Want to know what EU4 Parabellum is on June 19th?? Look here: doras.to/parabellum Discord Here! - discord.com/invite/4zBxE58F9C
@RichardGadsden2 ай бұрын
Laith, the reason the populations you're looking at are much lower is that the dates you mention were after the Black Death, and the start date is before.
@mst20822 ай бұрын
💯
@DrBunnyflipflopEOAАй бұрын
Oh damn, I hadn't even thought about the fact that we'll be going into the Black Death pretty much straight away
@Rokos_Basilisk2 ай бұрын
I like how in the devlog they're like "due to controversy we've split the british isles into the regions of britan and ireland". And then Laith comes along with "THE BRITISH ISLES!"
@henryglennon38642 ай бұрын
The Irish will just have to console themselves with the knowledge that the rest of the world actually likes them.
@enigmaticchickenmcnobody2 ай бұрын
The correct name imo
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
It is the correct geographical name, get over it.
@RichardMontgomeryYTАй бұрын
@@henryglennon3864 Lol savage.
@InsanepieАй бұрын
why are the irish so fragile?
@henryglennon38642 ай бұрын
For verisimilitude, if you zoom in on the map of England in EU5, you can see Paradox added animated raw sewage flowing through the rivers and off the beaches. There's also a huge medieval Weatherspoons just outside of Reading.
@emib65992 ай бұрын
EU5 with pollution mechanics
@mokslobrokolis66852 ай бұрын
I love that the "low views in no time - bro fell off" joke is as funny the millionth time as it was the first time. That is, not funny at all.
@carltonleboss2 ай бұрын
Correctamundo
@bobmarlej91062 ай бұрын
bro fell off
@ewancarey58472 ай бұрын
Opinion fell off.
@menacingcar04492 ай бұрын
126 likes in 3h, bro fell off
@johanneslangpap63352 ай бұрын
133 likes in 4 hours bro fell off
@TheJonnyjoh2 ай бұрын
Really love your take at the end to make Paradox Games easier to understand, because that's been the only reason so many of my friends did not feel comfortable playing EU4 for a very long time. I'm different because I'm cartophile. And yes that is appearantly a real word.
@SereglothIV2 ай бұрын
Thanks for this word. Now I know what I am too.
@TheJonnyjoh2 ай бұрын
@@SereglothIV One of us! One of us! One of us!
@thcrmsnchn1056Ай бұрын
And here I thought it was just my autism lol
@atlas90822 ай бұрын
Great point on the jargon at the end. "Allows peasants to migrate - False" is a lot less obvious in meaning than "Does not allow peasants to migrate."
@hem94832 ай бұрын
the first time I played eu4 I encountered a triple negative somewhere in the UI and just sat there staring at it in disbelief
@jasonstormsong49402 ай бұрын
I don’t perceive the ambiguity here. It’s not much different from a “this statement is true/false” condition.
@MrShadowThief2 ай бұрын
How???????????
@idoltrash235329 күн бұрын
I wouldn't worry about that for now. At the moment everything is going to be in code jargon for easy debugging and I doubt it will make it into the final game. For all its flaws Vicky3 does at least show that Paradox are getting better at communicating - even if they did go a little mad on the whole tooltips inside tooltips inside tooltips thing
@spideylover20002 ай бұрын
15:55 Aren't both of those figures from after the Black Death hit England? Granted, it only came in halfway through 1348, but I wonder how that affects the figure.
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
Something like 50% of the population died in countries like England and France so it actually seems about right.
@Scitch872 ай бұрын
The ONLY thing i want from the new maps is that the political map won't vanish if you zoom in. Just keep it like EU4 that when i zoom in i still see the political map colours on the map and not the terrain.
@kyrakia55072 ай бұрын
Mods will fix it?
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
I like both so an option to toggle would be best.
@harku1232 ай бұрын
@@Oxley016 Imperator has a mode for full on political map and also one that's transparent political and becomes terrain when you zoom in. I honestly like the terrain mode when zooming in but I'm more glad that it has both
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
@@harku123 Indeed, me too!
@ashj432 ай бұрын
I think it’s fair that at least some of the north west coast falls into the Dublin market. The rugged terrain of the Lake District makes it very difficult to transport goods via land so goods were transported by sea. , so it wouldn’t surprise me if they traded a lot with Ireland. Interestingly during the interwar period the Cumbrian coast suffered greatly when Ireland declared independence and imposed tariffs on British goods.
