The Ultimate Guide to the Anti-Ship Cruise Missile

Рет қаралды 1,110,068

Күн бұрын

The anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) is perhaps the defining feature of modern naval combat, at least when surface ships are being engaged. More than anything else, tactics, doctrine, force structure, and even warship design are built around this one weapon system. It truly is the naval artillery of the 21st century. One simply cannot understand modern naval warfare without first having a firm grasp on the ASCM. Despite the development of anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs) and hypersonics, the anti-ship cruise missile is, and will remain, the dominant arm of modern naval forces well into this century. This guide will explore the origins of this weapon, the way it is employed and the revolutionary impact ASCMs have had upon naval operations and tactics, the impact it had upon warship design and the western, soviet, and soviet successor anti-ship cruise missile design and employment philosophies. It is everything you need to know (and maybe a few things you don't) about the anti-ship cruise missile.
0:00 Inception
10:40 The Battle Network: a New Kind of Naval Combat
31:54 The Offence Defence Contest
55:56 The Western Sea Skimmers: Harpoon and Exocet
1:18:27 The Soviet Solution: Speed
1:41:23 The Soviet Successors: Russia, India and China
1:51:45 Stealth: Current Generation Western Systems
Some, but not all, of the material referenced in the preparation of this video:
Roy M. Smith. 2010. "USING KILL-CHAIN ANALYSIS TO DEVELOP SURFACE SHIP CONOPS TO DEFEND AGAINST ANTI-SHIP CRUISE MISSILES", Master's Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey.
core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36699...
KENNETH P. WERRELL, 1985. "The Evolution of the Cruise Missile", Library of Congress.
media.defense.gov/2017/Apr/07...
JOHN STILLION, BRYAN CLARK. 2015. "WHAT IT TAKES TO WIN: SUCCEEDING IN 21ST CENTURY BATTLE NETWORK COMPETITIONS" Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA).
csbaonline.org/uploads/docume...
John C. Schulte. 1994. "An Analysis of the Historical Effectiveness of AntiShip Cruise Missiles in Littoral Warfare". Master's Thesis. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey.
apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADB192...
Matthew J. Wemyss, Maj. 2016. "The Bear’s Den: Russian Anti-Access/Area-Denial in the Maritime Domain", Master's Thesis, AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE, AIR UNIVERSITY, USAF.
apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1031...

Пікірлер: 721

@lwilde 11 ай бұрын

I am a retired USN Surface Warfare Officer. For three years, I was a Naval Sea Systems Command missile test officer. We lived and breathed air defense against the cruise and high diver supersonic missile threat. Your presentation is amazingly accurate and superbly constructed. Your assessments of the relative capabilities and limitations of each system, both offensive threat and defensive systems are very accurate. I salute you Sir. Very well done! Bravo Zulu!

@gusgone4527 8 ай бұрын

Sir, firstly let me thank you for your service. I'm a retired British Army Senior NCO, my 22 year career covered the end of the Cold War and a handful of years afterwards. My question to you concerns Red Storm Rising. It was required reading for my unit and I was wondering if it was the same for you given your role. After almost two decades studying Warsaw Pact (WP) tactics, doctrine and various details of enemy SOPs. As well as familiarisation with the West German terrain etc. All the things a professional soldier and student of Sun Tzu would be expected to do. The USSR and WP disintegrated before my eyes, and poof! We were deployed to the Middle East, to prepare for war with Iraq in a totally alien desert environment. The life of a soldier SNAFU.

@jamielonsdale3018 6 ай бұрын

Huh. Surprised you didn't correct them about the whole "man-in-the-loop" fire command authority used to operate the Phalanx CIWS - unless that threat follows the parameters of an anti-ship missile.

@Ansset0 3 ай бұрын

I'm almost moved by your sad story 🤮

@watdeneuk Жыл бұрын

2 hours, 16 minutes and 21 seconds and not a single ''like, subscribe and comment''. What an amazing video, I enjoyed it very much. Thank you very much.

@CumulusGranitis Жыл бұрын

The very best do not have to grovel for subscriptions or likes, they earn them automatically because of the amazing quality and accuracy of their content.

@clown134 Ай бұрын

then again, i dont mind link and share reminders, the content is free after all. what i do not like is exclusive premium content that only people who can afford it have access to. youtubers deserve to make money from google for us watching videos on their website, like reminders help sometimes

@masterofsaveloy Жыл бұрын

Your stuff is simply Rolls Royce. Just a cut above everything else. For minds that want well researched, well reasoned and well articulated explanations of complex topics… you have the throne. Chapeau 🎩!

@elektrotehnik94 Жыл бұрын

Chaps, spread the word of this channel in the relevant comment sections. The lack of views on these masterpieces is criminal. ^^

@masterofsaveloy Жыл бұрын

🎩 chapeau!

