This Soft Girl Painting Ignited The Slave Trade. Here's Why.

  Рет қаралды 119,755

Art Deco

Art Deco

Ай бұрын

This piece is called Marie Antoinette in a Chemise Dress by Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun. What started off as a humble portrait of the queen scandalized Paris so badly it was stripped from the Salon walls and fueled the expansion of the slave trade. But how could a painting cause such catastrophe?
The garment the queen is wearing in this portrait is called a chemise which was something usually worn underneath womens clothing. Basically, Marie Antoinette is posing in her underwear. But the queen’s indecent exposure wasn't what altered the course of history; It was the fabric she was wearing when she did it. The chemise Marie Antoinette wears in this portrait is made of muslin, which is a type of cotton. People were accustomed to seeing French aristocrats in fitted silk garments. And they were offended when the queen wore an inexpensive fabric like cotton because they interpreted it as a threat to the class structures.
Also at this time, the majority of cotton was produced in India which was a British colony and so it was seen as an English textile while silk was produced by French merchants . The very thought of cotton grazing the queen’s skin was seen as unpatriotic and a threat to the entire French silk industry.
Despite the outrage over Marie Antoinette’s cottage core aesthetic, everyone still wanted to look like her. Every affluent woman couldn’t wait to get their hands on their very own flowy cotton dress. And thanks to the invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton could be processed much more efficiently to meet the surge in demand. But there was just one problem. They couldn’t grow and harvest it fast enough. But there was another way: the American South.
Within 10 years of the invention of the cotton gin, the value of the US cotton crop went from $150,000 to $8 million. The boom in cotton demand meant the slave population grew from around 700,000 in 1790 to over 4 million by 1860. By the 1830s, the U.S. produced the majority of the world's cotton, and by 1850 the Southern states were responsible for 75% of global cotton exports. This made the South extremely wealthy and economically dependent on the institution of slavery.
Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun’s relationship with the queen brought her fame, fortune, and prestige, but all of this vanished in an instance when the French Revolution began in 1789. Because of her proximity to the queen, Elisabeth became concerned for her and her daughters safety and she fled France for Italy. The artists decision to leave France turned out to be a wise one as Marie Antoinette was beheaded a few years later. The artist was able to build an equally impressive career and reputation abroad as she had in France which is perhaps the best testament to her artistic genius and charm. Elisabeth Vigee Le Brun wouldn’t return to France until after the turn of the 19th century. She died in Paris in 1842 at the age of 86.
When Marie Antoinette slipped this dress on to pose for her portrait, she probably didn’t know the damage it would do. But she probably also didn’t know that she wouldn’t be around long enough to see any of it come true. Thank you for watching!!
Credits:
Arcadia - Wonders by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/...
Smoke effect from Vecteezy

Пікірлер: 401
@bornontherimofchaos
@bornontherimofchaos 28 күн бұрын
Indecent exposure? This poor woman had to give birth in front of a crowd showing her inner parts. Talk about isn't life strange.
@Pollicina_db
@Pollicina_db 28 күн бұрын
Also take into account that Marie came from her mothers home in Schonbrunn were the atmosphere was much more relaxed and rational unlike Versailles where even going to a toilet is a public act.
@Girl_In_The_Forest92-2
@Girl_In_The_Forest92-2 28 күн бұрын
That would freakin' suck, I wouldn't be able to handle it I'm extremely shy. 😮 lol
@paulwoodford1984
@paulwoodford1984 28 күн бұрын
😛
@HeyitsBri_
@HeyitsBri_ 27 күн бұрын
It’s not about the dress. The painting is the equivalent of an influencer romanticizing being “simple” because she has a garden in her back yard that she pays people to keep for her
@elenalatici9568
@elenalatici9568 27 күн бұрын
IKR? I can't begin to imagine the humiliation. Giving birth is traumatic enough without having a crowd watching. Abusive and inhumane. Barbaric, actually.
@bdariamihaela
@bdariamihaela 28 күн бұрын
The queen posted
@thatshrian
@thatshrian 28 күн бұрын
We must gather to cherish her.
@Art_Deco
@Art_Deco 28 күн бұрын
😍
@laininbluescourt
@laininbluescourt 28 күн бұрын
All hail art deco
@laurav5767
@laurav5767 24 күн бұрын
She's so cool✨✨
@ShadowWitch666
@ShadowWitch666 17 күн бұрын
👑
@thewinterjule
@thewinterjule 28 күн бұрын
She’s actually wearing a chemise a la reine (called such after she popularized it) dress. She’s not just in a chemise, but a dress inspired by the look of them, which is why it’s so fancy (and not plain)! She would still be wearing a normal chemise under it :)
@animationlover219
@animationlover219 3 күн бұрын
Thank you. I was coming in to comment this myself. She isn’t just wearing a chemise under it, either; you can see the shape of her stays underneath it. For anyone reading this besides @thewinterjule, this garment was called a gaulle before everyone started calling it a chemise a la reine because of this portrait. In fairness to the scandalmongers, the one difference between a gaulle and a fine chemise was that one was worn over the stays, as a gown, while the other was worn under the stays, as underlinen. People really did assume that this was a portrait en dishabille, and of course that played into the accusations against chastity that were always levied against any unpopular, or even interesting, woman of the day. Also in fairness, the fashion was considered a bit of a racy one, for fairly obvious reasons.