@ValidIsCool2 ай бұрын
para bellum ad goes hard
@SereglothIV2 ай бұрын
I also saw it at Red Hawk's yesterday but I still don't know what that is. A mod? A tournament? An event? Or what?
@bookmarkobjectanimations1232 ай бұрын
The london market has a very strange and concerning lack of sea tiles. I'm not a historian, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't sound quite right.
@ap64802 ай бұрын
I think the reason was they wanted to create a somewhat independent dutch market that wouldn't get completely absorbed by the english one within a few years
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
English weren't particularly known for being great seafarers and traders quite at this point, that starts to occur much more over the couple centuries following game start.
@oldyladАй бұрын
@@Oxley016yeah but that just means it’s poorly represented later. If there are dynamic market changes or something this works fine but England seems underrepresented
@Oxley016Ай бұрын
@@oldylad I am quite sure it is a somewhat dynamic system.
@MausOfTheHouse2 ай бұрын
The 5.3 million figure also includes lands outside of England proper, like Gascony and Calais
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
And is a pre black death number.
@pileofcheese50172 ай бұрын
On the "plainer English" comment at the end: I would most prefer it if there was a toggle, between "code language" and "lay language". Often when it comes to modifiers and abilities like this, they can be slightly ambiguous when read in lay language, and someone with expertise (me, I'm someone) in how pdx talks, can get more clarity from the more code-y language than from the lay language.
@MrShadowThief2 ай бұрын
I'm autistic so I much prefer codey language.
@oldyladАй бұрын
@@MrShadowThief”I’m autistic so I like apples”
@CN-cb6yu2 ай бұрын
The 5.36 mil population probably includes the continental holdings as well, like Normandie and Aquitaine?
@nachtderuntoten36822 ай бұрын
It’s also before the Black Death.
@campbellfranklyn71922 ай бұрын
England doesn't have Normandy in 1337. King John lost it in 1204 and Henry V got it back in 1419.
@hardcorelace75652 ай бұрын
Well 30-50% of england died to the black death. The population went from 6 ish million to 3-4 million, which would line up with the 5.4 million shown and figures laith says.
@robmarney2 ай бұрын
Great point on the confusing nature of binary tooltips and especially AND/OR conditions. Even streamers are confused about the conditions for clicking some of these buttons!
@royalkiwi73002 ай бұрын
I think the population of England could also include some of the French holdings, I could be wrong but it would maybe make it much closer to 5m
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
Yes, that, but also it is pre black death numbers. England and France lost roughly 50% of their populations to the plague.
@Schmitt-2 ай бұрын
I'd be interested to hear your opinions on the dev diarys every week, also as you may know the dev team is very open to feedback and will most certainly see this video (and its comments).
@NoshGilligan232 ай бұрын
I like how Isle of Man is under London Market Control while surrounded by Dublin
@westy67642 ай бұрын
Still release that other video Laith! Id be interested in seeing that
@EnglishOrthodoxАй бұрын
plot twist, March of The Eagles 2
@Nifalh2 ай бұрын
That population is before black death
@HarryTheArchaeologist2 ай бұрын
@4:53 Without going into whether the Northwest of England is represented correctly; trade over sea is far far cheaper than over land. It could just be that people in England in the Dublin trade area find it more convenient for their goods to head towards Dublin rather than London?
@lister17452 ай бұрын
Pretty sure they said they want have the ability to change terrains and stuff in game but would depend on their engine team improving the engine tech
@combrade-t2 ай бұрын
The whole changing terrain is something unconfirmed I believe. I recall reading Johan saying that he was waiting on some of the backend stuff to change to see what could be done but it wasnt off the table :D. Personally I feel like the marcher lords could do with being more deeply represented than what it seems atm because the way they ruled and their relationship with the english crown was quite different from the rest of Wales so yk..
@tommou43212 ай бұрын
First time that my hometown has been included as a location in a PDX game! Couldn't stop myself from going to the forums and giving some feedback 🤣🤣
@quadcannon2 ай бұрын
Considering that the Exchequer was established so long before the EU5 start date, would it not make sense for England to therefore have a (possibly significant) bonus to income from taxes? 10:40
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
That might be one of the ways that allows the English to be competitive with France during the 100 years war
@Popmanpraise2 ай бұрын
It’s very impressive how eu4 KZfaqrs are able to drag out tinto talks of maps that take me like 2 minutes to read into 20 or 30 minute videos
@mud2132 ай бұрын
I could see "ALLOWS peasants to migrate" (with "allows" in green/blue) and when toggled says "DOESN'T ALLOW peasants to migrate" (with "doesn't allow" in red). Now it is written more like it is programmed with: concept yes/no. Instead of real sentences. I will also point out that this sort of thing is harder to translate. The sentence structure may need additional changes to inflect into a negative.
