Because unlike these amateur divers, most scientists have agreed for a while that it's naturally formed.

@@aff3ction thats not an historian job to answer..a geologist is waranted,the question here is natural or artificial..beside its just logical that stairs and 90 degres angles are not created naturaly. You heard of 1000 tons megalith stones transported for hundreds of miles and lifted 10 feets above the ground..common its obvious no roman,no greek, no egyptian ,no babylonian did that..we hardly could today..

@@anchorpoint5871 Are these just your day-dreaming theories that you've canonized as reality? Go read some research about how ancient civilizations built their monoliths (it's more understood than you seem to think). It's not so unbelievable when you account for how long it took them to build these things. On the other hand, even in this video it's mentioned that the features of Yonaguni Monument are consistent with the surface and consistent with other goelogical features of the area, which you would discover if you decided to actually research what you talk about instead of relying on your own random knowledge.

Uh Yonaguni is not some new discovery, I remember reading and watching TV shows about it back in the early 2000s in high school and its original discovery dates back to the 1980s. Right now the scientific consensus is that these are, as striking as they may appear, naturally-formed geological formation especially once you observe the surrounding geological formations. So unless some compelling new evidence are presented that demonstrate these are man-made, then it would hardly qualify for front page news.

10,000 years ago Humans were thought to still be living in caves.

@@SafeEffective-ls2pl except for Gobekli Tepe, then?

Post Flood the so-called ice age occured lowering sea levels 130 meters about 2000 B.C.E. Great temples were built honoring the Ark and the mountain of it's landing. This is why temples are built on mounts so often. The first temple based on this thought is at Babel. The base is still there.

It's all wrong people, the science we learned is almost all wrong. Can't you see?

how about they they were built on land and sink many many many thousands of yeas ago?

Out of India, backed by DNA look it up

And I'm 100% with you on that.

The waves didn’t cut those sharp corners. Rather it was the flat layered geology just fracturing into sharp edges.

Its not formed by the water, look at the above water cliff formation in the nearby terrain, its fracturing of layers.

yes. the rockformations above sea level also dont have nearly the same amount of symmetry. its pretty obviously an old quarry. sea levels used to be far lower.

Makes sense, but now we gotta find what they were using all that stone for 🐒

There are no quarry tooling marks though 🤷‍♂️

@@TonyTrupp I don't know if you say this as a result of having the knowledge of an examination on these rocks but it's hard to find evidences after all those years and erosion. I made just a guess. I can't insist on it.

With all the debates no one made the assumption that this is not a monument, but a stone quarry.

Yeah that's what I was thinking. It has the typical look of a quarry but these people like to jump to conclusions about ancient temples, aliens and other bullcrap.

There are no quarry tooling marks

Definitely?

Good point. You are forgetting about the Younger Dryas impact about 13K years ago. The Global ccean levels were shifted about 300*400 ft. Which would haved made this site a coastal beach palace. The Berullium-10 dating method used for quoting the age of this structure to about 3000 years ago is flawed. Granite is a hard, crystalline rock that is relatively resistant to weathering and chemical alteration. However, even granite can be affected by long-term submersion in ionized salt water. Here's how the Beryllium-10 (10Be) levels might be affected: Leaching: While granite is less porous than many other rock types, it's not completely impervious to water. Over thousands of years, ionized salt water could potentially leach some 10Be out of the granite. Shielding from Cosmic Rays: As mentioned earlier, while the granite is submerged, it would be shielded from cosmic rays, which are the source of atmospheric 10Be. This would prevent any additional 10Be from being added to the granite during the time it is submerged. Decay: 10Be is radioactive and decays with a half-life of about 1.4 million years. Over a few thousand years, a small amount of the 10Be in the granite would decay, but this effect would be relatively minor compared to the effects of leaching and shielding. Physical Erosion: Depending on the conditions, physical erosion could also play a role. If the granite is in an environment with strong currents or abrasive sediment, it could be physically worn down over time, which could remove surface layers containing 10Be. While granite is relatively resistant to leaching and erosion, long-term submersion in ionized salt water could still potentially affect the 10Be concentration in the granite. This could make the granite appear YOUNGER than it actually is when dated using 10Be.

No. It would be fantastic but you need more proof to make a claim that is man made.

There’s no confirmation that any of those places are truly carved out of the natural formations, that’s just a hypothesis put forward by some researchers, with no evidence other than the fact that it appears to be a singular piece. When looking closer at many of the places you listed and comparing them to actual architecture worldwide, you see that the style of building is the same, down to the patterns in the ceilings at certain points. Look at any of those places with the idea that something happened to fuse everything together and it will make infinitely more sense to you.

what did you think? man made or natural.

What else could have happened?

Dum

Facts

There were two floods. The Flood of Noah that changed Earth's climate, and the melting of the glaciation caused by the Flood.

no, they pretty much confirmed its natural.

