Would you be able to just play on the computer with head phones with the audio interface and get theb same sounds??

Interesting. A guitarist could just bring a PC or laptop computer with an amp modeler and audio interface and plug that into a mixing board at a stage, church, club, arena, or venue, instead of bringing in a huge tube amp rig with a pedal board.

@@joec8057 yes.

I have a Laney tube half stack sitting in the garage. Haven’t used it in years. Plug-ins are definitely the way to go!

@@place_desjardins I know a few church people who have been doing just that for a while.

You can find this interface for 80

@@goblator4186 Well the overall idea stays the same

@@catalinvoronca689 You need an interface and a computer to record guitar period. It's a moot point. It harms their argument when they don't even get the prices right.

Plugins closer to 200

@@Snavels I was responding to gobaltor, event if the interface costs 80 instead of 180 that is a minor changes cause you have to add many more expensive tools. We are saying the same thing.

So would a cabinet work if you directly plugged it in

@@ChoomMedia nah, not really Edit: After giving it some thought, hell yea u probably could, but I guess it's just awkward going from a interface to a cab... but it should work

“Heartwork” by Carcass incorporated Marshall Mini Stacks into the rhythm tone for upper end clarity, apparently

Cry For You by Andy Timmons was recorded on a small battery-powered practice amp when he couldn't get the actual large tube amp they were gonna use originally into the studio in time.

Starting from Jimi Page from Led Zeppelin

For the first two albums by the Strokes Julian Casablancas sang through a small practice amp and they recorded that.. that's how they got the distorted vocals

some of queen's most classic solos - I want to say everything from A Night at the Opera - we're recorded from Brian May's guitar into a old stereo speaker and recorded in a tiny bathroom

yes and you can put it on the clean channel to try not to mess the tone up completely

How did you figure this out

Good, because it's a really bad way of doing things and it can mess upp your amp. Do NOT do it this way.

This doesn't make any sense. What you're talking about is the line out from the preamp. Normally that goes through the speaker in the combo. You're just replacing that with a cabsim.

Makes it feel more like a lesson in the room that way. Idk If that's the intention or not but considering what it is, that noise seems appropriate

With video titles like "This hits harder than my sandwich" he may actually harm his channel. I was looking for a specific video to practice with the other day, searched for 45 minutes, and was about to give up when I finally found the right one. It's very frustrating when you can't find the right video because the in-video overlay text doesn't match the title. At some point people like myself who use his content for training might think "why bother looking for that one video; I'm not going to find it anyway." For a channel to blow up properly, viewer retention needs to exceed 100% which happens when people rewatch the video. But that doesn't happen if people can't rewatch the video in the first place. As an example, try finding the video where he covers the absolutely epic Super Locrian Diminished scale. He calls it that in the video, but the title is something generic.

well, the interface makes it possible to play the amp-simulation from the PC to the 30 bucks amp. With just an interface and amp you wouldn't get any different sound than without an interface, straight to the amp.

The "amp" is just acting as an awkward computer speaker. Any other speaker would sound the same. The tone comes from NeuralDSP. You don't need a great audio interface to use NeuralDSP. A $30 Rocksmith guitar-to-usb cable would do the job just as well.

@@icedragon769 ohh ok, i never undertsood digital plugins when they have nothing to do with the amp itself. Thanks a lot !!

@@icedragon769 That's what I used to use before I got a THR30II. Now it's just that. Used to use my Katana MKII 50. But the Yamaha does all that I require. Plus, it plugs directly in via USB negating the need for my 2i2............

@@icedragon769 They work, but the quality is absolute dogshit. If you have a choice, use an interface

that's my question too. Aren't you risking blowing up the amp by running an amplified signal through the guitar input?

I think the amp is just a speaker so he doesn't need headphones; the raw audio from the guitar is sent to both the amp and PC, and sound shouldn't be coming back through the amp.

@@joshcelnik Not the raw audio, it's the plugin audio.

