Two subscribers, indeed.

Welcome aboard! :) Glad that I could help

Pp

I will be posting it later this week

Hey Could you connect with as I need help in my dissertation

you're welcome, part 2 coming at the end of this week

I really appreciate you sharing this, really happy that my teaching makes the topic of research and data analysis a little bit less daunting :)

Thank you! :)

thank you for your question. One way to integrate chatGPT with NVivo would be to ask chatGPT to found codes/themes related to something specific we have in mind (or maybe just ask it to create Any codes or themes), making sure to instruct it to specify quotes for each code/theme (also specify that you want the quotes in the original, raw form - with no corrections from the bot, as it likes to do so), then you can locate these quotes by the text search option in NVivo (this is why you need the raw form, so that you can just copy and paste the quotes) and code them, using the code ideas from chatGPT

thanks for sharing !

I'm not a "qualitative research experts" but I second this. I've tried both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 and both cannot provide nuance and comprehensive result, especially when we provide them a chunk of data and straight asked them to analyze. However, after quite numbers of trials, I've found that it can be done but through "little by little" (explained in my 2nd paragraph), and for now it only works for identifying codes. First, I need to "establish the thematic process" with the GPT before I start asked for the code. I've provided them with 1) the title of my study, 2) my research objective that require thematic, 3) the condition of the "data collection", like in my case is a series of sessions (longitudinal study), number of participants and groups (treatment vs control) and 4) example of previous studies' "Thematic methodology". So, the GPT will establish the process or steps that we are going to do, including the details such as inductive/deductive, critical-realist perspective, or whatever needed. Second prompt is, I asked GPT, based on that (the established steps with details), I will provide him a table of subject and the question (type what is the question), where the subject's first letter indicate which group they belong to (e.g., T01 for treatment, C01 for Control), for total of number session (in my case is 8). For each subject's response, I want the GPT to provide the details such as a "nuance inductive coding" based on the research objective (repeat again to remind) based on the condition of each group, and specifically based on the question asked (repeat again to remind, type again the question). The "code" must be together with the "quote" and "reasoning", and list again for only the quote (so that I can have 2 data in a column for the "code, quote, and reasoning" which is for my future reference for further thematic steps, and list of "quotes" only so that later it is easy for me to do the next thematic step. I have tried posted whole column "subject" and "questions/response". After that, I posted again but 1 time for each subject, and I can see that a data from single subject has more codes, and it has better results in my own judgement of my study. I've tried 2 subjects at 1 time, it still provides quite decent result, but I'm so lazy to try 3,4,5 and so on. This is what I meant by "little by little". Both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 will go NUT if we provide too many data to interpret, and it is undeniable that there are difference results between using GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, but don't forget that GPT-4 has limit caps, like 50 prompt per-3 hours. This method requires hard work as if were doing the thematic in a traditional way with a little help of the technology. And of course, we still need to manually verify and validate each result as well before moving to the next themed step (which has already listed in the established thematic step above). However, this is just my ignorant opinion, that, the "reasoning" ability provided by the GPT itself (assuming after we have validated and approve it) is a good handicap compared to using other software. Other software like Nvivo Atlas.ti does have the "reasoning" ability, but they did not provide as what GPT can do. But yeah, they were more easy and faster way to get a similar decent result as using this "semi-traditional" way - unless the GPT can remain "sane" with a chunk of data to interpret. Thats my 2cents.

Dr. G. Your chat GPT was VERY informative..I look forward to reviewing How can I get a transcript coding theme analysis using Microsoft WORD that you were referring to and an NVIVO TUTORIAL? I have all my data for my dissertation in transcript I need to expedite coding and theming in an accessible ethical way. Please guide me .... Very grateful to have found your page...

I have use chatgpt 4.0 and its powerfull results i got. Please use the right prompt. 😊

Have you tried the new chatgpt features with data analysis? I also found that you can continue to “train” or submit more detailed information within a given chat session to beef up the AI’s process around a given area

Thanks for the effort! :)

Glad it was helpful!

glad to hear that!

Hey I am also working on my dissertation could you help me in this?

​@@aditiyadav8544i can. I write academiic papers for masters and phd students

Glad it was helpful! I have another one on this topic (either the most recent upload or one of the most recent ones) that I think will be useful too!

you're welcome! I'm glad that you're finding this content useful

Thank you! Hope to keep doing this , and comments like yours keep me going!

I don't have one specific solution to this, you'd just need to find a way to indicate them somehow, if not by colours then by different fonts, sizes, etc

never heard of it, need to check this out

It's my pleasure!

