Does Might make Right? www.patreon.com/user?u=849925
Пікірлер: 491
@ProtagonistOfficial7 жыл бұрын
Just stopping by to say that I appreciate how much effort goes into these videos. From the research to the scripting, recording, and editing.
@randomcat7817 жыл бұрын
Hi
@keelanmaclear44926 жыл бұрын
yes
@victoriaandrews45476 жыл бұрын
Protagonist ii
@isrealistheauthor14896 жыл бұрын
Protagonist Survival of the fittest: The Prisoners Bible. By Chief Shuaib Y. Israel. Get the book! FACE THE Music!!
@isrealistheauthor14896 жыл бұрын
Kittens For some reason Survival of the fittest: The Prisoners Bible. Google The Book! Or Face The Music!!
@Deathnotefan975 жыл бұрын
I always thought of "Survival of the Fittest" as the opposite of what people usually mean Species don't survive because they're fit, they are fit because they survive The problem comes from the _definition_ of fitness
@altansirin58307 жыл бұрын
Survival of the ''Fit enough''
@henfinzim6 жыл бұрын
Altan Şirin Thats actually a better description.
@isrealistheauthor14896 жыл бұрын
Altan Şirin Survival of the fittest: The Prisoners Bible. By Chief Shuaib Y. Israel. Get the book! Or Face The Music!!
@virtxual67614 жыл бұрын
Allah akbar allah akbar la ilah illa allah
@enderpup92894 жыл бұрын
Altan Şirin Listen to the mandalorians and pre vizla: ONLY THE STRONGEST SHALL RULE!
@altansirin58304 жыл бұрын
@@enderpup9289 Strong will rule ofcourse but that doesn't mean the meek can't exist. No man rules alone. They need people to do their bidding. Those who are strong enough will continue to exist and procreate.
@MrAntieMatter7 жыл бұрын
I love this channel because the way he presents seems so relaxed and casual even with the silliness that's actually happening in the video.
@MrAntieMatter7 жыл бұрын
Had to repost this, because my other commented disappeared?
@MrAntieMatter7 жыл бұрын
I'll be sure to become a patron when I get my next paycheck, or at least if I remember.
@evenasgrimplass94117 жыл бұрын
noot noot
@virtxual67614 жыл бұрын
Allah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila Allah
@virtxual67614 жыл бұрын
Allah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila AllahAllah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila Allah
@FirefoxisredExplorerisblueGoog7 жыл бұрын
I want Sally to stop.
@thedarkmagicianofthecrew65747 жыл бұрын
Firefox is red, Explorer is blue. Google+ sucks and Chrome does too. No Sally must kill.
@bojan010107 жыл бұрын
I want to get off of Ms. Sally's wild ride.
@blank0s1627 жыл бұрын
Bojan T. Ms. Sally says: "The ride never ends"
@UnusuallyLargeCrab7 жыл бұрын
God damnit Sally.
@dr.catherineelizabethhalse18207 жыл бұрын
Go on Sally. I'm sure he deserves it.
@DrTomatoSpaghetti5 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the "moral foundations" theory, basically saying that humans tend to share a set of ethical values across cultures because they're evolutionary useful, and those foundations go on to inform political and ethical preferences/choices. From the little website the theory has, the moral foundations are: 1) Care/harm: This foundation is related to our long evolution as mammals with attachment systems and an ability to feel (and dislike) the pain of others. It underlies virtues of kindness, gentleness, and nurturance. 2) Fairness/cheating: This foundation is related to the evolutionary process of reciprocal altruism. It generates ideas of justice, rights, and autonomy. 3) Loyalty/betrayal: This foundation is related to our long history as tribal creatures able to form shifting coalitions. It underlies virtues of patriotism and self-sacrifice for the group. It is active anytime people feel that it's "one for all, and all for one." 4) Authority/subversion: This foundation was shaped by our long primate history of hierarchical social interactions. It underlies virtues of leadership and followership, including deference to legitimate authority and respect for traditions. 5) Sanctity/degradation: This foundation was shaped by the psychology of disgust and contamination. It underlies religious notions of striving to live in an elevated, less carnal, more noble way. It underlies the widespread idea that the body is a temple which can be desecrated by immoral activities and contaminants (an idea not unique to religious traditions).
