Wait for 1 year... and building will turn too soil agian😂😂

​@@SandeepSingh-or7jrreally 🥴😩

Did you consider the cost of machine it's installation etc,overall expenses will exceed conventional construction cost

Using European technology and innovation! The COBOD 'printer' that they're using was designed and built in Denmark, it's a Danish company!! You're welcome India!

@@universaltruth2 So what?

@@universaltruth2 Glad we got that established. You must be really boring at parties!

Ulsoor ?

@@PES_Brazuka yep

@@BhavinTolia ty

No way.. 3d printing is currently suitable for small scale structures only

Still in earlier stage. This is showcasing project to be durable and robust it as to go through R&D. I know your pain of metro station conjuction.

That was first in iit madras they build House than for nxt month election they are doing this😊

The technology comes from Denmark!

U can make complicated artistic structures which occupies less space and with same strength which is otherwise which are impossible to construct using manual labour

@@shivakumar-cn9bg not impossible, just more time consuming

The strength is not as reliable as traditional one..

would not even briefly consider it, and I used to work with a concrete printer. 3D printed concrete is not traditional concrete. The printing process requires something that can be easily and reliably pumped through a nozzle, but also has gel-like properties so it stays in place once you print it. In order to do this, you don’t really wind up making concrete. You have to remove all the large aggregate (gravel) and then add bentonite clay to get the mixture to gel. It would be more appropriate to call that “mortar” than “concrete” - and the difference is fairly obvious in close-up shots of a printed structure: If you look carefully at that photo, you might notice a couple oddities. For one, the layers are not consistently stacked, and there are lines between each one. 3D-printed concrete is not fully bonded between layers, and there are small air pockets and gaps. No through-holes or anything, but it's not the same as a continuous pour. For another, the color of the concrete seems to change from layer to layer. This is because 3D printing is exposed to the environment, and the material has to be mixed in multiple batches as the building is being printed. This isn’t due to something that can be engineered out, like print volume or machine design constraints, it’s an inherent requirement of the process. By design, the printer must run slower than the material hardens (if it didn’t, the walls would collapse as they got higher). This means the material is inconsistent and poorly-controlled, and is generally much weaker than standard concrete in bulk. Any claims you’ve heard about the strength of 3D-printed concrete are likely false or misleading. It is not currently a reliable process, and because concrete has to stay moist to cure properly, there are all sorts of problems associated with printed structures, like microcracking and extremely poor durability (where the surface is dry and brittle): That’s not to be pessimistic about the capabilities of the tech - these may be the sorts of problems we can fix long-term, and there’s no guarantee it even matters. In fact, we may have fixed it already - some companies have created proprietary concrete blends that may be less sensitive to variability during printing. However, the process of qualification testing for this is not just complex, it involves embracing variability that traditional construction tries hard to remove. This is complicated by the state of the industry - since mix designs have become proprietary to gain a competitive advantage, they all have to be independently tested. I know for certain nothing on the market is qualified currently, because there hasn’t even been enough time to develop testing standards, much less actually do it. Since every new layer is fully exposed at some point during a print, the humidity, cloud cover, wind, temperature, and shape of the building all significantly impact the quality of the final product. Concrete cures on the scale of months, so testing this many variables is absurdly time-consuming. Although the standard for strength measurement is 28 days, that is really a “good enough” threshold, and the large-scale changes we’ve made to the mix design may slow down or speed up that process. There are other complexities beyond this that I could cover, but the basic conclusion here is that this industry has developed so prematurely that we've barely even discussed what the standards should be. The buildings you see in the wild are driven by investors’ Fear of Missing Out and a lack of regulation to stop them. If you buy a 3D-printed house, then you are acting as an early-adopter for a product that's normally intended to last decades, if not centuries. More importantly, the industry is currently speculative enough that if we even tried to impose proper regulatory constraints on it, my guess is most of these companies would go bankrupt doing testing. Perhaps, in several decades, we will have a good understanding of how strong these houses are and how well they age. But we certainly don’t now.

American house are built with timber, this is built with cement and iron pillars. You can't even compare these two.

@@avinash22i Welp sorry to break it to you it’s iron pillars and Plastic composite

​@@lgtv8526 What do you mean bro? As you can see in the video, machine is clearly pouring the cement. With iron pillars and cements it looks quite durable

@@lgtv8526 0:21 its clearly mentioned as Cement.

@@avinash22i no its not, it is a hybrid plasticky portland cement which gives the texture and rigidity similar to the portland cement but falls face first in strength.

All good questions

Good questions.

Answers; Already given as 23 lakhs...saves a plenty of money. 3D priting allows you to construct building as per the site geometry - thick or thin, tall or short, round or square or conical, oblique or flat, etc., etc., Uses same cement, sand , water, electrical energy, ..what is your carbon foot print...?? It reduces man power requirement ...counter ; when does the population control happen ..?? What is human progress is ..?? It's the result of human development & progress that this came into being.

@@girijaramarao4252 1. The price of the raw material is the same. So then, what cost is being cut here?! Money that should go as daily wages to construction workers, instead goes to purchasing Printer and its long term maintenance. How can we justify that? Construction workers are local people with family and children going to school; children are the future pillars of a society 3D printer is a machine (technology )purchased from a developed country.

@@Kennethkrishna sir it’s technology L&T is experimenting with support of central government and once successfully implemented then they will go with multiple other projects… this situation is there daily in our lives of humans/manual vs machines/automation. So we’re all going to live with technology

Construction time is the catalyst here,45 days compared to 300 days ,so thts makes sense why the costing is low!

23 Lakhs

More stronger than normal buildings as it is entirely concrete

It would be strong but cost

Not strong if 1st or 2nd floor constructed .

@@tejesheconomics4072 strength of a building is determined by columns and beams . Not walls

Labourers and construction workers will still be needed I guess but with computers(I guess)

Waste fellow ur beo

Sahi hai expiry to date bataye 😅😂