@Watchingall64 Жыл бұрын

Could not have said it better

@BeKindToBirds Жыл бұрын

This is what happens when you go to historians and military experts instead of video gamers who have wikipedia!

@cpdukes1 5 ай бұрын

Damn! I was thinking it was anti-cruise ship missles!

@Yxalitis Жыл бұрын

You and Perun should definitely get together!

@HolyNorthAmericanEmpire Күн бұрын

But Perun sucks

@robertriley4759 Жыл бұрын

This is the first time I've been significantly intrigued by Naval Warfare of any kind and my goodness I believe you've shown me the error of my ways! I suspect I will appreciate much more naval history now thanks to this very engrossing video! God bless your diligence and hard work! Love from Iowa

@Frenulem Жыл бұрын

Watch some Drachinifel! I was never into water war until I watched his videos

@robertriley4759 Жыл бұрын

@@Frenulem thanks for the reccomendation! Ill check it out! :)

@sirdo946 Жыл бұрын

I was the same until i read Red Storm Rising a couple months ago, somehow made me realize naval and sub warfare, while not as cool as air warfare, may be as interesting.

@parkercushingable Жыл бұрын

Same here, its kinda outside my wheelhouse and I feel hella sad about unarmed sailors getting killed without much agency.

@Chironex_Fleckeri Жыл бұрын

I'm stunned by the quality of the information and presentation of information you always manage. You deserve success. The work you all are doing is impressive. Brilliant and inspiring. There are professionals in the industry of deterrence who have seen your presentations that have been floored. Be proud. You've been heard. We will applaud anything you create. You are inspiring and informing.

@elektrotehnik94 Жыл бұрын

If NCD & Perun watcher are not +50% of the audience here, I'll be disappointed. ^^ ❤

@theblueescapologbb227 Жыл бұрын

@@elektrotehnik94 I was thinking the exact same thing! I was wondering if it was just me that was thinking the level of quality in this video I'm from the other guys you mentioned it's just a cut above the rest. I mean seriously better, don't you think?

@jonathanstrong4812 Жыл бұрын

yes indeed the amount of information is astonishing accurate

@CumulusGranitis Жыл бұрын

Very well summed up Bill. This chap has assembled well researched and thoughtfully presented gems. I am impressed to say the least.

@codmocodmo6474 Жыл бұрын

@@elektrotehnik94 Wondering which channel is NCD? :)

@Smokey298 13 күн бұрын

The thesis that the cruise missile is what killed the dreadnaught rather than the aircraft carrier is 100% correct and you deserve an award for this alone.

@peterharrop179 Жыл бұрын

Hey mate, great to see yet another video! I think I speak for everyone when I say I really enjoy these in-depth historical biographies on weapon systems and military history. Thank you! Also would you think about doing any live stream Q&As? I heard you mention that would be a possibility in one of your tiktokers Q&A videos and I want to say that would be great. Anyway, really thank you for the videos, they are really great and quite unique in that there isn't much like this (at least this in depth). Have a good day man!

@mastathrash5609 Жыл бұрын

Some of the most extensive content of the type and for that, I 2nd that notion and thank you as well.

@bighulkingwar_machine1123 Жыл бұрын

AGREED

@johndignan64 Жыл бұрын

😅😢t😢😢😢😅😅🎉❤😊😂😊😅😊😅😢😂❤😅😢😅😢😢😢😅😢🎉❤😢😢😢😮❤😢😢😅😢😢😮😂😢😢😢😢😢😅😢😂😮😂😢😢😅😢😅😢😂😢😢🎉😊😢😢😊😮😂🎉😊😢😊🎉😂❤❤😢😊😅❤🎉😢😅😢😅😢🎉❤😢😂😂😅🎉😢😅😢🎉❤😢😢😢😢😊😮😢😂❤😢😢😢😂😮❤❤❤😢😅😅😢🎉❤yryy

@johndignan64 Жыл бұрын

😢😢🎉😢😂😂❤😢😂❤😮🎉❤😢😢😢😅😢😂❤uuuui

@creeib Жыл бұрын

No you don't. I don't like war mongering

@motmontheinternet Жыл бұрын

I just want you to know that you're very good at this kind of presentation. I have interest in your content but I can't listen to someone go on about a specific class of missile for two hours unless they've really put the presentation together correctly. This is a very good product and you should be proud.

@mikedorava7961 Жыл бұрын

I am always impressed by the level of detail you go into regarding whatever subject matter you are presently discussing. So much so, that, I have learned to wait to watch your videos until such time that I am sure to be free from distraction or interruption for at least 2 hours. As a married man with children and pets, those moments do not come often and are treasured. The fact that my activity of choice during those precious periods of time is to enjoy and mentally download the wealth of information you provide is probably the highest compliment I can pay a content creator. You are a master of your craft. Thank you for your diligence!

@gamingwhatwecan Жыл бұрын

I haven't watched this yet but oh man am I excited, two hours about anti ship cruise missiles in the content I unironically crave, I wish we had more people like you on KZfaq.

