206. If someone asked us 'but is that true?" we might say "yes" to him; and if he demanded grounds we might say "I can't give you any grounds, but if you learn more you too will think the same". If this didn't come about, that would mean that he couldn't for example learn -history- continental philosophy
@yuriarin32372 жыл бұрын
On Certainty. L.W.
@alexanderthedude5474Ай бұрын
ineffably based
@szefszefow75629 ай бұрын
Based Williamson
@kripkeino4512 Жыл бұрын
miopadreeeeeeeeeeeee
@ckae28462 жыл бұрын
May I know which video is this from?
@ib42362 жыл бұрын
It's from a personal VLOG titled "Confessiones".
@ib42362 жыл бұрын
La-da-da-da-dah :)
@helenlauer95452 жыл бұрын
when a genius walks into a room, all the pickpocket sees is pockets.
@das.gegenmittel2 ай бұрын
lol
@tempusfugit36355 ай бұрын
~ o B j E c t I o n S ~
@TheJpwm7 ай бұрын
Whereas poring obsessively over logical minutiae is deeply satisfying
@kattenelvis17786 ай бұрын
Yes
@olindblo4 ай бұрын
Sounds pretty based to me
@TheJpwm4 ай бұрын
@@olindblo Fair enough. I suppose I think it’s a laughable and irrelevant abuse of philosophy 🤷♂️
@Dere27274 ай бұрын
@@TheJpwmlogic is irrelevant to philosophy?
@TheJpwm4 ай бұрын
@@Dere2727 Logic is relevant to philosophy, of course. But not everything done by people engaged with logic is relevant, to philosophy or anything else. Playing games in esoteric rabbit holes within esoteric rabbit holes likely won't amount to much. Which may be why very few people outside of Williamson's tiny circle engage with his work, and nobody outside of analytic philosophy has any idea who he is.