And Machina Fortress

And madolche

More like, historically, what is Necrovalley known to do? Students: Am.................

draw 2 cards

@@TheMultiRaphael I'm sure that is for jar of greed

Play this card draw 5 cards then your opponent strips 5 cards from his or her hand.

Clearly it wins the match for you if played

Blue Eyes White Dragon because screw the rules I have money

number 92: HearteartH dragon

That just kinda made me hate Konami for making EGCs extraordinarily hard to bring out but making them kinda weak boss monsters. They all should have the effect to be unaffected by other card effects. They are Egyptian GOD cards, my god, but any old card everyone uses makes them totally worthless.

@@point-five-oh6249 Obelisk is weaker than Dragoon of Red-eys KEKW

@@darklewd9844 Obelisk is weaker than any of the Majespecters, level 3-4 animu furries.

or like the blue dragon and the red-eyes chick. Man its sooo dumb

Everyone says “Except frog the jam.” Nobody says “Accept frog the jam.”

Or guardian

imagine being a new player and every 5 minutes someone has to tell you "oh no this card doesnt do what it says here". this game went to shit xD

@@ich3730 I been playing for a year now and literally didnt have a single situation where a card didnt do what it said

They prevent Zombies become meta lol

@@jofx4051 zombie is a type tho

So basically: "Top 10 Cards with the Most Reprints", right?

@@korsaiyajinkami3766 Speaking of reprints has Evil HERO Malicious Bane and Evil HERO Aduster Gold gotten reprints.

So....reprints. Mystical Space Typhoon and Pot of Greed would win

@@AxisChurchDevotee no

@@rektreborn6269 No wonder he's called Aduster Gold he cost a crap ton of money to get.

Would be the most difficult list Dzeeff ever made.

spell book of judgment, chaos emperor dragon come to mind

You got any Ultimate Falcons?

@@justanothercommenterwithan9089 The difficult isn't list the cards, but order them.

Sparks,ultimate falcon,spell book of judgment, blue eyes ultimate dragon,chaos emperor dragon That's my top 5

That’s because it’s an OG!

That’s for the 8th errata

Cant be the only one who finds GY dumb

@@scantyer I also think it's dumb, but they probably had to do it to shorten card texts as Yu-Gi-Oh card effects were getting so much bigger and more complicated that most cards had giant walls of text in them.

I find the GY unstylish as all fuck, (it just feels better somehow to read "graveyard"), but with how much crap some cards do today, I can understand the whole GY thing. On the other hand one could say that using a short GY instead of specifically spelling out 'graveyard' is actually pretty appropriate though, since nowadays the graveyard isn't usually much of a graveyard at all, lol.

I’ve been thinking about requesting that

Hero would be #1

Performapals

Genex would ironically be really high on that list

Blackwings

Or all the normal monsters in Legendary Collection Joey's world having their description read like if Joey was describing the card

Anthrosaurus: "Dis man-like dinosawz gotta high I.Q., even the he's lackin' in da strength depawtment. (Kinda like yooz, if ya had a high I.Q.! Nyaah!)"

Oh my god, this gets even better when you realize Hitler's book was titled " my struggle" 😂😂

I need that card now

Oh I remember getting that one! A Rare from Legacy of Darkness set. Good times

What a coincidence.

Yeah I've seen a few videos use it and let me tell you that shit is CLEAN. Probably the best update I've ever seen KZfaq implement.

What timestamp feature?

@@Ghostwolf4004 idk about mobile, but on desktop yt there's a clear distinction on the timeline between each of the cards on the list

piemaster831 Yeah it works on mobile

The Pharoh's gift to his loyal followers.

@@mirraisnow6050 job benefits

Wouldn't harpies and gravekeepers count as well, they were good for one format before disappearing

Madolche is still relevant

X-Sabers will always be special to me

DDD definitely, since Zoo limited them to what, 3 weeks?