@thusiiast2 ай бұрын
shouldn’t the fens in the east be much larger?? i don’t think they were drained by this points, most of Suffolk should be sparse and most of the coast that is labelled sparse in Norfolk and Suffolk should be farmlands.
@Baconomics12 ай бұрын
yeah the drainage efforts in the Fens really only took off in the mid 17th century
@Gamereal62862 ай бұрын
I like the different mapmodes EU5 will bring like, Population for example. That will be interesting how they will further implement this. If you want, please cover the other regions of Europe like the Netherlands and Germany when they release (totally not biased by the way). Edit: England had feudalism, so why are peasants allowed to migrate? Didnt landlords force them to stay on their land? If not please elaborate. Also, you seriously hired a real historian and then they said "Lol nope". Trolladox at its finest. I have a feeling they have beef with you. 🤭
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
England was already on it's way to limiting feudalism quite significantly at this time having created the Magna Carta that granted more basic rights to serfs than was normal across Europe over 100 years before EU5 game start. By the time EU4 game start comes around it was pretty close to abolishing feudalism 'thanks' to the effects of the Black Death killing roughly 50% of the population meaning land owners needed more flexibility with the peasant workers being allowed to come and go between estates when needed.
@thevis5465Ай бұрын
"you can kind of take these areas of england" That's scotland, those are the Scottish borders, it is not england and never has been.
@Kasaaz2 ай бұрын
Do we think there will be anything to do with the Hook and Cod Wars near the start of the game? Lots of maneuvering over control of the low countries?
@wolfcounsel28622 ай бұрын
Maybe the population number for England looks off because it includes the continental territories like Gascony which aren't shown on the map?
@curtisdesu19802 ай бұрын
A cool idea could be that when you start a game it does a Dice roll to decide on stuff like if the Isle of man should be under English or Scottish control or if Durham should go go England or Wales, adds a bit more uncertainty to the game and allows the best of both worlds when deciding on stuff that the devs aren't 100% about
@casio66512 ай бұрын
Wales being on the map *as it is* is incredibly dubious. Even if you want to use the word "dominion" (dubious, it was administered from London under English law, the King did not take the title "king of Wales", the title "king of England" included the welsh lands), the lands actually held by the Principality of Wales do not correspond with what is shown on the map. The Marcher Lords were defacto independent and the Principality basically just ran the Gwynedd area in northern wales.
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
The Marcher Lords are there - just as strong nobility. In the Tinto Maps they talked about if the Marcher Lords should be put under England to be their problem or not. I agree that the Marcher Lords should probably be independent/under England as a subject.
@razier52992 ай бұрын
Go tell them then. They have taken advice before.
@someoneinoffensive2 ай бұрын
You're confusing the principality with the pre Rhuddlan kingdoms. This is all post statute of Rhuddlan and accurately reflects the 4 lordships for the most part. Even Chester was lumped in with Fflintshire. Yes Wales existed within the Kingdom of England but with a separate legal system, language and culture - English common law was introduced but much Welsh law was maintained until 1536 until dissolved by a "Welsh" monarch. Given Glyndwr created an (albeit brief in historical terms) internationally recognised independent Welsh state not long after this, I think structuring it like this in the game so you can have similar events play out is fine.
@casio66512 ай бұрын
@@someoneinoffensive I'm sorry, Wales being on the map is egregious and an embassament to the games purported desire for histoical accuracy. In EUV I am going to click on Wales and "play" as that "country". This makes no sense. The administration of Wales was conducted by three independently appointed and seperate English bureaucrats. The Justicar of North Wales, the Justicar of South Wales and the Warden of the Marches. The overall administration of Wales was conducted by a council of English bureaucrats based in London. So who am I playing as? The Warden's had no power over each other's lands, or the Marcher Lords, so at best I would rule a few small counties as a Justicar of the north or south. So am I playing as the "Prince of Wales" (who will stop being the prince as soon as his father dies) in London and my cabinet will be the council in London? This situation is just laughable.
