Many things can not and should not be discussed publicly. Specifically in a country like India.
@KillerDrummerNikeАй бұрын
exactly. it would be the stupidest thing ever. when he means in "public" he means with opposition parties. it will turn out to be a donkey doctrine.
@sb9060Ай бұрын
Why did the congressi regime not have any declared comprehensive national security policy in the past?
@Vivek10010Ай бұрын
Because they are socialist-communists, lol. They dont beleive in borders and hence dont beleive in national security.
@darkspineslayer5614Ай бұрын
useless whataboutist question. how does it matter now dhakkan?
@sukantpanigrahi76Ай бұрын
They were waiting for China to tell them what to do.
@ramachandrannair4554Ай бұрын
Simple how much did they were nationalist.
@satyendrapradhan5169Ай бұрын
The utility of a national security doctrine for India was explained excellently. An amazing analysis.
@The_Great_Game_BeginsАй бұрын
People from R&AW/ Military should be given priority for NSA post rather than Police/ I.B. Its a multi dimensional Post.
@ghanvedsingh8946Ай бұрын
The function of military is different so to deal in foreign countries how military will deal the civil people they don't have that much liberty in thinking on their rights?
@ChandranPrema123Ай бұрын
@@ghanvedsingh8946when it comes to Security Nation is more important than Liberty
@s-qc9nsАй бұрын
@@ghanvedsingh8946 but police are also corrupt and can't be relied upon
@sanchitsharma6852Ай бұрын
Stuf stupid@@ChandranPrema123
@amithabv1060Ай бұрын
RAW would be IPS. Also military has a very different role. NSA needs a strategic overview along withworking knowledge of the entire intelligence and external affairs apparatus. That's why it's either a IPS or an IFS officer
@ArkoProvoMukherjeeАй бұрын
Amazing analysis! Thanks for making the case for a NS doctrine in such a forceful and thoughtful manner!
@ThePrintIndiaАй бұрын
Dear Arko, Glad to note that you liked the content of this video. Thank you for supporting ThePrint.
@adityadeshmukh9444Ай бұрын
Amazing
@PatSenАй бұрын
15:41 excellent point. However it seems that India prefers to keep such articulation close to its chest. Perhaps for flexibility that it needs for the fine tightrope walk it has to do to maintain its strategic autonomy. The west does not like this studied vagueness. And that is perhaps another reason to continue with it. 😀 16:01 That’s an interesting proposition. I can’t think of any country doing that as a process or a framework. Can you? It would be interesting to hear you expand on the possibilities of states and political parties being included in the discussions. Btw, do take a look at the support structure of the two book-cases behind you. They don’t look strong enough to support the weight of books. It gave me palpitations to just imagine all those lovely, painstakingly numbered and labelled books get damaged. 😄🙏🏽
@tvm73827Ай бұрын
This was an incredibly insightful and thorough provocative piece by Mr Sanjeev Chopra. India has been traditionally very inward looking and reticent about her internal and international views. This is not consistent with her global aspirations and newly acquired status on the world stage. I hope the political establishment heeds the advice that Mr Sanjeev Chopra has provided in this The Print segment.
@vinayaktrivedi8654Ай бұрын
Thank you
@s-qc9nsАй бұрын
Make Bharat great again 🤝
@PramodPandit-yz9niАй бұрын
Very through and thoughtful talk. Hopefully there will be some follow-up by the PMO/Parliment, since in the past our great Babu and Neta class seem to be very selfserving, steering very carefully away from any accountability whatsoever. Publishing a NSP while remaining totally dependent on imports for security related hardware will put us on par with Pakistan, not the USA, China, or Australia. We are unfortunately only talkers not do-ers.
@nrusimha11Ай бұрын
"16:01 That’s an interesting proposition. I can’t think of any country doing that as a process or a framework. Can you? It would be interesting to hear you expand on the possibilities of states and political parties being included in the discussions. "
@Red.bulldozer3Ай бұрын
Modi is in his 3 rd term. What he had done to solve the border issues with china and pakustan. Nahi🤦🏼 Under his rule indisns lost more land to china in 2020😂
@justcurious40Ай бұрын
3 big risks 1) Not enough Air Force squadrons 2) Not enough jawans ( infantry) thanks to COVID and agniveer policy 3) defensive policy vis a vis Pakistan
@PurnaVarma-rk2rgАй бұрын
National security is both defensive as well offensive. So defence experts are fully aware.