@fabricdragon
@fabricdragon 28 күн бұрын
a note about "Muslin". TODAY the term means a very poor quality cotton (or not) fabric, often used to make trial garments, or ... cheap things. that is NOT what the term meant then: Muslin was a very very fine cotton fabric, something closer to what we might call handkerchief linen, or "lawn".
@SuperStella1111
@SuperStella1111 21 күн бұрын
Cambric, even.
@ViolettaD1485
@ViolettaD1485 19 күн бұрын
There also was silk mousseline, which was very different from the stiff taffeta typical of the mid-18th century.
@ammasophia4663
@ammasophia4663 17 күн бұрын
The fine muslin was created through a very expensive and time consuming way. It no longer exists because it was so finely made that it was not profitable.
@kathleenstoin671
@kathleenstoin671 11 күн бұрын
​​@@ammasophia4663Not only that, but the type of cotton plant used for that fabric has been considered extinct. Apparently it was an unusually fine fiber. It was grown in India.
@ammasophia4663
@ammasophia4663 10 күн бұрын
@@kathleenstoin671 TRUE !
@christiancupcake8310
@christiancupcake8310 28 күн бұрын
I really loved to see you talk about a painting done by a female artist! I'd really love to hear you talk about other female artists, such as Artemisia Gentileschi
@lizczerwinski5614
@lizczerwinski5614 28 күн бұрын
Judith Beheading Halofernes by Artemisia Gentileschi is my favorite painting of all time. The juxtaposition of such beauty and talent in it's execution, depicting raw rage and gore is truly what makes it beautiful.... and what makes her such a talented artist.
@heatherjones6647
@heatherjones6647 28 күн бұрын
Florence Carlyle (Canadian)
@a24-45
@a24-45 28 күн бұрын
oh yes! Artemisia's incredible life story (she had to testify under torture in her father's notorious legal action accusing another young artist of her rape) puts her paintings such as "Judith and Holofernes" in a whole new light.
@DiabolicalAngel
@DiabolicalAngel 27 күн бұрын
Yesss and Mary Cassatt!
@janerecluse4344
@janerecluse4344 21 күн бұрын
I love a supportive dad, especially back in the day, when it was usual to ignore any talent in your daughter.
@lz738
@lz738 28 күн бұрын
Actually muslin isn't a type of cotton. You can have silk muslin, too, for instance. The specific muslin fabric in the painting may have been cotton muslin, but muslin is more a type of lightweight, semi-sheer, loosely woven and slightly coarser weave fabric. Cotton muslin is the most common type of muslin, but it is not the only type. Just like you can have silk velvet, rayon velvet, cotton velvet, etc. muslin can be made out of different fibers.
@gemmaanne4161
@gemmaanne4161 28 күн бұрын
😊😊
@JaRule6
@JaRule6 26 күн бұрын
I spend a lot of time correcting people about silk being a fiber and not a fabric. I don't know if you've ever played the New York times game connections but they really annoyed me one day because the word lace was associated with shoes and not with luxury fabric. Instead they included the word silk with satin, velvet and taffeta. Those were the four words that they said denoted luxury fabric and boy was I annoyed 😂
@lz738
@lz738 26 күн бұрын
@@JaRule6 There right with you, man! haha
@ViolettaD1485
@ViolettaD1485 19 күн бұрын
I thought the cottage-core outfit might actually be silk mousseline.
@wiffley
@wiffley 6 сағат бұрын
​@@ViolettaD1485agree: I have no idea how original viewers of the painting would guess that was a cotton garment. It looks like silk.
@MEGA-ASMR
@MEGA-ASMR 28 күн бұрын
“Honey wake up Art Deco uploaded!!! “ ❤
@paulinarapicka
@paulinarapicka 28 күн бұрын
Wait, the real muslin, the one from that special type of cotton (Phuti carpus), was INSANELY expensive (from BBC article "The ancient fabric that no one knows how to make": "At the time, a yard of Dhaka muslin fetched prices ranging from £50-400, according to Islam - equivalent to roughly £7,000-56,000 today. Even the best silk was up to 26 times less expensive."). Let me repeat: A YARD of this fabric's price was £7,000-56,000 of today's many! So it couldn't be that the queen was wearing something cheap... EDIT: This type of cotton has SHORT fibers= is NOT suitable for machine processing! So this is why this plant nearly went extinct...
@evaluna5124
@evaluna5124 28 күн бұрын
Coming to say that too... American cotton was used to undermine textile industries in Africa and India. Muslin was a luxury product. Marie Antoinette was criticised for the reasons given but the change in fashion happened without her. She was just the scapegoat.
@paulinarapicka
@paulinarapicka 28 күн бұрын
Yes, for the reason, but in the video is something about "cotton=cheap". Not this type of cotton. Everything else- yes, I agree. There is (and was, as it started replacing the original one as soon as it was possible) muslin produced by machines, but this is not from the original plant, and it is cheaper.
@barryslater8629
@barryslater8629 28 күн бұрын
😊​@@paulinarapicka
@PieRatKings
@PieRatKings 28 күн бұрын
Textile drama is and always has been WILD Thank you for peeling back yet more layers before us
@elainealibrandi6364
@elainealibrandi6364 27 күн бұрын
It was more that buying muslin was giving England business.
@bwalker77
@bwalker77 28 күн бұрын
That 10 minute video could be a whole movie.
