Idk about ignister, it was always pretty strong, but mathmech getting the love it deserves warms my heart

Wait, do people care about @Ignister?

@@abcrx32j in my local there's a Ignister Mathmech player. His deck is so consistent that every single card in his deck could use for combo. 3 4 negates cant stop him continue to doing his stuff, only floodgay and Maxx C are the most consistent way. The combo is too long thou

Ignister is still garbage though 😂

@@donutthepop5297 why though? Only Arrival is a win condition against lots of decks, and don't forget that you get a monster negate and 4 interruptions with just 1 card (@ignister mathmech version ofc). The only thing I have to agree with you is that it's kinda easy to handtrap: not a meta deck for sure, but an honest t2 really (ignister pure version, with mathmech engine is far more strong and consistent)

The operator pun coupled with mispronouncing “Laplacian” hurt me

@@aidanyoung9133 Pardon, operator pun?

@@xCorvus7x “Operating at number 5” The Laplacian is an operator

@@aidanyoung9133 oh, neat, thx

Also the number 8 spot. "Adding in and taking away" at number 8 is Mathmech Addition and Subtraction. Smart scriptwriter lol

Maybe Differentiation can be a Desynchro for Mathmechs + other effects while Integration could be a spell speed 2 synchro/xyz (though that would prolly phase out superfactorial)

Don't interact with the spam bot above. I shouldn't have to say it, but, it's quite clearly a scam. Seriously, it's so blatantly obvious, that if you actually fall for it, you deserve what comes next. But replying to it shows that people are seeing it, and incentivizes them to keep doing it. Don't reply, just report and move on.

@@AeridesEntertainment I didn’t reply to it

Same here. I finished building my mathmech deck in master duel today and it's so fun to play.

@@lynxofsyria8655 I fell in love with that archetype since I saw a Crusadia Mathmech hybrid in a recent World Legacy solo duel and Math was one of my favourite subjects when I was younger.

Speculating that it will become a UR card

Same here. I hope Komoney won't make circular into an UR.

Same waiting for Circular

Of the level 8 Kaijus Gandarla is the best out to wind based decks while Gameciel has the lowest attack value for that sweet extra damage.

I'm getting back into Master Duel after a few months away, because I can't believe I slept on this deck. It actually looks like a ton of fun.

@@KuroDokueki Just remember that Circular isn't in master duel yet. I'm playing mathmechs now anyway though, theyre just really fun

@@lemlem35 Yeah, that's fair. Though it not being in yet makes it easier for me to learn general patterns and movesets for the deck.

@@KuroDokueki For sure. I find it a little difficult to win against a lot of matchups currently but it's really satisfying to pull stuff off

You mean non pure Mathmech and going first versions ? They have a lvl 12 unaffected by card effects synchro monster, one xyz monster who can give your opponent -3 and one who can search any spell and trap

# 2 without doubt is lil "Harr Harr bins", of the Storm that is aproaching

Bonus points if Final Sigma can attack two monsters on the same turn.

I like puns

I like puns, math, and YGO Top tier comment

Mathmech is one of the most open cyberse archetype They have many effects that can be used with non mathmech cyberse monsters And with alemb ability to search any s/t and cyberse monsters With this deck ability to summon bunch of cards without normal summon even before circular Mathmech have a high potential to use most of cyberse cards and be a very good engine with cyberse decks And with circular release mathmech is now a very good engine to cyberse decks

Top 10 annoying deck to face no troll deck don't count or stall

4 + 8 equals OTK

Lmao I actually felt the same way but fot Sky Strikers, since I really wanted to build a Mathmech deck

I happily went for both, both decks are amazing and fun on their own right, with very different playstyles (although both are pretty link summon reliant)

For me it's more like the opposite, Sky Strikers don't fit well with my playing style.

@@ace-trainer-aj That's fair, I'm more of a "I want to try that, seems fun" player than having a specific playstyle. There's certain decks that I really don't like but I'm usually pretty open to a variety of decks, be it combo or control.

