No video

Theories of the Industrial Revolution

  Рет қаралды 7,571

UC Davis

UC Davis

Күн бұрын

This is a discussion of the major prevailing theories of the onset of the Industrial Revolution (chapter 11).

Пікірлер: 10
@hannecatton2179
@hannecatton2179 2 жыл бұрын
Britain..............a truly remarkable country. An enigma wrapped up in a mystery. We are the world we are thanks in large part to that country and the people therein.
@bryncomeaux
@bryncomeaux 12 жыл бұрын
the printing press led to the Protestant era the protestant era led to the enlightenment era the enlightenment era led to science as a study science as a study led to the development of calculus and trigonometry necessary for engineering to occur including chemistry allowed for better metallurgy necessary for these machines to be built to their higher thousandths of an inch machining and casting.
@jamesthomas4841
@jamesthomas4841 17 күн бұрын
There is some truth in that especially the bit about printing presses, Protestantism and the enlightenment but the early industrialists were not particularly educated men. The progress in textile weaving or steam engines were made by practical men who experimented by tinkering with existing tools. The Spinning Jenny was made using traditional materials. James Watt improved on the efforts of Newcomen, the metallurgy necessary for a Beam engine was really no different to that used in making cannons for the Royal Navy something that had been going on for more than a century.. It is said that George Stephenson was illiterate until he was 18.
@kennoble9581
@kennoble9581 7 ай бұрын
So the industrial revolution was a response to an ecological disaster. The British had chopped down all their trees and had dug so much coal out of the ground to the point that to extract more coal they had to be inventive and find a way to pump water out of the coal mines, thus creating the steam pump engine. This technology would later be applied to transportation, rail and ship.
@paulgraystone4919
@paulgraystone4919 4 ай бұрын
what!! no mention of the enclosures ???
@bryncomeaux
@bryncomeaux 12 жыл бұрын
the question isn't why did it take thousands of years but what happened 10,ooo years ago to start us on this path of urbanization, and how remarkable it is that europe developed from the dark ages to industrialism in under 700 years
@stevo728822
@stevo728822 12 жыл бұрын
I assume you mean speculative investment bubbles? There were plenty prior to the industrial revolution. The most infamouse being the Tulip Bubble in Holland and the South Sea Bubble that burst in 1720.
@polvotierno
@polvotierno 12 жыл бұрын
Could bubbles be connected to sparking economic growth?... Once business started growing, and wages rising, and markets increasing... could a large bubble have changed the nature of the economy? changed people's perception of the economy? and their incentives? Did bubbles exist before the industrial revolution?
@edwardrichardson8254
@edwardrichardson8254 10 ай бұрын
Solipsistic and crass. It did not take "thousands of years' - every early city in Mesopotamia was its own Industrial Revolution. Victorian London was the first city in 2000 years to surpass a million in population but Rome had done it without spinning jennies and gunboat diplomacy. I place the rise of modern banking and credit systems and merchant classes of the Italian Renaissance as infinitely more important Wedgewood China. One could go a step further and say the Black Death initiated that by weakening the authority of the church, thinning out the population and creating a huge abundance of cheap land and ushering in mass literacy w/ the printing press. The "why did it happen here" question is no different than why did "it" happen in Ancient Egypt? Athens, in Rome, in Florence, in Venice, Spain, Columbus and the New World, etc?
@user-ey6oi4xw8r
@user-ey6oi4xw8r 4 ай бұрын
There's nothing mysterious about it. In Britain from 1800 to 1900. 20,000 Waterwheels decreased in number. Windmills decreased in number. Englishman Thomas Newcomen's 1,500 Atmospheric Pumps disappeared. Scotsman James Watt's 500 Steam Engines and their descendants increased in number to 10,000,000 !!! For every SINGLE Waterwheel in 1800 there were now 500 Steam Engines in 1900 !!! That's an increase in Power Capacity for the whole country of 500 times, in one human's ( possible ) lifetime. This WAS the Industrial Revolution, it was a Power Revolution. It only required one single Invention. James Watt's Invention of the world's first PRACTICAL Steam Powered Engine in Scotland. Something that had never existed before. And you don't need a flowing river of water for any of them either, so they can be sited anywhere Take away Steam Power and you don't have an Industrial Revolution. It's not difficult to see, but it seems to me like a hell of a lot of people just DON'T WANT to see it! For reasons that I won't go into.
The English Industrial Revolution and Theories of Growth
44:32
The English Industrial Revolution II
44:00
UC Davis
Рет қаралды 19 М.
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
Мы сделали гигантские сухарики!  #большаяеда
00:44
The English Industrial Revolution I
40:37
UC Davis
Рет қаралды 47 М.
Social Mobility
48:46
UC Davis
Рет қаралды 2,8 М.
Coalbrookdale: Origins of the Industrial Revolution - Denis Smith 1985
21:39
Imperial College London
Рет қаралды 22 М.
The Anarchy: A New Book by William Dalrymple
59:52
Asia Society
Рет қаралды 120 М.
The Logic of the Malthusian Model  IV
48:50
UC Davis
Рет қаралды 6 М.
The Early Industrial Revolution, 1760-1851
1:13:30
Columbia University
Рет қаралды 36 М.
What Was the Industrial Revolution? - Robert E. Lucas
1:16:11
Barcelona School of Economics
Рет қаралды 5 М.
The Logic of the Malthusian Model  II
51:20
UC Davis
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Empire In The Pre-Industrial World - Professor Richard J Evans
1:01:20
Gresham College
Рет қаралды 98 М.
ISSEI & yellow girl 💛
00:33
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН