@Uddipan Chaudhury; Uddipanji, Hinduism/ Sanathan Dharm is hypocritical. It claims to follow the noble doctrine "Ahinsha parmo dharma,' while using its faculties, wisdom, bravery, and labor in practicing caste apartheid for 2500+ years against lower-caste Hindus(~30% of the Hindu population), treating them as ACHUT, whose shadow would pollute the stupid, bigoted brahmin. Uddipanji, Hinduism/ Sanatan dharm, is the only religious belief that worships KALPANIC KATILS, like Ram, Krishna, Durga, Kali, and Shiva, who beheaded his son and, like a murkh, replaced it with a large and heavy head of a slaughtered elephant, crushing the beheaded lifeless body lying on the ground calling the composite MURDA, Ganapathi, and worshiping it for good luck and removing life obstacles. Good luck, Uddapinji, and your murkh Hindu samaj. Valmiki and Tulsidas Ramayan narrate that Ram, in rage and revenge, murdered Ravan and Khumbhkaran for Sita haran with the help of a monkey, Hanuman, that failed to pluck out Sanjivini booty growing on the Dorangiri parvat, yet, Hanuman, a monkey broke apart the parvat, LOL. Monkeys, including Hanuman, evolved with a monkey face and tail, without wings necessary to fly; still, murkh, Valmiki, and Tulsidas narrate that Hanuman, a monkey without wings, flew across Bharat carrying the parvat to light a flame with its flaming tail, biologically jhoot and bakwas, to Lanka to burn its inhabitants, including innocent women and children committing the world's first GENOCIDE for vicious KATIL Ram, who encouraged Laxman to chop off Supernakha's nose. Bhagwat Gita FALSELY claims to contain Krishna's verbal discourse with Arjun at the Mahabharat ydh, 5561 BCE. Arjun and Krishna died without leaving any manuscript containing the verbal discourse for reliable printing. The earliest printing of the Gita occurred after many generations over a few centuries in the 15th Century from a new manuscript by an anonymous author who was not even born during the Mahabharath ydh, 5561 BCE. It is incomprehensible that a morally deviant Krishna, a neighborhood chore pervert, ogles and hides the clothes of the women bathing at the Yamuna ghats to lust at their boobs. After failing to mediate, he encouraged Arjun to do his Kshatriya dharm and joined Arjun in the mass murder of 100 Kauravas who would write the words of wisdom for a productive life. Facts lead to the truth. Sadly, the truth being bitter is missing in Hinduism. Your explanation of Brahmin, Kshatriya, vaishya, and Shudra is like putting lipstick on a pig. It will always be a stinking pig. Satyemeva Jayete.

Be subversive like a mlechha

​@@st.mephisto8564 be predetory like a Christian missionary

@@st.mephisto8564 The European/Christians have genocide-d & exploited billions of natives; looted their lands, plundered their resources & destroyed their culture in Americas, India/Asia & all around the world!! They didn't even spare wild life & nature!! Hell!! imposition of Christianity in Europe led to Europeans killing their own people, burning their women alive as "witches" & destroying their own nature loving polytheistic culture!! -- It's worth reading the freely downloadable book on European History of the Middle Ages: The Darkening Age - The Christian Destruction of the Classical World (2017) - By Catherine Nixey.

@@bababistril Make Biryani like an Abdool

@Sailesh Suresh So is like her father who was a great journalist] and a staunch defender of Sanatan dharma.

@@bmniac many Hindu Baniyas have surname Jain, it's speculated that perhaps they reverted back to Vedic religion sometime when Rajputs became prominent and dominant powers in North Western India not in fear though as we have Jain records praising Rajputs along with records of Jain Ministers in their courts, or that Jain word itself had different connotation this whole time and some people who identified themselves with Jain identity practiced Vedic Religion while others practiced Ajaivik Religion But either way there are Hindus with Jain lastnames and professor is one of them.

LOL that she already has, what she really needs is exposure and appreciation, if all of us proud Hindus ever read her works, we'll be armed with evidence filled counter arguments and rebuttals of 80% of the intellectual attacks anti Hindus throw at our civilizational History

50:20 for example

Yavana has always been used for Ionians that came along with Alexander, it's meaning later incorporating people of mix blood was due to the general consideration of Indo Aryan/Ionian mix children as Ionian too

@@orionsbelt927 again peddling the aryan myth. Rather say indo-european. Aryan is just a Sanskrit word that means noble. Yavana was used to describe people who are foreign and later it was used to describe the Greeks. There is no strong evidence to propose that yavana the word was invented for the greeks.