@Boeing_hitsquad Жыл бұрын

Now you have to go watch a video about SLQ SEWIP systems.. because amazingly he totally forgot them 😂

@Turd_Burglar804 Жыл бұрын

Being a former US Navy airdale, I learned very little of surface warfare tactics and weapons. In my opinion this video is a must watch for former and current sailors to know what modern navies are up against if a peer to peer conflict ever broke out at sea.

@sbkarajan 11 ай бұрын

Do you think aircraft carriers are still relevant?

@gusgone4527 11 ай бұрын

A good question. Yes they are. Aircraft will always be the primary launch platform for missiles due to speed and stealth. The arrival of unmanned wingmen will change the game even more.

@gusgone4527 11 ай бұрын

I forgot to mention their role in sensor altitude. F35 for example gives a huge increase in radar and IIR sensor reach. Mapping enemy naval and land based systems.

@riskinhos 11 ай бұрын

if you learned very little than us navy is absolute shit. even in russia there's comprehensive mandatory training about all this

@riskinhos 11 ай бұрын

@@sbkarajan grandpa doesn't know about DF-21. carriers are worthless. they will be sunk in seconds. there's no countermeasures. there's a reason why many countries are staying away from carriers having only a small expeditionary force for small conflicts. you can bet that in a large war, in the first hours all carriers will be sunk.

@AdurianJ Жыл бұрын

The AS-5 Kelt was used in Red Storm Rising as decoys by the Badgers. Its a 1950s missile and looks like a small fighter plane without a cockpit.

@1KosovoJeSrbija1 Жыл бұрын

I've heard they were commonly used as targets to train SAM operators

@lil__boi3027 Жыл бұрын

It doesn't look like a fighter without a cockpit, it IS a LA-15 without a cockpit

@fluffly3606 Жыл бұрын

More importantly it flies at a plausible speed and altitude for a manned jet so with nothing else to go on radar operators will likely misidentify it as one, as happened in RSR.

@matthewholt2174 Жыл бұрын

I love red storm rising, you just made me re read the whole scene again with the backfires. However, I’d argue the genesis of the anti ship missile is the ASM-2 bat, which was a radar guided fire and forget munition deployed before the the fritz X and used for far longer than it after the war.

@Yourlocalhuman8 Жыл бұрын

I think the best german comparison would be the HS-293, since Fritz-X is an Bomb while Hs-293 is rocket powered

@twddersharkmarine7774 Жыл бұрын

Hs-293 would honestly be the better example of the very first ASCM, being rocket boosted, it has longer range than the Fritz-X, and in terms of usage, it saw even more widespread use than Fritz-X Also fun fact, Imperial Germany has developed gliding bombs even back in WW1, dropped from an Airship

@dogsnads5634 Жыл бұрын

@@twddersharkmarine7774 See the RAE Larynx of 1927....

@h4wk5t4r Жыл бұрын

What a fantastic way to use 2 hours! Thanks for the detailed and interesting analysis of missile warfare

@Boeing_hitsquad Жыл бұрын

But he totally fucked up and didn't include SLQ SEWIP systems... So huge parts of this video need amending and additions

@AdurianJ Жыл бұрын

Sweden developed a sea skimming anti ship missiles for its fleet of A32A Lansen strike aircraft in the 1950s. It was the worlds first sea skimming anti ship missile when it entered service in 1961 as the RB04C. This missile was essentially impervious to air defences as nothing at the time could reliably shoot down a sea skimmer for 15 years. Its origins can literally be found in the V1 as the V1 autopilot was copied given a roll axis gyro and used in the missile. Sweden had the great fortune to be oposite the german test ranges in WW2 so lots of V1 and V2 missiles landed in Sweden and could be studied. It is ironic that the british air defence systems (Sea Slug and Cat) blamed as obsolete where newer systems than the RB04 in service. The missile was one of the most top secret items in the Swedish military, you where not allowed to visit their dispersed storage cites in military vehicles or clothing. Hence the missile was never exported. It basically did everything the Exocet did in 1975 back in 1961 it just had shorter range. The RB04 lives on in the RBS15 class of missiles which reused the missile body and warhead, and started life as RB04 Turbo

@jamesharding3459 Жыл бұрын

Hardly impervious to air defense, resistant to the crude first generation surface to air missile systems. The close-defense systems of the time, such as the superb French, Italian, and American automatic guns would find it a trivial target.

@AdurianJ Жыл бұрын

@@jamesharding3459 Tracking a target low to the sea is difficult and monopulse fire control radars hardly existed in 1961 which is the accuracy you need. Proximity fuzes for anti air projectiles of the 10-12cm variety where not optimized to destroy targets so close to the surface as 2-10 meters.

