Australian English is not good English. Sorry to say that.

@@seanleith5312 and what is a "good" English according to you? There's nothing like a "good English". It's international language with many variants eh

Wow! Did anyone notice how her head was perfectly round, like a melon with eyes. Yeah I suppose, if she bent over, grabbed her ankles, and asked really nice, I'd

It's market value could sky rocket after this video ! 😃

day tripper yes it was, I had one !

It took a real idiot to buy a pet rock.

yeah to spread darwins atheistic beliefs to spread his agenda to drag humanity to think that there is no GOD and we are here just accidentally :D

vincentj Ahh, but it’s good to laugh at such comedy genius...

The Three Stooges were much more entertaining than this monologue of garble. I wonder what she was trying to make valid I have no idea . Was there a message here ?

USA USA USA

Maybe studying the 3 Stooges rather than just watching them…specially Moe, he was a genius

Now that's a bit jaded, don't you think? Yes it's easy to focus on the stupid, and it is rampant, but remember to see the opposite. We also gave rise to Mozart and Da Vinci, Einstein and Hawking, Colin Chapman and Robin Williams. Today our artists push and stretch our limits ever further and our scientists continue to pull the threads unlocking the realities of the very fabric of the universe we are a part of. Remember, if you only see rocks you will probably become a rock.

Haha...We are what we are. your comment pre-supposes that we are meant to be around forever. try thinking this way- just like 3.5 billion yrs ago bacteria produced an oxygenated earth, we are here changing the conditions that support life on earth. in fact our job may well be to put all of this carbon back in the atmosphere and set the stage for the next round of evolution. it is not all about a lineal progression of more advanced evolution. that is not the history of life on this earth to date. it just sucks if you are too precious about humanity. its not precious in a geological timescale.

I am made from the dust of the stars, so in answer to you comment, yes.

Oh, you are sooo right...humans are the worst of all species-dumb-egocentric- critters have the game rocked...can't wait til we're extinct and critters will no longer be tortured.

@@BRUSHYSURFING The universe eventually dies as does all things- there hads been 84 big bangs and there will be a total of 112. Look up what the Hindus say and then watch Carl Sagan confirm it....quoting the Hindus.

Aishwariya Sweety who or what will be reading it..... I’m perplexed by that life form. I was here 🥺

@@zaydawood5354 my guess is AI or some alien intelligence. Or intelligence that forms on earth after millions of years of our demise.

🤣🤣🤣

Aishwariya Sweety Likely the reason even.

It will be evidence we tried, that we knew only love and kindness matter, that that frequency is that of source energy, and that gratitude to God in all that we do produces more abundance the lack there of and to seek first the kingdom of God. It will be a digital record of our love, and attempts, to save one another.

@@spaghetti_monster and twinkies, I believe twinkies have a longer shelf life than even Kieth himself...but we will see! Or perhaps not.

Hilarious and factual. Right on

there is a nearly endless supply of wife possibilities, so, peace friend.

LOL. Priceless. Your comment is probably the most intellectual comment in the string of comments on this video and the most intellectual experience of my watching this video. No, I am not being flippant or sarcastic. Truly a genius statement. Hilarious!

A beauty !

Fake Science is always Amazing....

Hahaha 🤣

@@davidvasquezcalero1053 🤣🤣🤣

It's God awful. pukeworthy

You are closer than you probably realise to fact the speaker seems unaware of. We have known as long as synthetic chemistry that no matter how much chance you give chemicals they can not really reach complex molecules like carbohydrates. This is directly leading to intelligent design re examination! ET is the Only alternative to God.

@@gazmasonik2411 Actually they told me while I was taken in their ship. They are awesome.

They told me they preferred that Mars documentary the Red planet. Didn't understand comedy preferred extinction events! Raving about Bloody David Attenborough he's everywhere. So someome isn't being honest

Lol!!!!

@@gazmasonik2411 Then who or what created those aliens which created us..?

I think the way she speaks is what led me to reading posts like this one while she droned on about 4 bil yrs and we’ve now got it all figured out. Just saying...

She is beautiful and articulates her self very well.

M 500 it made me skip forward. It's funny how people have such opposing reactions to the same stimuli.

She must be Carl Sagan's lost daughter. Both talk so painfully slow that they drive me crazy. And English is not my native language. I can't imagine the anxiety native English speakers would feel.

@@MucaroBoricua Go into settings and increase the speed

what if there is no deep sea, or events for that matter, but rather just a bunch of conscious bubbles programmed to think there was Or perhaps this one: we were created to invent what happened to bring us into being, so that whoever created us could implement that invention and see what happened…and also by us inventing it we would elevate our consciousness enough to realize we were programmed and thus program other bubbles to do the same

@@Williamb612 Noooooooo!!! Stop that, you're making me think when I'd just kicked the habit!! 😵

Good job!

