🤣

Hahahahaha

Precious

Correct!

Made me giggle.

Sure you did

@@JMRabil675 I did

I believe you. There is always a Karen in KZfaq comments. 🤷🏼‍♀️

The usual tenants of firearm safety don't apply at all on a movie set. Completely different world. All firearms handling and safety should be conducted by the armorer and the AD. When you start handing out responsibility for these things to actors or people with other jobs, you fuck with something called LIABILITY

I like to hear that. He clearly knows the ins and outs of this single action.

I was an Infantryman in the Army and there was never an accident that I was aware of the entire time I was in.

@@xtraflo Working for big guns and there is always something that will cause an incident with ammunition. Safety first.....

Every cowboy movie I've ever seen.They're constantly pointing guns at each other and pulling the trigger with Blanks... But alec baldwin removed his blank and put a live round in it 🤔.. 😂

Do you know how stupid you sound john..😅

@@xtraflo They military runs a pretty tight ship when it comes to firearms safety for the most part. I've had a few small ranges where there were a few logistical issues and the only real accident was from our combat engineer platoon. Every now and then you get the occasional trigger happy idiot that shoots too soon They were doing bounding drills and someone slipped and ended up hitting his buddy in the back of the head just under the helmet. Accidents do happen even if everything was done right but I wouldn't even remotely equate that to the negligence of Alec Baldwins fuck up. I'll never forget sitting in church and seeing all his close friends crying, a real tragedy.

Exactly, even if you're anti gun, which is ok, if you're going to handle a gun then at least know how to handle it.

@@dougupah8778 I am anti sword and anti halberd myself

Alec Baldwin is an anti Gun, anti Gun Safety, pro hypocrite pro Gun murderer. Only some ass in Hollywood could achieve that.

The usual tenants of firearm safety don't apply at all on a movie set. Completely different world. All firearms handling and safety should be conducted by the armorer and the AD. When you start handing out responsibility for these things to actors or people with other jobs, you fuck with something called LIABILITY

@Doug Upah anti gun, then why did they order over 500 rounds to just shoot while on set? Nowadays, everyone says whatever won't get them canceled or attacked. If you think being gay is wrong, do you think any famous person would ld have the balls to say it🤔🤣 NOPE .... he probably has a gun in his home for protection. And remember you better agree with the group you surround yourself with because if not you will get blk listed. I don't believe a word famous people say because 99% of them are fake and could give two shits about you.... Hence, he why he says he doesn't feel any guilt. Stright scumbag rich pompous ass that should and would be in jail if they were a regular citizen.

Has an autopsy been preformed? Was that poor lady pregnant? Do you see where I'm going with this? Pure speculation on my part, but I remember what Ted Kennedy did.🤔

Evil has no conscience. Alec Baldwin is a leftist with no conscience and his past behavior proves he is a evil person.

@Strum Bum He's a narcissist, that's why - classic traits of one!

well what do you expect narcissist's don't think they're wrong on anything or anything bad is ever their fault!!

Baldwin is a nut job to start with !

@BayMac If you’ve never really heard of him then he’s well known from the TV show “The Dukes of Hazard” from the early 1980’s and “Smallville” from the early 2000’s.

@@marcelo6707 Never heard of him,🤔

@@joefairweatherblues8511 You must be very young.

The problem is John is extremely partisan. If Alec was a republican this video would never be made. I lean right, love the Dukes, and I'm not a fan of Alex's politics but this just reeks of kicking someone when they are down because they don't subscribe to your politics.

@@christopherflynn Bull, George Clooney said basically the same thing. I know many experienced and responsible gun owners, all are livid over this, no matter the party. Same when Republican Dick Chaney shot his hunting partner. My very conservative father never stopped saying he should have been charged!!

He was instructed to say this. It's a loaded question. Guilt implies responsibility. Responsibility in this scenario means imprisonment.

He's a left-wing nutjob and an entitled celebrity. What did you expect? Two levels of sociopathy on top of one another.

Absolutely. Anyone would feel guilty.

You noticed it also? When Brandon Lee was shot by Michael Massee, Massee quit acting from a year and even until his death, was haunted by it.

@@Teppest33 exactly. Meanwhile Alec Baldwin was literally shopping at Ralph Lauren going about his celebrity life.