@ryanthyag2723Ай бұрын
No doubt Modi govt brings in safety and security to India
@sisubk6321Ай бұрын
Kindly make a draft & send to NSA.
@ShadyAJАй бұрын
Drafting a doctrine and adhering to it, or taking a stance towards achieving the penned objectives are two seperate things. When US talks of its superiority it doesn't mince its words and it ensures to maintain the same by hook or crook. Similarly China is spot on about creating rich nation with large army and so on and so forth...as it strives hard in that direction. Our's on the contrary, whatever exists for now, is more around theatrics and lip service.
@balabhaskaran2570Ай бұрын
National Security Doctrine should be secondary to National Philosophy Doctrine.
@rajeshkumarchand8802Ай бұрын
Hope the desired security doctrine is realistic which identifies the long term goals and required resources to achieve them. The doctrine should have a direction but flexible enough to the dynamic character of direct and indirect threats, be it political, economic, social or environmental. The doctrine should not be personality or idiology or ism oriented but exhibit wisdom, vision, inclusivity and realism. Sure it has to be well debated and so that the intent of the doctrine represents the national character and value systems.
@pardeeptandonАй бұрын
Under Ajit Dowel's watch, our relationships with all our neighbours have deteriorated. The situation in Kashmir has also deteriorated to the extent that the EC could not hold assembly elections in Kashmir, nor could the BJP dare to put up a candidate in recent LS elections from Kashmir.
@raghunathphadnis6541Ай бұрын
Will it be independent of army, cabinet committee on security or even PMO being a public document?
@JATINDERKUMAR-bv5fbАй бұрын
Good talk.. sensible research
@2596mrАй бұрын
This was a very well thought out video
@prabhatsinha8318Ай бұрын
Absolutely classic view on this critical subject.
@kefifirefly8510Ай бұрын
Very Knowledgeable
@satishverma-bl5rsАй бұрын
Nonsense analysis
@nitinskadamАй бұрын
Superb video
@AlokAsthana1954Ай бұрын
Which patient goes to a doctor who hasn’t done any course in medicine, but is serving patients for last 20 years? Do you?
@satishverma-bl5rsАй бұрын
Biased view
@vipulshah6874Ай бұрын
Disagree with the contention that it should be debated in public. It should be a secret document or understanding. Why destroy the surprise factor?
@santosh_979Ай бұрын
Nothing new, waste of time.
@sadenbАй бұрын
I have a feeling the public should not participate in the national security and foreign policy. I don't like this aspect of democracy.
@tejprakash3561Ай бұрын
It is very very general. apple pie statements, meaningless.
@trishulmawaАй бұрын
Boring speaker
@pardeeptandonАй бұрын
BJP wants to make Bharat of the ancient Vedic period follow the Laws of Manusmriti. This philosophy failed because we have been occupied by foreigners for the past 1000 years.
@s-qc9nsАй бұрын
This is nonsense. How did you come to this conclusion?
@pardeeptandonАй бұрын
@@s-qc9ns During recent elections, all Modi did was Hindu Muslim. Last week, they proposed introducing Manu Smriti to teach it to law students at Delhi University.
@thecomment9489Ай бұрын
Manu smriti was never the law of the land in India. May be some small kingdom but never the whole territory that is present day India. So ascribing Manusmriti as reason for enslavement of India for thousand years is identifying the problem/issue very incorrectly.
@pardeeptandonАй бұрын
@@thecomment9489: The Brahmins have ensured that Manu Smriti is still practised in our society even after 2000 years of its writing. Caste certificates are today given on the basis of Birth rather than merit, as the Verna system was formulated during Vedic times and is part of Sanatana Dharma. Islamic Bangladesh has more women doing paid jobs than in Manuvadi India, where women are treated as second-class citizens. The Temple and Akhilesh Yadav CM are washed by Ganga jail, and the laws of Manu Smriti are applied. Inter-caste arranged marriages are discouraged by Manu smriti and practised by society.
@Kang.31Ай бұрын
😂😂
@karanchandra2491Ай бұрын
What, is he reading the constitution...kis kis ko pakad ke le ate ho. Channel band karwana hai kya