@myishakane6927
@myishakane6927 20 күн бұрын
I was put off by the inexpensive fabric statement. Muslin cost wayyyy more than silk -- in modern money, up to about $56,000 per garment. It was an incredibly exclusive fabric used only by royalty until England started making a knock off version during the industrial revolution. It was so complicated to make and so exclusive that it disappeared altogether when it couldn't compete with the knock off. Muslin no longer exists for that reason.
@user-wz7eq2yk6n
@user-wz7eq2yk6n 28 күн бұрын
Wait? They were thinking about abolishing slavery in the 1770s? Damn you American Education System! Now I gotta do my own research again…
@lainiwakura1776
@lainiwakura1776 28 күн бұрын
At least we don't have a couple thousand year long history like Italy and China.
@user-wz7eq2yk6n
@user-wz7eq2yk6n 28 күн бұрын
@@lainiwakura1776 true but 2 centuries of propaganda isn’t great either.
@tinkergnomad
@tinkergnomad 28 күн бұрын
I've learned way more history from TT and YT than I was taught in school.
@Whatlander
@Whatlander 27 күн бұрын
Yeah, I mean the whole narrative that "that's just how it was at the time" is at most a feeble excuse. Even if racism was widely accepted, it's always been obvious how brutal and unjust the practice was. Some people were just crueler than others. (If you haven't read Fredrick Douglass' writing, I highly recommend it!) (I can't remember if this was cut or not, but even Hamilton had a footnote of a song about abolition being put on back burner for political reasons.)
@spiritmatter1553
@spiritmatter1553 27 күн бұрын
@@WhatlanderHuwite ppl bad.
@itssofiee4631
@itssofiee4631 28 күн бұрын
Marie Antoinette is like the it girl of high school in history, a lot of people like her and a lot of people hate her
@TheOriginalScorpioBelle
@TheOriginalScorpioBelle 17 күн бұрын
If that girl didn’t do anything, they actually hate themselves.
@josephhargrove4319
@josephhargrove4319 28 күн бұрын
I fell in love with Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun (or at least with her self-portrait) when I saw one (you flash it on the screen at 8:51) at the Kimbell Museum in Fort Worth, Texas. Of all the amazing paintings in this museum's permanent collection, I found the Le Brun self-portrait mesmerizing. I must have stood in front of it, visually drinking it in, for 15 to 20 minutes. I literally did not want to stop viewing it. Like most great visual art, reproductions don't do it justice, robbing it of its vitality. Of all the pieces at that museum, I would want that one to take home with me. richard -- Oscar Wilde: "I wish I had said that" James McNeill Whistler: "You will, Oscar, you will."
@gingerdean1521
@gingerdean1521 Күн бұрын
The original is not even in France but in a London Museum. Where I bought a postcard
@lollipoplemur5073
@lollipoplemur5073 28 күн бұрын
What a twist!! Did not see that coming!! Fascinating story. ❤
@matrixiekitty2127
@matrixiekitty2127 27 күн бұрын
Le Brun’s style is so beautiful, her work has a warmth and life to it that I can’t look away from! As you said, she put her subjects at ease so they just seem more lively and like themselves in the paintings💖
@thatshrian
@thatshrian 28 күн бұрын
Marie Antoinette is THAT GIRL of the 18th century. Such a queen.
@angelicart.6
@angelicart.6 28 күн бұрын
and also a qween
@HeyitsBri_
@HeyitsBri_ 28 күн бұрын
She was actually awful
@JustMe-vs1kj
@JustMe-vs1kj 25 күн бұрын
@@HeyitsBri_ doesnt change the fact that she was the it girl, its not like the people in power now are any good
@JeanAntoine213
@JeanAntoine213 23 күн бұрын
​@@HeyitsBri_ It was her husband not her. She wasn't even a ruler just a baby maker 😂
@tirramasu7948
@tirramasu7948 16 күн бұрын
​@@HeyitsBri_Y'know if theres one thing about Marie Antoinette Its that so much is written about her and yet we know so little The French revoulution was not a political battle but also social. So much Drama during that era almost makes rumors fact in the minds of the people Take " let them eat cake" always misattributed to Marie but then again she drank sugar water regularly showinb how frivolous she was but then again she was a women in the 18th century sent off to be married at such a young age what was she supposed to do? Be a major political player in a world dominated by men? But yet again she was the Queen of France then again she holds much influence. She's so complicated. Tyranical Queen, Victim of circumstance or Ditsy French aristocrat? This is why I love learning about her, So much is known yet we know nothing.