Right right so what you're saying is Alec Baldwin is a little kid with chocolate all over his face? Lol but not really!

@@kristopherbeer5422 I in no way say that a loss of life is even comparable to chocolate, more the situation him trying to avoid his roll in it. If that's what you drew from it you are sadly mistaken.

I didn't eat the chocolate, it tried to eat me...

Stupid comparison!!

@@enricomandragona163 Excellent rebuttal !!!

Which reminds me of another tragedy from Las Vegas

It sounds like the prop people were out playing with guns the weekend before, Alec and nobody checked gun before scene. Are you thinking something else. Like what? Intentional murder.. maybe a secret government setup? C'mon. It was just a parade of irresponsible actions.

@@Horizontreecare It's suspicious but I haven't been able to find a good source on how the lady killed was gonna be part of a Hollywood exposé

Huh.i hadn't heard that. He seems like a guy who wouldnt do that. Or needs to. His wife is nutters but ... Oh wait maybe

@@Horizontreecare Like what? Intentional murder.. Hmm, could be, kinda like, a hush move? At this point, you can't rule out anything..........

Are you people nuts real guns have no place on a movie set it's make believe not real so why would you need to check a gun that's being used for make believe on a movie set? the person in charged of the PLAY GUNS IS RESPONSIBLE NOT THE ACTOR! I'M A GUNSMITH and if I was on a movie set play acting in a movie the last thing I would do would be to check to see if a play gun on a movie set was loaded ! Do you check your child's gun before you give it to them OF COURSE NOT BECAUSE IT'S A NONE LETHAL GUN ON A MOVIE SET and how many people knew that real firearms were used in movies not me I was shocked I was a block from the movie set in Wilmington NC when Brandon Lee was killed by a movie prop gun So I guess Hollywood has not learned from past mistakes

@@kennethlong2280 I’ve handled weapons on sets for thirty-five years and the vast majority of them were real guns. The only time we used fake replicas on set was for background actors who didn’t need to fire a weapon on camera. As I see it the main issues are unqualified people handling guns and the lack of safety training. Anyone who touches the weapons has a responsibility to make sure they are safe. The only people who should ever touch the weapons are the armorer, the prop master and prop assistants, and the actors/ stunt people. All guns, at all times should be handled as if they are real and loaded until proven otherwise. As I said, the vast majority of weapons on sets are real; there are some that have had baffles put in the barrels in order to create enough back pressure to chamber the next round. As far as being NUTS; if being nuts means never having anyone hurt by one of my prop weapons in three decades because I followed strict safety rules, than I’m as nuts as it gets.

@@kennethlong2280 I understand what you're saying, especially with the technology we have today it's easy to make a toy gun look authentic enough for the movies there is no need for real guns on sets anymore. But in saying that many movie sets have used real guns before and through their own safety measures no one was hurt. This is not an argument for or against, it's a plea to those who wish to use real guns apply the correct safety measures every other movie that has used real guns without any fatalities used. The simple fact of the matter is that an incredible lack of gun safety was missing on that set. Why? We could argue about if they only used toys, it would never happen, but as was said before countless movies have been made with real guns without fatalities. At the end of the day those in charge choose real guns but failed to ensure proper safety measures were being used, the end result being the loss of lives.

@@StanslaMichael They actually have them and that's what should have been used, this was just a rehearsal.

​@kennethlong2280 thank you for getting to the point most people are missing

Hopefully he doesn't pull a 'Binger'.

Will not happen a gun Smith will examine it if the trigger mechanism jammed it will show.

@@carrollsanders9376 And if it was in perfect mechanical condition? I am sure the prosecutor will want to put him on the spot....whether he is stupid enough to take the stand is another question.....but considering he was dumb enough to give that interview....I wouldn't put it past him....would you?

Remember u dont have to pull the trigger to make gun go off..just the hammer enuff to slam firing pin will hit primer on bullet shell..

@@bobbygzzz7116 ummmm.....no. As you start pulling back the hammer on a revolver the cylinder starts to rotate.....even in the unlikely event that the hammer was pulled back a small amount before it went into half cock position....and slipped.....and assuming again that the hammer had enough inertia to detonate a primer....the primer would not be under the hammer any more as the cylinder has rotated a partial cycle.

