If you're referring to the sun, he only really does that for his own sake. It doesnt actually do anything. The rocket being angled gives him just enough to prevent him from falling into the sun. That was unclear to me as well.

Well, the star's heliosphere is made up of particles emitted from the star's surface, so the stickman could be using the fact that time is slowing down for him to be able to push the particles around with the hat for enough time to stabilize the orbit, while the thrust of the rocket is helping too.

A sombrero works pretty well too, but it has to be made out of felt fabric, not straw.

@@maupach2022 Greetings, fellow Boomer!

If the cowboy hat is shaped like the normal distribution curve. Bell curve = balance

I get the electromagnetism part. But can you explain the conservation of momentum. Because even though at first, I thought that conservation of momentum of was being violated but then got to thinking that he is creating an angular momentum first, and then converting it to linear momentum. the energy is being provided by his own body so I dont think conservation of energy is being violated?

@@aritrajitraha5944 for one, the icy surface is shown to have a mu of 0.1, so we know there are external losses, but the demo of potential to kinetic back to potential energy shows a zero loss system. Also, he converts angular to linear momentum the first couple times with losses due to friction and then suddenly he's sliding on one leg with zero losses as he approaches the large ball. All that being said, a little creative license to demonstrate different concepts! something something spherical cows haha

Absolutely, and while we're at it, can we please address the scientific inaccuracies of a 2 dimensional orange stick figure that seemingly displays a capacity for consciousness

More fundamental, at 3:20, the ball falls straight down on the top of his head. By Conservation of Momentum, the ball should just bounce straight back up to where it started. The parabola is a combination of gravity and linear momentum.

@@charlesgantz5865 That's only true if it hits the exact top of the head. Otherwise, it should bounce off at an angle.

so, the reason they entered the black hole was because they were angry at being hit in the face by the apple and wanted revenge. but in order to avoid breaking causality they had to hit themselves in the face with the apple. they were laughing at the irony that they were angry at themselves all along.

Yep❤

Ive been looking for this comment

There is this weird stigma around intelligent people (in terms of IQ anyway) liking regular shows and books, as if you are required to only talk about intellectual topics. It's very weird

​@@shadowyzephyrMostly if you are good with maths, people already think your whole personality and life in general turn around that xd something i find sad is that only mathematicians are considered intelligent, because you can be good with other subjects but you aren't intelligent because you're not good with maths😢

@@sgjoyder2890 "only mathematicians are considered intelligent" I'd be interested in where you get that massive generalisation from. Especially as even you yourself don't seem to agree with it. I think a key thing is that it is a generally held belief (outside of the arts and religion) that _everything_ is described by mathematics and the other, derivative sciences. I mean how can you possibly deny it in a world so driven by technology? A technology that constantly pushes this world-view. Because without it, you simply wouldn't be typing words into a medium which is only there because of all the work done by mathematicians and the rest of science. And I'd not be replying to you via mechanisms I don't even understand. But this all leads to the idea that if you understand mathematics, you hold the 'key' to everything. As a mathematician, I certainly appreciate the very compelling validity of this, from a philosophical point of view. In the real world, it's possibly mostly garbage (also from a philosophical point of view). The universe and life and language and culture existed in some form long before we articulated it all in maths. And although, fundamentally, I believe that mathematics is the language of the universe (because it all matches up so very nicely), I don't really think that a small understanding of it defines intelligence. Of course, I might be completely wrong about all of that. But would only prove my point, as well. 🤔

Firs orange how developed this loop? Or why taking new oranges hat? i think it might be because first orange just boring and take his own hat and new oranges hat so he left with two hat.

Well, everything happens in a loop. TSC will do this indefinetly. That's physics for ya.

@@Serhat-of2fg Nah I think that he only has taken one hat. Because his hat had been taken away by the one who came before him! If that make sense😅🤣

@@kashishyadav6932 its an option

@@kashishyadav6932 its complicate and it has infinite potantiel so yeah maybe.

he's gonna be making more, these 2 are part of a series called 'Animation vs. Education'

I have heard AvChemistry as a common rumor for the next AvEducation. Alan listens to his fans, let's see if this comes to fruition.

@@elijahpatterson2596 it could be biology too, but who knows

@@o1ken_ez It's anyone's guess at this point.

@@elijahpatterson2596 yeah

If the rings are too close, wouldn't that end up with them all sticking?

@@returneefromthemoon Once the magnets get within range of the two fields interacting, they will attract/repel, so, yes, they would stack. What Fabio is getting at is how railguns work by using electromagnets that turn on/off rapidly to accelerate a piece of metal (as long as it is ferrimagnetic). The animation tries to show this with the rocket, but without magnets having the ability to toggle, the same force that pulls you in from the right would equally pull you from the left, leaving with a new acceleration of zero.

@@returneefromthemoon Perfectly! For the magnet slingshot to work without them sticking together it's necessary that the magnets are at the limit distance, so that, their poles do not interact with others and no one magnet attracts the other, and in the same way, the deceleration caused in the rocket in the passage will be low.

@@NelielSugiura in my eyes, he isnt showing how railguns work, but the other version of them, the Gauß Rifle, which is like in the video, a 1:1 version, but as sayed correctly, they would have to be shut down, as soon as the projectile passes through, which you dont have to do with a railgun

Hearing this from someone that's taking the EL Engi. Course, you're making me want to take it. Thanks for the little lesson😁

5*

The setting they change it to has a label on the setting that looks like the words "the end".