@@stealthis thanks! It's being reviewed right now. Once it approved, it will be public.

Good work mate! We need all brains on earth thinking about this stuff. I hope the listeners/readers (and yourself) will be free from persecution though. I do worry that we have lost too many Einsteins, Attenboroughs or Darwin's to poverty, diesese or dogma in the last hundred years alone. Knowledge will be the saviour of our species, ideology perhaps the end

Arabs need to drop the religion first

@@emceeboogieboots1608 all you mentioned struggled to be as them. Don't worry. All that come, will be come.

true; however, there are bacteria that thrive in many environments, halophiles, psychrophiles, thermophiles, etc. Also, there are certain bacteria that consume gases such as Hydrogen sulfide. also there are aerobic and anaerobic bacteria which means that some bacteria don't love oxygen at all.

TestosteroneRN fascinating stuff. I know bits and pieces but always happy to have some new terms and concepts to investigate 🤘

I have seen a video on bacteria and the sheer amount of bacteria on the planet and in our bodies. I'm foggy on the numbers they quoted but it was insane like 1 in 10 cells in your body are actually yours and the conspiracy theory is bacteria dominate the planet and we are their cows lol

concept1027 Hey... you miss the point. Modern research into the Human biomesphere (as extended to all complex life) suggest that we are as parasitic of the microbes as they are of us. That their free lunch is ours. That in fact the degree of symbiosis is truly symbiotic, as in without our walking zoo of microbial life we would not and could not function and be complete at all. They ain't just hitchin' a free ride... they have helped form us as we are. They are an integral part. But I agree... she should stick to waving a rock around and theorising about life's Origins. Her comments on Complex Life leave a lot to be desired. Plants only photosynthesize and release oxygen for example, because they have incorporated the very same oxygen releasing bacteria she speaks of, into their cells. It is simply no good to suggest as she has that plants later took over the role of producing oxygen, since the bacteria are still there, and still responsible.

Michael Gallagher Actually it’s closer to 1.3 bacteria per human cell. Research shows somewhere round 30-50 trillion bacterial cells in each human- so yes we are their cows or maybe we’re in their matrix.

Good. An apt metaphor

thank god you reminded me. should we feel guilty when we wash? i mean all those bacteria and nematode worms n stuff??

@@HarryNicNicholas nah, but it doesn't hurt to feel grateful for their work with oxygen. To develop empathy towards living things it is best to start with other mammals, like dogs. Then work your way towards other branches of life. It has nothing to do with guilt.

Please don't tell that to the children dying of Ebola, one of the deadliest viruses on this planet. It may be beautiful to you but to them ... not so much.

@@Josef-EU Ebola is not a creature. But regardless you are missing the point.

Aki Rodic Living... beautiful... etc..

PLAGURISM IS RAMPANT AMONG IDIOTS

That's why they invented religions! For the ignorant fools!

@@robertorourke6614 it's spelled plagiarism. And multiple scientists coming to a common conclusion based on a careful scientific analysis of the data and the observations is not plagiarism. It's called reproducing the results and is an important part of determining the veracity of one's conclusions. That's how science works. If no one can reproduce your experimental results, then it's most likely a problem with your results.

@@crhkrebs you are correct plagiarism. I thought I had corrected that error & thats most important point in this discussion apart from the kiss. & the recent statement that nothing came from nothing. as far as reality goes, science is not even close to its sperm & the egg stage, unfortunately you,ve got a stuffed shirt name & I learned it from a book horrible attitude, sorry but I have no use of brain cells for consciousness & am not a pearl to swine thrower, If you did not come here to be insulted, tell me, where you usually go?

@@robertorourke6614 off your rocker and into the grass eh?

You are nuts.

@@charlesfleming7281 Most of the time...

And that's where her reliability and authenticity lived and died... Such a really good statuesque speaker with a lot of BOMBAST and EMOTIONAL STUFF unworthy of scientific note... Sheesh! Tara Djokc never proved that Geyserite in Australia "This ancient rock is changing our theory on the origin of life..." 90% fluff and 9% emotional crescendo, less than 1% of information in visuals and audio... such a RELATIVELY MODERN way of BLUFFING one's way to make people "feel" science! :)

@@thevagabondsgambit jeez dude, does she really make you feel that insecure?

