, Lochner v. New York, and Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections would also make interesting videos.

Yes, my favorite series. Another underrated case was brought to life by the talented Mr. Beat. Also early congrats to 700k subs

You should do Lochner v. New York to talk about substantive due process

I've been hearing about some important case called Moore v. Harper going on dealing with states rights. Also this is my favorite series! You should do Atkins v. Virginia and US v. Lopez

as a Canadian, i must say, y'alls Supreme Court sure does do some interesting things

Please do West Coast Hotel Co. v Parrish The switch in time that saved nine is prime for this series! Thanks Mr. Beat!

A worf is the half klingon security officer for the USS Enterprise-D and later the space station Deep Space Nine. So the kids DO actually talk about worf pretty often these days 👉👉

I love your Supreme Court briefs, Mr. Beat! Also you are so close to 700,000 subscribers!

Have you ever thought about covering the Jones Act and how it affects American shipping?

Got a Politics exam in a few days, this is going to come in handy! Love your videos, keep it up Mr Beat 👌

This is genuinely amazing. What a problem for the supreme court to wrestle with.

My favorite series on this channel is back 🎉🎉🎉

Just took a test with this case on it earlier today

Other than "Mahanoy Area School District V. B.L.", I would recommend "Northern Securities Co v. United States. The first deals with student free speech on social media, and the other deals with the legality of monopolies in the US. Great video btw.

I'll take that dare! I've only got like two to go but I'm saving them

Underrated Supreme Court case.

Favorite, I want to see more. I’ve seen all your Supreme Court Briefs. This made me interested in legal stuff (even if it’s not what I studied in school)

Enjoyed the video. Always knew the proposition of law Barron stood for, but did not know the facts. Having read a good book on Lochner called Lochner rehabilitated, you should do Lochner next, and then some of the other cases from the Lochner era, like Pierce v Society of Sisters, Adkins, and Meyer v Nebraska. Also of interest would be doing the Coach Kennedy Case from last term, Kennedy v Bremerton School District in part because it's relevant to your students and teachers in terms of free speech and religion rights, and also because it declared the Lemon test abandoned.

Mr. Beast! Please give me money!

Mr. Beat are you still writing a book based on your Supreme Court Briefs series?

Great to see more Supreme Court briefs! Merch idea: ACTUAL Supreme Court briefs

I would love if you could do Lawrence v. Texas! Ever since Dobbs it's important to know our rights before we lose them. I'm a high school sr going going to college to study constitutional law, and your series has been an amazing and funny help

Crazy to think that John Marshall was still sitting on the Supreme Court, for reference Abe Lincoln was 26 years old during this time

This is an amazing series. Cait, wait for more.

I thought the 5th amendment argument was quite clever and I thought perhaps the Supreme Court would rule on whether it constituted a violation of that amendment. I did not expect at all that they'd say states don't have to respect your constitutional rights. That came outta left field.

I vaguely remember my middle school US History teacher talk about a similar or same event.

One of the best series on KZfaq has continued for another episode!

Look, I love all your videos, but I especially look forward to these briefs.

Since you're making longer videos these days you should make a video explaining every amendment. You could also mention the clauses in them and important Supreme Court Cases dealing with them. It could gain lots of views.(I know you don't rally take suggestions from regular subscribers, I'd be a paetron supporter but I'm a broke college student)

Hello Mr.Beat! love this series from Egypt!!

PBS once had a program called "Connections". A wonderful premise of taking a modern concept or tech, and how it's connected to some obscure ancient tech idea. This was a wonderful example. More of the unknown hidden court cases are needed. Great Channel! Thanks

feels illegal to be seconds early, *in a Mr beat vid*

The double meaning of "briefs" as a joke was used in the Black Adder TV series in the 1980s. Lol

Great review! I wonder if you might review the Olmstead decision (Olmstead v. LC), which decreed that people with disabilities ought to be able to live in their communities, rather than institutions, whenever appropriate.

“You can scrap the S cause I’ve never missed a beat”

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." The fact that we need the 14th amendment to get this through is crazy.

Yesssss another episode

Well done. Enjoyed the video. I'd like to see you cover Marbury v. Madison if you haven't already done so.

I love supreme court briefs you really need to do more of these including setting up a different youtube channel for this series.

MRBEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAASST!!!!

I appreciate you, thank you for making content.

Over a freaking wharf

"Supreme Court Briefs" are my favorites! Thank you for making another one. Hmmm....I wonder if I have seen all the other 68? Mr. Beat, could you do a video on how the Supreme Court decides which cases it will hear for an upcoming session? I am always curious how they decide which to hear and/or how they prioritize (?) them. Thank You.

For what the constitution and the United States as a whole was viewed as at the time, the supreme court's view makes total sense. because it was viewed as basically separate countries but united

I absolutely love this series! For your next case, talk about “Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson”, “Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer”, “Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States” or “Abington School District v. Schempp”.

