He’s skin color isn’t white

@@osmanzubeir9701 Yup...Elitist Superiority knows no color bounds

Guys can you tell me whats the tittle of the movie? Plsssss

@@khimeater8185 the man who knew infinity

Nothing but jealousy. Young man is smarter than that old guy is and could ever be.

his formulas were junk and gibberish. He couldn't prove 99% of them.

@@bexultanassanov1930 Bollocks. Source please.

@@bexultanassanov1930 I bet ur smarter than him

He was actually only good at math and always strungle with any other subjects.

@@QuynhAn689 So?

All that and he Died at the age of 32

A fucking street shitter detected

You seem to admire intelligence. You might be a clever person

Also interesting is that they talk about him in Good Will Hunting. His story is supposed to be why the professor wants to help Matt Damon's character.

@@thepunishe52 You seem depressed or angry on something. Life must be really hard for u emotionally, hang in there everything gonna be fine.

because teachers back then rely on books as the absolute. they never look at a student as someone that can be smarter than the teacher otherwise why would they need to be taught. but teaching is like a current, some boats float faster in the current than other boats. its not who is smarter or dumber... its simply a boat moving on a current as its meant to move at the pace of its design

but... im dumb so dont mind me i just talk alot. im sorry

95% of my teachers in highschool, and 80% of my professors in college acted just like that or far worse. Even though I was encouraged by several mentors to go for a PhD, i stopped at a BA, as I was fed up with all the games and B.S.

If you're referencing the one where he tells at the guy for doing the prrof then here's some explanation: the student is from india and he is a mth genius. After writing advanced theories to another math teacher at cambridge, he is accepted into it. However every other cambridge teacher there is racist towards him and he is highly discriminated against, hence the scene

Gregory Underwood Then you just lack common sense. For some reason I don’t believe you could’ve gotten a PhD and you are just trying to get internet points. If you really could have gone for one you probably would have in reality.

William sidis

Wait, will isn't real!!!? WTF!

He was real. It’s based on Will Sukon.

@@ericfonseca9551 Who Will Sukon the is?

@Alexander Leblanc it was a fonetic joke you smartass.

Hum thank you

the first one is The Social Network

It says it in the vid

You’re Goated for this comment lol I was blanking hard asf on the will smith clip cause I kept thinking of Kid Cudi and being like “yeah that’s not it”

If you wanna get technical, it's a "genius character moment", so they're not exactly calling him smart BECAUSE of that moment, but rather, it was a moment in which he displayed his smartness. It's the same thing as saying "he's not rich BECAUSE he bought that car, but rather, being rich allowed him to buy the car." With that said, you call it a stretch, but in fact your comment is a massive downplay of what they actually showed. It wasn't just "a question right in class", it was a difficult question in an advanced computer science class at Harvard University that many students gave up on, and it was a breeze for Zuckerberg. I personally still wouldn't call him a genius (mostly because alot of his success comes from a lot of the help his parents and private tutors have him when he was young), but he is definitely very smart

Lol he was coding and created product when he was less than 12, even before going to college and dropping he was smart enough to create multiple programs/product for his father's dental something. he was coding & programming genius even before facebook, even in harvard there were hardly any who can compete him in programming during his first year.

Good thing thats not what happened. Nice strawman fallacy though.

@@notricky1680 Not just had a genius moment O.o, but Not is right tho

The best part about that scene is the Professor hasn't actually given enough information to answer. Zuckerberg has given the classroom some missing information, and NOW the Professor can ask some other questions that are meaningful, based on this information. The number of each bit given is arbitrary but important for asking other questions, like how big is the physical address space?

watch BBC's sherlock. they show and have him explain his thinking. enough episodes of that and john watson AND the audience both agree that his inductive reasoning is actually quite simple. yes, it's inductive reasoning most of the time. if you look up the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning, sherlock often uses inductive.

it's a lot easier to teach an actor to fake doing something than teaching them how to do it. Especially if you can't see their hands

Because the point is that these characters are supposed to see what nobody else does. When their intellect is incomprehensible, it instills a sense of wonder in your average viewer.

@@DavidLinn Qi.

@@DavidLinn Sherlock LITERALLY says "from that I deduce" in every single book. Are you sure you understand the difference? He studies the clues, in fact his magnifying glass is iconic, and says things like "once I have eliminated the impossible", and solves the crime. Deductive.

Kim GFY you wang!

@@kim98677 Why are you so butthurt there are thousands of people who can do 4x4 & even 32x32 rubik's cubes in really short time frames just search it in youtube

@@kim98677 3X3 Rubik's cube world record is 3.36 seconds if you didn't know

@@kim98677 so i'd believe a man could've done it when it first came out in a day or two or even a week, Sam didn't specify a time frame

Nagato2k the chances are almost 0. Also comparing a 4 by 4 to a 3 by 3 shows what you know about solving a cube

Duuuad out of body* edit this comment again, please

RED PILL SOCIETY Thank you kindly.