@feizon2 жыл бұрын
Interesting
@hedgehog31802 жыл бұрын
I see a few huge issues with this. One it frames everything in dualistic terms which is actually a very uniquely western cultural idea, it is not universal and we've just gotten so used to it that we don't even realize it's an idea, in Chinese culture for example usually the focus is instead on harmonies, the idea that instead of having things oppose each other everything exists as part of a whole and when everything is in balance relative to each other you have a harmonious state and this is good. So the whole idea of the foundation kinda inherently fails because it's based on a western idea. Two the last three points just have little basis in historical facts, power structures have certainly shifted but throughout history the thing people have always primarily been loyal to is their friends and family above all. Until the invention of nationalism it was only in the upper class that you saw any kind of identification with some kind of overarching group and it was also only really the upper class where you actually saw any kind of real betrayal where people completely jumped to the other side, otherwise in war peasants usually just deserted to go back to their home because those were the people they cared about and they really did not give a shit about some far away king or nation. That's also why most armies were made up of mercenaries because no one wanted to risk their lives unless they were getting payed very well, and most of the time they became mercenaries because they were on the run. There's not any evidence of a "long primate history of hierarchical social interactions" the earliest evidence is stuff like burials where someone might have gotten a lot of stuff in their burial but it's simply impossible to know whether they were given a lot of stuff because they were the chieftain or just because they were really well respected and liked. After all the people who we tend to care the most about dying nowadays are not those who held any kind of power but celebrities and those who were really selfless and helped others a lot. Not only that but if you go further back it completely breaks down, one of the closest relatives to humans is Bonobos and they basically have no strict hierarchies. The point here isn't that humans are naturally anti-hierarchical the point is that the evidence doesn't clearly point towards anything. Some human relatives were hierarchical, some weren't, and some archeological evidence might point towards hierarchy but a lot also doesn't and in general it's just hard to interpret stuff that's many thousands years old. The idea that the body is a temple is not very widespread, the idea that it is special is but that is not the same as it being a temple that must be kept clean. Buddhism for example would contend that the body is a complete illusion and whether or not it's clean is an unreal idea that keeps you attached to the world and prevents you from reaching nirvana. And the idea of living in some sort of morally pure way is also not at all universal, a lot of religions don't place any kind of importance on that and instead place importance on great skill in battle or hunting or being able to communicate with spirits. A lot of these things are just common in organized religions, but you can perhaps see why an organized religion might say that a specific way of living that's out of the reach of common people is somehow better and benefits the group as a whole, it's kinda needed for you to even have a priest class at all.
@Eutrofication7 жыл бұрын
I feel almost tempted to go get a job at a sperm bank...
@ThisPlaceChannel7 жыл бұрын
It would certainly takes the masturbatory element out of masturbation
@sundude8007 жыл бұрын
Master-bator
@96unicorns6 жыл бұрын
I strongly recommend you do not :D
@brazni7 жыл бұрын
Bold, but quite essential to make a video on how science relates to philosophy, ethics and other fields of humanities. This is a dimension that I've noticed is lacking in a lot of great educational channels. It fosters unnecessary division between people with different interests and just generally makes people miss out on how intimately and useful different ways of looking at the same thing can be. Thanks for making great videos.
@EXHellfire7 жыл бұрын
"and replaced aaaall the DNA with his own"... jesus there goes my idea of donating sperm and not having to deal with children
@ancsuther3 жыл бұрын
ik it's 4 years but, he didn't replace all of it, and you shouldn't expect it to be replaced
@jamesgrey137 жыл бұрын
As a professional junk rubber, I have to say that your junk rubbing animation was spot on! :D
@asj34197 жыл бұрын
Good lord, pepole pay for strange things nowdays.
@ScienceAsylum7 жыл бұрын
Nailed it again, Jesse. Well done!
@ScienceAsylum7 жыл бұрын
Favorite Line: "The phrase only makes sense if you know what Darwinian fitness is... and, if you know what that is, you're never going to use the phrase, because it makes no goddamn sense."
@dylandreisbach19867 жыл бұрын
How old is the earth? "Like real long"
@hcn67087 жыл бұрын
;)
@bananafone14146 жыл бұрын
It's about 2000000000 years old or more
@immortalsun5 жыл бұрын
“Long” isn’t an age, lol.
@virtxual67614 жыл бұрын
Allah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila Allah
@KillerOfU337 жыл бұрын
Holy shit less than 20 seconds and already hit with the abortion question. I commend your balls and bluntness.
@kevinneuf81433 жыл бұрын
Can you say, "Survival of the adequate?" You just have to be good enough to be alive at any given moment.