I wanted sky strikers but Math was my favorite school subject so it got my attention Now I'm wasting resources crafting link climbing cards for it and trying to decide between IP Masq or a second cynet mining

The current event is definitely the most I've seen other people play them. It's actually really fun to get a mirror match since Final Sigma becomes vulnerable to your opponents effects so it takes some more strategy.

These could be covered in a "history of specific cards" video, since most modern players don't know that MST was limited for 6 years

The traps are pretty good, the main reason why they're useful is because they're vital pieces of interaction for the deck going first that can also easily be searched within archetype,the deck kind of struggled with going first at times so either of the cards were extremely useful to have. Once diameter came out super factorial became a staple of mine personally, though I don't run induction, but it's still useful. I personally find the equip a little too win-more for my taste. It helps when otking but the deck doesn't need that much help in the otk. Nabla into multiplication into final sigma is still one of my personal favorites though, even if accesscode talker plays are better, but accesscode is really expensive, and I'm not made of money.

@@nottelling5723 I agree that while most of the time the equip is overkill it is still useful. The equip lets you more reliably otk, Final Sigma with it can otk against a monster with 3000 attack by sending Multiplication so you can still otk if you get delayed a turn by something like threatening roar. If summoned with Multiplication you can send Division to guarantee a kill on anything less than 7000 attack and while most decks don't go above 3000 a final Sigma summoned with Multiplication and Nambla is only lethal against a 2000 attack monster and they may or may not have more than one monster. It prevents them trading a 3k into it, or from being able to buff up enough to kill it and it goes off after things like honest, so it actually protects Final Sigma pretty well if you end up not getting the otk. It can send Nambla for an additional attack which comes in handy if they try going on the defensive. It can also be used to bury a Sigma, I don't think that's useful but it is an option. On a 1000 attack main deck monster it can match a 5000 attack monster with Division and this archetype tends to lock you out of summoning Lightning so it can be useful even if you can't get Final Sigma out. It also has recovery when destroyed which means it will be useful even if they imminently destroy it. Plus I just like the overkill, it's why I play the deck. I'm not used to the newer additions to the archetype, before them getting 3 materials into the grave sounded tricky as the monsters that special summon themselves are once per turn, and you most like would need to search it so the set up to me sounded like summon 4, search twice, barring a foolish or a cynet mining or something. Previously this sounded to much to be consistent especially first turn. With the new monsters I think doing that is much easier to do now, so yeah I might start using it myself at least at one. I feel like Induction just doesn't do much, the problem being that it is a continuous trap so it can be destroyed when it's being activated to stop it. Between all the negates and removal it will probably be taken care of before it does anything. Plus it's just one targeted destruction, tons of boss monsters are immune to at least one of those if not both, others could play through that easily. I just feel it isn't useful with how the meta is.

Ice barriers: You called?

codebreaker 😳

Naturia: Hey

Laughs in Ally of Justice Catastor

Does knightmare count?

Just curious did you win because of floodgates?

@@Big1nz I faced The Sanctuary Field Spell and won that, lost to Tearlament, but won against Labrynth. For Labrynth, I used Harpie's Feather Duster and Red Reboot to destroy my opponent's spells and traps, then link climb to get past Number 41, as Link Monsters are unable to go into defense mode. I linked into Accesscode Talker and destroyed Number 41 and then attacked twice (Update Jammer).

@@geraldsinger9954 That's awesome to hear man, just curious hows your extra deck look like? Anything outside of the norm?

@@Big1nz 2 Dark Infant @Ignister, 1 Dark Templar @Ignister, 1 Wind Pegasus @Ignister, 1 Light Dragon @Ignister, 1 The Arrival Cyberse @Ignister, 1 Link Spider, 1 Update Jammer, 1 Transcode Talker, 1 Accesscode Talker, 1 Cyberse Wicckid, 1 Decode Talker Heatsoul, 1 Primathmech Alembertian, and 2 Splash Mage. I got the idea from a few friends of mine as well as Duel Evolution on KZfaq. I also browse the Neuron app, so I can compare my way vs other ways the deck is used.

You can also do a funny otk with utopia beyond and final sigma

@@andrejv.2834 I've had that one happen to me. They pulled out Underworld Goddess of the Closed World on me to so they all had 0 attack and were negated too lol 😆