at least he wasnt in #TheFogBowl

Most definitely. This, and One Shot Wonders are probably two of the very best out of all 150 or so.

Happy normal families appreciating their mom or grilling with dad. Nowadays that commercial would be two obese lesbian moms making soy insect burgers. Fatties flipping patties.

I remember a game in Arizona at the Cardinals' old stadium with the metal benches, they put an egg on one of the benches and it was cooked within a few minutes. it was probably 120 degrees. much worse than cold in my opinion

In the Top 10 Homefield Advantages video they talked about how the Orange Bowl had opposing teams wilting under the searing Miami heat (ha, I made a funny!). But yeah, the Epic In Miami is a prime example of heat absolutely taking it out of you.

Good point and it did affect the Chargers, especially Kellen Winslow. They had 81 degree temperatures in that game and I don’t know what the heat index was, but it had to be higher than 81. After playing an overtime game that day, the conditions were the exact opposite extreme a week later. I know the official low wind chill was -59 for the game, but we were told throughout Ohio that gusts could take it as low as -75 degrees. I am surprised,i in facing those two extremes in a weeks time that some Chargers didn’t have side effects from it.

yeah, some hot weather games would be good. I remember one between the Cowboys and Cardinals (back in '97 I think, @ Sun Devil) where it was just ridiculously hot. Guys were just dying.

At least in hot weather you can hydrate yourself constantly. One you're freezing cold that's it.

This Redskins fans would still like that game to be played on a field that wasn't 58 degrees below zero.

@@w41duvernay I'm assuming you're talking about Chargers fans

Kinda like dropping a hot glass into water. CRACK!!!

More like from a sauna {humidity} to a freezer.

I just mentioned that. I doubt those extremes back to back will ever be repeated.

Some later episodes the unrelated guests didn’t add much, but the meteorologist in this episode is one of the better they used.

And the way they call him a convict, you'd think Henderson was a serial killer.

Atkinson is such a crybaby

They keep playing that on these top tens with Gene calling Swann soft. Swann was hit in the head in mid air countless times, and still got up to beat them. That's not soft. That's kicking their you know whats. All those years in the 70's, the Raiders thought they were tough and evil.. But the Steelers were the ultimate in darkness. The greatest dynasty and best team in NFL history and dominated the 70's. The Raiders evil couldn't beat the Men of Steel. You can't beat the dark Supermen.🤤

@@algini12tbf the Steelers are 3-2 (‘72, 74, 75) against the Raiders in the playoffs during the 70s (‘73 and 76)

Noted - the Chargers had no answers at all in that weather.

He also almost collapsed of heat exhaustion the week before in the Epic In Miami against the Dolphins

I grew up in chicagoland. It was cold. Then i visited a friend in Minneapolis. No contest. Anyway seeing Bronco Nagurski a gopher in l recall is cool. Saw his size 14 shoes at hall of fame. The cleates were 1.5 to 2 inches of what looked like bronze. Could not imagine having those feet trample any part of your body in the cold.

Hell, we played tackle football as kids in the seventies. I broke my hand in 1977 in a backyard game.

Ah yes I remember those days on the farm in Missouri. Always had to drain the hose or it'd get frozen solid in minutes. I also remember having to take the axe and walking to the ponds in pasture that resembled tundra to chop through the ice so the cows could get water. Twice a day sometimes three if it was zero with a wind chill of -25. When everything thawed it turned into a quagmire of mud. It was always a moment of suspense for me listening to the radio listening for school closings. However if we were hosting a basketball tourney hell or high water couldn't make them close school.

😅😅 3g droid

Paul Brown

You also saw Wellington Mara in this video who was with the Giants for 80 years (1925-2005)..

Bert Bell

Dont forget a about shane falco

Don’t you forget about me

Ok a couple of questions, did you take the time to record this, did you take the time to post this, did you personally request this to be posted commercial free most importantly did you pay Isaac Green for his effort in recording, posting this. If the answer is no to any of these questions shut the hell up, this is not exclusively meant for George but also for the 21 people who did this 👍. I noticed these commercials as well I found it quite easy to hit the forward arrow on the remote. See, when you press that key it will advance the program 10sec with a commercial break typically being between 60 and 90 sec you press that button 6 to 9 times. Guess work gone I hope you do that before you bitch about something you got for free.

@@bumpusjones.1978 lmao shut up

Isaac Green can you upload the "Top 10 Innovations" by NFL films. Thanks in advance.

@GetBenched. The Ice Bowl is arguably the most famous because of the finish, the last NFL title for Lombardi…it’s a game they will talk about 50 years from now

Because of Packers bias

​@@EmmaBonn96🤡

I am a Cowboys fan and when I saw the field at the beginning of the game I said, uh-oh. Thanks to Leon Lett, uh-oh was right. What makes it crazier is that I believe he had another brain lock in the Super Bowl, turning a long fumble return TD with his showboating causing Dallas a record for most points scored in a Super Bowl.

