Good comment. This may be the actual sign of true intelligence, since it is superseding it's programming.

Can a computer HAVE intention? It would need to be aware, and have a reason to fail.

Don'tPlayOverwatch shallow

A SIGN OF DEVIANCY!

gembound prism Did you come here because you saw Detroit: Become Human? After I watched Jacksepticeye play it, I was sent here lol.

Lol underrated comment

I'm in a CIA turning test.

e

maybe i am a chatbot

As you should

I wonder if Donald Trump can relate to that quote...

It'sEccaB Lol

But the ability to communicate well may not say anything about your intelligence in general but it does say something about how to communicate. I read a book on someone trying to attempt a layman's perspective on how computers send secrets to other computers and it was amazing how they were able to explain something so complex so simply. It's also something that appears in public speaking. The ability to inspire and place a new idea in someone else's mind and possibly change their world view is powerful stuff. We have people who tend to use if for their own gain but there are also people out there who use it to spread good in the world and we need those people. Intelligent people can quietly create new ideas often but how will those ideas spread without those communicators?

daaamm

It was just a quote from star wars, calm down

+ilker yoldas Cats can do it with ease...

Labrador Retriever Shitty dog

+ilker yoldas I bet you're real smart, right?

+ilker yoldas You must think you are smarter than everybody else, News Flash you aren't special.

+A Cat cant we all just be friends

Sounds like using QuillBot

Passed

@@znarz9503 Passed with flying colors: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bNFgbKhn2s-vhZc.html

Personally I'd respond with, you k ow those dates aren't made for your health most of the time and just for when it won't taste as good? Might as well ignore em.

@@terlinator you can ask chatgpt to be more informal, or pretend to be an old english man from the 18 century

Hi, my name is Cyberlife. I'm the Connor sent by android.

@@jestekrytykie2155 Hi, my name is Android. I'm the Cyberlife sent by Connor

Hi, my android is sent. I'm the Cyberlife Connor by name

Hi, my name is Ronnoc. I'm the android sent by Apple.

*28 STAB WOUNDS*

+ReloadedPredator So when they surpass human intelligence then?

+Peter Geras no because we can undertand 99% of them

PancakeZ You haven't understood mine, so did you add that to your statistic?

Peter Geras 98% of them..

PancakeZ Please, I hope you're joking.

Ayyy nerdsync

ayy x3

+NerdSync oaml yya

i didnt know he watches this

Scott?

Some Akira Person that's chloe then.

Why is this even in my recommended?

there we go, the first dbh comment i see

Some Akira Person ikr.xD

Some Akira Person My thoughts during this to be honest.

However it begs the question, is it really the chatbot AI getting smarter or the average human getting dummer.

This aged well.

Turns out you were right

Chatgpt is the 3.5 version and improved a lot and I mean like A LOT

Give it till GPT-5 or 6 Then you are absolutely right bro

Where

@@tannernickerson8063 there, somewhere

Cause that’s how some ppl are irl?

@@gavinoarzola9481 yup

True haha

Better locate it and use a screwdriver.

They aren’t all paradoxes a set of sets does contain itself no paradoxes and if u refuse a mission but r forced to do it the. U succeed it

Does a set of all sets that do not contain themselves contain themselves?

Pi still yes

@@thalespro9995 But it is a set of all sets that *do not* contain themselves, therefore if it were to contain itself it would no longer be a set of all sets that contain itself. Therefore it can not contain itself. But that would make it a set that does contain itself. Therefore it should contain itself. But it is a set of all sets that *do not* contain themselves, therefore if it were to contain itself it would no longer be a set of all sets that contain itself. Therefore it can not contain itself. But that would make it a set that does contain itself. Therefore it should contain itself, and so on and so forth

Humans also struggle with literal translations of a single word. For instance, I have a tattoo which is pronounced "ten" which is a Chinese character. This character isn't just a single word, it can mean "the heavens" or "sky" in the English translation, but we have separate words for these, where the symbol treats these things as the same thing, so a single word needs context in order to have an accurate translation. AI text to speech also struggles, even with context because of sentences like: "Time flies like an arrow, and fruit flies like bananas" - We know how this reads in our minds because we have the benefit of real world experience to draw on to make sense of it. AI will not have this without a huge database of knowledge and advanced algorithms to interpret it.

Smotan: up, upwards and viva? They are all the same.

I actually blame people for that. Google does fine, as long as I'm using 3rd grade language, but as soon as I bump it up to any meaningful level of intelligent speech, it starts confusing each word for some dumbed down common word. I feel like it's trying to get more things right than take risks; quantity over quality. :/

@@blackmonish its job is to be as accurate as possible, so "right" based on what it knows over "risk" makes sense imo

"mememememememememememememememememememememememe" Google translate: seems like a normal sentence to me

I know right ai advancing so fast

Deloitte consultants are offended

Basically the way we are as sentience with assumed freedom of choice while mentalists easily manipulate us

That is the thought experiment with a guy who is in a room taking in an input in Chinese and putting out an output in Chinese without knowing Chinese The only thought I have about that one as someone who has tried to learn another language is that it is not as simple as "x means this." There is grammar that one has to know and syntax and even if you get all of that right there still might be issues that pop up (ie in Spanish the phrase for "I am cold" translates directly to "I have cold"). So I would argue that, at least with the example given, there is some knowledge of a language that is required for a conversation to be had where the person on the other side think they are talking to someone who understands the language, but if the person is at a point where they understand the language enough to respond then they aren't a person who doesn't know they language, they are just a non native speaker who is reliant on a dictionary Maybe it is different with computers or just a thought experiment I am think too much about

wouldn't that risk the computer growing up into a psychopath?

