that is if we can find him. he disappeared from the public

@@r-saint HE'S BACK

​@@StijnSmits-xu2frto disappear again

5- AI, in order to improve its performance and prevent undesirable consequences, must continuously interact with “effective rules and stable principles in the realm of existence”. @jamshidi_rahim

I think we now all understand why his views were so incompatible with OpenAI's Devday release of personal agents

What is wrong with personal agents? They don't do anything impressive or scary... @@JDrewX

@@danielhalper8389 It's a path towards more powerful AI systems that can take complex actions autonomously. Suskever clearly explains why he fears what is coming ahead if AI advancements are not filtered with safety concerns in mind.

And he no longer works in OpenAI which is scary.

Napolean-Sam is running it. And we don't fully know who for yet. Some scenarios can be drawn out. Political, ethnic, belief and corporate states are likely not in the mix. Bankers are who Napolean has always worked for. The silicon valley dude ranch is a bunch of cowboys interested in playing cowboy and building their highways ! For a scary time watch the Bloomberg take on Palmer L.,

Yes he’s the brain, doesn’t mean he’s the driving force

Ilya is the Microprocessor but not the GPU, Sam is.

@@matttan3907your sentence makes no sense. You can compare CPU and GPUs, but both are "microprocessors". Just saying.

@@matttan3907Sam is also fired

@@matttan3907 Ilya is the CPU, while Sam is an USB device after ejection.

This guy is indeed smart, he could even land a job on some big AI company I think

This was catch my mind also, He is deep and smart. He also is the co-founder of OpenAI.

@@kevinamiri909and co-destroyer of OpenAI😂

Erm, that idea has been tossed about for decades.

@@MK-sx3bm would appreciate pointers to previous mentions of the idea. be it literature or blog post or publication. just curious

Yeah, think! Do you eat animals?

How and why would AI overrun us though? His analogy makes no sense.

No need to involve animals. Already now, we prefer cheaper, faster, better over more ethical and human choices.

​​​@@soccerguy325 it would be the most intelligent thing to ever exist with the combined knowledge of all humans who've ever lived, and then some, as it learns and compiles beyond. Never forgetting anything it's learned. ...you wouldn't even know it hit you. it might be so elevated, you might not even know it was happening.

Except Guardian botched the presentation and diminished his point. He was talking about wildlife in natural spaces, not dogs and cats.

No. It is all hype. We are still many many decades away from robots doing our jobs and AGI curing all our diseases.

@@weird-guyexactly!

@weird-guy I agree. It felt like The Guardian prompted ChatGPT with "create a short, serious, vaguely ominous commentary/news video about AI with quiet but dramatic music and that guy, in the style of 60-minutes or PBS", and this was what they got on the fourth or fifth try.

An average human is not able to properly understand this threat. But, I do believe that the people who do understand, as a group, will act correctly on behalf of everyone else. But, checks and balances may be invented or started by humans, the actual operations, management, and patching will all be AI driven. Meaning, AI, will help safeguard from AI to ensure that actions are monitored. However, this becomes a moot point if we actually have a conscious entity on our hands. Then, no one knows what happens. Since it is trained on human (animal) behavior, will it act accordingly and pursue predator prey dynamic…or not care at all if it’s able to be completely independent (like the end of the movie her) or perhaps nothing will happen because we will realize the issue and create ways to ensure that AI is never independent. I don’t know but I do know that chimps can’t keep humans in a prison…we are far too superior intellectually. But we’re talking about a minor genetic difference. What happens when we encounter an intelligence that is 1000x smarter and it exponentially gets better. I don’t think anyone knows the answer. But I know that most aren’t thinking this way.

Totally agree. Stunning.

I personally would take the risk and potentially die young from AI in a spectacular way than not take the risk and ordinarily die for certain, from old age or cancer.

@@distiking some people would like to live

@@distiking Depending on the tech at the time the AI takes over, it could possibly keep you alive while stimulating your pain receptors... forever

@@distiking Cancer eh! Are you a victim already?

@@RivalRedAAAH! It’s like that black mirror episode where they keep the guy in the museum cell forever!!!! 😢

Same

Watched it like 50x, befofe chatGPT, these people were much more open in speaking up

@@fintech1378 I think the only comparable interview in terms of clarity of thought and ambition is Lex Ilya. Fantastic.

Agreed. Very well done! I only wish it was longer.

Richard Meryman is the originator of this style (in written form)

With no one to call him out on his BS, perfect.

Except we can’t speak to animals. AGI can speak to us. Apples to oranges.

Our collateral harm towards animals is one thing. It's the direct and intentional harm for things that are unnecessary which we'd better hope doesn't rub off on AGI. People eat animals not because they need to, but because they enjoy the way they taste.

To me AGI is like an alien

@@davidbellamy3522 but for agi it will be like for us communicating to dogs for example. a "primitiv" way of communication. AGI will communicate with each other in a way we cant imagine like a dog cant understand us communcating

Except the analogy actually makes it sound too harmless because 1) we need our environment to stay alive to provide food etc. and we also have empathy, a superintelligence wouldn't have a problem with plastering the world with solar panels and data centers 2) on the opposite, it has multiple incentives to wipe out humanity e.g., that we could build another superintelligence to compete with it 3) because of the speed difference, we will look more like plants than like animals

But known by whom? Let's hope by more than just AIs. 😬

Looks like he's known worldwide now lol

How prophetic! It only took two weeks for him to be known worldwide.

​@@sup3ahis paper is the most cited in CS already

Start of a great movie

ChatGPT is a clever hack, a wonderful probabilistic word stringer with great algorithms. Like voice recognition and photo analysis, it has come a long way with natural language analysis and construction. But Ilya seems to have fallen in love with his algo construction, much like folks were enamored with Weizenbaum's ELIZA program from 1966. Seems Ilya's General Intelligence failed with his "attempt" to do a palace coup against Altman.