Most modern SAAs today are called "three click" actions. I have never been 100% sure why the action should change because of the receding pin. Certainly there was some fear of liability that made them switch to the receding pin though but I've never had a direct answer why the three clicks instead of four. The last one I bought from Uberti came with a three-click receding pin so I purchased an aftermarket hammer/trigger/latch kit that comes with a fixed pin and a classic four-click action. Also on classic four-click actions if you watch and listen very closely there is actually a "fifth" click at the very top of the action again idk why. I think it is the trigger sear falling into the notch and then pressing upward against it, I don't really know. At any rate, none of this should impact the gun going off unless it was dropped or something. The only way the gun could fire without pulling the trigger is if the notch on the hammer or the trigger latch literally broke off in that exact moment he was holding it. Which is not technically impossible in my opinion but so unlikely as to be basically impossible.

Baldwin is a Socialpath and never feels guilt for anything much less this shooting. People like him never take responsibility for anything, always blaming someone else.

The gun that John used looks like a Taylor's 45 Colt stage coach pistol. However a real traditional Colt 45 made by Colt does not have a transfer bar safety and to carry one safe only 5 rounds are loaded with the hammer down on an empty chamber. Once the hammer is cocked or even fanned the cylinder is going to turn to a loaded chamber...... Bang!!

He'll never be charged, sued yes, but never charged with a crime!!!

@@mikep5695 Evidently New Mexico isn't Hollywood 😉

What Baldwin is going to go for is a defective product angle, and his narrative the other day was coached by his lawyers. And actually what he's going to say is feasible, if you remember from day one it was established that he was practicing quick draws, if his finger was off the trigger and the pistol had a defective trigger mechanism than it is feasible that it could have happened the way he said, if he drew it and "fanned" the trigger, or cocked it any other style associated with a quick draw, expecting it to stay cocked then it could very well have gone off, a defective trigger mechanism could even bypass the half cock safety feature of an exposed hammer type firearm like a single action revolver or even a lever action rifle. Now as we all know that's not what happened which brings me to the next point, and that has to do with everyone through all the comments sections of all these videos addressing this tragedy from day one, the subject of firearms safety, everyone keeps ragging on Baldwin as if he was a shooter at a range or even handling a firearm at home, those rules don't apply here, this is a Hollywood movie set and the people handling these firearms are not shooters, collectors or someone at the range, they're actors, there's armorers on these sets that are responsible for these firearms and their safety, ie there never should have been live ammo on the set much less in a firearm that was handed to an actor who was assured it was safe, ie a "cold gun". Actor's are not by their nature people who are into firearms, that's exactly why they have people to coach them on how to handle them in a realistic fashion, and sitting around on a movie set practicing quick draws is something that's even expected of an actor so they give a realistic performance, just the other night I watched a Gregory Peck movie where the premise is he's the fastest gun in the west and has a reputation that causes him problems everywhere he goes from some young punks always wanted to challenge him, you can bet that in between takes Mr Peck was sitting around practicing quick draws for the sake of not looking stupid on screen, you can even bet John Wayne did it in between takes on the movies he starred in. As far as checking to see if it's loaded that's also a mute point, once again we're not at the range or at home, this is a movie set and inert "dummy" bullets are loaded in movie guns all the time for the sake of realism, the same exact people who are ragging on Baldwin for not checking to see if it was loaded are the same people that would rag all over the movie for someone brandishing a revolver that is obviously unloaded, once again that's why these armorers are on these movie sets, one of their responsibilities is to make sure that the ammo in a firearm is inert dummy ammo and not live ammunition, how exactly would the actor know the difference? Which brings things full circle here, Baldwin has to play the defective product angle, because even though it's not his responsibility as an actor to make sure that firearm was safe but it was his responsibility as a producer to make sure it was a safe movie set via having hired a competent armorer to make 100% sure that when a firearm is placed in an actors hand and they're told it's a "cold gun" (meaning it's safe) that it is indeed safe. Now I want to be clear on something, I'm in no way shape or form an Alec Baldwin fan, the fact is I can't stand him, nor am I defending him but I'm just being realistic about how things are run on a movie set concerning firearms safety, you can't realistically expect an anti gun leftist Hollywood flake to know basic firearms safety, and once again these firearms aren't on a shooting range nor are they being handled in someone's home which are both environments that basic firearms safety rules are meant for, a movie set is an entirely different story. All that being said yes, Alec Baldwin is responsible for her death, but not because he himself was handling that firearm, he's responsible because as the producer it was on him to make sure that a competent armorer was hired to run the show with those firearms, he'd be just as responsible as if it was another actor who shot her under the same circumstances and he was the producer.

but why in the hell did someone hand him a weapon with REAL ammunition on a set?