@@NoRiceToEat lol wtf did i just read ? Aryan is what people of Indo Aryan stock described themselves to be, and they certainly won't want the word they identity with to mean Barbarian would they ? The Pandya Inscriptions of the south literally describe their kings killing and punishing Aryan kings with alloting them titles such as āryapīdaikadandikā meaning the punisher of Aryans, so Arya or Aryan is the genetic and lingual identity our mighty ancestors and establishers of the great Vedic religion described themselves to be Plus Alexandrian Greeks literally called themselves ionians, the word itself is one of the cognate words that is Yavana along with Huna Saka found in Indo Iranic and Indo Aryan languages

Yeah, Yavana also means Javanese, Java is the major island of the Indonesia Yavana means Greek , it can also mean Javanese

​@@orionsbelt927 Lol you didn't hear a single word of this podcast did you? Just as Meenakshi mam said there are manuscripts which mention "Rishi, Arya and Mlechcha" differently... So are the Rishis also different from Aryas now? 😂 Rishis wrote the Vedas not some hypothetical idiots called aryans who came riding the chariots... 😂 And Indians a lot of times also called the Muslim Turks as Yavanas... So were the persianised turks were also Greeks? 😂 Common sense tells that the pandya inscriptions are simply stating that those pandya king didn't consider themselves as 'Noble man'... Yavanas in Mahabharata were sons of Yayati...

No, bro , I dint see anything related to Caste or jati varna , where she has said that there is no caste system, she implied that the caste system was not so rampant and rigid that it become later on . And it is fact, Dr niraj rai research paper on endogamy in india also proves that endogamy within caste became rampant after 5 bce and manusamriti was also written during that period .

@@sagarpaul7934 Around 26:30 she says that while she has not dealt with when this (meaning caste system) "aberration" happened but she has mainly dealt with the 8th and 9th century and in that period she has not come across this. The fact that Buddha, as early as 500 BCE, spoke against the caste system clearly shows that caste system was not just prevalent by rampant even then. This was probably even before manusmriti was codified. Also, around 22:30 she says that the customs and laws were not imposed from top down. That is BS. To the best of my knowledge there is no record of the customs and personal laws, in a codified manner, of lower castes especially the shudras and chandalas. All dharma shastras were written by Brahmins and to say that these laws were not imposed from top is mind boggling. I would like to see what evidence she has to make such claim. The writ of Brahmins in making laws, and thereby the customs, of all castes placing Brahmins at the top and shudras at the bottom of the hierarchy (with clear delineation of what which caste could do or not do in every field of life) is clear from any scripture you pick up be it the shrutis, smritis, sutras or shastras. There is an attempt by some historians, with certain affiliations, in re-writing Indian history by distorting facts is very obvious, at least to me.

@@vs9324 // she says that the customs and laws were not imposed from top down. That is BS. To the best of my knowledge there is no record of the customs and personal laws, in a codified manner, of lower castes especially the shudras and chandalas. // So explain the concept like Samucchaya or Samayacarika & Apastamba Dharmasutra ?

@@dsbdsb6637 Don't ask questions. Make your point.

@@vs9324 The question is the point.

Address yourself as "nobody asked for my opinion"

@@rawadosa90210 Why are you butthurt with my comment?

Yes it's an Islamic word we should always use Bharat

Do you even know you've just revealed your stark prejudice against Brahmins and every body that talks for the Hindu faith ? Where did they advertise Jadoo Tona exactly ? Or it's your tóílet cleaning prejudice leaking out of frustration to the prospect of people starting to respect the Brahmins again for all the atrocities they've been through and all the sacrifices they have made ? I see where it comes from, the ideology who's founder was himself a prejudiced cunning charlatan would only prepare prejudiced and illiterate charlatans like yóu through his ideas who shíts on every body that defends Hindu faith and represents an evidence based counterview point to the purely political anti Brahmin narrative that came into existence in 19th century Brahmins are Shreshtha and so are the Kshatriyas because it were their ancestors who wrote our scriptures down and ensured it's safe keep. People give Dakshinas to the Brahmins because of their knowledge of Shastras and expertise in Karmakand or Hindu Rituals, and only Brahmins are qualified for it because their ancestors were who wrote them down, if yóu have a problem with that leave the religion but keep yóur shít to yourself, don't need to impose yóur thoughts upon others, because if not Brahmins, then we surely will thrash yóu back