@annagibson6466
@annagibson6466 23 күн бұрын
The claims in the video, like the article it was presumably based on, requires us to ignore everything else related to cotton demand and production and pretend that this singular portrait is the reason cotton was in demand, thus ensuring one of the staples of the American slave trade was kept in demand. It's a very simplistic, "plug your ears and pretend nothing else is happening" sort of view. The garment is not called a "chemise." Chemises (undergarments) are different than "chemise gowns," also known as muslin gowns, chemise a la reine, gaulles, and a number of other monikers. Women wore actual chemises and other underclothing underneath chemise gowns. Marie Antoinette was not posing in her underwear, she was posing in an existing informal style that was popular among women for their informal clothing intended for wear at home or in private settings. The issue with Marie Antoinette wearing the dress was multifaceted. She was criticized by contemporary art critics for wearing a gown "in public" (her portrait being displayed at the Salon was viewed as her being in public) that should be "reserved for the privacy of the palace." Meaning it was fine for her to wear it, but not in public view, which should have been treated as a formal court setting. Decades later, the artist wrote in her memoirs that people claimed she painted the queen in her undergarments. Contemporary criticisms of these gowns also related to a blurring of class barriers; non-aristocratic women wanted to wear them, and could wear them, allowing them to emulate what noblewomen were wearing which would not have been as possible (at least in terms of what aristocratic women wore in public) with court gowns. The fabric wore by the queen was not inexpensive cotton. Muslin and cheap cotton were not interchangeable, at all, and this is a critical fact. The criticism against the usage of muslin was not because it was cheap (it was not--it was notoriously expensive and had to be processed and laundered in very special, time consuming expensive ways) but because it was foreign and because it was related to a reduction in demand for silk. When women's fashion shifted away from expensive heavy silks for everyday fashions (with exceptions for formal robe a la francaise, which still had to be worn at certain court functions, but were no longer the fabric for dresses women typically wore out to the operas, balls, etc) this devastated the French silk industry. The industry blamed Marie Antoinette, because as she was the queen, she was blamed for just about everything. The situation was so bad that in 1785, Marie Antoinette swore to only wear "French gauzes," with Thomas Jefferson noting: "how many English looms will this put down?" It was not cotton fabric from North America, nor was it connected to the North Atlantic slave trade. It was connected to the exploitation of Indian workers, who were said to work in difficult conditions. The cotton gin was created in 1793... more than a decade after the portrait was created. The cotton gin was not used for muslins. The development of the cotton gin is not connected to the chemise muslin gown portrait, as that would require claiming that the reason for its development was muslin gowns that didn't use cotton that could be produced with the cotton gin. Other types of fashions using cotton were far more popular than the muslin gown worn in this portrait. Cotton was a vastly popular textile, and trying to pin its demand on this singular portrait, again, requires ignoring everything else that was involved in the demand for this textile. Which isn't a solid way to approach an historical topic. Like the article this was based on, the premise of this video ignores that cotton was already a popular fabric, and the boom in cotton demand and production was related to the existing demand for cotton growing exponentially during the 18th century. In the early 1770s, England removed restrictions on cotton import/export in the early 1770s, which made cotton more accessible for far more clothing styles than ever before. So when the shape of fashion began to change in the 1780s, with "English" gowns and less restrictive gowns becoming standard for everyday wear, this increased the demand for cotton. Cotton was popular before Marie Antoinette was painted in an existing fashion trend, and it would have been popular without this particular portrait. There is no reason to think that cotton would not have continued to dominate just because Marie Antoinette didn't have this portrait made, especially since the trend for these gowns already existed, and women were already beginning to venture into public with them. But of course, "Marie Antoinette's portrait sparked the slave trade, and it's all her fault that the American slave trade didn't magically disappear in the 1770s" is much better clickbait...
@cluckcluckchicken
@cluckcluckchicken 21 күн бұрын
Thank you for the actual history. This video is FULL of myths and lies. Shame on this KZfaq channel for spreading lies about serious topics like slavery!!
@KristinesTruth
@KristinesTruth Күн бұрын
🥂
@RanyaKato
@RanyaKato Күн бұрын
Thank you for the clarification.
@Wjajajamqmmqjaj
@Wjajajamqmmqjaj 28 күн бұрын
5:37 the way you said “what the f-“ in a nonchalant voice made me laugh 😂
@smritithakur9164
@smritithakur9164 28 күн бұрын
I love your videos. I wait for it. And I'm watching the no. of views increasing in the real time...!!!
@michaeljohnangel6359
@michaeljohnangel6359 28 күн бұрын
Excellent!! Thanks! I lecture on Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun as part of my French 18th-century painting gig, and I learned a lot about her and Marie Antoinette from your video!!!
@gingerdean1521
@gingerdean1521 Күн бұрын
Read LeBrun's autobiography
@benardmarx
@benardmarx 27 күн бұрын
Why is this one of my favorite channels? I know nothing about art and thought it would remain this way for the rest of my life. Now I find myself thinking about these videos often, with interest and cannot wait for the next one!
@juliemarshall7458
@juliemarshall7458 28 күн бұрын
I'm from the southern U.S.A. I've picked cotton and worked in a cotton mill. Little did I know that there were so few degrees of separation between Marie Antoinette and me. 🙃
@jovindsouza3407
@jovindsouza3407 28 күн бұрын
I feel sympathy for Marie Antoinette. I think she was a horrible queen and even worse politician, but I have to admire her care for her children, biological and adopted. When the Jacobins accused her of abusing her son, she fought back and appealed to the women of France, asking if they really thought her so heartless she would inflict that on her children (ironically, her son Louis "XVII" was abused and murdered at the hands of the revolutionaries when he was 10, years after Marie died). The famous "let them eat cake" was almost certainly never said by her, and if it was, it was probably more like "If they're starving that badly, shouldn't we give them some of the good stuff?". And then her reputed speech when she was sentenced to death - *_"In my defense! Nothing. For your scruples! Much. I was a queen, and you dethroned me. I was a wife, and you killed my husband. I was a mother, and you tore me from my children. Only my blood remains: you are thirsty. Drink it. Hasten to meet it that you may drink it."_* Oh, and her last words were apologizing to her executioner because she accidentally stepped on his feet when she was climbing the scaffold. Literally everything about her life has many, many layers, and so many of those layers are completely awful to analyze. I'm not saying she was this innocent saint - she was probably partly responsible for France's bankruptcy through her ridiculous extravagance and was right beside Louis XVI when he was making his own terrible decisions, but I tend to look on her a little more favorably than on the other people involved in the first revolution.