@@tonytorres8062 yep. And possibly he is totally gun illiterate. Still you never point a weapon at someone.

@@tonytorres8062 why was there real ammo on a set to be in a gun?

@@tonytorres8062 That's exactly the point, there never should have been live ammo on that set, think about it, how can you as the actor handling the firearm tell if it's live ammo or the inert dummy ammo that's loaded in guns in movies for the sake of realism? Which is what makes it so stupid when all these people are saying "He didn't follow basic firearms safety and check to see if the gun was loaded". And here's another news flash for everyone who's saying "He pointed it at her, why'd he do that?" Watch any movie that has a lot of gun action in it, it's very common for actors to point a firearm at the camera, it's called dramatic effect, and the director and camera man are standing right there. John Wayne did it, Clint Eastwood has done it, Keanu Reeves has done it, it's called cinematography, pointing the gun at the camera for getting that dramatic shot on film, it's a common practice in the movies to do it.

Sadly the Woke crowd made it go away in syndication,but they can’t take our memories.

I hadn't heard that before... that's an interesting possibility. The way I understood it, he wasn't fanning it in that scene, but they mentioned that the gun had been fanned to point out that the fanning could have damaged the action, which then failed. Since he claimed that once they got the angle right, the director had him cock the hammer and when he took his thumb off, the hammer supposedly fell without him pulling the trigger, then he could claim that he didn't do it on purpose. The problem with that theory is that fanning doesn't damage the catches between the trigger and hammer, it damages the "bolt" that locks the cylinder in place. Either way, the armorer should have checked the gun for both being unloaded AND for any faults in the action before handing Baldwin the gun... and he should have checked it as well. It's understandable that he wouldn't know enough to check the action for proper operation, but he should at least have known how to check if it was loaded knowing he was going to be pointing it at people. It may very well have been an accident, but he's still responsible for it since he could have prevented it.

NOT really John just pointing fingers and condemned someone he failed miserably!

@@carrollsanders9376 - ok Alec

I believe the word your looking for is capable! Country boys/girls are more capable!

@@carrollsanders9376 - How often have you taken the time to hang out with country folks? I'm betting you never have! You'd know better otherwise! You're just a typical Progressive who can't wait to progress backwards!

@@aarongoodwin4845 I stand corrected 🙂

They should pay you for that response.👍👍👍

Well said

It Proves Baldwin is a LIAR

That would require that AB have integrity and own up to him messing up... But his ego can't handle that hit at all...

Actually the term "prop" is for ANYTHING and EVERYTHING on set, ie "property". It does NOT mean it isn't a real one. A real gun used on set IS properly called a prop gun.

to "accidently Fan" the Revolver you need to hold the trigger, the Revolvers has so heavy spring on Hammer that you won't release the hammer UNLESS you pull the Trigger :)

@@John_Raynor Again, that's true of modern revolvers, but early revolvers were not constructed the same way modern revolvers are.

@@GregoriusTheBrown FBI lab proved using the very same gun the trigger had to be pulled for it to fire.

@@triamaria Yeah, this video and my comment predate that information becoming public. At the time, we did not know what kind of revolver was used on the set.

I watched my son put one down in front of my then THREE YEAR OLD grandson and he knew at that age; don't touch. He's almost 15 now and knows his stuff.

A few years ago of two men videoed their session at a shooting range. The 10-year-old daughter of one was also at the shooting range. The other man handed the girl's father a pistol without locking the slide back and ensuring it was not loaded. The ten year-old girl immediately scolded the man for handing her father a gun without ensuring it was not loaded. The other man humbly apologized to the girl, told her she was correct, and promised to never do that again. The look of pride on the girl's father's face was obvious. (The video might still be on KZfaq.)