​@@davebox588 Hahahahaha... Nah... :) You're dead wrong! :) What made you think that any MAN WHO CORRECTS A WOMAN is insecure of her "error" and "faults"? If that were the case, you can't even correct the error and imprudence your daughters and nieces, much less your WIFE and female subordinates... Sheesh! What a gum hole of pain a "suppressed principled man" would you become!! Don't ever get married, or become leader of any woman, Dave Box! You'd SUCK AT MAN'S GOD-GIVEN DUTY to all women... Hwahwahwahwahwa! Oh, and, if ever, learn to step out of your pro-feminist/pro-choice mentality and HAVE SOME GOOD CLEAN AIR in the world of RESOLUTE AND INTELLIGENT MEN! But if you Will NOT, you can NOT benefit from the manliness within you... Toodles, man-trying-to-get-into-feminist-pants! HOah! Deus Vult! Semper Fidelis! Men of the Faith, onward to battle for the hearts and minds, and the souls of the beloved Flock of Jesus Christ, the Catholic Faithful! WE WILL NEVER RELENT against the snares of the Devil! Vive, Cristo Rey et Spiritus Sanctus! Viva, Ecclessia Catholica Traditional! Ave Maria - Mater Dei... salve regina! Gloria Deo! Dei, fiat voluntas Tua! HOah!

Start caring by learning some facts based in historical records and not hyperbole. No ocean dwelling fish ever "crawled" out of the ocean to become a land animal, if this had occurred there would be millions upon millions in the fossil record indicating the slow progression of this mutation which, if it had occurred, would have put these mutating life forms in grave danger of survival due to their slow evolution and they most likely would died off long before attaining life on land. Evolution is junk science, period. Here's some real science based in the historical record with good comparisons to the crap spewed by humans over time about the currency "evolving" climate crisis nonsense: realclimatescience.com

@@thevagabondsgambit try looking through TED talks, find male scientists expounding on their peer reviewed research, then see how many men challenge their research. Not many, is the answer. You're American and those bossy females who know stuff keep making you feel bad because if only you hadn't tried to be the cool kid at school you could have been a genius by now. Next time, maybe answer with a bit less alcohol in your system, have a bit more respect when a scientist tells you something in front of an audience of his/her peers, and a be less obvious INCEL.

..and it is..check YT,Mudfosil Universety

Thank you

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!

Ahahahah

I had 3 cups of coffee....1.5 worked for me hahahaha. Seriously....good call

Underrated

Tantiwa Hopak Wow... you made an exclamation.

@@gammakeraulophon what about yourself ?

What a load off crap. Scaremonger got nothing to live or hope for in life.

She's Serbian, she's not an Elf. Go search about Serbian woman's, we have most beautiful and smartest woman's in the world for sure!

And hit the special K after frosting it with a few xannax before taping a Ted talk. O.o

Lol but for reall though she is really pretty.

@@MisterXdotcom A superb example (especially for people who don't know classical music yet: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z86kdqSHyszXcok.html).

@@MisterXdotcom dude calling someone elf is a compliment.. Like legolas from Lord of the rings

There is no research yielding such evidence. Miller's goo was over sixty years ago, and nothing has come close to answering your question.

Aleixo Pinto ~ Always remember: If you repeat something often enough, and widely enough, it becomes true.

great speaker. so pleasant.

Yes, she is!! LOL!!

Yeh, you are right, who would thought ahy.

X1.25

I'm so used to watching these talks at 1.5 or 1.75 that 1 speed seems like they are talking very slow.

Thank you. So slow and boring.

1.5 but yes.

David Baker oh that’s very fun 🤓

@@bowtguy4929 maybe shouldn't have bothered with that word!😂😂😂

David Baker ~ ...at the same time. 😋

@@jimhughes1962 yep! Before breakfast, one day!😂😂 (No, not as far as I know!)

So what...

The intelligent species will not ask, "Are there intelligent species?"

and with any facts...

age of rocks.

Are we really? Better? Microbial life mamaged to maintain a somewhat stable environment for millions of years, before some "radicals" started pumping tons of oxygen into the atmosphere. How long can we keep things stable the way they're heading right now? So, not better - simply different. As different as the next dominant species on this planet will be to us.

@@JescoLincke Could be we are just more efficient and effective at bringing about rapid evolutionary change than the microbial life we supposedly succeeded. We need to be careful when throwing around theories about the remote past, because sometimes it sounds like the current trajectory of life of earth is merely the inevitable progression of what, we claim, brought us to the scene.

I was thinking the exact same thing! How could she miss out on such an opportunity?!

😂 probably placed there for size reference, yes she could crack a joke here and there, like most hot scientists, she relies on her looks too much.

or the sharpie.