@immanuelt6132 жыл бұрын
Survival of the fit enough
@kiro92917 жыл бұрын
this episode is brought to you by... Patreon! and deer poison.
@symbioticcoherence84357 жыл бұрын
youtube ought to be a better place because of you.
@emberisk7 жыл бұрын
Symbiotic Coherence it ought to happen
@Viscidsquare0405 жыл бұрын
Symbiotic Coherence “This place” ought to be a better place because of you
@virtxual67614 жыл бұрын
Allah Akbar Allah Akbar, La Illah ila Allah
@ThatArrow7 жыл бұрын
I found your channel and I'm loving the videos, a lot of ideas I've had myself and it's really interesting seeing someone talk about topics and questions the way you do. Thank you and I'll be watching more!
@katherinel69807 жыл бұрын
Helloooo I dolphinately missed you and your videos
@ThisPlaceChannel7 жыл бұрын
Dolphins!!! i.imgur.com/bByt9q1.gifv I'm pretty sure this is from Planet Earth 2 or something. Luminescent plankton
@katherinel69807 жыл бұрын
THat has to be where they got the idea for patronuses/patronusi (??)
@1MrShiny7 жыл бұрын
this gif goes great with the outro music.
@sk8rdman7 жыл бұрын
At first I thought that might have been a typo, but it seems you spelled it that way on porpoise.
@katherinel69807 жыл бұрын
I sea you caught my drift
@RedrunLoL7 жыл бұрын
it's always a nice surprise to see one of your videos on my feed
@_._enril_._7 жыл бұрын
Great video, yet again. I absolutely love the casual way that the content is presented and without undermining its deeper meaning.
@thomasbroadbent95187 жыл бұрын
I loved this, Your stuff is some of the most Interlectually Engaging videos on youtube. You appeal to me with your basic ideas and then develop them so skillfully. Thanks for all the content!
@MrAntieMatter7 жыл бұрын
Hell yes, love this channel! I probably like this channel because the way he presents seems so relaxed and casual even with the silliness that's actually happening in the video.
@MrAntieMatter7 жыл бұрын
You have a Patreon? When I get my next paycheck I'll be sure to become a patron, or at least if I remember!
@Wnivre7 жыл бұрын
And also because every character is Rayman.
@JimmyJthe4th7 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the hard work it takes to make these videos. They are always amazing and really make me think about things I otherwise wouldn't think this deeply about.
@SpektralJo7 жыл бұрын
Yeay, new video!
@SpektralJo7 жыл бұрын
An a very good one!
@sino_diogenes7 жыл бұрын
arent they all
@dexis94127 жыл бұрын
Congrats on reaching 100k subs. It's good to see that you are getting the recognition that you deserve
@AphidKirby7 жыл бұрын
This is such good content!!! It reminds me of the incredible potential internet media such as youtube has to illustrate and spread ideas.This vid is prime example of this in its highest capacity.
@WheatleyOS6 жыл бұрын
I know something you could say that is "bad" but doesn't affect anyone or anything we know.. The death of the universe >an irrational fear
@Quasarbooster4 жыл бұрын
WheatleyOS I know you're probably joking but I don't see anything inherently "bad" about the end of the universe.
@bekzadbeknasirakhunov77877 жыл бұрын
It's going to be the next Kutzegast
@bobbobson20617 жыл бұрын
Kurzgesagt
@bekzadbeknasirakhunov77877 жыл бұрын
Bob Bobson Yeah that's what I meant ))
@ihebammar65684 жыл бұрын
Gastrukast
@sansoooxygen7 жыл бұрын
hi, i love how you explain the is-ought difference. Very easy to understand and informative. Great job!!!
@chrisli73587 жыл бұрын
Hey man! I absolutely love your videos and I have shared your videos with everyone every time you release one. Your content is amazing and I sincerely hope that you grow as a channel.
@SinisterSi7181137 жыл бұрын
"If a is true, then a is true. Thus, a is true."
@jasscat76455 жыл бұрын
If a is false, then a is false. Thus, a is false.
@kyesol3 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a student trying to hit that 2,000 word mark on an essay.
@bryanoberholtzer7 жыл бұрын
You're videos always challenge my view on sciences. Great job on this one!
@Travisharger5 жыл бұрын
Really well done brother. Please don’t stop making videos, I watched your whole playlist today.