Same here! Daisy Duke ( Catherine Bach ) was my first crush... My second, unfortunately, was Samantha Micelli ( Alyssa Milano ) from "Who's the Boss"... But, John Schneider is completely wonderful in allowing himself to think things through with logic and purpose...

@@billstephens396 John played the Navy Officer in a version of the Sound of Music. Great performance.

@@ghostcityshelton9378 We know he can sing... He can also act... He knows his Constitusional rights, so he is highly intelligent... What can't the guy do? LOL

I remember him from Smallville. Such a good actor!

After reading your comment on my fan page, I realized how much you like and follow my page . Thanks for your support and positive vibe 💖💖💖

You're pretty good! 🤠

@@dvaunt3516 activate dead eye bro it's that easy

but with the firing pin on the hammer, you only load 5 and keep the hammer down on the empty chamber.

@@dvaunt3516 there's a 🐻 bear in a mission of metal gear 5 that definitely doesn't die in 6 shots. Gotta use the tranquilizer rifle.

@@airwolf36 That's why the usual (and competition) way of loading a Colt is with 5 bullets. Put one in, skip a chamber and load the other 4. When you're done you'll be over an empty chamber.

and he never shot anybody....but...even if there was a situation where he did, he would own up to it...by all accounts, keanu reeves is good guy, not at all like baldwin, with his temper and anger

I know many older folk who say that many of the students pickup trucks parked at school had rifle racks wifh weapons on them and there was never a thought of a school shooting. The times haven't changed, the general level of public idiocy has.

@@ant88310 Exactly. Guns is a tool like the wheel that has been around hundreds of years. Gun don't kill people. People kill people.

@@ant88310 I am Canadian, and even though our firearms laws are tighter than the USA, there was a time in the late ‘70s when I had a gun rack in my truck rear window with a couple of rifles and a shotgun. Unloaded of course. Never locked the truck, parked at high school. Me and my buddies would hunt or go drink beer and plink after school. Times sure have changed.

@Mills Rickman Amen brother.

there were loaded weapons all over my house growing up. my dad took us to the range at 5 yrs old. responsibility and respect is 100% needed at all times.

Excellent advice -- don't go near someone who demonstrates ignorance or disdain for the most basic safety measures. But...how does someone who's also ignorant know that the person holding the gun is an accident waiting to happen? If for no other reason than to protect yourself from the Baldwins of the world, EVERYONE should have a basic understanding of what is safe and what is unsafe. Apparently, the camera crew that walked off the set knew enough to realize that their workplace was hazardous to their health...and that knowledge may have saved their lives.

who'd want to go near that pos in the first place??

next witness for the prosecution in the trial of ........ and watch the view and MSN rally round their boy - the justice for thee but not for me crowd - wonder how many prisoners have had sex with a hollywood star - standby we might find out - rough house no lube

It is already (well-documented), but a certain (very) well known actor, once called his daughter “a *#%cow”. Very sad, as in pathetic, that Baldwin refuses to admit the truth.

@Miraak AB is a Jackass Mr. Schneider is just too classy to say that.

Except putting his finger on the trigger before verifying it was empty.

@@Gregwing good eye he certainly did at the start

No he didn't

@@Gregwing literally came here to say that. Starts the video out and immediately shows no trigger discipline lol

@@professorneturman2249 yes he did...approx 12 sec . mark Muzzle control was fine , but his finger went to trigger.

Mic the primer. The depth of strike tells the tail. Even if hindered by a thumb but even half cock will change the strike force. Gee people be smart and figure the facts.

RAF regiment walty cnuts

And yall really got no guns over there no defense???...what happens pre say if your government went completely insane tyrannical and authoritarian on yall how would you guys stop them???..no trying to be a prick either like I'm genuinely interested..do you guys even plan for such an issue??? Would it be like the great English knife or ball bat war or like hows it break down over there...I'm sure you could see why Americans keep them and want them around if put in perspective...of course look at our current president dude can hardly form a sentence in the pocket of China and is insanely dangerous for our nation here and on the world scale..but theres a line american Democrats are dying to cross but know they cant...or they atleast should know we coming off these guns and our 2nd amendment and the constitution in general over our dead bodies...idk America maybe on it way there now...but what about England and the other nations over there...do ppl even try to game plan for such a situation..they all think it's not possible but I agrue this bullshit is some evil human instinct

That was my initial response to hearing about the whole thing. And I thought the same thing Wayyyy back in the day when Brandon Lee got shot on the set of the crow.. There's absolutely positively no excuse for that happening ....ever. The only excuse would be murder.