And to top it off, San Diego has just played the weekend before in an epic game in Miami that featured Kellen Winslow being carried off the game due to pure exhaustion from the heat and the length of the game being an OT game. That has to take a toll on the body professional athlete or not. Then to go from playing in 80 degree weather to -9 with nasty wind chills......

I have a co-worker from Columbus, Ohio State fan, of course, and he told me one time the snow's real bad up there. I'm from Oklahoma, and the wind here is what makes travelling dangerous. The opposite of Ohio, as I understand it.

Craig, you have any pictures or any other type of documentation??

@@sludge8506 No, nothing but my personal experience, but any football fan from Ohio, in their 50’s or above, might.

@@craighenry2351 🏈🏈🏈🏈🏈🏈

@Harry Engel I know it was a real feel good story.

@@Gungho73 and then Culverhouse completely fucked it up by being cheap as hell and the Buccaneers went back to being the dumpster fire of the NFL until Dungy came into town.

@@arizonawrestlinginterviews1040 He found he could spend no money and make money. A classic businessman not understanding how money was made in the sport.

@@arizonawrestlinginterviews1040 There's weird eras like that in history. Sometimes we say the owners are the problem, like in Cincinnati. But Culverhouse and, I cant remember the gentleman, but the man who owned the Patriots prior to the Kraft era clearly didn't understand what it took to make a football team produce and practical. Those teams were vile for stretches of time.

@@Gungho73 Victor K. Kiam II

As a Bears fan, I will say this- if the fog had not rolled in on that day, I think Chicago loses. The Bears were badly understaffed (Dent, Wilson, and Perry were out of commission, McMahon wasn't healthy which was sadly common), and Philadelphia had a solid team under Buddy Ryan. It's no wonder, looking back on it now, that San Francisco blasted them the next week. It would have been a more competitive game if it would have been the Eagles. And yes, I agree with you about Duerson. It's a tragedy to be sure. RIP

I enjoy football, but it’s disgusting to me that, after watching a decades old game, some pathetic ancient armchair warrior makes a post saying how much he liked the brutality.

You're welcome. Me too.

We never said it wasn't a fumble but that was the rule, we didn't make it but we're glad it was there!

Bears got thumped the next week anyway and were out of the playoffs.

We need that attitude they had in 48 now in 2020

That was when Philadelphia was the true city of brotherly love. That's my hometown, but you couldn't pay me enough to live there today.

Listen, I say that as a COWBOYS fan too!

I will try to find it.

It's called alliteration.

Rain.

As a Ravens fan all I have to say about the Tuck Rule is that people need to get over it honestly you know why? Because not only had that call been used earlier that season when the Patriots played the Jets when Vinny Testaverde had gotten the same call but it had also been used since 1999 almost two years before that Patriots vs Raiders playoff game was in existence. That's not the only thing either. During that game after the officials had made that call the Raiders had opportunities to put that game away in their favor. They could have blocked Adam Vinatieri's field goal, and they could have stopped the Patriots offense in overtime the Raiders defense had them on 4th down and still didn't get a stop in OT the Raiders had their chances and they didn't seal the game. So you tell me who's really to blame here? The officials or the Raiders ineptitude?

@Harry Engel gasp what's this? It appears someone has common sense?!

@Harry Engel Brady on the Ravens would be to quote a famous actor "The Role of a Lifetime!" My two favorite players of all time Ray Lewis and Tom Brady on the same team would be nothing short of spectacular

@Harry Engel you wouldn't know if I told you

@Harry Engel Bledsoe was a massive Yards machine

It was clearly all about business and the idea to host superbowls,bowl games and any other events. The packers and bears have stuck to outdoor games their fanbase does not care about the cold weather heck the revel in it they know in big game if they play the vikings and its a cold weather game they can win. Look at the 98 vikings if they played outdoors against the falcons in cold Minnesota they probably beat them handily because the falcons played in a dome with warm weather.

Well without the Dome you wouldn't have the Vikes anymore so... Would you rather have a soft team that can't win in the cold or no team at all?

@@jasonfire3434 Yes, if Red McComb had had his way, they might have been the San Antonio Vikings. And how many Norwegians are in San Antonio?

This was from 2010

@Fries That's because the end was bizarre!

College football would have the 1979 Cotton Bowl, the 1967 Alabama-Auburn game (Ken Stabler's run), and (if infamy is allowed) the 1983 Oregon-Oregon State rivalry game (aka the Toilet Bowl) - that's for starters.

ohio state would've made the rose bowl if they decided not to play... but they did, and lost to michigan. interesting how that went

You're welcome.