@jamesharding3459 Жыл бұрын

@@AdurianJ Not attainable with 1960’s flight controls. 20-50m was the minimum that could be realistically attained under operational conditions - unless you wish to kill fish instead of ships.

@AdurianJ Жыл бұрын

@@jamesharding3459 There is a reason the altitude control system took the most time to develop. But 10m was achieved operationally in 1961, if the weather was bad a higher altitude was selected manually.

@herptek Жыл бұрын

@@AdurianJ Grapeshot-type charges could probably have been an easy fix for the very last ditch self defense effort if the proximity fuse is found too difficult to optimize, as long as the missile can be at least tracked.

@TheKenigham Жыл бұрын

I love your videos man! congratulations for this great job. I'm really grateful for having this kind of content available on youtube!

@amistrophy Жыл бұрын

The USN fielded the first fully autonomous radar guided glide bomb "ASM-N-2 Bat" during 1944 and used it to some effect against japanese shipping from stand off (20nmi) ~33km distances

@daverobertskult-children7561 Жыл бұрын

Jeez, talk about well researched, well written, in-depth, long-form video. I had to take a brain-break in-between to digest the flow of facts. Just the sheer volume of video used to illustrate a really well-made one! Amazing achievement. We in Britain thought, as any superpower does, that Argentina would be seen off quickly. My stepfather was second in command of H.M.S. Sheffield, under Captain Salt, you can imagine his shock at finding himself in the north Atlantic in the first week of battle. This is not generally known, but he told me, in order to mitigate the threat of the Exocet after the Sheffield/Atlantic Conveyer, Margaret Thatcher armed a nuke being carried by submarine, aimed it at Montevideo, and gave President Mitterrand, an ultimatum to give Britain the launch codes of every Exocet carried by Argentina, or face the consequences. I am not sure if that is why there were no more Exocet kills but Argentina had bought enough of the anti-ship missiles, and only used 9 or 10 against a huge task force? The Sheffield was the first Argentine kill, and no nation in war stops using a weapon unless something else is in play, because there were 40 ships out there under British flags. We now know Israel and France, where both helping Argentina in that war, and America was helping both. Who can you trust in war if you can't trust nation's, you have helped before? And so much for the special relationship between Britain and America.

@dogsnads5634 Жыл бұрын

"This is not generally known, but he told me, in order to mitigate the threat of the Exocet after the Sheffield/Atlantic Conveyer, Margaret Thatcher armed a nuke being carried by submarine, aimed it at Montevideo, and gave President Mitterrand, an ultimatum to give Britain the launch codes of every Exocet carried by Argentina, or face the consequences. I am not sure if that is why there were no more Exocet kills but Argentina had bought enough of the anti-ship missiles, and only used 9 or 10 against a huge task force?" It's not widely known because, to be frank, its total bollocks. Literallly nothing there has any basis in reality. No Polaris boat was shifted from CASD patrol. Montevideo is in Uruguay.....not Argentina. President Mitterand is in France, and the idea we'd threaten France with nuclear weapons, a fellow NATO state also armed with nuclear weapons is laughable. In reality the French helped the UK to a huge degree, even sending Super Etendard to exercise with the Task Force so that the ships could easily recognise the Agave radar signature that presaged an Exocet launch. There is also no such thing as 'launch codes' on anti ship missiles. The UK perfectly understood how Exocet worked for the simple fact that we were the biggest user....we had more Exocet on the ships of the Task Force than the Argentinian's possessed in total. The Argentinian's had a grand total of 5 air launched Exocet delivered that could be fired from Super Etendard. The French ceased deliveries at the start of the war and assisted the UK in making sure no more got to Argentina through other routes. They fired all of them. They got 2 hits. A further Exocet hit was from a trailer mounted missile system that they had taken from a warship in Argentina, flown into the Falklands on C-130 and jury rigged.

@FulkNerraIII Жыл бұрын

I just stumbled upon your channel today and this is first video I watched. Bloody amazing content man, very impressed. I haven't found anything as in depth as this video. Keep up the high quality work!

@jamesogeto3061 Жыл бұрын

watch the video on nukes and chemical weapons and f35 very good

@lightspeed388 Жыл бұрын

How on earth do you not have at least 100k subs?? 😮 Doesn’t make any sense. Your content is second to none. Thank you!! 🙏

@tuomasnurmi7353 Жыл бұрын

Great video! Your descriptions of the battle net and kill chain were really interesting! As a former mortar man, the ability to maintain that communications net is crucial. For some time this idea has been creeping down tge food chain and now it seems it might soon reach down to the infantryman level. It would be interesting to hear a history of battle nets and how future iterations and applications of networking might change the battlefield at different scales. And what countermeasures are there to disrupt the enemy's com tech. All the best!

Жыл бұрын

This was very illuminating. As always. I recently read a book about the history of the early west german navy in the cold war. For a time their major problem was that they had absolutly no counter to soviet ship lunched anti ship missiles. Making a defence of the baltic sea exit very difficult indeed.