@@stephanierummel5066 yeah ikr what would the Brits do if Russia invaded too?

I was taught that the stove is always hot and the gun is always loaded. Don't ever point a stove at someone unless you intend to cook.

@@Earthneedsado-over177 Yup, even toy guns my brothers weren't allowed to point at anyone, or the animals

I haven't ruled out murder as a possibility. But probably just lack of understanding safety.

I’m pretty sure that this is where this tragedy is going.. It’s the guns fault and therefor they are going to try and push gun control. It’s coming you watch🙄AnyOne with slight knowledge of guns know that Mr. Baldwin’s story just does NOT Add up or make sense whatsoever... Definitely missing pieces

@@since1876 it’s not murder. It was negligence!!! His negligence will get him a manslaughter charge. Please educate yourself what that means and understand the difference

LARRY im in total agreement with you sir

@@accesstotheredcarpet Since you DON'T know what was in his mind, you CAN'T know if it was murder or not...

WRONG!

@@colecole3352 What about proper gun safety is wrong?

@@sladetheblade9349 John told it tottally correctly!!! None of what he said was wrong. I spent 26 yrs in the U.S. Army, am a Combat Vet Hon.retired and some of my jobs was: ammo and explosives and taught bio-weapons and nuke warfare and was a Drill Sargent for seven years.

@@colecole3352 Oh ...I guess you'er a big fan of Balwin, eh? Balwin could have placed live rounds mixed in with the other rounds so he could place blame on others. I spent 26 yrs in the U.S. Army, a Combat Vet Hon.retired and was a Drill Sargent for seven years. Some of my jobs was ammo and explosives and taught bio-weapons and nuke warfare.

the person who made this video does not have access to the revolver that was involved in the fatal accident on the movie set. He can play around with the one he has in the video, and take it apart and pull the hammer back all he wants to impress people like you But he does not know what the revolver that went off on the movie set would do, because HE DOESNT HAVE IT - and HE HAS NEVER TOUCHED IT the revolver on the movie set was not suppose to have live rounds in it - it was not suppose to have blanks in it at the time - it was suppose to have been rendered safe by a gun expert and was then handed to an ACTOR what part of this do you not understand - the actor was never going to fire it with live rounds, he is not trained to handle live weapons - that is why they are called ACTORS get over yourself and your self righteousness

When John blew down the barrel, I thought Nope, not a good thing to do. Come on John. Duh.

Yes finally a comment that someone knows where he's from lol

@@flip8966 He will always be Bo Duke to me...

What in the heck is Smallville? He is Bo Duke.

Really?! I was thinking why this guy was so familiar.

He was absolutely the best Jonathan Kent. I loved Dukes of Hazard as a kid, and he did a fantastic job playing Justice Byron White in Roe v. Wade.

That would mean he’s financially and criminally responsible for her murder

Admitting you are in error does not happen with the perfect and all knowing left crowd. Their actions have no consequence.

@@dfb1111 That also applies to the right crowd also.

@@dfb1111 Pretty much. I wouldn't be surprised if the left would want to ban the word "facts" from the vocabulary.

Baldwin is a malignant narcissist, and is thus unable to accept responsibility for nearly anything he does. Furthermore he will continue to talk about the incident against his attorneys express orders to his own detriment. He literally can't help himself.

Single action colts have 4 “catches” it can be remembered because the first catch = C second catch = O third catch = L and fourth catch = T so all together it has four catches which equal COLT.

Typical on all 1873 Colts and clones. Uberti , Pietta, and many, many others. 1st click “safety” notch, second is half cock or loading position, third is bolt release, and fourth is full cock. Properly timed they are 4 distinct clicks. Many copies have early , late, or mushy clicks .

A re-enactment guy I'm friends with said that his late model Pietta has the safety transfer bar whereas my early model Uberti does not.

