I love these discussions about the old champs and times. Thanks for sharing!

Can you guys please put this as a podcast, this is the best

I'm from Barlinek! :) And I must say that my city didn't nothing special to commemorate this great person.

I could listen to Gms talk shop for hours....

I think Nunn said he didn’t play bad moves on purpose, he played moves that were equally good but which offered chances for his opponent to go wrong. Nunn says his play was tight and controlled.

Great information on the historical players super nice

6:50 in - the 1924 NewYork Tournment?!?! That would be Emanuel Lasker - not Capablanca (finished second) - who won when he was 55 years old!! He took years off at a time and yet was still competing at the highest levels well into his sixties. Extraordiary talent in several different fields.

And don’t forget he was a defensive genius.

Great format!

emanuel was my fav.

Well whatever they say about Lasker and private world championships also applies to Capablanca and Alekhine. Both handpicked and waited for someone to cough up the cash. And ‘not losing in 8 years’ - well this has something to do with world war 1 too.

"OMG, Yasser! It's a rover!" - J Shahade

alekhine was a beast

Lasker took his title from the true great of the previous generation, and then beat several of the would-be rivals of his own generation very convincingly, before finally giving up the title to the next generation's great. I think Carlsen is as likely to surpass Lasker in the number of successful title defenses as he is unlikely to surpass him in years as champion, but I'd say the broad strokes of their stories are very similar so far. History never repeats itself, but it often rhymes.

It depends : Are you playing for the results in Chess or for the "truth" of Chess ......

Jen made love with Maurice.

... NO VIEWS

That gay guy cant stand that girl. lol