@SkyreeXScalabar3 жыл бұрын
Original quote was "Survival of the Most Adaptable to Change"
@MrPinknumber7 жыл бұрын
I love those comments next to your sources, it makes me want to go check them. Well done :)
@wex4sex7 жыл бұрын
Loved your humor with airplane sound and I loved your video.
@OrchidAlloy7 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on 100,000 subs!
@mr.99077 жыл бұрын
Great science channel, like how simply you explain things.
@saifsterosman4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic topic and presentation. May I know what the end credits music is?
@Woodyhlr7 жыл бұрын
The animations in these videos are freaking awesome
@maximusthedude83057 жыл бұрын
"Time's, like, real long" One of the better quotes out there on the internet.
@BabyShenanigans7 жыл бұрын
Loved the hitting with the stick part.
@SMEGMA420693 жыл бұрын
This was a brilliant way to present these ideas, well done
@aaronanderson14847 жыл бұрын
you have some of the most well made videos on this website imo... keep these up man
@chloewebster56697 жыл бұрын
Makes you think so much I love it
@Ruby_V_7 жыл бұрын
your references made me happy. . . your everything makes me happy.
@thejoojoo99995 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. But what do you think about pragmatism based on nature ? By that I mean that one considers “moral” what is the likeliest to make the most people happy, and since we are in a large part programmed by nature and evolution to be happy for certain things, then we are accepting as moral (generally) what we are programmed to do ?
@michaelabdoofficial3 жыл бұрын
Dang. Gonna have to watch this one a few times
@Fatortu7 жыл бұрын
So much food for the mind ! I'm going to think about that my whole week-end.
@Ellie_fi7 жыл бұрын
you deserve way more subs! thanks for the video!!!
@horae25837 жыл бұрын
it's nice to see another video from you! :)
@Gatzlocke7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video! I've had this opinion for a while and it's always hard to express through words.
@matthewb38647 жыл бұрын
This is a fantastic idea that I have considered myself. The way that I think about it is by considering the philosophical question about mathematics 'are numbers a fundamental quality of the universe around us or are they a concept created by the human intellect to more easily understand the universe around us?' and then ask that same question about ethics. 'are good and evil fundamental qualities of the universe around us or are they a concept created by the human intellect to more easily understand the universe around us?'
@mikew64846 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making such great thought provoking videos.
@frankytoad127 жыл бұрын
"Frank has 2 peaches".. looking down at my peach cobbler I am genuinely disturbed...
@mynamejake7 жыл бұрын
IM SO HAPPY YOU MADE ANOTHER VIDEO!!!!!!!
@sagsolyukariasagi7 жыл бұрын
Could you give me the source for the empathy study pls?
@Vealdebate7 жыл бұрын
Why are more people not this well thought out. Excellent video.
@hoangnhan0117 жыл бұрын
waited sooooo long for this
@onixz1007 жыл бұрын
It's worth noting, though, that many professional philosophers (those doing philosophical research today in meta-ethics) think that moral truths are objective (i.e., their truth values do not vary according to our attitudes about them)-a view called "moral realism"-and that there are first-order normative ethical theories (e.g., Kantian deontology) that can generate particular "oughts" without reference to, or being conditional upon, particular desires or any other "empirical determining ground." Robust moral realists would dispute the claim that "goodness" and "badness" are moral properties that only subsist in minds. They would say that "goodness" and "badness" (and perhaps other moral properties) actually exist in the world just like any other objective properties do, perhaps because they are reducible to certain natural properties. There are a handful of theories that explain the "reduction relation" that obtains between moral properties and natural properties. (For example, analytic reductionism says that moral properties are identical to some natural properties; synthetic reductionism says that moral properties stand in some other relation to natural properties: e.g., that moral properties supervene on natural ones, etc.) There are a handful of theoretical virtues to these kinds of views, like how they explain our moral epistemology (i.e., how we come to know moral facts). Of course, there are also some cons. These pros and cons are what constitute the contemporary debate in metaethics among professional philosophers. That said, not all moral realists are robust realists. Yet, that doesn't threaten the objectivity of morality for them. And again, on the first-order level, it's a good exercise to think about how we can generate unconditional/categorical oughts (cf. Kantian deontology).
@ThisPlaceChannel7 жыл бұрын
Ah. Stay tuned for "Part 2" This was a 30 minute video. All my "beta testers" agreed it was disorganized and confusing so I’ve been splitting it up. But the ideas you talk about were the inspiration for the video
@stephenparker2347 жыл бұрын
Veritas most would argue that deontological arguments just like kantian ethics are flawed in the sense that making something a categorical imperative takes consequential reasoning (usually utilising emotion-good vs bad within the mind) and therefor even these arguments are not exempt from good vs bad thinking.