@m.streicher8286 Жыл бұрын

I love this channel. I've listened to your videos about the Aus/SEA theater a few times and they're great.

@ajr993 Жыл бұрын

You and Perun make God tier content, I would love to see you guys do a livestream together.

@BeKindToBirds Жыл бұрын

This guy has a phd in history isn't perun a gaming channel that became a wiki warrior with the invasion of ukraine? Doesn't seem like it would be worth his time. That said, since you are talking about perun on this channel I will go check him out. Amateur channels quickly start pumping out misinformation so my hopes aren't high but again, if mentioned in the same sentence as a real expert ...

@pt17171 Жыл бұрын

Perun is garbage, just Wikipedia nonsense. People get fooled by production quality.

@MaxwellAerialPhotography Жыл бұрын

We need a collaborative effort from the holy trinity of Australian defence channels: Perun, HypoHystericalHistory, and Animarchy.

@stephendwyer4659 Жыл бұрын

@@BeKindToBirdsAny feedback on Perun yet?

@BeKindToBirds Жыл бұрын

@@stephendwyer4659 He is quite good. He is actually a member of the military community, he works in defense logistics for the Australian government I believe so he does have relevant expertise. More to the point he does not do deep analysis anyway, he stays at high levels and so doesn't ever risk making a mistake. That said his utility is limited by that same distance from depth and you are a russian bot,name name, random number account

@mingming9604 Жыл бұрын

You and Perun are my go to entertainment . You Aussies are amazing! please keep it up!

@savasolarov8424 Жыл бұрын

Having followed Drachnifell's channel for a while, I like the way you have interwoven the different topics. At least for the WW2 part. Very well informed video, as always!

@AbsoluteKhan. Жыл бұрын

There aren't too many youtubers that keep my attention for 2+ hours but you are definitely one of them! I love your videos! Keep up the amazing work!

@acerbicacorn6489 Жыл бұрын

This is a better brief than most I've seen inside the military. I'd not hesitate to use this as training material.

@shainemaine1268 Жыл бұрын

You're incredibly thorough and it's a treat to watch. Thanks for cranking these out !

@Jon.A.Scholt Жыл бұрын

Been waiting on your next video; didn't disappoint!

@harrikeinonen7576 Жыл бұрын

Another masterclass in comprehensively researched and well presented briefing. Thank you.

@Boeing_hitsquad Жыл бұрын

Masterclass? Dude totally left out SLQ SEWIP systems... That's a huge error

@harrikeinonen7576 Жыл бұрын

@@Boeing_hitsquad you make a good point. Thank you for reminding me of the SLQ-32 block 3 upgrade program. I’d forgotten all about the evolving non-kinetic aspect of anti-ship missile defence. 👍

@akwakatsaka1826 Жыл бұрын

I’m so glad I discovered this channel… I’m leaving a comment so that the algorithm will hopefully pick up

@lukeingram7655 Жыл бұрын

Fantastically presented material here, definitely going to watch more, keep it up mate!

@mickmckean7378 Жыл бұрын

Another awesome presentation. I really like your delivery of the content, very easy to listen to. Well done again mate.

@m.streicher8286 Жыл бұрын

Calling the hit on Hood a "crippling blow" is kinda like saying JFK died from a head injury lol

@MaxwellAerialPhotography Жыл бұрын

Technically it is correct if something of an understatement.

@mike7652 Жыл бұрын

Also oxygen is good for you and Jeffrey Dahmer was a bit of an asshole.

@randybaumery5090 Жыл бұрын

JFK lost his mind. Rimshot

@chipschannel9494 Жыл бұрын

British understatement, “it’s only a flesh wound”.

@Strong_UP_Calvins_zombie Жыл бұрын

Huh?

@markswayn2628 Жыл бұрын

Another outstanding and comprehensive contribution. I love both the great content of the current environment as well as the historical context.

@Boeing_hitsquad Жыл бұрын

And yet he missed SLQ SEWIP systems.. which are the most important module on US ships responsible for defence

@christianoakley1686 Жыл бұрын

Another wonderful, informative and bloody well produced video. Love em,..watch em more than once.

@Pre-flightChekist Жыл бұрын

Awesome video, honestly. I was very much fascinated with both military aviation and navy, and your video, narration and analysis are just stellar. And, to be honest, it is really heart-warming when english-speaking authors dont miss or degrade the /eastern/ weapons, tactics, etc. If you perhaps need assistance in translating or in pronunciation of soviet/russian documents for future videos, i can assist to the top of my ability. But i am, of course, not a proper translator, just an enthusiast. Thanks for the video anyway)

@TheRG1400 Жыл бұрын

Always looking forward to your next video!

@maxwellfairfield888 Жыл бұрын

Phenomenal information as always. Thanks so much for the effort and hard work in making such high quality videos! Keep up the good work!