Lero2409 ~ My thought also. 😝

ajcook7777 : she’s trying to remember what to say .

"There is not one example of "life" without this DNA "operating system" that organizes the protein factories that produce life." Aaah......RNA containing viruses may beg to differ. "Everything in the universe appears to be "devolving" from a higher state of energy, ie, organization, to a lower state." Wrong. You should familiarize yourself with what happens in the Orion Nebula or the Ophiuchi Cloud complex, just to name some nearby examples. And you should learn a bit more about Entropy if you think it is a valid argument against the evolution of complexity.

Haha this just made my day. :D lol thanks I need that.

ramp it up to 1.25 and that sounds how she should be talking

Life is more likely to arrived to our planet as encapsulated bacteria and fungal spores than arising on earth. This makes our scientific community uncomfortable because it suggests worlds have to be destroyed for life to spread. Thus our blue green planet is no exception to being destroyed by cosmic disaster such as a direct hit by asteroid...

@@davidhollenshead4892 a very interesting possibility!

@@davidhollenshead4892 interesting, but I'd like to see something authorative that suggests it. Also, if there was evidence to support the idea, why would it make a scientist uncomfortable? Far wilder conclusions have been arrived at over the last century or so.

@@GCU-YouNaughtyMonsters Yes! Panspermia is just a romantic notion based on nothing! It saddens me to sometimes hear super intelligent people like Neil De Grass tyson even consider it. I can't understand why! The Earth having the most conditions favorable for the emergence of life( The Goldie locks zone, Eons of favorable geology,a magnetosphere, water, oxygen, all the essential elements etc...) then why would anyone ever consider this totally baseless hypothesis! I would first put Okum's Razor and all the vast amounts of sciences we have accumulated before this fantasy!!! Or maybe the aliens did build the Pyramids?

Melissa H Yeah... people get paid for spouting any old drivel nowadays so long as there's some cool images on large screens as companion.

of course rock can't and couldn't talk.The Alliens visiting in the time these stromalites were the only form of life found the conversation so utterly boring they never came back again and removed Earth from every galactic tourist guide.

Nope, someone who went to the Public Speaking school of public speaking. Slow, clear enunciation.

@@davebox588 And no notes! No flubs. Impressive.

Slow... with... gaps... to seem profound... yet... utterly banal... self important... pomposity...

These cheeses please Jesus where can we see your Ted talk?

@@thesecheesespleasejesus4238 we can argue about the rest of your criticism, but can you justify 'banal'? This is her PhD thesis and has been presented several times already. I believe she is now Doctor Djokic. A little insecure and envious are we?

Ken Wells it’s rocks that haven’t shifted too much. It’s the difference in the things fossilized inside. Rocks can show time.

Depends on your definition. Are you a millennial?

Not if you are kid rock.

Most rocks are pieces of petrified titans and big animals.Check out "mud fossils" Geologists don't know anything .

Volcanic rock isn't

Yeah, great talk. Too bad bacteria just dont form by themselves. Its easy to say they did. Now try explaining where billions of (GlcNAc)-N-acetylmuramic acid molecules came from and all hooked up in the area smaller than the tip of a needle. Im not even gonna mention the inner membrane.

@@followthelamb144 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Are you a stromatolite?

Life developed in the oceans, which protected it from the UV radiation. When cyanobacteria started making oxygen it first oxidized the Fe+2 to Fe+3 in the rocks, and when that was done started to build up in the atmosphere. The high energy light blows apart the O2 molecules and then a single oxygen atom can combine with another O2 molecule to make ozone O3, which helps absorb some of the UV radiation entering earth's atmosphere. That allowed some protection for life to leave the oceans and come on to land. We still need that protection since the UV radiation can break bonds in biological molecules and that could destroy life.

thomas barnes Your hat came first. Such nice protection for the face and eyes.

Totally agree! She is so clear and her presentation takes us on an informative journey.

She could use more body language.

Let me know when Hawaiian spirituality cures AIDS or invents a useful new synthetic compound. Until then, it's getting about as much honor as any religion/spirituality merits scientifically.

😂😂😂

Nice comment, but spirituality will never remove an infected appendix, design a km long bridge that can carry thousands of tons of vehicles, make plane fly hundreds of people across the globe or even treat a blood infection just to name a few examples. Spirituality is important to human beings because it makes you feel good (hormonal response) but it is definitely not even remotely comparable to science in explaining the natural wonder that the cosmos is.

And then ... reproducing.

Well, obviously it did happen - the question is how?

@@HeavyK. .. only foolish people would think this could happen by chance. Imagine a bicycle assembling itself.