I should add to my own comment regarding the Raiders vs New England that the NFL made the fiasco worse than it was. It was NOT ruled an incompletion because of the tuck rule!!!!! Fact!!! End of story!!! The NFL made that up after the fact and only muddied the waters. It was ruled, just as the referee announced during the game, an incompletion because the arm was moving forward. That was the rule. It still is, even after the elimination of the tuck rule. So, Raiders fans and players whining that, as in this video, “it’s never been enforced or since”… fine… you’re right… and it wasn’t enforced in this game either. It was a stupid excuse that the NFL made up for whatever reason after the fact. The official clearly announced that the arm was moving forward. Even in today’s NFL, with the tuck rule deleted, that’s an incomplete pass. Here is why I think the NFL made up that excuse, and, in defense of the Raiders, as much as I’m ripping them, why they have an argument: Brady lost control of the ball almost at the very instant that his arm stopped moving forward. Sooooooooo… was it moving forward or not? Almost impossible to tell, because you can’t precisely determine loss of control. So, maybe it’s an incompletion, maybe it’s a fumble. When I see it, I think it’s an incompletion. So, I’m not all apoplectic about it. BUT… and this is where Raiders’ nation may have a beef… it’s supposed to be clear cut in order to overturn the call on the field. It absolutely was NOT clear cut. It never should’ve been overturned. But… my well of sympathy for the Raiders runs dry pretty fast because, even though it shouldn’t have been overturned, it was PROBABLY overturned to the right call. Here’s the problem with all of the audio commentary that you hear… “he’s pumping, not getting ready to pass!!!” That DOES NOT MATTER according to NFL rules even today. It’s irrelevant. The commentators are morons. If his arm is moving forward, it’s incomplete. Period. That’s the rule. End of story. So, although I agree with Raiders’ Nation that the call shouldn’t have been overturned, that’s only because the evidence wasn’t indisputable. Looked to me like his arm WAS going forward. So, the initial ruling on the field was WRONG (and the tuck rule had nothing to do with it… that was an after the fact pathetic defense by the NFL). So, I’m sorry, I have a REAL hard time being sympathetic when your argument is that the WRONG call should’ve been upheld because you can’t PROVE it was wrong. Actually, by the letter of the law, you’re right… which is why the NFL had to make their lame tuck rule declaration. But, bitch, please… that is one lane defense, Raiders Nation. “Please uphold the WRONG call because the evidence isn’t incontrovertible.” That is one seriously weak, lame argument… “I know we’re wrong. But you might have a hard time proving it. So… since you said we were right in the first place, even though everyone knows we’re not… please don’t change your mind.” The ONLY reason most people to this day still think the Raiders’ argument is right is because the NFL poisoned the well with the tuck rule. The tuck rule had nothing to do with this call. That was an after the fact invention. The on field official told you why the call was reversed. His arm was moving forward. Even now that the tuck rule has been abolished, nothing would change… the “arm moving forward” still constitutes an incomplete pass. And that’s what the official announced. The tuck rule was irrelevant. It was not a factor in that call. The official announced it himself… arm moving forward… incomplete. The tuck rule has been erased from the rule book and guess what? This portion of the rule remains the same… arm moving forward… incomplete. I’ll repeat it for the umpteenth time, the reason the NFL had to intercede with that piss-poor excuse is because the evidence wasn’t incontrovertible. So, the ruling on the field shouldn’t have been overturned - which is the ONLY correct argument Raiders’ Nation has. That said, the ruling on the field was PROBABLY wrong (yes, it’s not incontrovertible… tough to tell). So, I have zero sympathy for Raiders’ Nation. Sure, the ruling probably shouldn’t have been changed. But, in the same light, it was probably changed to the CORRECT call. How is ANY NFL fan supposed to be upset by the officials making the right call?!?!?! The officials were right, and you lost. So, please tell me, where exactly is the controversy? There is none. Patriots won fair and square. The NFL actually made it worse, injecting controversy, with their made up excuse about the tuck rule. If anything, the Patriots got screwed by having their legitimacy questioned!!! The right call was made, the better team won. End of story. And they proved they were the better team. They absolutely steamrolled Pittsburgh in a game PIT assumed they’d win. Would the raiders have done the same? And barring one irrelevant Willie McGinest holding call - about 20 yards away from the play - the Patriots would’ve pancaked the Rams in the Super Bowl. Y’all remember that play? Fumble and a 95 yard return for a TD… called back on a completely irrelevant holding call 20-30 yards away from the play, on the complete opposite side of the field. I’m not complaining. Don’t care. Best team still won. All I’m pointing out is that the game wasn’t as close as the score indicated. Patriots dominated both the Steelers AND “the greatest show on turf”. You seriously think the Raiders would’ve done the same? LOL. The better team won The Snow Bowl game. And the Brady incompletion call was probably correct. I’ll grant that there’s a small chance it wasn’t correct and, by rule, it shouldn’t have been overturned. But it’s the Raiders claiming they lost on some technicality. No no no no no… had they WON, THAT would’ve been on a technicality. They would’ve won because the officials PROBABLY made the wrong call on the field, and because it was merely PROBABLE, not CERTAIN, they couldn’t overturn it. They had the balls to go with what was probably correct (and, yes, probably violated the rules, which would’ve handed the Raiders a win on a technicality). The officials deserve a bonus and an award for opting to get it right over following some ill-defined rule (what percentage defines clear and irrefutable evidence? 100%? Or is 90% enough? And if 90% is enough, how about 80 or 75%?). The replay official just said fuck it and called it as it was. Kudos to him. Get it right. That’s the most important thing. He called it right and the best team won. There is no controversy in that game. It’s all manufactured controversy. And, sadly, the NFL itself contributed to the controversy by injecting the tuck rule bullshit. The tuck rule had nothing to do with it. That was an after the fact addendum in order to protect the officials. The officials needed no protection. They made the correct call. And as I’ve pointed out a million times, even WITHOUT the tuck rule, the same call would be made today. If the QB’s arm is moving forward, it’s deemed a forward pass. Period. End of story. In fact, I’m not trying to be a Pats fan here. You want to find a case where the Pats got an advantage with this rule? It is NOT the Raiders game. It’s their SB win vs the Falcons. The strip sack of Matt Ryan. Was his arm moving forward? Very, very, very hard to tell. But Hightower didn’t hit his arm forward, and the ball landed in front of Ryan. Soooooo… simple physics tells me forward momentum. Incomplete pass. And it’s much the same situation. TECHNICALLY, on review, it’s unclear, you can’t overturn it. But REALLY it was probably incomplete. So, by rule, technically, since it’s unclear, you can’t overturn it… but in fairness, you should… it’s the right thing to do. SO…… anyone who may be disagreeing with me up to now based on some Patriot Hate you have in your heart, you maybe should shift your ire to that SB game. THAT was a truly dubious play. The Raiders Snow Bowl… not so much. Correct call. Best team won. Zero controversy. It deserves to be on this list for its horrific weather. But if anyone thinks it’s on this list because of the controversy……. Nope. Zero controversy. Right call. Best team won. Simple as that, honestly. I’m actually regretting typing this much, except I know how defensive Raiders fans still are over this. It’s dumb. Why did I type all this? Waste of my time. The right team won. The better team won. Maybe I should just circle back to my praise of Dan Fouts. Amen and kudos to him for being the only person on the losing end in this video to behave like a mature adult. Team Raiders are a bunch of infantile clowns. Take a lesson. Fouts exemplifies how a professional accepts loss.