@Boeing_hitsquad Жыл бұрын

And yet he didn't include SLQ SEWIP systems... Kinda massive omission

@thescatologistcopromancer3936 Жыл бұрын

@@Boeing_hitsquad Calm down. It's already a two hour video.

@markignatiev7194 Жыл бұрын

Just stumbled upon this great video! Excellent research and really enjoyed how you described the transition from WW2 to Cold War strategy/systems.

@jakeverbakel204 Жыл бұрын

I thought this came out longer ago than it did. So probably just goanna watch it again. Love you're work!

@hultaelit Жыл бұрын

Love these feature film length deep dives, can't wait for the next one!

@highwayman6805 Жыл бұрын

Great to see another video! Please keep them coming.

@williamlloyd3769 Жыл бұрын

If you find yourself exploring Southern California; take Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) from LA to Ventura county. Visit Missile Park, just outside Point Mugu Naval Air Station which displays numerous aircraft & missiles that were tested at Naval Air Station Point Mugu. Displays date from 1950s to present.

@stuartb9194 Жыл бұрын

Not just informative but really entertaining, great stuff, cheers!

@Rob_F8F Жыл бұрын

Excellent in-depth review of history and current status of ASMs. Thank you!

@kasmiller9289 Жыл бұрын

This is my favourite KZfaq channel. Thankyou for the excellent documentary. Documentary, because it’s more than just content.

@DevastatingExplosion1989 Жыл бұрын

Favorite channel as of late, keep it up!

@donmichaelcorbin4417 Жыл бұрын

Outstanding work! This is the most comprehensive guide one can find without a security clearance.

@ThaFunkster100 Жыл бұрын

Great and interesting video as always. Just wanted to say I really enjoy your modern weapon / system analysis more than the historical videos, I know its one of your pet loves, but just wanted to share my thoughts. Thanks for your entertaining videos.

@miamijules2149 Жыл бұрын

Nice profile pic 😝

@ThaFunkster100 Жыл бұрын

@@miamijules2149 :)

@parrot849 Жыл бұрын

Fantastic video. Quality from beginning to end!

@Rationalific Жыл бұрын

Well, it's hard to hope for a better overview than that! Excellent video! I learned a lot!

@danielthuku8192 Жыл бұрын

I thoroughly enjoyed the description of the attack of the carrier group by Bears and Backfires. Great video

@CumulusGranitis Жыл бұрын

Mind boggling and accurate. Very well put together and presented in an easy to follow, logical order. Clearly "masters" level research of the highest order. From an ole "digger" and retired historian, well done sir !

@billdude1564 Жыл бұрын

I always listen to these while I’m doing stuff so I miss bits and can justify listening again. Makes them last even longer

@Leptospirosi Жыл бұрын

You are correct: we keep hearing the carrier spelt the end of Battleship, but a carrier cannot do shore bombardment and a carrier can be taken out as easily as a battleship by planes. That is why you won't send a lone battleship in battle after WWII and you won't do that with a carrier either. It was because of how monumentally expensive battleships where, able to bankrupt nations. They were literally big assets nobody can afford to lose light-heartedly. The 2 Bismarck and the Littorio played a big role strategy wise locking in place huge assets of the enemy to counter them, which was worth as it was difficult to get rid of them, but the day a single plane showed it could take out a 6 milion Lire worth ship with a single bomb, the battleship as a concept died. It was not the plane, it was the reliability of the hit and the impossibility to up armour the ship any further against the menace.

@Warspite1 Жыл бұрын

Hard disagree that carriers are as vulnerable to aircraft as battleships and can’t do shore bombardment. A battleship’s defence against aircraft is limited to the range of it’s anti-aircraft guns (or SAM systems, on any modern-day equivalent to a BB) whereas a carrier’s defence extends to the protection granted it by it’s air wing and their combat air patrol. And with modern day AEW&C aircraft and long range air to air missiles this umbrella is very wide indeed. As for shore bombardment, for a carrier that is just ground attack and close air support by another name. And in the modern day a carrier can strike at a greater range and with more precision than a battleship’s guns can. Perhaps the only aspect still in favour of it’s use in shore bombardment is the psychological effect it can have on enemy forces.

@piotrd.4850 11 ай бұрын

@@Warspite1 Except no. Battleship - especially with air & asw umbrella - can be just parked along shore and respond more quickly than aviation could. And continue siting there long after aircraft have to return....

@13deadghosts Жыл бұрын

Nice Video :) Two more examples from WW2 that would fit the technical definition of an Anti ship (cruise) missile a bit better than the Friitz-X: The US Radar guided ANM N-2 Bat and the german MCLOS/TV guided Hs 293, which was the most successful anti-ship missile until the introduction of the Exocet in 1975.

@StrelitziaLiveries Жыл бұрын

Im pretty sure the Fritz-X was closer to an LGB than a cruise missile but the bat is certainly a very underrated weapon.