Your accent is the best for story telling, unironically.

Why did it take you so long to post another case:((. This made my day

Love your shirt at the end, Rock Chalk Jayhawk!

I love this series!

You mentioned in another comment that these kinds of videos don´t perform that well, but if you ever stop uploading Supreme Court Briefs, I will take you to the highest court in the land! Keep the videos coming semi-regularly, or you will be hearing from my lawyers!

Congratulations on the 700k subscribers

SCB suggestions: Marcus v. Search Warrant and Quantity of Books v. Kansas. These are a pair of cases dealing with laws regarding obscene materials and, more specifically, established necessary procedures for seizures to not violate the First Amendment. The latter case was an important clarification of the former, despite coming only three years later. In addition to being important and interesting cases, the somewhat humorous names of the cases might help boost viewership on SCB videos. Another option for an important case with a humorous name would be the case One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania, which extended Fourth Amendment protections to civil cases as well as criminal ones.

John Barron sure has a lot in common with Anakin Skywalker. Both see sand as an issue because it gets everywhere

Great work as always. Wonder would you have a video planned about the Whiskey Rebellion or any other uprisings planned?

United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians is a rather important case that I think would be interesting to have covered.

HELL YEA THE SERIES IS BACK

Very interesting, I really enjoy your videos (especially enjoyed your oregon trail vid).

Hi, Mr. Beat! I love your content! For your next comparison video you should do Romania and Chad. These countries may have nothing to do with each other at first glance, but they do have the exact* same flag! Just a silly idea. *There are minute differences between their colors but you really have to squint to see them.

What happened to John Barron? Did he repurpose his wharf, did he build another wharf, did he move to another business altogether?

crazy they would say that, there had to be people who were alive who helped write the bill of rights to tell them otherwise. kills me how horrible the supreme court has been throughout history

Amazing video

My main takeaway from this episode was that Wonder Wharf from Bob's Burgers is not actually a wharf.

Great Video!

Being from Baltimore I can confirm no one cares if you're from Baltimore or what happens to you while you're in Baltimore

I doubt it would be too exciting, but a series showing the long and inconsistent history of "incorporation" would at least be instructive. Adamson v. California would be a good one to cover.

I think that Pennsylvania V. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan would make a great video! Important case (made it so that the Bill of Rights applied to civil law) plus the somewhat ridiculous name and story behind it could get a lot of views and be an interesting discussion.

Love your videos ^^ have to mention the DreamBrief: Bob Jones University v. United States. Maybe too specialized to hold general interest (dunno if I'd find compelling had I not been raised in/kicked from Bob x.x)~~

Oh, hey! I remember recommending this case. Great job! I'd love to hear what you have to say about Chisholm v. Georgia, which lead up to the 11th amendment

This stuff used to be my government homework but these vids are so good that I just watch them because I want to now

Thank you so much. It is a useful series

Can you make a court case call "Roper v Simmons"?

I'm glad we got an amendment to correct this mistake. It would make the bill of rights pretty toothless for this decision to stand. State government oppression is no better than federal oppression. Not sure I understood what private property was claimed to be taken though...

IS THAT...... MR BEAST?!?!!?!

That sand covering the screen was smooth starting at 0:52

GOAT series 🐐

I love you Mr. Breast

If we're explaining old fashioned terms, the owner of a "wharf" is known as a "wharfinger". Honest. It's in the Oxford English Dictionary (that's the one that spells "colour" with a "u").

Pretty sure there was a SCOTUS case that said the bill of rights applies to State and Local governments too pretty recently. Happened in the Roberts court too.

Fascinating seeing how early interpretation of the constitution really treated the US as a much more strongly federalized system than the more centralized end of the spectrum built in the 20th century

Maybe we should cover a recent Supreme Court case like West Virginia v EPA

Mr beat il love your videos

Wait how is an infrastructure project somehow taking away private property? Can individuals own harbors in the USA?

I once saw a great movie where the hero dramatically saved their lover's life, and they were ready to conquer a foe they'd faced for the entire movie, but "The End" suddenly appeared on the screen. We burned the place down, so I won't tell you what the movie was. But ohmygod, what is the rest of the story. I rarely believe anything I hear on the internet, but I mostly believe you, and I'd like to hear about it from you.

I need money señor bestia

sounds like this case would be a good plot for a Bobs Burgers episode

Yes my favorite series Another Supreme Court Vids

Mr beat, got a question. Do you think the SAFE T act will pass in Illinois or not? Live here in Chicago and honestly just wanted to know.

I'm not a US citizen, but nonetheless I find these videos very, very interesting. I wonder from which point in history the court started leaning more towards a specific political spectrum.

I really love Supreme Court Briefs

Do you scrap the s, because you never miss a beat?

Bro i thought you were mrbeast😭😭😭 you are still a cool youtuber tho