@someoneinoffensive2 ай бұрын
@@casio6651 Wales is still within the Kingdom of England. This just accurately shows that bureaucratically they weren't administered from London but Caernarfon. Your idea of country is a bit 19th century and Wales doesn't meet your criteria for that for another 200 years. It's not egregious, and one of the reasons the several acts of union took hundreds of years to implement is the fact the Welsh nobility were largely left intact and brought into the system. You'll be able to play as one of these nobles, you won't be able to play as Llewellyn the last or 'the principality'.
@zVampiirePlatypusАй бұрын
You're on thin ice with that thumbnail boy.
@D.AbyssMusic2 ай бұрын
with regards to population, the question remains in the minds of the developers should we balance the game to make it more fun or remain fully historical, I think the increased population is just so that systems in place function properly to give balance to the game while still giving weight to the fact that population differences do matter. Though I'm no game dev but thats what came to mind the moment the population differed from historical records
@-._A2._-2 ай бұрын
Could also be a work in progress thing. Plus while laith here says it's unreasonable for London alone to have higher population than Irish regions that doesn't reflect the current situation in present day. London has the similar amount of population as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland combined. So to me it make a whole lot of sense for the high population in London.
@meth4163Ай бұрын
the pre norman English Kingdom was actually the most effectively governed and administratively effective kingdom in Europe
@derekskelton41872 ай бұрын
Would really enjoy one of those succession games with you an red hawk where you take turns playing the same game of EU4. Whether it's the same nation or different ones.
@oliverthomas-couch2 ай бұрын
Carmarthen being included makes me so happy even if it should probably be called Carmarthenshire
@dylanwarner7009Ай бұрын
I love the detail they gave to Ireland, since the political reality was a hodgepodge of Anglo-Norman estates and tribal realms
@lolpuuroa2 ай бұрын
OMG FINALLY PLEASE MAKE MORE OF THESE I DONT WANT TO WATCH LUDI OR ANYONE ELSE COMMENTATE ON THESE
@CameraHam2 ай бұрын
I’m so glad to be part of a community that loses its collective mind when new maps get released
@Solon1581Ай бұрын
16:08 The answer to your bewilderment is that your sources references England in 1350 while the game starts in 1337. The main factor you are forgetting is the big thing that happened in the 13 years between 1337-1350 that drastically changed England's population, known in the history book as the Black Death.
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
4:38 They don't assugn locations to hubs, only place the hubs, location go to the hub because of the simulation.
@Skyguy22Ай бұрын
Hey, you should have released the video about the start date of eu5 anyway. Would have been interesting to watch and I feel like a small editors note in the beginning would have been enough to clarify the confusion.
@cymraegpunk14202 ай бұрын
I think Wales is a but off in terms of terrain I know thst pre heavy industry it was more wooded than it is now but even so the mountains and valleys are the defining feature
@kevdog64252 ай бұрын
Yeah, Paradox does need a win.
@megapikachu6624 күн бұрын
While chester was historically part of wales, that's going 700-800 years prior to this period. So pretty english at this point.
@sootymikeАй бұрын
my home town, being a location in eu5. makes me happy. it should be a location mind you. very important historically speaking.
@raaaalf2 ай бұрын
o love thatt there's a place just called e-sex in england and everyone's like 'yeah sure'
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
Because in England lots of people understand the history of the name. It comes from a modern English shortened form of the Anglo-Saxon English name 'Ēast Seax' which is itself short for 'Ēastseaxna rīce' which means 'Kingdom of the East Saxons'.
@Hatypus19 күн бұрын
9:19 ...having seemingly all of modern Perthshire in the Lowlands feels weird, it goes right up to the bloody Cairngorms! (Also, I feel like Wales could have stood to have had two regions there)! So yeah, as they say in that following paragraph, I am a liiittle offended. /j 5.36 million is a definitely a bit high, but that population dominance actually drops for a while until after the acts of Union.
@Legoless27 күн бұрын
British Isles is a colonial term
@nplayssАй бұрын
im rlly near the pennines now i just gotta reach out to paradox
@IncontenentiaButtux2 ай бұрын
You should still release the video, there's no reason not to lol. Praise to the amount of knowledge you have on political and socioeconomic systems and the practicality that builds them, Cheers
@ziggyboboАй бұрын
laith, as someone who also did their degree in penryn / falmouth, i need to know if you ever went to mangos
@A_itsar2 ай бұрын
I just notice it just now but did laith changed his pfp?