What about Bronco Nagurski at 13:00.

The Eagles were screwed over.

​@@dumisatonyjohnson8145idiot

He's with the Weather Channel enough said

Anything changed in a year? 😝

@@utahhoopsfreak8648 yep. 40°- 85°.. Still wouldn't be thrilled to be going to cinci

"The Kellen Winslow Game." That's the only example I know of a player LITERALLY leaving everything he had on the field. If that game had lasted any longer and Winslow had continued playing in it, he might have died.

Third down actually.

Me too!

Salty bitch

Belichick was already coaching in the league. The Patriots had a history of questionable coaches before Belichick with Meyer, Carroll, and Chuck Fairbanks

You're welcome.

I will try to find it.

Motivational Coaches too

A lot of people not me said that Ken Anderson wasn't a good quarterback to make to the NFL Hall of Fame.

Fun fact: the final score of the game Fanus Philici claim should've been postponed was closer than it was when the weather they invoke took root.

There's a documentary on the game explaining why they kept playing, but to give you the short version, neither coach wanted to call the game, so the refs obliged them.

@@Jonathan83X I didn't know that and thanks for clearing that up. I can't say I agree with their decision, but armchair quarterbacking is an easy sport . Thanks again.

@@sheilapasquini6232 Yea, you ought to look it up. It's called Timeline: Fog Bowl. It's sadly not on KZfaq anymore other than some small clips of it, but it was really a well done documentary. Anyway, the main reason Buddy Ryan didn't want to suspend the game was because he was ticked off at the refs for how they were officiating the game before the fog rolled in, so to him, it was an equalizer. To be fair, he wasn't entirely wrong. Cunningham did throw for over 400 yards in that game. The problem was the team kept turning the ball over in the red zone, which is why I roll my eyes at Eagle fans crying foul about it. The Eagles had chance after chance to win that game, but when you turn the ball over numerous times in the red zone, then you can't blame the refs for losing you the game.

Yhea I remember watching it and I kept thinking why aren't they calling this game?!

Thank you!

@@DaDitka your welcome my friend