@nuotatorre8741
@nuotatorre8741 28 күн бұрын
Agree she is such a fascinating person to study. I also wanted to add that aldough I agree she wasn't a saint, Queens consorts in France didn't have that much political power. Unlike in Englad for example where weman always had a good ammount of political infulance. Ofc there have also been politicaly active french queens (Catherin De Medici, Eleonor or Aquitane) but it was not expected of them to buisy themself with running the country. Even so it wasn't unusual for 18th ceuntry queens to take the power from their husbands (her sister Maria Carolina did just that), so Marie could have definatly done more in her position if she had the drive to.
@cassiereno114
@cassiereno114 28 күн бұрын
But also, the public got offended that she wasn't extravagant enough in the initial painting so she's expected to be decked out at all times yet is also blamed and punished for it. She couldn't win no matter what she did.(also she gave to charity a lot, unlike so many of the upper class yet she got the brunt of the blame)
@gayzell850
@gayzell850 28 күн бұрын
Actually, Louis XVI had six aunts and two sisters that were just as extravagant if not more so than Marie Antoinette. However, she got the blame for two reasons. First and mainly because she was a foreigner (she often referred to as "the Austrian") and secondly because she didn't produce an heir straight away, although this was mainly Louis' fault. Apparently he was clueless as to sex. It wasn't until her brother Joseph paid a visit seven years into the marriage and instructed Louis how to do it that the marriage was consummated, according to a letter Joseph wrote to back home describing Louis as a complete fumbler.
@sophiejones3554
@sophiejones3554 27 күн бұрын
@@cassiereno114this is really the takeaway imo. It's not that all of her decisions were the epitome of sensitive (she could certainly be politically tone-deaf on occasion even if the "let them eat cake" story is probably apocryphal) but that she was in a position where some group would be calling for her head no matter what she did. That situation wasn't created by her either: it was largely the fault of LouisXIV. If you want to talk about extravagant royalty, well: he was the pinnacle if it tbh. The general resentment against royalty in France really had nothing to do with the current King and Queen, and everything to do with the residual effects of LouisXIV's policies as well as the oppressive way the regime was organized. Marie Antoinette did very little to ameliorate the situation, but she also didn't cause it.
@alilith3476
@alilith3476 25 күн бұрын
The treasury was already almost empty when they got the throne and added with the war they sponsored smh
@markusstorzer4545
@markusstorzer4545 28 күн бұрын
Marvelous! ..the details, the dash of humor and the big plot twist...mind blown and always edutained!! Thank you so much again!!
@kerryberman609
@kerryberman609 2 күн бұрын
You have further educated a person who, prior, only received a scant drop of info on this. Thank you!
@narrowonflow
@narrowonflow 28 күн бұрын
2:22 this guy had all the names
@ironwillACNH
@ironwillACNH 28 күн бұрын
LeBron James
@flowersforthedead5182
@flowersforthedead5182 28 күн бұрын
I think its beautiful that the queen bared herself physically and emotionally for her subjects in this portrait. At this point it was probably established that she was allegedly spending her country into ruin with her lavish shopping trips parties and finery so this would make people upset because it went starkly against those accusations for her to be donning a simple garment for a portrait.
@richardcoughlin8931
@richardcoughlin8931 28 күн бұрын
Thank for another excellent program. The back story of this painting is fascinating. I never would have guessed that a simple painting would tie into the political economy of cotton and slavery in the US.
@djparn007
@djparn007 28 күн бұрын
Marie Antoinette couldn't get a break! ❤❤❤
@zorromaskedman685
@zorromaskedman685 28 күн бұрын
C O N T R O V E R S I A L. OH. MY🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨🎨 Art Deco You've done it again, as we've come to expect. You've dragged me down the Time Tunnel some 241 years to life in 1783. The brush stroke felt around the world. It's amazing the consequences of such a painting. Both Marie & Elizabeth were 28 years old at the time...perhaps this is why they got along so well. 💜💜💜art deco💜💜💜
@jillwanlin9558
@jillwanlin9558 26 күн бұрын
Wasn’t aware of Elizabeth Vigee Le Brun. Beautiful and talented. Sounds like she had an amazing life. To live til 86 would have been a rarity in those days. Ty AD. ❤the channel.
@gingerdean1521
@gingerdean1521 Күн бұрын
Her Daughter Julie died from some sexual disease as Liz cared for her
@daveseddon5227
@daveseddon5227 28 күн бұрын
I thought you were going to say that Elisabeth was a serial killer - oh, well, maybe next time. Another great video - thanks for brightening my week and a few other people by the looks of it! 😍❤
@hippyelise1
@hippyelise1 28 күн бұрын
These just keep getting better and better. Thanks ❤️
@angelicart.6
@angelicart.6 28 күн бұрын
I’m about to make a part of my thesis about french revolution, thanks for this video. just on point
@cluckcluckchicken
@cluckcluckchicken 21 күн бұрын
This video is not true. Marie-Antoinette did NOT popularize cotton clothing (it was already popular before she wore this dress) and the slave trade already existed for centuries beforehand. Don't include it in an actual academic paper, you will get a terrible grade!