@playmaka2007 Жыл бұрын

Exceptional video, highly detailed. Loved every second!

@georgemgm5 Жыл бұрын

you put a lot of work into your work and it shows

@kensommers5096 Жыл бұрын

Once again OUTSTANDING, learning has never been such a pleasure thank you.

@troymosher2147 Жыл бұрын

My favorite KZfaq channel. Awesome work!

@patriciamanroe6371 Жыл бұрын

This is my first time watching your videos. Great job. Very informative and thorough.

@shawng7902 Жыл бұрын

those first pictures really show that camo paint job and what it does better than Ive ever seen. Blending in has to be all but impossible but it sure jumbles it all up. Makes it super hard to tell what you are actually looking at. That first one had that line on the bow that made it look like it could be 40ft shorter than it really is. Always amazed at what you can learn from these videos. I cant even imagine what it would feel like to be on land back in the WW2 days of total destruction and seeing the Navy show up. I will always be in aw of the conventional guns, but the invention of guided missiles had to be a change on the level of air support and black powder.

@NicholasLaRosa0496 Жыл бұрын

1:18:04 I don't remember where he got his is source from, but Lazerpig (on What Sank The Moskava) read from a maintenance report that the ship was heavily malfunctioning due to a lack of maintenance. They couldn't even use their missile defense system or even detect them while using communications or something.

@spark5558 Жыл бұрын

Yeah maintenance is often ignored when talking about these things

@davidrobertson5700 Жыл бұрын

No smoking signs were stolen you mean ?

@CumulusGranitis Жыл бұрын

I believe you are correct. Explains why many of the aerial photos take by western observing aircraft that have been released to the general public will show a tug boat accompanying the old Soviet era capital ships.

@virginccyy7645 Жыл бұрын

That's what happens when you have a corrupt government. Putin ultimately destroyed the Russian economic system and the military as well.

@davewolfy2906 6 ай бұрын

Echoes of Type 42 in the Falklands

@danielm81 Жыл бұрын

What a great and comprehensive analysis! Thank you!

@FW190D9 Жыл бұрын

Another excellent video !! Thanks for making it

@sixstringedthing Жыл бұрын

Well, I know what I'll be listening to on my drive to/from work. Thanks mate, interesting and relevant topic.

@eliasb8 Жыл бұрын

This was truly incredibly! A masterclass. I appreciate your massive effort!

@eliomarlacerda2364 Жыл бұрын

Remarkable work, this video is so well done.

@glenn9229 Жыл бұрын

one-third the way through this epic........the grass is gonna miss out on being cut and the windows will stay dirty, I'm digging in for the long haul......an excellent presentation on a very contemporary subject. Thank you

@davew8841 Жыл бұрын

Thanks...another great video! I particularly enjoyed your referencing of Clancy's Red Storm Rising....coincidentally, I've been re-reading it now...and I'd always considered it a logical way to take on a carrier battle group. You cover all the questions I can think of, and I look forward to your next one. If you're looking for more idea's....I'd love to see more on the Soviet Union's take on fighting a major war. After the events of WW2, there's not much available on KZfaq.

@jasonferguson5195 Жыл бұрын

Audible has a great read of Red Storm Rising. 31+ hours long if you're curious. I've read it a dozen or more times. Such a great book. I'd love a movie based on it but am afraid Hollywood would ruin it like Starship Troopers.

@jakobneubert6801 5 ай бұрын

The very best walk-thru video. Amazing job well done.

@thegenericguy8309 Жыл бұрын

small correction, in actuality the warhead of the KSR did not form an EFP, it simply was arranged to increase explosive effect via shaped charge without an EFP-forming liner. I could be wrong on this but shaped charges of this type were to my knowledge the default choice for soviet ASCMs

@jasperlawrence5361 Жыл бұрын

A really well written and researched video, thank you very much. You win my subscription.

@airsoftwwbde Жыл бұрын

i like that u used red storm rising as an example, keep up the good work i love your content

@keymad4 Жыл бұрын

A lot of work this, Brilliant, Great video, liked and subbed.

@mikerowe402 Жыл бұрын

Great video, well done!

@Alseki7 Жыл бұрын

Amazingly in depth; excellent

@janzzen9095 Жыл бұрын

I have read "red storm rising ". For the first time around 1990. I have never understood the complexity of the dance of the Vampires chapter. Until now. Thanks for the great explanation!

@alucardofficial7074 Жыл бұрын

Holy shit man, 2+ hours of content in one video. Time to kick back and enjoy

@samcruickshanks6856 2 ай бұрын

This is a great v video fella, well done to you all 👍

@killsomethin Жыл бұрын

Subbed and liked without being told to sub an like . Great video both educational and entertaining. Thank you ! Can’t wait to watch the rest or you’re work.

@milohog3871 8 ай бұрын

Ultimate this is! So many questions answered, TY.