@JimmyJthe4th7 жыл бұрын
+
@AuroCords7 жыл бұрын
I am definitely a robust moral realist, I think morality is inherent to intelligent life, and that it's real even beyond what we know as intelligent life.
@beegum17 жыл бұрын
I've seen many times, you just state a definition for term. Typically, they just say something like, "it's hard to argue that the killing of the rabbit isn't doing evil to the rabbit." What, then, is a reasonable way to assess our wants versus the needs of another? And this is where from you get derivatives of thought that expand the definitions of things like sentience to include all manner of animals, often without considering them in relation to our own sentience, but as an absolute. Thus, with regards to the first question, it does not seem that in our civilization the paucity of resources with any linkage to a developed world country has anything to do with abortion, indeed, one may obtain additional resources simply by placing the child for adoption. Thus, we are lead to a place where morality of abortion is nigh absolute in terms of doing evil to the child, and the validity of doing it for the civilization seems unlikely as well. Although some philosophers I've seen point out some remote cases, however, they do not center the need for abortion on these unlikely circumstances. I think this is what you're asking? Indeed, in most of the developed world the rights of the child are acknowledged after 12 weeks, or several weeks later, and the woman is then expected to take responsibility for it. One could argue they were more or less obligated to "take care of it" before that point. Although, it seems if one really wants a work around it is sometimes available. Nonetheless, in the design of the system, this is relevant. I suspect you're form the US, in the US the SCOTUS decided that the child's rights were undetermined and the woman was given the right to privacy. A very odd finding, lol, to make killing a human something the state cannot be concerned with, and I fairly certain it's an anomaly in law, not just US law, but abortion law internationally. That makes it trickier in the US to assert the rights of the child or the medical good of the abortion itself. Very late term abortions aren't safer for the female and seem to result in negative life outcomes for the woman as well. Indeed, from a statistical standpoint women are better if they give live birth, in general, and women with a deceased fetus recover more quickly if they give birth and grieve rather than have it ripped up, although, I believe, inducing labor is fine. The point is that the grieving process seems to work better if birth is given. SO, what you have even after abortions in many countries where they are legal is that the socialized medical system packages the abortion around these types of care which improve outcomes, often, these include what in the US is considered obstacle, but just health care, in the rest of the world. Certainly, that first baby takes a toll on the body, and there is some normally quite minor risk to health, in the developed world. Also, there is certainly a social aspect... regardless of the choice you make. I don't mean to be misconstrued, as is often done by pro-choice persons... Indeed, pro-life persons often do counseling in the US for post abortive women who seek such service, apparently much often than noted by PP, perhaps for plausible deniability reasons. It seems a bit serious, but perhaps it's amusing to note that religious beliefs are blamed for the pain caused to women by having their unborn child killed. Rather perverse thing. We see a similar behaviour in the media, wherein they do not like to discuss abortion to remind people of what is, lest they become devasted unnecessarily, especially because of widespread lies about a mass of cells or some such nonsense not present in the reality of looking it up online, perhaps the most notable reason, other than unity fighting among religions... it is quite easy to research abortion on line, and look at the product, which appears to be dead human beings, and, indeed it is. And this is why the decision of the SCOTUS using pragmatic reasoning to yield abortion to the feminists has not aged well.
@PyroMancer2k7 жыл бұрын
"Survival of Fittest" is a term coined by people who were trying to put a spin on why some people end up rich while others end up poor. It was never used in Darwin's Book on Evolution. It's just become associated with it due to political spin and trying to reframe it with "biological fitness" means is gonna fail. Funny thing is Darwin actually says in his book that it's not the Fittest that Survive, but rather those most responsive to change. Another words being more adaptable is better than being "fittest" which usually refers to the best as in fastest, strongest, and etc. And it's this common misconception and reference to "Survival of Fittest" which leads people to faulty conclusions and surprising results in studies. Because the implications of the phase is usually that it's best to be the best in the most selfish way looking out only for yourself. Which turns out no to be true as those with experience in game theory can tell you.
@d0tz_7 жыл бұрын
interesting how this video kinda links to the minute physics video that came out 2 hr prior about how models we use to look at the world isn't nesssarily reality
@Praxiszooms5 жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. I - as a homosexual often get this viewpoint from other people that humans have to do something and that it is against ome kind of "natural order"...but I think - with making your point clear it is easier for them to accept, that it is their system of feeling or wanting something "creates" their "order" something ought to be. V€ry nice illustrations - very cute. Also the voice over again ;).