@Izadirad1995Ай бұрын
Looks like a good game for now
@rikiba8512 ай бұрын
He said that Hen Ogledd will be a formable from Welsh culture, which may be informing the consideration to include Chester (and beyond) as part of the Welsh lands. I'm looking forward to giving that a playthrough in particular, but I don't know how real that Welsh link would have felt for those over the border at the time.
@Zelein2 ай бұрын
Wake up babe new Laith video just dropped
@Kasaaz2 ай бұрын
Love the Para Bellum spot.
@Alphabetical-Soup2 ай бұрын
It looks exciting but I've had this feeling before so let's see
@SquirrelMaestroАй бұрын
The high population is due to it being before the black death
@kabobawsome2 ай бұрын
The English population is probably counting the English holdings in France.
@cybertechmaser2 ай бұрын
instead of having it say yes/no why not but it "we ARE able to do x" or "we ARE NOT able to do x"
@Joehasligma782 ай бұрын
You should play Judea in imperator Rome it’s a really fun nation
@seamushogan9668Ай бұрын
British and Irish Isles...nice.
@theman84212 ай бұрын
If england does not get an event about the devil warwick eu5 would not be worth it
@Baromanthefool2 ай бұрын
I LIke THE PART WHEN LAITH SAID WE WOULD GET OVER THE WHOEL SPEAKING FRENCH BIT......OPPS CAPS... we really still have not gotten over it ... le offended.
@justinr60062 ай бұрын
Are they going to add the military system from Viki3 into this game?
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
No
@viniciusdemoraes84142 ай бұрын
Maybe the extra population of england is due to their french possessions
@sofyer2 ай бұрын
I have a strange feeling that they’re gonna mess up pop numbers or just put wrong ones for balance purposes. I’m mentally preparing for like 2 mil pops entire Maghreb region 😢
@17kpk2 ай бұрын
Could you imagine if London just gaslighted a bunch of lords into believing that they had special ancient rights, to the point where everyone believes them that they do but can never explain where they came from? Pretty based, not going to lie.
@Oneiroi02 ай бұрын
I am afraid although EU5 will have very wide features and countries, they will have no depth at all.
@qliphalpuzzle54532 ай бұрын
I thought he was going to reveal the Tunisia map
@markwood62992 ай бұрын
Para Bellum jumpscare xD
@carltonleboss2 ай бұрын
England would have lost a lot of its population in the Black Death, though
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
2:28 I thought they already confirmed that?
@alexisdespland49392 ай бұрын
you should look at what lord labert say about the same stuff in his video.
@HansWurst1569Ай бұрын
FUck im so jealous. CK3 dropped the ball pretty hard. Idk seeing all this makes me think EU5 will be a better medieval strategy game than CK3 is becomming...
@zurabavaliani81012 ай бұрын
I fear EU5 will be like KK3, no one would care enough to jump in, and will die out over time.
@portalfan0438Ай бұрын
bro needs to stop calling the british isles england smh
@maperns2 ай бұрын
Release the research cut!
@albert76432 ай бұрын
English population might be including French territories? Still seems a bit high
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
It's pre Black Death
@Person748922 ай бұрын
Day 1, u should play AOH2
@kevgl272 ай бұрын
"British isles" Days since the tans were at it: 0
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
It is the correct geographical term, cope seethe mald.
@kevgl272 ай бұрын
@@Oxley016 found the tan
@Oxley0162 ай бұрын
@@kevgl27 Call me what you wish if it makes you feel good, I don't care. Although it has nothing to do with politics and it has everything to do with facts, however.
@kevgl272 ай бұрын
@@Oxley016 you keep telling yourself that, pal. Irish people aren’t British islanders. Leave your colonial terms at the door. They don’t teach you shit in school in Britain. Anois, ciúnas Sasanach.
@kevgl272 ай бұрын
@@Oxley016 😂😂 if it isn’t political then why does only one of the 2 involved countries recognise it? Almost as if it’s just colonial horeshite
@johnconnor82062 ай бұрын
Day 30 of asking you to play Victoria 2 semi regulary.
@ortherner2 ай бұрын
have you considered a haircut?
@blorgajork20882 ай бұрын
Disagree with the last point but I do program a bit.
@willfakaroni58082 ай бұрын
I don’t like how Eu5 is stepping more into medieval times, I want early modern to age of revolution damnit
@monty1691Ай бұрын
Making it anglo irish culture is so bad its hiberno norman
@UwU_for_Christ2 ай бұрын
People on the forums have made several points about the locations, materials, and culture being inaccurate, which I would recommend people read. Also some good suggestions about making the Marcher Lords English vassals rather than part of Wales. I'm hoping England gets a bit of a rework like Iberia did.