@HistoryofArt-365
@HistoryofArt-365 6 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video! Your channel is so informative and interesting!
@Fernarcis
@Fernarcis 27 күн бұрын
I adore your work, the fact that you incorporate history to every aspect of it and even go as deep as other subjects is extremely appreciated. ♡
@ginoongboyong
@ginoongboyong 28 күн бұрын
Wow! Never expect paintings of the "influencers" before can affect the lives of the other continent. I really loved your content. Keep up the great works!
@countesscable
@countesscable 28 күн бұрын
I love this. The narration is so pleasant and ASMR. It’s also really informative.
@fairyofdarkness2950
@fairyofdarkness2950 27 күн бұрын
Girl I love you and your videos, it just lights up my day to see you posted 💕
@Shortcake8399
@Shortcake8399 14 күн бұрын
Can't wait until you post again!
@alicemoody6682
@alicemoody6682 28 күн бұрын
Wow! Love your videos. Thank you for always providing such insight into not only into art and history but showing the passion. Have a great day!
@juststardust8103
@juststardust8103 12 күн бұрын
One of the best videos I have ever seen. That is a real class!
@Vintage_Recreations
@Vintage_Recreations 24 күн бұрын
Except this was before the invention of the cotton gin and Indian Muslin was 25 times more expensive than silk at the time of the portrait.
@kristinakharin3412
@kristinakharin3412 28 күн бұрын
I love this channel, I am always waiting for a new video to come out!!
@shylockwesker5530
@shylockwesker5530 14 күн бұрын
All of this was very interesting. Thank you.
@jacquimg2469
@jacquimg2469 28 күн бұрын
I love this channel and appreciate all the insight given to each painting. This video is especially interesting since I knew nothing of the artist.
@cassandraescribano8433
@cassandraescribano8433 21 күн бұрын
its been years since i havent watched her channel, ITS SO GOOD WATCHING IT ONCE AGAIN
@awesomedallastours
@awesomedallastours 8 күн бұрын
That needle drop sound effect that you use in everyone of your videos never gets old.
@osmia
@osmia 27 күн бұрын
Absolutely love it when one of your videos shows up in my subscription feed. This lady, Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun, had a life that from the little you've told us makes me admire her greatly above and beyond her beautiful paintings
@sourxpill
@sourxpill 28 күн бұрын
I swear to god, I haven't been getting your videos in my sub box. I thought you took a break for a few months. I'll definitely hit that notification bell now.
@IMAMONGUS
@IMAMONGUS 28 күн бұрын
That's happened to me on another channel. I keep checking all my subscriptions and notifications
@Verbalaesthet
@Verbalaesthet 28 күн бұрын
The algorithm is broken. Happens all the time.
@lindacecile5647
@lindacecile5647 28 күн бұрын
I absolutely love your channel. You give such indepth examination of each topic. I found this particularly fascinating, linking cotton demand on France to the South and affects a b slavery!!! What a history lesson, as well as revealing the interconnectedness of all aspects. Amazing commentary😊
@osmia
@osmia 27 күн бұрын
+
@SDMA1989
@SDMA1989 28 күн бұрын
Fascinating video! Really appreciate the research you do. ❤
@Art_Deco
@Art_Deco 28 күн бұрын
Thank you so much, Joe!
@CurtRowlett
@CurtRowlett 28 күн бұрын
Brilliant bit of art history here. Thank you for sharing it.
@suzannemomma
@suzannemomma 28 күн бұрын
Another painting! Thank you so much!
@kateburleson6129
@kateburleson6129 27 күн бұрын
My 11 yr old daughter loves this series of art history videos. Her current favorites! (She's hoping g there's a new one to enjoy around her birthday on July 30th). Thanks for such interesting content!
@karinscott4455
@karinscott4455 28 күн бұрын
Fascinating, as always. Thank you.
@graphite2786
@graphite2786 28 күн бұрын
Wow! What a story😳 I wonder whose idea it was to pose in the cotton chemise? It's the butterfly effect enacted 🤯
@fruity4820
@fruity4820 28 күн бұрын
You'd think that there would be at least one adviser that would think "the queen's loyalty to the nation is constantly in doubt, she needs to be patriotic down the fabric of her clothes" Maybe it's just hindsight, maybe everyone in the royal court were just that detached from the public so there just wasn't anyone around to catch that mistake, but honestly the more I learn about Marie Antoinette, the more I realize that no matter what she would have done, she would have never survive the french court. The upper class hated her guts for being Asturian, the lower class hated her guts for being rich AND Austrian, and so she became a symbol for everything that the revolution wanted to take down (despite arguably being the one with the least blame for the state of France out of everyone in the upper class, like, she was still 'the queen' but it's not like she was the sole ruler of the nation and got to call all the shots)
@indigenousserpant7779
@indigenousserpant7779 28 күн бұрын
This is a very good channel, one of the best at accurately explaining art history and I honestly love it ❤ I must ask however, if you can push out new videos quicker, and I do realize you have work etc, but I personally think this fanbase has the potential to grow, as I got interested in it only a few months ago, and I have now watched all your videos. Great job!
