If I remember correct every time he finished at Ferrari it was top 4, but Nigel had a tremendous number of car failures at Ferrari. He probably thought the lawn mower was the vehicle to be in one of the many F1 champions to be let down by Ferrari.

Hill above prost at anything is a joke.

THIS is far closer to a real top 10. Brits just can't stop hyping their own kind

Prost is massively underrated by both F1 fans & pundits alike.

@@stavroshadjiyiannis6283 Prost is the GOAT. Under current points system rules he would have 7 WC titles. British F1 media is so embarrassingly biased.

Rosberg? Lol

Damon actually hit Michael mate, how can you hit another driver if your in front of them, Damon was at fault for that incident Keep Fighting Michael 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🐐🐐🐐

Cheating German.

🤣

#1 could also bei Goatifi.

On the contrary, Piquet is constantly under-ranked, especially by Brits, who are to be admired for their unconditional love for Nigel Mansell. The guy was a disaster at Lotus, mediocre at Ferrari and pathetic at McLaren. He was indeed a good driver at Williams but he lost to Piquet as his teammate and could only win a championship when it was absolutely impossible to lose it (due to the huge equipment advantage he had). There is no way he should be higher in this list than Piquet, who - let's not forget - BEAT him, let alone be the 1st.

And scored 0 points compared to his younger and less experienced teammate with 7.

....and won .... errrrr.... in fact ... finished... errrr... His best result in a Williams - classified 13th.

I noticed that too, who is mark schumacher? FFS say michael.

@@judgedeath3 they sound different enough that it should be clear when you speak it.

Thought he said Mike 🤷‍♂

Completely agree! This should have been more of a rundown of sorts rather than a ranking! Cheers!

@@mbbb9244 that seems like a very cynical way to look at a persons opportunity to achieve his dream under advers circumstances. I do agree that at that time, the drivers were less valued, because of the teams dominance, but that should not deminish their achievement! Thanks for reading, cheers!

@@harbushy Hill was qualifying 1.5s slower than his team mate Senna when Senna joined. It just showed how much untapped potential was in the car that Hill was unable to use. Hill should have lost his seat and they could have got Hakkinen. Williams never recovered and they wasted years on Hill that should have gone to a driver with more long term potential,. A blind monkey could have won drivers WC in the williams in those days. I was watching.

@@mbbb9244 fair enough! Difficult to say for certain. Perhaps specific moments in history would happen no matter what driver would drive that infamous Williams, and Hakkinen could have got injured if he was in Sennas or Hills place. You can say this is just a long winded excercise in speculation! Thanks for reading!

@@harbushy Being in Europe, the only way to watch the F1 on Sunday afternoons was via the BBC, and the Hill "reverence" shown by the BBC in those days got pretty annoying to a non-English (the country) person, when considering his team mate was Prost who completely dominated him in '93. (13 poles vs 2). Then Senna really showed up how much more potential was in the car, by out-qualifiying Hill by over a second for the first 3 straight races of the '94 season. Senna got more pole positions in the first 3 races of '94 than Hill did the entire previous season! Then looking at wins, Hill got the same number of wins over '95 & '96 that Villeneuve got over '96 & '97. Nope, if they're going to put Villeneuve down in 7th, they need Hill down near there too! Anyway, those were great racing days and fun to reminicse! Thanks.

What did Bernie manipulate , that masseur story 🤣

Fantasy. 🎉

Carlos is better than Patrese and Ralf, much better

You're talking about Nico. The list has his father

@@Limegreenedragon yep. im talking about nico.

Both Rosbergs are a running joke. Talking crap all the time.

Well, yes he certainly is (due largely to fanaticism and myth with a dose of ignoring the hard facts). That said this is just a Williams list but even so he should be a little higher considering everything.

*De Angelis

Well, it is true that the was a unique character aka not many liked him.

And the he went to Indy and won in his 1st season and was a whisker away from winning the 500 on debut! Mansell was as good as his record indicates…hot headed yes but that’s part of his character. Change that and you change his driving style completely. Coming back in 94 and putting it on Pole in Adelaide at 41 and pressuring Schumacher into crashing was seriously impressive.

@@reds005, impressive would have been coming back in 1941 at age 94.

Theres a funny old Top Gear vid of him coming in last in a sports car race after ramming into the back of Tiff Needel and then angrily confronting and blaming Needel for his own poor driving. Guy seems like a twat.

Soy, piercings and tattoos.

The biggest mistake Frank Williams and Patrick Head did was letting Adrian Newey go even though he wanted to stay. He asked for a stake of the team but they weren't willing to give it to him. Williams could have won multiple championships in the 2000's with the power of the BMW engine and Newey's designed cars. Just imagine how different the history of Formula 1 could have been if Williams and Head made Newey co-owner of the team.

@@Montas19 they didn't and now they're reputation has gone down the toilet 😆

@@Montas19 With Adrian Newey, Montoya and Button World Champions