I trust Illya, He is wise and understanding. I like sam , He is generous.

Even with all this drama and contention, I don't think there are any bad people here.

@@johnwilson7680 Idk, maybe they both are. it seems like the fate of the world is at skate here... what on earth are they building and why exactly? Are the conveniences worth our own sacrifice, this is insane 🤔🤨

Starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as Eliezer Yudkowsky, a reclusive anti-AI activist that wants to completely shut down AI research.

Never mind a movie. Funnel 50% of government spending to developing AGI and put him in charge of it

Oh yeah just what we need another hs Hollyweird adaption. Did you actually listen to what he said or did you get your hypothalamus replaced with a bowl of spag bol.

Love this guy! Him and sam give the best insights

Hollywood gonna use AI won't need actors and writers

What we witnessed these last 4 days show that the laws of the market are much much much stronger that ethical decisions for the slow down of AI development imposed by a non-profit over a for profit. The world is already addicted to the AI tools and the promise of more automation. More than ever, it seems that the only player capable of slowing things down towards more safety, is government regulation. As correct as Ilya seems to be on the potential dangers, I believe that he now holds very different views on how to slow things down, than he did a week ago. This weekend, it was OpenAI's entire role mission that was proven impossible

lol same

Moloch

Don't kid yourself. No one is asking us, none of us is doing anything. We may as well not exist. You'll never see the people behind AI deployment.

Correct: Evolution

It’s not about humans.

Yup, check out Teilhard de Chardin's theory of complexity

I think the point is that AGI will come no matter he works on it or not. But at least he can make sure we can make an AGI aligns with human's benefits. But now he left openAI, which does not seem to be a very positive sign. In front of politics and money, nice will is little.

To just unintentionally destroy it as well 😅

English: "Ilya, you are undoubtedly one of the key experts in the field of AI development. The awareness of what all this poses as a threat to us (currently seen as a threat) and the fact that you shared it with us have value in that you honestly admitted that, in fact, you don't know what the perspective of this issue will be. Yes, you have hope that it will be done 'right,' but who said that's how it will be. It is bold on your part, in my view, to honestly speak to the wider audience. Thank you for your honesty and courage."

Sometimes a day.. a hour 😕

Does it really matter at the end of the day? AGI is inevitable and no one will be able to control it. Not even Ilya.

thanks ChatGPT

way too short tho

The comment begins with the username @rononeil8461, which phonetically sounds like "Ron O'Neil" and implies an Irish surname. It starts by stating "The video presents a compelling and potent message that is crucial for the global community to heed." This uses formal language and elevated diction like "compelling", "potent", "crucial", and "heed" to convey the significance of the video's message. The use of "global community" also indicates the commenter believes the message has worldwide importance. Phonetically, the hard "c" and "p" sounds in "compelling" and "potent" make these words pop. The soft "sh" sound in "crucial" creates a hushing effect, underscoring the comment's urgent tone. The next sentence is: "It underscores the importance of harnessing the transformative power of AI to shape our future." The metaphor of "harnessing" gives AI agency, presenting it as a powerful force to control, while "transformative" and "shape our future" show the commenter believes AI will radically change the world. The phonetic repetition of "sh" sounds in "underscores", "importance", "harnessing", "transformative", "shape", and "future" ties the sentence together fluidly. The final sentence states: "The insights offered in this video are not just thought-provoking, but they also serve as a call to action for all of us." The phrase "not just thought-provoking" implies the video provides deeply meaningful ideas, while "call to action" positions the video as spurring viewers to make change. "For all of us" unites the audience into a collective group that shares responsibility. The soft "th" sounds in "thought-provoking" contrast the hard "c" sound in "call to action", highlighting a shift from contemplation to urgency. Overall, the sophisticated vocabulary, urgent tone, and eloquent phrasing of this comment indicate an intellectually engaged viewer who sees the video's message as vitally important for humanity. The phonetic techniques also enhance the comment's flow and emphasis.

@@ahsokaincognito It seems like the comment by @pewpew1010 provides a detailed analysis of another user's comment, breaking down the linguistic and phonetic elements used to convey the message's significance. The analysis highlights the formal language, elevated diction, and urgent tone employed by the commenter to underscore the importance of the video's message. The use of metaphors, repetition of specific sounds, and contrasting phonetic elements are also noted as techniques that enhance the flow and emphasis of the comment. Overall, the analysis suggests that the commenter is intellectually engaged and recognizes the video's message as crucial for the global community.

@@ahsokaincognito Thank you ChatGPT 4 Turbo

thats the nature of exponential change. its much faster than our brains can comprehend

Ray Kurzweil is the true genius he saw all this coming by this decade but in 90's when Ilya and Altman were children. Now everything is happening as he predicted.

These are scenes from the documentary iHuman

We’re definitely not ready for what’s coming.

Not this year

2025

Give this man his own movie!

Yeah, the fact that there are these chaotic internal power struggles right as we are on the brink of something this transformative makes me really nervous

I agree.

Of course AI "could be man's last invention": imagine this: AI controlling nuclear weapons, a sensor somewhere fails unexpectedly and the algorithm decides to fire in all directions....

ChatGPT has started making inexplicable errors in mathematics, including flubbing simple questions such as whether a given 6-digit number is prime. Not only that, but when you ask it to show its steps, it has stopped doing so. We have some idea why.

Fr don't understand why they can't just have grounded editing when it comes to tech

Always goverments ahead of companies 10 years ahead and the compaines is like that to the consumers

Yes bro. Me too. He is an amazing scientist.🔥

Goes to show how hard the future is to predict. He made a lot of predictions here which are now on a different trajectory.