Only if you stayed two three more years and was not upset by safin, edberg and federer and the other european guy maybe 20 slams' in the bag easily. Thankyou pete for keeping your fans thrilled amazed and happy.

Thank you, Peter Sempras. Thank you. Thank you for doing this interview. And thank you for revealing yourself to possess Beta Thalassemia. I don't know anyone in this world who has achieved this far with your blood trait. Not many. No more than a handful. I am glad you have endured this difficulty and... you won't be alone. 謝謝你，彼得Sempras。謝謝。 謝謝你做這個採訪。並感謝您揭示自己擁有β地中海性貧血。 我不知道任何人在這個世界上誰也用自己的血特質遠遠實現這一點。不是很多。不超過少數以上。 我很高興你已經忍受了這一難題，並...你不會孤獨。 Ευχαριστώ, Peter Sempras. Σας ευχαριστώ. Σας ευχαριστώ γι 'αυτή τη συνέντευξη. Και σας ευχαριστώ για την αποκάλυψη τον εαυτό σας να έχουν β-μεσογειακή αναιμία. Δεν ξέρω κανέναν σε αυτόν τον κόσμο που έχει επιτύχει αυτό το μέτρο με το χαρακτηριστικό αίμα σας. Δεν υπάρχουν πολλές. Όχι περισσότερο από μια χούφτα. Χαίρομαι που έχουν υποστεί αυτή τη δυσκολία και ... δεν θα είναι μόνη της.

One of the all time greats of the game 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

It's a question of opinion... I don't think anyone ever played as good as Sampras at his best. Not Federer, not Lendl, not McEnroe, not Agassi, no one. He was just so powerful and fast. Federer's great and gracious but he doesn't have the same overwhelming power that made Sampras so dominant.

Honest person.

Sampras has an edge on grass, and probably a very small edge in the US open. Yeah Federer has won many grand slams, but he didnt have to face greats such as Courier, Agassi, Chang, Becker, Edberg, and major talents like Ivanisevic and Muster. The only guy today who can come close to these guys besides Federer himself is Nadal

@EmitFlestiKY I think he asked some good questions! Really got into Pete's frame of mind. Other than the stupid mistake

Michael Chang was faster! Damn he could move!!! Grand Slam Champion aswell.

Why do you people care that he said Wimbleton, what does it matter?

Because it's Wimbledon.

Federer would have been about this age when he won all that stuff in 2017

I totally agre with jmminu comment, The technology of tennis racquets and tennis strings have helped everybody in the game ( even weekend hackers) But if Nadal played Borg both in their prime with wooden racquets I would have to say Borg wins in 5 sets.Borg to this day was the fastest guy I saw on a tennis court.

sampras would have owned federer on a fast wimbledon and US Open, federer would have won at AUS and French Open. tough to take one over the other.

I think Sampras looks as a man whos gonna be 40 years soon... and who steel capable to beat the number one player on hard court!!! I know that's nothing... is it bab?;)

i can't agree more with you... i don't know why can't ppl give credit where its due..they behave like a compulsive ignorant...

what is the yardstick for measuring greatness of a player? i think your aregument does not hold water.. Federer wld have beaten everybody consistently(the names you have taken)..morever even Agassi has admitted that Fed is the BEST.. i am sure you wld agree that agassi knows more tennis than you or me do.