@Penultimate
@Penultimate 7 күн бұрын
She painted so much life into eyes. It’s mesmerizing.
@lilashelton535
@lilashelton535 28 күн бұрын
Interested and entertaining as well as informative. Thanks
@tinkergnomad
@tinkergnomad 28 күн бұрын
I would really love to learn more about this artist! Thank you!!!
@bleh5419
@bleh5419 27 күн бұрын
This is honestly such an amazing channel
@stephenpmurphy591
@stephenpmurphy591 28 күн бұрын
Saturday just got brighter Art Deco posted.
@KT00700
@KT00700 13 күн бұрын
Could you do The Acrobatics?? I just learned about this painting!! Love your videos!!
@shreeeeeeeeeeeeee
@shreeeeeeeeeeeeee 6 күн бұрын
First video of yours I’ve seen, and subscribed not even 30 seconds in.
@aliceahueman3005
@aliceahueman3005 28 күн бұрын
👏💯💐💝🥳I love your videos so much you're so good.❤❤ I get so excited every time I see a new one posted.❤❤ I love the art humor you add it's fantastic bravo.
@adelem432
@adelem432 28 күн бұрын
I so enjoy your videos. We never learned a lot of this in art school.
@bethanywicker8990
@bethanywicker8990 28 күн бұрын
French society was so debauched then it is almost laughable that this picture is considered scandalis
@seeleunit2000
@seeleunit2000 28 күн бұрын
You'd be surprised how seemingly innocuous works of art and sculpture can have a scandalous history. Or are considered scandalous during their time
@emilyp3150
@emilyp3150 Күн бұрын
Yes, very hypocritical I think!
@aeolus75
@aeolus75 28 күн бұрын
Just Beautiful ❤, the model, the painter and the story.
@ohmyshescute
@ohmyshescute 28 күн бұрын
My mind is blown again. The facts about the artist were most interesting. I love you and your work.
@jeromemckenna7102
@jeromemckenna7102 12 сағат бұрын
I've always liked Elizabeth Vigee Lebrun since I first saw her paintings in London, but I didn't know anything much about her.
@johnzengerle7576
@johnzengerle7576 28 күн бұрын
Thanks!
@AndromedaCripps
@AndromedaCripps 16 күн бұрын
This chemise style of dress was so popularized by the Queen’s portrait that the technical term we most often use to describe it today is the Chemise á la Reine; the “Queen’s Chemise/Chemise in the Style of the Queen”. I’m not certain but I believe I recall that term being used in the period as well!
@Jonesnaltitude
@Jonesnaltitude 28 күн бұрын
Fascinating as always
@sheenawarecki92
@sheenawarecki92 28 күн бұрын
Studies Artemisias work for art history class! Was really cool to learn and love seeing you post about her!
@zzz181085
@zzz181085 28 күн бұрын
Impressive video essay and quirky humor! ❤
@LadybugPrinzess
@LadybugPrinzess 28 күн бұрын
Always love your videos! ❤❤❤❤
@Berrybernese
@Berrybernese 19 күн бұрын
Could you please cover Bélizaire and the Frey children,it's such an interesting piece
@meganbroomhall6013
@meganbroomhall6013 26 күн бұрын
I always know it’s gonna be a good day when you post keep up the good work!! ❤❤✨✨ - I have a painting recommendation ( The Great Conemaugh-Valley Disaster - Flood and Fire a Jhonstown pa ) - By Kurz and Allison
@circles3446
@circles3446 14 күн бұрын
Could you please do some on Raja Ravi Verma paintings? You are so so insightful in your explanation - I really resonate with the way you think and express your take on paintings. It would be very interesting if you could do at least one video on Raja Ravi Verma’s paintings. 🙏🏽❤️
@nannettefreeman7331
@nannettefreeman7331 28 күн бұрын
I just watched a video about Dhaka Muslin, which was 30-40x more expensive than the finest silk at that time. The strain of cotton they used went extinct & the craft of making the 1200-1300 thread count muslin was lost to time. ✌🏼
@blackvx
@blackvx 28 күн бұрын
Amazing presentation, as always 😊👍
@deghovst6646
@deghovst6646 24 күн бұрын
Can you do Salomes Dance by Leopold, Ivan the terrible and his son ivan, Isabella and the pot of basil, or Kriemhild accusation? Love your vids btw❤
@marklatture
@marklatture 14 күн бұрын
Can I suggest that you add where the piece currently can be viewed? then you could even tag the name of the museum, develop playlists of art pieces in Metropolitan Museum of Art in NYC for example. This would increase your views and be a valuable resource for those planning a trip to a specific museum.
@kaybrown4010
@kaybrown4010 28 күн бұрын
Elizabeth Vigée Le Brun was an amazing artist. I wish she was better known.
@HeyitsBri_
@HeyitsBri_ 28 күн бұрын
The issue people really had was that Marie Antoinette was cosplaying poor while the actual poor and middle class were actively starving in the streets. Le Petit Trianon was a small town that hired people to run it whenever she gave notice to visit like Disney Land. They would stuff it with flowers, bathe the livestock and put ribbons on them, and would pre-harvest fruits and veggies but place them in such a way that the queen could feel like she’s doing something without the strain of actually doing something. Once this is understood the “let them eat cake” thing makes more sense and why the people felt she had to go.