Nothing accidental about it.

Trigger Jams hammer released gun fires, Malfunction known as Phantom Notch!

"Accident "

There is absolutely no confusion about the accident … the trigger had to be pulled for the gun to fire

@@carrollsanders9376 There was nothing accidental about what happened nor a phantom notch! He’s guilty of negligent homicide and isn’t man enough to own up to murdering her! Good job schilling for a murderer!

an he is smart to know his guns ,,,

@@Monza62000 Movie Star?? In What??

@@user-ic9qm8mb4t I am going to take a guess here - you are a libtard aren't you. John is doing a great job in explaining the facts about the gun. Kind of retorting what Libtard Alec rehearsed and did an interview with another Libard Georgie Stepaluphugus. John is a bigger and better man and movie star than Alec ever was.

John is a Legend, not just a star. No matter his amount screen time in Hollywood. I took up Archery because of the Duke boys.

Always did like you now I know why you have a lot of common sense you need to go teach them mother scratchers in Hollywood common sense

After reading your comment on my fan page, I realized how much you like and follow my page . Thanks for your support and positive vibe 💖💖💖

I still wouldn't trust him. He managed to shoot two persons with one bullet.

@@Ulvetann Isn't that a dream come true for snipers? One bullet two hits?

Lmao 🤣

🤣

hahahahaha, Alec lied and got away with murder. No one hand him a nuclear missile please.

The issue is that actors are not firearm experts and they don't have any control over most of the process. Physically checking at that point just serves to increase the likelihood of an accident happening. The Crow was a great example, an actor would not have found that bit of material lodged in the revolver as an actor wouldn't expect to look for it there. Similarly, there wasn't supposed to be a live round on the set and they're still trying to figure out where it came from. It's not about being a "pain in the butt" it's about the fact that entertainment productions like this have different needs from what typical use of a firearm would permit, and it's not fair to hold them to the same set of rules. It would literally make filming impossible.

@@SmallSpoonBrigade First off, how does physically verifying that a gun is empty/safe after it’s been cleared and handed to you increase the likelihood of an accident.?? That idea goes against logic. Second, if the gun used on the Crow set had been physically checked/ cleared (as John just demonstrated) then the barrel blockage most definitely would have been found and Brandon Lee would not have died that day. Third, your idea that movie sets shouldn’t be held to the same safety standards that any other situation/job involving firearms would be held to is insane. I quote you “it’s not fair to hold them to the same set of rules” Also, just so you know, it has been standard practice/protocol on movie sets for decades to have every hand that touches a firearm confirm it’s condition ie loaded/unloaded, prop-gun/real-firearm etc. In this situation Alec Baldwin had over 30 years experience and training using firearms on set in movies and television. The safety protocols have been drilled into his head for years. He did not follow protocol, period. This is the reason for this accident, which killed one person and wounded another. He is at fault. There’s no way around it. It’s not murder, as many are calling it, but it is definitely manslaughter, probably “Criminally negligent manslaughter” or “Involuntary manslaughter “. He is guilty. This doesn’t mean that he should or will go to prison. I don’t believe he should. It does however mean that he will face consequences both monetary and other. Your statement sounds as if you’re trying to wash away responsibility because they are movie makers/actors. Laws and regulations do not work that way. There’s not a different set for “special people” ie actors & celebrities. Bottom line is, He fucked-up. He fucked-up bad and he’s going to have to pay for it. So will anyone else that touched and cleared that weapon that day. Anyone who cleared that weapon on that day failed at their job and contributed to the situation including Alec. Alec was the last link in the safety chain ( the most important one because it’s your last chance to get it right)and he failed. Now someone is dead and there must be consequences.

@@SmallSpoonBrigade You really don't know what you're talking about......

@@SmallSpoonBrigade I don't understand how you can make this claim when even George Clooney said that he checks EVERY gun he's handed EVERY time it's handed to him. Not only that, but Baldwin was also one of the producers of this western (a genre that is obviously going to involve a firearm in many scenes) on top of being an actor, therefore I would argue that his need for knowledge on proper gun safety procedure would be even greater than it would be if he was just an actor for the film in question. Also I don't understand how an actor checking a gun increases the likelihood of an accident occurring. Guns aren't complicated, and proper gun safety for any specific firearm could be taught to literally anybody, yet you make it sound like it's some complicated process that would go over an actor's head.