Glad it was helpful!

I cannot tell you for sure how this works, as I am not a programmer, but in my opinion, this would not make sense - since this is your original raw data. One thing you may try, and I know this will sound weird.... is to ask ChatGPT about these things - you will be surprised, I think it may actually give you the answer to this query

Glad it helped!

Thank you , I'm glad to hear that this content is useful!

this is why you should definitely control the whole process, and I would definitely leave the theory generation to a human, I agree. I may only, if anything, use GPT's assistance for coding (provided that, again, I am overlooking the process)

Glad you like it!

The process I use was influenced by Constructivist Grounded Theory, described, among others, in a book by Charmaz "Constructing Grounded Theory". This is not to say taht you can only use this approach if you are doing a GT study - I have been using thsi approach in a variety of studies, hardly any of them being grounded theory

@@qualitativeresearcher thanks for the kind and detailed reply~~very informative~~

Thanks so much!

I believe it will be detected if you are using it for writing your literature review or any other parts of your thesis. I would also never recommend doing this for many other reasons

If you use it for literature review be sure to actually look up the source and read it and then cite it. You also need to include the AI output as an appendix of your work. If you do that, you shouldn't have to worry about the AI detectors

I believe someone has done that in the comments :)

it is, if you use it ethically. However, convincing the academic community that this is acceptable and ethical is a completely different story! :)

you should try and experiment with it. I am guessing that it would, but you would constantly need to monitor it, as it sometimes randomly goes nuts :) I was, for example, using it to translate some text that was written in another language, and it was doing an absolutely amazing job until it just randomly decided to start generating some text it just came up with, instead of translating what I was giving it. so chatGPT definitely needs someone to monitor its work :)

This is the main problem with Chat GPT, I think. I guess it's just trying to consistently ask for more, or maybe breaking the data up into chunks that are easier for the AI to digest? I know it can be annoying

I believe someone has already done that in the comments. Also, here is a video where I go into more detail of this process kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qKeWjbKZmMXUY58.html

Yes, as I replied to a similar comment, I think that before it is confirmed what exactly is done to the data and whether it is being protected, this may indeed be an issue from the ethical point of view. I expect this issue to be addressed in the coming weeks or months, as it is certainly an important one

Before you copy the text, make to remove anything that would breach confidentiality. @@qualitativeresearcher Example change names of people or places

You're welcome!

yes, if you have the Plus version, then there is no reason not to attach the file :) At the time of recording, I think I could only paste the text

Never thought of it before, but I imagine I'd list all the pre-determined codes, explain the purpose of the study and ask GPT to code the data (which I would upload as a file if I'm using GPT4, or paste if the earlier version) and list quotes that match each of these codes

I agree. I definitely still prefer software that were specifically designed for data analysis, but with the current AI capabilities, I don't think we are far from the point where it will indeed surpass this kind of software

yes, if you are doing document analysis, or any other secondary data analysis, you treat it just as you would treat any other data, which means using quotes from it too

I read out all the prompts that I use in the video. These are just prompts I previously wrote to save time on the video

I will be posting it later next week

@@qualitativeresearcher Thank you, Dr. Would code sorting and grouping into themes be done manually or through ChatGPT?

Thematic analysis, reflexive thematic analysis, grounded theory analysis, all of this is done in this way. Except for specific models (such as Brown and Clarkes' one) where more steps are provided. As I often explain in many videos, these approaches are not as different from each other as the authors describing them would like it to be the case

You would need to ask the developer what their rules for this are but I do not think you would have issues with plagiarism

Unfortunately, I do not know the answer at the moment of how the data is being stored and treated by ChatGPT

as soon as I manage, I will try within the next 3 days - I spent whole morning today trying to do it but chatGPT kept crashing because of the number of users on it ;) will try again soon (and most likely this will be a part 2 and 3 video together)

​@Research with Dr Kriukow you're incredible I hope you're told this enough

@@qualitativeresearcher Awesome, thanks looking forward to it...