Jeffrey Shaffer *sobs*

Like Yugioh Eternal Duelist Soul

I guess this means Top 10 cards that are too good for their own archetypes, He had uploaded a video about that

@@Yami_Duelist no,he/she means that one card fix the whole archetype problems,and that video means card that so good that played other decks more than it's archtype

Yami Duelist Not really, I just mean cards that made an old archetype good again. Cards “too good for their archetype” are just good period, they didn’t necessarily modernize another archetype like the two examples I gave. More examples would be toadally awesome and extravagance (for gren maju).

@@any13th But Magician Soulls and Electrumite are used with a bunch of other stuff

Baxter Bruce I’m not saying the card can only have to be used by one archetype, just that it really help one archetype in particular. Magician souls is run as an engine now, but it’s undeniable that it really helped spyral come back as a meta threat.

Yeah i noticed i didnt know u can do that o.o

I wonder if this is a new feature or if I just somehow never noticed. This seems really helpful

@@ddog12359 New feature from like weeks ago. KZfaq does it automatically when you put timestamps in the description, as far as I noticed.

@@Tomix4k Noice!

Would Tyler the Great Warrior count for #1?

Agreed and I'd want to one the rare ones that aren't just prizes from tournaments. But have them as honorable mentions

I was always under the assumption that every card had the same amount of copies of them out there, but with rare cards and ultra rare cards having less than commons but still the same like. Common cards have 10 copies of each, rare cards have 8, ultra rare having 6, secret rare having 4, and ghost rare having 1

"get your game on" is on that list, right???

would dark cavalry be on that list?

Blue eyes chaos max dragon

Airknight parshath,Darkness destroyer and twin sword marauder. Those cards I think could make the list.

Mefist the Infernal General

Spear Dragon lol

A lot of cards got their name changed and while I could handle most of them, I still slip and call Sky Scout "Harpie's Brother".

@@MasterArchfiend i still call it Harpie's Brother, sounds better than Sky Scout to me anyway.

Would be nice if they added a real one to the archetype. Maybe as an xyz monster...

I think the problem with Harpie's brother is that it was released before archetypes were really a thing so it was only seemingly given the name Harpie for lore reasons and didn't have any support (for instance Harpie's pet dragon specified that it could only gain attack from Harpie Lady or Harpie lady sisters because back then cards had to specify the full name of a card they worked with and couldn't just say a "harpie" card). Harpie's feather duster was another weird one. One of the most powerful spellcards in the early game that everyone loved to use and yet almost never with a harpie themed deck because there wasn't anything in the text that specified it had to be used with a Harpie card. Come to think of it, in the anime Mai I think was the first (and for a long time only) character to use an archetype deck (Harpie and then later on Amazoness cards) while everyone else would just use a broad type of card (e.g. Rex used dinosaurs, Weevil insects, even Kaiba didn't really build his deck around Blue eyes cards, just had the three dragons and their fusion form) so it makes sense that konami really struggled with what counts as a Harpie archetype and what didn't.

@@sliver170 Lmao why

It is the year 2030. Necrovalley has just been erratad the 15th time, its new effect now stating that necrovalley can no longer be on any banlist after the last errata which allowed it to freely summon any monster from either graveyard during either players turn ignoring their summoning conditions got it finally banned, a step that most players welcomed once the errata that restricted the opponent to only one spell card per turn took place.

@@nicolaistuhlmuller8718 The year is 2050. Yu-Gi-Oh matches are now determined by whoever goes first after Necrovalley's 420th errata made playing it an instant - win condition, which comboed well with its 69th errata which allowed it to have up to 40 copies in any deck.

​@@Andyjoe522 The year is 2068. Yu-Gi-Oh matches are now deterministic draws, as Necrovalley's 701st errata made it play itself from the deck or hand as soon as the duel starts, which comboed well with its 420th errata

Fitting for yugioh. Dark types always get the best kit

You mean like...(gulp)like Pot of greed?!

Kaiser Colosseum

@@anthraxous You know, I wish I could like you comment twice. 👍

@@anthraxous pot of greed needs an errata, it’s far too convoluted

Every old toon card used to be like this

I guess you could say Toon World was literally a book.