@@SmallSpoonBrigade you are wrong about everything you just said. But it doesn’t matter now, because John just proved Alec lied. Just like he said. A single action revolver will not fire. Unless you pull the trigger. He killed her. Then lied about his being responsible for it.

Sheered lead in the trigger mechanism, could have caused the trigger to jam back, when he released the hammer at full draw he experienced the Phenomenon Notch effect and the hammer did not contact any of the Catches on the trigger.

Except it's impossible for the hammer to "slip". There are stopping points (as John clearly demonstrated) that prevent the hammer from accidentally striking the round. The first position would have stopped it. And Alec has claimed he never pulled the trigger...which is actually impossible given that the hammer DID engage the round. Alec lied. Period. To be fair, although he absolutely did NOT practice ANY weapon safety, someone else was responsible for there even being a live round in the weapon. Personal opinion: Negligent homicide on the part of the armorer, the person who handed Alec the weapon and Alec himself.

If he was pulling back the hammer and letting it go it would stop and lock at the first catch on the hammer. It wont go all the way forward unless u have the trigger pulled.

@@carrollsanders9376 Nope.

@@robosteveo Had it happen to me on a 45 Colt Army!

With this new generation it's a must

Dead on demonstration. The empty chamber myth is for older guns ànd usually from horseback

He did a lot of the firearms checks on Smallville as well, if I recall correctly, especially in the few scenes he had a gun.

He was overkill, but through

He doesn’t appear to be trained. If he was trained he would not be pointing at the camera man and he would be keeping his finger off the trigger. Trigger discipline is the most basic of all handgun safety.

That is the most important thing that people who don't understand the subject get a very solid understanding of the core subject. Certainly a great video.

Second that

Alec Baldwin get a chance to watch this Tutorial?

@@gmathis4829 the great thing about tv interviews is there are no consequences for lying. In fact its highly encouraged as long as your politics are their politics.

@@Sixstringman Birds of a Feather..... Flock Together, IMHO.

Except he's wrong and he has limited knowledge. Revolvers absolutely can malfunction and have NDs for a variety of reasons.

The trigger would have to be cooked, Baldwin is a lieing little coward

Didnt even know who this guy was, other than a gun expert. When I saw your comment I thought 'Shit yeah, he is Bo Duke'. He has aged well.

First season was aired in 1979 but it’s really am 80’s show.

No way! I had no idea that was Bo Duke!

Also a has been trying to stay relevant by milking this.

@@mcgaugh57 trying to stay relevant (mind you he had 240k subs before these videos) by making a video explaining how Alec Baldwin is a liar How is he milking something by making a thorough explanation of how a firearm that went off on set had to have had the trigger pulled by the actor in order to go off

👍And I love that he’s giving ‘the shooting actor’ a run for his money!🤣

alec's interview was for city idiots like me who never fired a gun. thing is, I have common sense and I know better than to assume a gun is unloaded, I also know never to point a gun at anyone unless I want to shoot em, and never rest your trigger finger on the trigger. But, if I know this is because my dad taught me. I also know a gun is NOT a toy. Alec saw the gun as a prop and not a real gun, so he thought he could do anything without consequences.

The only reason you think it was an "accident" is because his PR team had the media call it an "accident"

@@shouygui4955 Call and get an accidental shooting with a prop gun on the 911 call. You’ve got to wonder how long did they think with their statement should be before they picked up the phone and actually made that call.

I get called for jury duty every time I'm eligible, it's always a wasted day but I'd love to serve on Alec's jury.

Yeah seriously! Hell he's got enough money to buy his way out of it!

You like the part where he points the barrel at his face to look down it? 😂

He was not too damn safety conscious when he shot that lady and killed her, was he?

@@redrambler2000 without a cylinder, its basically the same as you pointing your spoon at your face. Spoon maybe deadlier, if its putting icecream in your mouth all the time

@@johnharris8191 Are you talking about John or Alex?

@@flawlessfoose sugar kills. Many doctors think sugar should be banned. It’s linked to so many health issues.