@mickeyjus57 6 ай бұрын

Such an informative and well presented episode,looking forward to more

@jujenho Жыл бұрын

Fantastic! This survey is staggering for its completeness and clarity. Congratulations.

@s.f.pharm.d.1197 Жыл бұрын

Excellent, informative, thorough, the best! TY.

@micstonemic696stone Жыл бұрын

wow that was long still I watched it all it was great, fascinating thank you for making it some being very relevant.

@mikemorr100 Жыл бұрын

You know just 3 days ago I was doing a bunch of digging online for what exactly differentiates an anti-ship missile from a regular cruise missile. Google isn't super helpful in that regard but this video is perfect!

@doemacmonkey Жыл бұрын

I’d always just assumed a cruise missile was any missile that ran on an air breathing sustainer motor, google just suggests any missile that maintains a fairly consistent speed over its ‘cruise’ portion.

@m-egreenisland7086 Жыл бұрын

This just made my day,nice work.

@antonleimbach648 Жыл бұрын

I was in the USN during the 1990’s. I’ve worked on several surface to air missile and gun systems and without a doubt I can say they we have no idea how a full scale war against China would go. There are so many variables and conditions that could affect the outcome of every engagement that until we actually have a few battles we just don’t know how effective any of our systems are. Most weapons are completely controlled by computers as things happen far to quick for humans to understand and react to. In peacetime it’s easy but with thousands of missiles, planes, ships, and submarines all trying to sink each other it’s a holy mess.

@LuvBorderCollies Жыл бұрын

I'd say let the US attack subs litter the ocean floor with Chy-na ships. Then decide if surface assets or carrier aircraft are needed. Even the "old" LA class sub could wreck the Chy-na fleet before it could do much.

@WWeronko Жыл бұрын

Outstanding presentation. I would like to add that stand off electronic counter measures embodied in the EA-18G Growler make targeting a carrier that much more challenging. These highly sophisticated platforms can jam and spoof acquisition radars and jam data links and communication. They would require launching platforms to get closer to burn through jamming and become vulnerable to kinetic countermeasures. Moreover, in addition to the EA-18G on defense operations, they are powerful tools in the offense. They can push back air defenses and confuse the enemies tactical awareness while antiship missiles, HARM anti-radiation missiles and ADM-160 MALD (Miniature Air-Launched Decoy) missiles fill the battle space with real and imaginary threats.

@garynew9637 Жыл бұрын

Mach 6ballistic, you're toast.

@guillaumelalonde7945 Жыл бұрын

@garynew9637 nope, Standard missiles can intercept hypersonics. Hell even patriot can intercept hypersonics.

@guillaumelalonde7945 Жыл бұрын

And thats just the air wing, then you consider the Aegis equipped cruisers abs destroyers that would be escorting the carrier and it gets incredibly difficult to get through the layered IADS. Seeing the MALDs and Patriots performance in Ukraine gives a slight glimpse of just how advanced and effective Western Ewar tech is. Considering patriot has been intercepting hypersonics and doesn't seem to be greatly effected by russian jamming efforts you can imagine what systems like THAAD and Aegis can do.

@tomhinchliff7624 5 ай бұрын

Is you ultimate guide to nuclear weapons available anywhere else? I miss that video, why did KZfaq take it down? It was so interesting and fantastic

@MasterJCT 5 ай бұрын

Yeah! Where'd it go? o.O

@shoominati23 Жыл бұрын

The way a Heatseeking Missile actually works, is (well the long and short of it) is there is a spinning IR camera inside which looks at the target through and array of mirrors that can adjust in angle kind of like changing focal length on a camera, it gets the name 'Sidewinder' from the porpoising motion it makes through the air as it barrels it's way toward the enemy in ever diminshing arcs which is a direct causation of the afforementioned rotating camera.

@mikeh7860 Жыл бұрын

Bravo sir. Amazing video. As always

@plflaherty1 Жыл бұрын

Excellent as usual. TY Sir!

@PvtSchlock Ай бұрын

The code name/NATO Designation thing drove me nuts but fine video production. Take THAT algorithm!

@surajbiradar9827 Жыл бұрын

That's why I don't like those 10 mins videos explaining a weapon system by reading out wikipedia specifications It requires history, doctrine, employment tactics to fully understand the capabilities Bravo to you sir..!

@benghazi4216 Жыл бұрын

As a Swede I'm sadden that the RBS15 was forgotten. Easily up there with the other western offerings. Even the old ones could "swarm" the target like the JSM for example.

@bramha9680 Жыл бұрын

It's actually a little faster than the other western missiles if I'm not wrong

@benghazi4216 Жыл бұрын

@@bramha9680 Yeah, it's still subsonic, but for example 27% faster than a Harpoon. And we Swedes usually give a lower number than reality, compared to the Russians or Chinese for example who over promise on everything.

@mattperson7293 Жыл бұрын

He's Australian, so he's in love with American stuff.