@rynneivarsson751
@rynneivarsson751 26 күн бұрын
Thank you for that info. I always wondered why the "farm" was such a major issue. It was actually more of a production then... I had imagined she simply went there and hung out in the flowers. Had no idea she had local poor people playing, well... poor people as part of the experience.
@KC-ip3uz
@KC-ip3uz 26 күн бұрын
Although the phrase is conventionally attributed to Marie Antoinette, it can actually be traced back to Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Confessions in 1765. The quote was only attributed to her decades after her death, and historians do not believe that she said it.
@annagibson6466
@annagibson6466 23 күн бұрын
This is incorrect information. The Petit Trianon was an estate, not a small town. I'm assuming you're referring to the hameau de la reine. It was not a small town, but a countryside estate with both working buildings (dairy, farm buildings) and recreational buildings for Marie Antoinette and her entourage. There weren't people to run it like it was a Disneyland trip. There were employees who worked the farm daily, in addition to servants for the Queen's House, as there would be in any place she stayed. They didn't pre-harvest fruits, put ribbons on livestock, etc. Marie Antoinette didn't pretend to milk cows or pick fruit or anything like that, these are inventions of popular media. What Marie Antoinette did at the hameau was what any elite did on their country estates--took walks, went fishing, relaxed, tasted the products created at the farm, etc.
@annagibson6466
@annagibson6466 23 күн бұрын
@@rynneivarsson751 She didn't. The above user is sharing misinformation. There were employees on the hameau to work the farm, dairy, and servants for the Queen's House. No one was playing poor people, and it wasn't like a faux Disney city. What she did at the hameau was what any elite person did at their country estate - took walks, went fishing, had suppers, relaxed. She also, as the mistress of the estate, consulted with the farmer on how the animals were doing, approved orders if necessary, etc.
@citrus_sweet
@citrus_sweet 4 күн бұрын
@KC-ip3uz It was Empress Maria Theresa who said it, but uneducated french peasants saw Mari- and jumped to the conclusion it was Antoinette.
@flamboyante._
@flamboyante._ 28 күн бұрын
actually, the chemise gown was a style worn in the French colonies in the caribbean, worn because of the heat of the land!!
@joeb5316
@joeb5316 28 күн бұрын
Keep up the great work!
@Art_Deco
@Art_Deco 28 күн бұрын
Wow! Thank you so much!
@MEMORIA1316
@MEMORIA1316 28 күн бұрын
Interesting content!
@Arkham_UK
@Arkham_UK 27 күн бұрын
These also look like Dutchess of devonshive Georgiana Cavendish by Gainsborough ? Is there a link or just the fashion pose at the time?
@zero_bs_tolerance8646
@zero_bs_tolerance8646 26 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@lanaistheneworange3013
@lanaistheneworange3013 28 күн бұрын
The artist and the queen were rOommATeS.
@Lainers2000
@Lainers2000 28 күн бұрын
Thank you, AD. What an amazing artist. So glad she achieved success in her lifetime. Very interesting history.
@heat420_7
@heat420_7 26 күн бұрын
Excellent video ❤
@makibo.mp4
@makibo.mp4 18 күн бұрын
Vigée Le Brun is such an underrated successful artist, people looked at her works because of the fact she painted an important person, but a few only paid attention into her skills and artistic potency. The way she made people younger and bloomy, while making it so it doesn’t stir away from their actual features, she made Marie Antoinette beautiful, charismatic and pleasant for the average french person. Le Brun basically made her marketable and likeable for french people at a good solid time before tragedy happened She was the everyday artist of her time, that had a chance of a temporary spot light
@gingerdean1521
@gingerdean1521 Күн бұрын
After she fled France she did many portraits of other Royals all over eastern Europe
@4everasinger286
@4everasinger286 28 күн бұрын
Another great video!!!
@Cammmila
@Cammmila 28 күн бұрын
One of your best!
@odohertyfalstaff
@odohertyfalstaff 28 күн бұрын
I love these videos. A bit of a chronological disconnect cotton gin 1794. Queen beheaded 1793. Maybe I missed something? I’ll watch again on a big screen.
@Rottingchild
@Rottingchild 17 күн бұрын
2:48 “and they would sing together”
This Cringe Painting Predicted The Future
12:07
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 663 М.
This Painting Ruined Her Life. Here's Why.
9:22
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 225 М.
He sees meat everywhere 😄🥩
00:11
AngLova
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
DO YOU HAVE FRIENDS LIKE THIS?
00:17
dednahype
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
KINDNESS ALWAYS COME BACK
00:59
dednahype
Рет қаралды 88 МЛН
The Ten Plagues - Exodus Explained
12:36
Jake Doubleyoo
Рет қаралды 56 М.
You Can't Unsee This Painting
12:02
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 75 М.
Today I Wrestled A 30 Pound Maine Coon Cat
13:52
Girl With The Dogs 2
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
How much clothing did they *actually* have back then?
32:47
Nicole Rudolph
Рет қаралды 117 М.
unfortunately, bridgerton fumbled season 3
35:46
Mina Le
Рет қаралды 614 М.
This Painting Is Weirder Than It Looks. Here’s Why.
10:40
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
This Painting Almost Killed Her
15:31
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 264 М.
This Painting Is More Dangerous Than It Seems. Here's Why.
10:46
Art Deco
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
He sees meat everywhere 😄🥩
00:11
AngLova
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН