Good review, thanks ! I was looking for to get 23 for my Fuji XT5 I think its a great choice

great review, very well done. Thank you!

Thank you for the review. Great photos too.

Great review, well done. Definitely my next lens for my Fuji setup

Great review and also including the moving auto focus part. I am looking this lens first dance videos

Enjoyed your video

Nice review, thank you

Will it be release for nikon z

In video quality specialy in vertical the video comes bright with this lens as we saw in full frame camera?

Great video!!!

Jó kis videó! Szeged amúgy?

I have a lot of doubt between the 16mm 1.4 and the 23mm 1.4, I have a 18-135mm 3.5-5.6 and 50mm OSS on my a6500, I don't know which one will be better to complement my kit. Can you help me with this doubt?

Thanks for the review, nicely done. Everything is good about the lens except the LOCA.

Come on canon this is a sweet sweet lense

Good video.

hizo mas Peralta cuando se retira en CHIVAS que CHICHARITO SUPERESTRELLA

Honestly speaking, the 16mm f1.4 by Sigma should be replaced by a wider single focal length lens, maybe an 11mm at f2.0 DC DN will do, and if designed at par with the 30mm f1.4 with 58mm filter diameter, that will garner my kudos

Everyone talks about Sigma APS-C lenses, but I think they kinda suck. The actual QUALITY of the lenses, and their optical properties are good, yeah, but their actual DESIGN sucks. The are like the most basic, plasticy lenses out there, and the tiny size they can get by stripping all the features makes them have a less professional appearance. I just don't think they are doing themselves any favors. They can obviously make excellent glass, so it sucks that they squandered the potential on these lenses. They could be SO much better, just add a focus switch, a custom button, and aperature ring, and then they WOULD be the best APS-C lenses. I mean, look at the Viktrox Pro 27mm and 75mm lenses. They pretty much BLOW anything from Sigma totally out of the water. They feel like mini G master lenses, not little plastic toys like Sigma, and are much faster lenses. All while being around the same price as Sigma. For the cost, I see zero reason to buy the Sigma 23mm and 33mm over the Viltrox 27mm f1.2. Once Viltrox fills out more of a range of focal lengths with these Pro lenses, Sigma is gonna be in trouble. Don't get me wrong, I don't think Sigma lenses give bad results. Just that the lens design itself is bad, and feels too stripped down and basic for the price. Even if they were like $100 more expensive, I would gladly pay more for an actually well made lense. At least add af/mf button or custom button, and an aperature ring, and they wouldn't feel so stripped down and basic. Plus they have this weird fascination with trying to "miniaturize" these lenses to the detriment of function. Yeah, you're gonna have a small lens when you rip out all the features/functions. It's like ripping the seats, dash, and radio out of a car to make it "compact". Yeah, goal accomplished, but now it sucks. The only reason Sigma is this popular is from a monopoly. I mean, you don't really have a choice with Sony if you need these focal lengths in an f1.4 or faster lens with good optical quality. Sony APS-C lenses kinda suck, Viltrox doesn't offer Pro lenses in a large range, and those Chinese Amazon lenses are worthless. Leaves you stuck with Sigma, and they know it. So they put minimum effort in these lenses, cause they're one of the only acceptable options. I just find it frustrating because Sigma has the POTENTIAL to be some of the best lenses, but they make them suck while also have really good glass, so you're willing to deal with all the negatives, instead of just making them good ALL AROUND.

This lens is fabulous, until you need to pull focus and you discover it is appalling. Not just bad, it is hideously bad. So while it can technically pull focus with the lens, the focus breathing is so bad, the footage is unusable. The Viltrox 23mm f1.4 has many technical faults but the much lower price, aperture ring, and lack of focus breathing makes it the much better choice for video. For stills photography the Sigma is a better choice, despite the price.