@najak4773Ай бұрын
i dont know about great these days
@RockSolitude12 күн бұрын
Laith has hair????
@Tommy-qc4rjАй бұрын
I'm from the Pennines. :)
@thevis5465Ай бұрын
Scots culture is far more close to highland culture than it is to english culture regardless of language, Scots speak a germanic language similar to english but the difference is not even close to "minute," I think you are less informed than you think you are. Scots and English, especially at that time were not mutually intelligible. Scots speakers had much more contact with gaels than they did with the English and had a shared culture to an extent, we still do. We do not share a culture with England.
@davidwright7193Ай бұрын
He is far closer to the truth in talking of small differences than you are. The Scottish border could have settled anywhere from the Highland line right down to the Trent depending on how various events play out. The difference between someone from Carlisle or Bamburgh and someone from Selkirk or Edinburgh would be less than between people from Carlisle and London or Plymouth or from Selkirk and Oban or Ullapool. Someone from Wessex would have a deal of difficulty dealing with someone from Aberdeen but someone from Newcastle, Keswick or even York would have much less difficulty. Just look at the place names. Aberdeen would be right at home on the Welsh coast alongside Aberystwyth, Aberdovey, Abermothach (Barmouth) and Abertaff (Swansea). In fact if Vespasian hadn’t been preparing an invasion of Ireland Aberdeen could well be the name of Chester. Which of these are north or south of the border? Fraserburgh, Edinburgh, Bamburgh, Peterburgh? Kirkcaldy, Selkirk, Kirkland, Brydekirk, Kirkoswald, Kirkby Stephen? Or Scotby, middleby, Dunnerby, Rickerby? Or Wigton? Your sense of difference across the border has much more to do with Walter Scot and tartan shortbread boxes than the Scots dialect or anything going on in the 14th century.
@thevis5465Ай бұрын
@@davidwright7193 Scots is a language, not a dialect.It was previously far more divergent than it is now and it was not mutually intelligible. Lowland Scots are Scots, not English people, speaking a germanic language does not make someone english....
@davidwright7193Ай бұрын
@@thevis5465 What evidence do you present for your assertion that Scots was not mutually intelligible with English in the 13th century as it is today, and as 18th century Scots is to a modern English speaker? All those names are descriptive and contain the same elements, each list contains names from Scotland and England. You will find Kirkland’s, Kirkoswald’s, and Wigton’s on both sides of the border. What you seem to have forgotten, and what everyone who makes this argument forgets, is that English dialects vary significantly, and did so more in the past than today. That the further north you go those dialects contain more and more elements of Scots in both lexis and pronunciation. The further south you go in Scotland the more the Scots dialects contain elements of Court English. That is there is a cline within which the actual political border is unnoticeable. As for the idea that someone from the Southern Uplands doesn’t share any cultural traits with someone 40 miles south who lives the same way, in a similar landscape, and with whom they share a mutually intelligible language. But that they do share a culture with someone 200 miles to the north who lives a different lifestyle in a significantly different landscape and speaks a language which our southern up lander has never heard and can’t understand a word of. Do you realise just how daft that makes you sound? I think you have overdosed on shortbread with a thistle stamp in a tartan box, along with tales of some French-Italian teenager.
@Piratejoe442 ай бұрын
Day 268 of asking for an Oranje Free State Playthrough of Vicky 3.
@boxedtoast2 ай бұрын
Victoria 3 is so bad i regret pirating it
@Piratejoe442 ай бұрын
@@boxedtoast To be fair, all of this is in an effort to make him suffer.
@Cian-O2 ай бұрын
As an Irish fan of yours Liath I'm asking you to not use the term "British" Isles if you're also referring to Ireland. We don't use it and even the official government naming in London for these Isles doesn't use that term anymore. Just say Britain and Ireland, that way it offends no-one.
@joshuafrimpong2442 ай бұрын
Shouldn't there be five provinces of ireland
@joundii31002 ай бұрын
There's 4, Leinster, Ulster, Munster and Connacht
@antorseax94922 ай бұрын
No. Why?
@fnansjy4562 ай бұрын
Yes Their was but meath was destroyed in 1172
@joshuafrimpong2442 ай бұрын
@@fnansjy456 the game starts in the 15th century, doesn't it?