I also wonder if the apple represents hawking radiation. I guess the apple would have to represent a radiated particle though instead of an entire apple

Which is labelled well in the video :)

But what would happen if you tried to do a gravitational slingshot using a planet (or whatever works as a gravitational slingshot), and it's moving diagonal of the direction your moving? (meaning left, or right of the direction your moving) what would happen? Would you get pulled in the diagonal direction that the object is moving? Or something else? 🤔🤔🤔🧐🧐🧐

@@DavidMuri-lm5vy It is mostly the angle of your exit from the gravity well that determines whether you gain or lose speed. The extent to which you exit in the same direction as the planet's orbit will determine how much speed you gain. And the extent to which you exit in the opposite direction of the planet's orbit will determine how much speed you lose.

@@samski2185 I had to stop the video to see this because it flashes by so quickly. But you're absolutely right.

btw im aware physics "is" math but like concepts and what not

Math is in every part of life. You do not think about it. But, we live in a mathematical world. Physics is the practical use of math. Then, we get into Quantum Physics. Which is the theoretical next step. To reach the Quantum level. We reached the level of being gods.

@@austinL. Math and physics are almost universally interchangeable. The only major difference between the two is that physics rely on units of measure, math doesn't.

@@Qardo Not quite. One would have to extend beyond the entire physical realm. Beyond time, space, and matter. We would have to venture into pure energy of thought or consciousness without bounds into all eternity. We'd be dealing with multiple fractals in conjunction with information theory, intelligent design, and more.

His name is The Second Coming.

The TSC hasn't become the second TSC, they are in fact the same, just different timelines / dimensions (hinted by the "world line", that was shown before the 2 interact). As he's now stepped outside of our spacetime, he's able to see every iteration of everything at any given time.

This reply needs to be higher, lol

The reference is dying out of the common knowledge because the film is so old now. These young ones have no idea about Dr. Strangelove unfortunately. Have only see one reaction video where someone has mentioned the reference.

I think hat also added to distinguish the future Second from the present one

@@sunshine1220 It can do other things! Why shouldn't it? - Hubert Farnsworth

Yes but not only that. There is a star on it so it's a Sheriff hat, old symbol for law enforcement ... laws of physics in this case :)

I was assuming the same thing.

biology

@@kenbow1290 Math, physics and chemistry - every aspect of them are formulas. Biology - not as much. DNA, maybe...

@@kenbow1290Biology is already explored a little in the video

I can't wait for chemistry. Many students like me are still struggling from it.

@@strenter Bio has more math than you think.

Yeah. I caught that, too.

As a programmer there is no such thing as an "insignificant" off-by-one error. That's either an easy fix or a five hour bug-hunting nightmare.

TL;DR: there is no "off by one" error! Here they are: 1: "An object can't change between stationary and moving on its own: an outside force has to act on it." 2: The magnitude of the force in question is exactly the ratio between the change in momentum and the time over which it occurred. (More commonly, momentum=mv is pulled apart- but that works because of conservation of mass) 3. This force isn't the only one! There's an equally strong force in the opposite direction.

@@wyattstevens8574 out of these three, which do you figure is F=ma?

@@bass2564 2, because the expression in form 1 is p/t= (p=mv) mv/t= (separating out m for F=ma) m*v/t, and v/t is exactly a!

I’ve been waiting for your reaction to this

You should probably pin this comment to the top of the comments section Love your videos.

An element to this idea is the need for a balanced equation. Simply put: SM2 found a replacement and moved on to create someone new.

Correct (almost *). Near to an infinitely long massive rotating cylinder it's theoretically possible to loop round it and return to a time before you started. -Fred Pohl- Larry Niven, the SF writer, used the idea in a short story along with the idea that a cylinder that is very long compared to its radius might show the same property. Rather nicely, in my opinion, his short story has the same title as the formal paper by Tipler. Look out for "Of infinite rotating cylinders and the possibility of global casualty violation". The Tipler is more rigorous, but the -Pohl- Niven is more readable and more fun if you enjoy SF (* almost) the thing about being careful where you enter and leave is a feature of a different theoretical construct, the Kerr black hole, which is a wormhole to another universe, not to our own past. The Kerr black hole is formed from a rotating sphere, which is then collapsed into a black hole (which remains it's angular momentum). The Tipler cylinder is not a black hole, and you don't enter it to time travel, you "just" orbit round it very close. (I am retired now, but used to teach this stuff for the UK's Open Uni)

@@trueriver1950 Thanks for the info

Correction: the short story was by Larry Niven. The Wikipedia article "Tipler cylinder" is worth reading, both for the science and for the section on the use of this device in SF. I learnt only in the last few minutes that the time-controlling "procrastinators" in Terry Pratchett are a reference to the Tipler cylinder: I'm now munching myself for not spotting the joke, as I love that book and have known about the Tipler part since the seventies.

​@@dinoeebastianyou're welcome.

Or if the portal at the end of the first video led here, maybe the second portal led to a 3rd video...

Ofc we will troll sometimes it's funny

Trumpadumpa may be orange coloured but no way is he stick like in width.

Either a paradox, or parallel universes. The penrose diagram suggests it might be the latter.

An interesting timeline to try and graph is the on in Robert Heinlein's story All You Zombies -- later made into the 2014 movie Predestination, which added even more twists into the timeline.