@@Tony07UK The first life would have been very simple and not really comparable to a bicycle. We would be better off imagining the most simple primitive single cell organism assembling itself but even then that would likely be too complex. And then through millions of years of evolution you end up with your bicycle.

@@davec8473 Science has discovered there is complexity beyond our wildest imagination in even the most primitive single celled organisms. Even the most simple single celled organisms contain manufacturing complexes and supercomputers more advanced than any computer man ever built. No supercomputer, no life, period. It is not even reasonable to think it just happened as an unguided process.

😂

But as with any self replicating system… it only has to start once.

@@christianweller4288 Way before replicating you need a Functioning Cell. Read anything on the complexity of a Cell lately?

Maybe not..perhaps we are perpetually in the present, being programmed to perceive a past…we could seriously be messed with…

@@Williamb612 I believe that there is a very high probability that what you're saying is the case. The concepts of past and future alike are probably just programs being projected by the "monkey mind" aka ego that we have chosen to believe.

From what I hear and read we just might find out how much survivability we earthlings have in us, in the near future.

@Sammy Honn life doesn't necessarily need a programmer, countless failed multiverses, we happened to sit in a working one with the unique physical aspects/laws that made such loop possible given unique permutation and or combination of events - in short, life is possible because of chance.

Yes programmed.

Greg Hartwick That is the case. The planet has endured many species rising and falling into extinction. We are just the next and life will go on without us.

Keep your eyes on the CO2 ppm.. we've set off the equivalent of a global bomb.. we've got a few decades left (max).

We DEFINITELY want to be the last. We just don't want to be a speck.

@@laurencevanhelsuwe3052 nah, humans have contributed to a max of 3.5% of all CO2 in the earth, and the earth contains 0.4% CO2. Quit with the doomsday cult talk.

@@Kothar- Your argument doesn't work. The human CO2 is causing the climate system to tip away from its previous balance. You're right about our contribution being a small percentage compared to what was already in the atmosphere, but that's no argument to claim there's no problem. Study the science a bit more, and you'll understand your flaw.

bj0rn Hah... Non-Critical Fan Fare.

@@gammakeraulophon well it is undeniably an interesting topic, she does speak well, and he clearly enjoyed the talk. So what's your beef?

Dave Box Go look at my original replies to which you have left unanswered and you 'may' find out. Here is a summary (not that I expect you to reply with any substance, since interacting with real Science is not your thing.. you seem to just favour the non critical 'lovely' and the unquestioning 'interesting' as valid comment); You miss all kinds of points here in relation to bacterial microbes. Modern research into the Human biomesphere (as extended to all complex life) suggest that we are as parasitic of the microbes as they are of us. That their free lunch is ours. That in fact the degree of symbiosis is truly symbiotic, as in without our walking zoo of microbial life we would not and could not function and be complete at all. They ain't just hitchin' a free ride... they have helped form us as we are. They are an integral part. This Speaker should stick to waving a rock around and theorising about Life's Origins; Rock = X Years More Ancient Than Previously Expected, Origin of Life Is 'Perhaps' Geyser Related Rather Than Ocean Floor. And such is it... such is her thesis. Would take about 15 seconds to present. The rest is rather superfluous and inaccurate padding at best, and empty and unsubstantiated conjecture at worst. She makes a fool's play at pretending to know about (later) Complex Life formation. But her comments leave a lot to be desired. Plants only photosynthesize and release oxygen because they have incorporated the very same oxygen releasing bacteria she speaks of, into their cells. It is simply no good to suggest as she has that plants later took over the role of producing oxygen, since the bacteria are still there, and are still responsible. Likewise, her comment to suggest that microbial life's 3 billion year reign is over. They are both everywhere and continuingly instrumental. Beyond the rock and some life origin hypothesis.. I fail to understand the commentary. Largely superfluous and stage playing outside of it's core hypothesis. But as per usual plenty of children out there enjoyed it.

@Mark Jolliffe Thanks for taking the time to elaborate.

@@gammakeraulophon its either just say life started by some chance or admit that its impossible due to pure and applied chemistry. They cant examine any other way . It hurts too much.

No scientific riour. No testing. Just talk.

That's what I said "capitilla".

And that is, wisdom.

that's science for you - you ask a question, you get an answer, you ask another question. And we are closer, we now know Amino acids form spontaneously, RNA is self replicating, lipids self organise - every discovery may bring more questions, but each is a step closer to understanding.

Actually several major breakthroughs have occurred over the past couple of decades. You can web-search them.

Too bad its a fairy tale

Human floss! Lol

@@lindafricks1377 wow human billions of year old fossils LOL