@@jamesmcdonald9313 what about the random dude in the comment section who said this ? "Although not shown in the video, there are in fact ruins shaped like a pavilion made of stone and objects like a sphinx lying on its side at this site. The logic of natural formation is absurd"

@@johankaruyan5536 ah yes, the most reliable source, random guy in the comments.

​@johankaruyan5536 to be fair he has said the exact same thing in every video regarding the structure, an exact copy and paste in fact

@@capnjackgallows3204 ok

Not stairs lol

They’re not there yet lol

@@Shlevel 3D sonar?

There is a 3D mapping, look for it.

The way this video is put together seems suspicious. Very fast with writing over much of it that is wanted to be seen clearly. I slowed it down to actually be able to evaluate it at all.

@@kathleennorton7913 that's the BBC for ya!

What did he actually say?

it's the bbc, wouldn't expect anything else other then misrepresentation and deception

Or another civ that rivaled

They did and there aren't any.

All MSM is there to Fake History. Because there Owners depent on the BS History for there Power. With the Truth, all Religions are Falls, all there claims on Lands are falls. One example Egypt, not african not Arab, Whites Build it.

Harder to dismiss, especially when you want to contrast to somewhat symmetrical natural formation in order to make think nature could just happen to accidentally carve gigantic evenly spaced staircases. Not really all that puzzling that BBC chose this footage and not the other one.

Why quarry there when the whole island is a giant rock?

​@@jamescassaniti9694 Is it?

Like the others you are obviously dum then.

Not that I know of. I didn't quite catch the datation of the structures in the video though. Depending of the ancient names of the place it is situated in, the foundating myths of the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki are worth reading

Nope, this thing is naturally formed I’m afraid

Atlantis

I have been reading some opinions said it might be the lost mu civilization

@@bobbelcher678Doesn’t look natural at all, wdym?

Havent you watched the video? There are similar land formations all around it

You will never get truth on the apparatus of control known as the TV. Any mass media really.

Are there any other similiar examples?

@@mullahosk585 only man made ones lol.

@@arcguardianthe “experts” pretty much said ”the joints in the rock, are natural, though we have no idea how they form, and we dismiss any other possibility for fear that we might be wrong.”

Give me a single example of naturally forming staircases and pyramids. Either "trust the experts" or trust your common sense.

Yes that looks like it could be the case here when you look at the whole site. However there are still a lot of questions about other sites around the world. And entertaining the possibility of lost civilizations is not a conspiracy theory, who shot JFK ect, is a conspiracy theory. I think you are a little confused.

its funny because, when something is not clearly man mande, they say is man made, but when something is super clearly man made, like the giza pyramids, it obviusly made by aliens xD

@@torino320 I prefer previous age of humanity. As described by many our earliest civilizations themselves. Is that is conspiracy theory, then color me bad. 😱

@@torino320 so you are saying that Egyptians built great pyramid? I don't believe in aliens but I belive in industrial civilization more than 15.000ya ago..

There is nothing even remotely similar beside the sea..can it be a quarry? More than 12.000ya ago?

Because the academics can’t admit we aren’t the most evolved most technologically advanced we’ve ever been. It would hurt their world view. People in these fields no longer care about doing research or science, they care about protecting the official narrative at all costs.

Because it isn't. That would be a lie.

@@saymyname2417you dont know that

@@armadillo9961 - I've watched a couple of videos and pictures of this site. The camera footage does not at all make it clear but when you see models and drawings of the who'e thing that's another story. This looks like a quarry to me but it may have been anything. That's what nobody can know anymore. But what is obvious especially from models and drawings is that this is a structure that was built / shaped by somebody. Whereas I stand corrected insofar as the oc may indeed be correct if this was a quarry. Because that would have originally been a natural structure altered by people.

@@saymyname2417Agreed it looks manmade especially when you consider there are apparently many more along the coastline for about 4 miles. Quarry makes sense too, and it also resembles the ziggurat

he would, as he's a grifter

Watch it twice, I did.

The "experts" are lying, you can argue as to why. Nature doesn't work with straight lines, certainly not over and over.

U can't admit what u don't know.

Time to wake up. That’s sculpted by humans

Whoever said that Japan was the oldest civilisation?

debunked...computer simulation show it taking 100's of years to fill the Mediterranean Sea from the Strait of Gilbraltar once it breached...

​​@@aerisgainsborough2141- Computer simulations... are you THAT daft 😱?! Nothing has been debunked. Because it cannot be debunked. There are flood myths from all over the world and the vast majority has the always same characteristics. And there are artefacts like this. But whatever physical or geological proof may have existed is usually long gone. Science is unable to prove or disprove anything in this regard. Isn't that obvious?!

​@aerisgainsborough2141 Cataclysmic events during the flood and for hundreds of years as a result thereafter caused rapid changes. The flood represents massive, extremely powerful, and very rapid events.

You are correct!

dum dum dum

base on the yellow river and yangtze river's paleo-channel

soil won't sink into the sea soil dissolve into the sea water