@@Xeando Completely agree...

there is part 2 of this video. Once you generate your final set of themes, just write a report on your findings (I have a video about that too), using some quotes from the data, this is why I said it is important to have access to quotes

there is no part 3, I explain this in the video

Except I cannot as I do not have ethical approval!

it is something I have been thinking about to be honest. You may be right that this may not be acceptable from the point of view of ethics, as I am not sure about the protection of the data we input into ChatGPT, but otherwise I think this would be a brilliant way to validate our coding!

you can do this in the free version, the only difference is that you have to then paste the transcript into the chat (the paid version lets you upload the whole file)

ChatGPT directly, or tools Based on ChatGPT (see my other videos in which I talk about SciSpace kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ot1xg7KU0dvSnnk.html&ab_channel=ResearchwithDrKriukow) that summarize the literature, provide main points, etc. Super useful! You do eventually want to read the literature yourself, of course, but these tools may automatize and speed the process up and make sure you are not wasting time reading things you do Not need to be reading

You do not. some people do this but this is entirely optional, and there are also many reasons Not to do this. I never do it

@@qualitativeresearcher thanks 😊 🙏

I'm pretty sure I shared it in one of hte comments

apologies for the delay. In terms of the prompt you asked for, you will need to experiment and do a bit of a trial and error and see what it "says", but I expect it to be fairly good at following what you described above, even in the same language. If it is confused, you just need to try to break each task into smaller chunks and be Very clear when you explain things to this tool :)

the rates should be on my website, it is 25GBP/1000 words, although discounts are available for larger documents like yours. The best way is to reach out through the email provided on the website - drkriukow.com

thank you for your question. In this video I only wanted to show how to create the codes. As I explained, ChatGPT should only be used if you want to support your own work, rather than something to be used separately. If I was using this method (normally I use NVivo), I think there are several variations to be used. You can either rely fully on the codes and associated extracts (thus, not read the transcript as a whole, but rather "learn" it from codes - remember, if you did the interviews, you are also pretty familiar with the data already, right?), or quickly skim through the texts and then ask the bot to do the codes as I did here, or even do your own coding (e.g. in MS Word - i have a video about it), and then ask chatGPT to also do it, thus validating the codes even more. I do not have a single answer to your question, as all of this is new to me too

Здравствуйте Асель! Просматривал это видео и увидел ваш комментарий и понял что вы с Казахстана (надеюсь я верно подметил). Согласно данному видео, автор указывает, что можно проводить анализ текстов (при помощи кодировании текста)?! Я пытаюсь понять применения данных методов. Может у вас есть другие способы анализирования текстов (больших текстовых данных)?!

Здравствуйте@@FrtnY ! Я только увидела ваш ответ; я использую программу MAXQDA для анализа текстовых данных. Возможно, она и вам подойдет. Насколько у вас большие текстовые данные ?

My course is on NVivo R1 (release one), and you will need to go through their website to purchase the license

@@qualitativeresearcher okay sir thank you. You are absolutely a saviour.

Good question and one I still do nto have answers to - this is why I do not currently use it for any sensitive data. I believe, however (although you would need to double check) that they do not store any of that data. The model is based on what was originally available up to 2021 I think, so it does not add any new data to its database - but again, you do need to doublecheck that first to be sure

I saw an example where the text described something that was released after 2021 and got it wrong. It looked great until a closer look showed the new model # was impossible.@@qualitativeresearcher

you would either need to break them down into bits and upload separately, or buy the premium version - which enables you to upload files to chatGPT. At first I did not think this is a good idea but eventually I got myself that premium version as I do use this tool a lot (not for analysis but in general for lots of things related to my business). I can't remember the exact price but it is not too much

Is this one still AILYZE?

I believe someone has already done that in the comments. Also, you may check my website for an ebook where I share much updated and more detailed version of the prompts

you don't analyze yes/no answers thematically - if that's all you've got, it means your data is more quantitative and you need other methods to analyze it

@@qualitativeresearcher thank you for the response! This was really helpful

I will be posting it later next week

@@qualitativeresearcher I will be happy if you could compile everything into Part 2 as we are running out of time. Thanks

"You are a researcher. I will now upload an interview transcript, and you will do what is called qualitative coding - specifically, initial coding also known as open coding. The text is an interview transcript, I do not want you to code the questions asked by the interviewer. I want the codes to be detailed and descriptive. I want you to apply codes to sentences or parts of sentences, and later when you develop a list of codes, I want you to be able to tell me what sentences or parts of sentences these codes were applied to. In other words, when I ask you to provide me example quotes for the codes that you create, I would like you to be able to do it. Here is the text to be coded:"

Can you please share your 2nd and 3rd prompt

Just treat the chatgpt as a child who is struggling to focus 😂

someone put all prompts in one of the comments

I am really not sure. If it does not store anything, it's a good thing (for ethics), but I am really not sure, I just don't know enough about this

there is definitely video in this, so must be something on your end. Are there specific sections where this happens? I double checked, and there is definitely video throughout

you can reach out through my website, thanks

@@qualitativeresearcher what’s your website please