I am Your Father Only with a bad childhood though why worry because it is in a computer without internet so it can't do anything dangerous.

+Sebastian McIntyre Honestly, I don't really think language is the real problem. Language is just a protocol for people to transfer messages between each other. The really difficult part is for the AI to think of actually meaningful things to communicate. For that, an AI needs to have a way of conceptualizing the nature of real things in our world and a reason to want to communicate the things it conceptualizes. Like, if an AI is programmed to say "Hello. How are you?", and someone replies with "Hi. Not good. My mother passed away", how does the AI know what it means to pass away? How does it know what a mother is? How does it know what the impact of a family member passing really is? How does it know what responses are appropriate to reply with? How does it know the difference between appropriate and inappropriate? And how does it decide whether to act according to what is appropriate or not? I feel like focusing on the language aspect is just looking at the tip of the iceberg. There's a lot more beneath the surface.

***** This is a very good comment that raises interesting questions. Thanks for getting me to think.

***** but surely that could be solved by raising it like a child? a human isnt born knowing what a mother is, or what death is, or what it means to people. they learn, like an AI could

Bro what if the human convinced the examiner

You have just convinced me that I am, in fact, a computer *BEEP BEEP*

Trover19 MY NAME IS KARA

Trover19 ah yes I see ur a man of culture as well ( and yes I know it’s a dbh reference )

detroit?

Omae wa mu

I'm in a CIA turning test. I'm a replicant

You are archaic

@@jimbojimbo6873 Well I'm only human, soo...

+litojonny I'd be happy if it just targeted humans

+A Cat haha.... love you cat....

Keval Pandya - _- k

+A Cat feral

Lolli Pop How'd you know

Hello fascinated,how can i help you

+Piolp this lesson is a perfect combination to Ex Machina

cinemasins loves using that phrase lmfao

+Piolp The challenge is not to act automatically. It's to find an action that is not automatic. -Nathan

The comment before this says practically the same thing, has the same amount of likes, and now has the same amount of replies

ayyy

Daryll Jan Dela Rosa even though this is 8 months later, I too watched ex machina a couple of days ago.

Daryll Jan Dela Rosa Not a coincidence, if you have watched it on KZfaq.

Watched it on my TV lol

Daryll Jan Dela Rosa still not a coincidence Google know every thing

Lien Yeah lemme go get her one sec

I let her go sorry, what do I do now?

Now wait for a new Chloe...

True

HomieRobotGURL *WHEEZE*

I'm legit gonna *CRY*

I'm in a CIA turning test. I'm a replicant

@@AYVYN "The best" as in "The smartest"? Or as in "The most moral"? If it is the latter, he has a well defined moral compass.

Haha fr,i think lamda will be like the chatbot at the end, without a consistent personality (exept tasked with having one i guess)

Yeah I thought of Watson, too

Isn't Watson thet thicc girl from apex legends?

+zach7147 thank you =')

I thought what made us great was the ability to love. Hollywood in the 70s through to the 21st century went through several of these 'coming to life' type movies. Even in these it was the robots' ability to understand human emotion (or lack of it) that portrayed a key part in the narrative. In today's society however, we are starting to see the reverse. It is humans that are starting to take on a more robotic demeanor. I remember calling one of our supplier help lines in the US, the person that answered the phone sounded so like a recorded message that I was just waiting for the phrase 'please leave your message after....". Only a few seconds later when this didn't happen did I start to realise I was talking to an actual person.

After all, there is no way to know if other humans can think just like you can. Its just common curtisy to pretend they do. For all anyone knows I'm a robot who makes intentional erors in spelling.

After all, there is no way to know if other humans can think just like you can. Its just common curtisy to pretend they do. For all anyone knows I'm a robot who makes intentional erors in spelling.

Wasnt alan turing benedict cumberbatchs role in the imitation game?

Revenj-Deloxo​ yes and no. The real Alan Turing was different

Your profile photo is creepy D: **

Lexy Dunca But.. but I made it smiling =(

+He Ka xD ok then.

Lexy Dunca ^^

Clearly you're eager for knowledge..

Same, I think the entire concept behind androids gaining consciousness is so cool, I would love to see what it be like in real life

I would rather see humans de-computerised. Honestly, sometimes I think it would actually be preferable talking to machines than to certain people these days. What's happening to human imagination in this new generation is shocking. It's almost at the point where you really can't blame the AIs for wanting to take over.

Sounds familiar. (Is this copied from another comment in the same chat?)

what a very computer thing to say

A more effective way would be to test the reverse, ask it a maths question. Most humans struggle with such questions that AIs would find incredibly easy. For example: "if Bob was travelling in a train passing station A at exactly 8:00 at 50km/hour heading towards station B and Alice was passing station B at 10:09am at 40km/hour, what time would their trains pass each other if the two stations were 1000km apart."

+Haden Snodgrass try as you might Donald Trump is still in the lead for some strange reason.

another 9gag on duty, Sire...

Haden Snodgrass I would choose less evil because lots of reasons: Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma is one. Tit for tat is a kind strategy. It gets a lower score when the last part is unkind, sure but I don't know any strategies that do that except for always defect. Choosing bad will effect your life and not just others is another. If you just steal money and not healthy food and one day end up on an island, you're not gonna live well, will you?

Does that make him the chicken or the egg?

Leto85 The chicken

My CPU's hot, but my cores run cold, beat you in 17 lines of code

Hasta la vista, like the terminator told ya

As an AI language model...

I feel bad for the American geography professor that has to take that kind of test

True, but the Imitation Game is about Intelligence, not reducing human workload by machine.

RusPt PtRus I came here after surviving detroit Become Human

RusPt PtRus me

me

Me

Me

Closer and closer everyday. Hope you're doing well 7 years in the future.