Do it flat if you are using something else for effects. Then tweek it.

tone gets colored anyway by the amp's circuit

run it through the fx return, that's how it sounds best.

replace the cable

@@dennis4113 Sure, but if you use a better gab that seems still fine. Might as well ditch the cab simulation in that case … naturally nothing wrong with using monitors instead and keep the amp sim, plenty of options for every budget.

more like vst amp head, cab sim trough combo amp

Wait a minute... I also have a Behringer UM2 and a 10w Amp. Can I do the same of the video without consequences?

Honestly I don't know, but I dont think it is bad for the amp, I just used the amp cause I wanted to use amplitube and I didn't have speakers to use with the interface, and it just worked out

@@Downpickeverything I tried it after reading your comment, and it worked for me. Thanks bro :)

I'm doing the same with focusrite interface but my amp is making noise whenever i plug it in...

you need an interface that supports ASIO.

interfaces usually have their own drivers to handle that latency

lowering the sample rate/block size on the Audio interface

no latency at all? what audio interface did u get

@@akiani I just got the best rated one on Amazon that was adorable. The focusrite scarlett. There is no noticable delay for me, and I was even just using the USB output on my crappy amp along with FlexASIO for a while. I do have a powerful CPU in my PC which is likely a big factor to having no delay with no audio chopping or glitching.

@@metalloriff I see, I'll definitely get that one. Thank you! Planning to try out neural dsp with just an audio interface lol.

@@akiani No problem! If you have discord, I can answer any questions you might have there a lot faster there, if you do get the interface and experience any delay or issues. And if you need any help setting up or want to see my setup, I'd love to show it!

If I want to do the same thing, but instead of playing through headphones, can I just use an usb powered speaker connected to the pc?

I had a 15 watt behringer amp and a silvertone single coil strat I got some filthy 80's proto Black Metal/Thrash Metal tones on that set up

ASIO drivers :) With a decent PC you can get the roundtrip under 15ms.

@@lynxxlynxx oh. Nvm then. I get 2-5ms (according to FL Studio) and the delay is quite noticeable. I bet the reportEd latency isnt accurate

I run my project at 192khz with asio4all det at a sample rate of 64

@@Mirinmaru I don't like asio4all, in my case it's overall about 4 times slower than the proprietary driver. (Behringer UPhoria in my case.)

@@lynxxlynxx I have the Behringet UMC 202HD and as far as I know there is no proprietary drivers or software. Where do I find these?

This is already a proper rig: being played through a cheap speaker and recorded through a cheap microphone. The amp simulator is the thing that's making the sound, he could record the output of the plugin instead of recording through a phone mic and it would sound far more "professional", but chooses not to.

@@icedragon769 he just said that he does both and blends it together. Kinda like the additional "in the room sound with strings and picking noise"

@@icedragon769 get this man a 4x12

@@brenk9161 wouldn't matter. None of this matters. Unless you are physically in the room with the cab it won't matter. Most the time only one or two speakers from a 4x12 are micked. Not to mention the mic is alps not your individual ear. Then there's whatever that's added in production and editing. The most important part is what you're using to play the audio through.

Bluetooth headphones already have high latency by default, not really much you can do there. You'd need a different pair of headphones with cables to connect to your interface, sadly.

@@childcemetery9937 nooooooo I can't stand cables anymore ;-; hahahaha oh, well.. Life goes on. Thanks :D

Bluetooth headphones will always have too much latency for playing, nothing you can do. Even premium headphones have 40ms latency which is very audible.

Thats true, NEVER run a line signal to an guitar amp, only instrumemt signal

No, this isn't dangerous. The worst case scenario is that the level is too high or too low, which would make for bad tone, but isn't dangerous.

@@nairanvac79 its not dangerous but he might ruin the preamp section of his amp

@@DragonboltBlastter It's fine but you should start with having both your source and amp on the lowest volume then gradually increasing it

Get a reamp box

focusrite

@@Inn0IWNL thanks

@@darksoulwarrior9662 looks like focusrite solo

Those who have money to surpass the quality of plugins