@virusladd6 жыл бұрын
Outro-music taste is yes
@warpedreality79887 жыл бұрын
Good video, keep it up Jesse.
@williambussiere8505 жыл бұрын
Feels like I'm watching jazz
@Xpegasu5 жыл бұрын
That sperm bank joke caught me off guard lmao
@purpurwax9303Ай бұрын
8:22 "The is-ought distinction can draw attention to the idea that goodness and badness, and better and worse don't exist outside our minds" :D
@Metyhel7 жыл бұрын
I fucking knew that Nietzsche was involved in this video, love ya for it.
@Crick19527 жыл бұрын
One could call this A MODEST PROPOSAL...
@verschlusssache62833 жыл бұрын
4:07 that's genius and a very well-placed joke.
@ANTIMONcom3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for another great video 😀
@preuenthegreat5187 жыл бұрын
What is the outro music?
@ThisPlaceChannel7 жыл бұрын
It's a fiddle version of this song kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l6mKe7Rm3czdn6M.html from here soundcloud.com/peakfiddler/2013-fiddle-tune-melody
@00Linares007 жыл бұрын
This might be my favorite channel
@ViableJourneys7 жыл бұрын
I think my brain broke
@Nom24215 жыл бұрын
I feel like we are dismissing the idea of survival of the fittest by talking in similar terms to how the days of the week are not real outside of human consciousness. Not that it is not true, but I do not feel like it pushes the needle anywhere. No idea is real outside of human consciousness, but I do not see how that challenges an idea's merit when that applies to everything we think about. Personally, I feel that we can not live the survival of the fittest way because we are morally obligated to see human life as valuable after we are born in most cultures.
@subice21587 жыл бұрын
Your videos are so interesting!
@jackbowis66507 жыл бұрын
OHMYGOD THIS IS THE HAPPIEST I'VE BEEN IN 10 DAYS!
@vadimuha3 жыл бұрын
4:08 Thanks for an idea
@BuddyDixon6 жыл бұрын
6:41 Just a minor nitpick, but the chloride ion should be larger than the sodium ion because it has more repulsive forces between electrons, whereas the sodium ion has more attractive forces between the nucleus and electrons
@ediskey6 жыл бұрын
"Survival of the good enough!"
@francescakray2333 жыл бұрын
Thank You .....
@philiphockenbury65634 жыл бұрын
Survival of the adequate.
@ThePwnedProduction7 жыл бұрын
I think of it as "survival of the fittest" as in which ones fit into the eviroment better survivals
@tariqtariqtariq883 жыл бұрын
Thats 11 minutes i can never get back
@ThePedrooo236 жыл бұрын
ending music name?
@fixamo7687 жыл бұрын
"Time's like, real long"
@Lezenda7 жыл бұрын
Is it me or videos are becoming more and more deep? I like it, and that is my truth)
@NikiHerl7 жыл бұрын
This Place has the best animations. They are terrific. Really, they're absolutely great.
@patromo5 жыл бұрын
I find is that using a literal definition of fitness, is the most effective when discussing evolution. Eg. the quality of an object's relationship to other objects or surroundings. Ie. How well does this organism FIT into its surroundings, including environment and other organisms.
@erhagman7 жыл бұрын
I missed your videos!!!!
@Theo_Caro5 жыл бұрын
I love your path of argument in this, steadily making stronger and stronger claims. First you reject Social Darwinism. Second you reject Moral Naturalism. And then third, you reject moral realism, and finally settle into a sort of Moral Subjectivism. I just found your channel, and I'm really loving what I see. Keep up the great work!
@highcc7 жыл бұрын
references, i luv when ppl do it. Luv u
@ThisPlaceChannel7 жыл бұрын
♥
@cauchemar4797 жыл бұрын
Welcome back!
@zenithquasar96235 жыл бұрын
Love your work!
@96unicorns6 жыл бұрын
Love your channel!
@AstroLizard7 жыл бұрын
Fantastically made.
@amcname4943 жыл бұрын
"Because it makes no god damn sense" and "and replaced all the DNA with his own." More great lines from yet another great This Place on yet another difficult subject.
@VENTRIX4207 жыл бұрын
the Moment If you think IT IS Handling from Ark sotf