i think so, but at least one step trying to reduce cars

There no bus or train station

@@janganliatchannelini they can just design it without cars

Yeah replace the car with something more essentials like van to carry supplies etc.

and the rest of the areas will be an overgrown mess in no time with minimal maintenance done

I mean they don’t look great but they are useful, and 99,9% of the time you see the houses from the ground and don’t even see them

Just build a nuclear power plant🤷🏻‍♂️

nuclear energy is not sustainable, and no one cares how the solar panels look

Yeah, because huge nuclear power plants look so much better 😂 When do you actually see the roof of your building? Solar panels on roofs are better than grey unused roofs. There are so many unused roof surfaces also in industrial buildings which could help a great deal to lessen the burden on the power network by adding solar panels.

They can be condos or co-op housing

@@EricSmith-dx1ll Do you know this or is this a fart guess in the dark…

@@jean-claudelol563 they literally said “they CAN be”, not “they are 100% going to be”. If they are not landlord owned, which is a possibility, then your problem would not exist

@@EricSmith-dx1ll i don’t agree with that. in america where “you build wealth through owning a house” so much of our money has sunken into repairs due to how bad american houses are built. and if there is only single family houses built, actually there is no way for the poor to build weakth because they can’t afford to live anywhere. and personally i would love to live somewhere like this

Having more competition lowers prices. Having more places for people to live makes more empty rooms, thus they will lower prices to fill. And single family homes force people to drive cars, public transport, biking, and walking are best and are only possible with high enough population density. But yes, as of now, wall street has a house buying addiction that's ruining America (gotta love greed)

so u doing this for school homework as well?

It does not rapidly decline in the US, this kind of midrise building actually is doing well. The only thing "green" on this design however is the rainwater collection system, but the shower water (grey water) to toilet concept is actually a violation of code without treatment first. The better way to recycle water is to have mini treatment plant handling grey water locally then send it back for toilet flushing. It can be done with smaller scale than toilet water flushing.

Why is this an outdated concept? Which buildings look good lies in the eye of the beholder. They have got the perfect density for an urban environment. The streetscape has got a good amount of space for pedestrians and bicycles. Since mixed used midrise buildings can allow good walkability, there is high pedestrian traffic leading to good attendance of local shops. Do you think car centric single family zoning is better?

@@je6a478 I suggest you move in tomorrow. Then perhaps you could get your neighbors to plant some more trees & greenery - an abundance - on the street side of the buildings before you add lush gardens to the courtyards. All best wishes on making it beautiful & green.

@@aalexander928 Yes, I agree that more trees could have been planted alongside the streets - although there aren't none. I still think that the rest of the points you've mentioned are wrong or unexplained and if you'd want to make a point, it would make more sense to refer to mine.