Even if it gets 10th errata, the players will still not understand it.

Is it a hard +2? Can I draw the cards from my GY? Is it a Quick Spell? No wonder why its banned. It's too confusing to be in the game.

I use it to draw a reverse card from my Uno deck and use it as a hand trap during my opponent's turn, is that not correct?

No , you draw 2 Cards from an Booster-Pack. A Hidden Code even tells you that , you may pay 2,99$ to draw again.

Pot of Greed - Errata After activating this card and resolving its effect, lay your hand on your deck and pick up the top card of your deck and add it to your hand. Repeat this action until you have successfully added 2 cards to your hand by this specific card effect this specific turn.

Did not deserve what they did to it. Still love it but damn did they not leave any hope of it returning to meta relevance.

It would just add an extra layer of text to all extra deck monsters though

The OCG has "Special Summon" in the monster type line (BLS-EotE is "[Warrior/Special Summon/Effect]") denoting a monster must be special summoned by its procedure first for exactly that reason. (【戦士族／特殊召喚／効果】). I wish the TCG would also adopt the ①② system, too, to wholly differentiate between different effects of the same card and show which ones have restrictions.

@@Kylora2112 yeah this is an insanely good idea. I'm pretty glad I only play Yugioh digitally, because it's pretty confusing sometimes figuring out which monster can be special summoned and which one can't.

I think their called "Nomi" monsters in the OCG

@@Nerobyrne its not the same feeling when you play online. if you can afford cards, i suggest that you buy them, its so nice to open packs and touch them😁. but if you cant, then just play online and still enjoy 😄

😂

Isn't dragon still immune to effect destruction in general on top of being untargettable?

Nice idea, maxx c and all other hand traps, but I think he should name those with the most impact, like maxx C, Nibiru.

Damn, you're right. That's a pretty good band name.

Sebarsh Thumbadoo every card follows the current ruling, regardless of what is actually printed on the card. If you insist on using your older text, make sure to have a printout, or a copy of the newest errata for the judges in case something happens

@@hotwheelsearl So if I can get away with it (if my opponent or the judges don't know any better), I can use the effect my one has until I choose (or when I need it) to reveal that there was an errata, to which I have to use the errataed effect afterwards?

As long as you state which version of the card you are using. Earl is pretty much right.

@@sebarsht12 Sure if you want to get disqualified.

Spellbook' of Judgements gotta be nunber 1. It took the Spellbook deck from high Tier2/bordeline Tier 1 into the only deck that can match full-power Dragon Rulers...

You can still play older copies of the card but the new effect is applied in gameplay

What I imagined was Obelisk getting shocked from attacking (and killing) Ryko, got so heartbroken that he killed himself right afterward xp

I'm pretty sure is the more recent errata effect that counts, if you could use the old effects the unbanning of Chaos Emperor would make no sense.

If a card targets, it means you need to select what you are targeting when you activate the effect while building the chain, and your opponent can respond with the knowledge of which card is getting destroyed. A card that destroys without targeting meanwhile picks what to destroy when the effect resolves, so you pick what to destroy after your opponent already lost their opportunity to respond. In addition to that, cards that do not target can affect cards that are immune to being targeted, so there are 2 benefits to a card not selecting a target. To give you an example, when Man Eater Bug is flipped, you pick the monster you want to destroy, and then your opponent gets the option to respond by chaining another card. Only once the chain resolves is the target destroyed. Meanwhile, when Ryko gets flipped, you do not pick a target, so your opponent has to respond without knowing what you are planning to destroy. Only once Ryko's effect resolves do you pick the card to destroy.

@Galaspark The original version of the card doesn't address where the fusion materials can be. It wasn't until its errata that it's made clear they can be on the field OR in the hand.

Not too great . . . if you don't stop the spamming of Link Summoning/Extra Deck summoning etc. (unless part of their spamming involves moving a card from their graveyard), it might not do much in these days' meta!