What does Marx have to do w/ this? If your point is that Nash "disproved" Smith and thus Marx was low key right you need to reconsider. Most economists, starting w/ Smith, hold that competition serves the common good b/c suppliers compete w/ each other to secure finite profits in a finite market. This serves the common good b/c when suppliers' strategy involves competition rather than collusion their profit strategy requires they constantly reduce their costs so they may reduce their prices w/out becoming unprofitable. In a market where nothing, expect price, differentiates the goods offered by different suppliers, buyers will strongly prefer the cheapest goods. Thus, the supplier w/ the lowest costs will offer the lowest price, and end up being the most profitable; what they lose in profit margin, they make up in sales volume. Nash simply articulated a mechanism thru which competitors may seek to collude w/ each other, at the EXPENSE of the common good, but this same mechanism also predicts the frequent failure of collusion efforts, which is to the BENEFIT of the common good (and consistent w/ mainstream economics). Nash's principal finding if I recall was that collusion becomes logistically impractical in many situations b/c collusion is prisoner's dilemma, especially when there are many "prisoners." The prisoner's dilemma partially explains why supply cartels are often unstable under market conditions. In this case, collusion b/w Nash and his friends to fix the game is socially optimal in a utilitarian sense, b/c avoiding competition is good for the men and (most of) the women. In real life this kind of collusion is not socially optimal. If the movie's "bar game" were analogous to market bargaining, the conclusions of Smith would be wrong, but it's not, so they aren't.

Juraj Donadieu I simply meant that Marx reconsidered Smith's emphasis on personal ambition decades earlier-and while you're right that, for Nash, the 'revision' involves a kind of utilitarianism, functioning through the Benthamite greatest happiness principle and hedonic calculus, such a revision was evident in Marx's work-Marx simply realised that a solution to this entire problem was to put need before strength (unlike the monism of pleasure in utilitarianism or the strength/personal gain of Smith). It was also supposed to be a slightly wry, comic comment but since I have now produced an equally pretentious and (almost as) lengthy riposte, I have really kicked over the pedestal of humorous intention and am currently hanging by the neck in the depths of KZfaq comments that pose as actual discourse. To better times... Signed: by Dr. Theodor Weisungrund Legal Advisor: Señor D. O'hana ra hanrahan

srinivasa ramanujan

It's in the description box

Is that a good movie? Sounds good

@@jerichobeach2967 it's a movie about one of India's best mathematician Srinivasan Ramanujan.

@@saifmehdi178 Pretty sure he’s the best mathematician in the history of the world

they got the fucking haircut way wrong though

Funny how much liberty he took with our information

lol. True. Most of that not with ill intent though. The founder of a small startup that's growing can't easily foresee what will become an issue when the company becomes bigger. Many of their mistakes would be small mistakes, if the company was small.

@jeffrey lmaooooo

@@jeffreybratton6186 it was never YOUR information

What are 'always goosebumps'?

Tycho I think the moron meant always gave me goosebumps..

fuk english

He made a mistake and you guys are being giant douches about it

Actually I speak like 4 languages lol, these English lovers don't even know single letter of other languages...(whole point of language is just tool of communication u don't have to fuk and fell in love with it , at least not me)...

DizzyDan Studying your ass off isn’t what makes one unique, anyone can do that. Not everyone can master a subject just based on natural ability. That, my friend, is what’s exceptional.

Hunter Melton I disagree

@@dizzydan1580 Okay then, why have most mathematicians failed to compare to the natural ability of Ramanujan despite him only living to 32 years old. There are people who have probably worked just as hard as him during his life but continued it for another 50 years yet still didn't understand maths in the same way. Not to say that hard work doesn't pay off, but their is often a distinction between good and great, I could train everyday in running and I could at some point do a marathon, I could improve my time, but I'd never be faster than those that have both natural ability as well as hard work.

@@maxdavison914 absolutely true! A well said statement! A believe it or not @DizzyDan , no matter how hard we work and sacrifice from ourselves, still we ain't gonna get to the point that a true natural genius will!

Some people are just natural savants with numbers. There is no “learning”. You just open up gateways on how to solve new problems. It’s literally an aspect majority of humans will never be able to understand. Like people who see color when they listen to music. It’s a gift.

What's it about and what actually happened in the scene we see?

@@z3alio He saw the the housing market bubble that lead to the great recession of 2008 as early as 2005. Everyone thought he was crazy to believe that the housing market could collapse. It's a great movie!

z3alio Everything @Kitty Kat said is right, also everyone got mad because he was practically investing his clients money and they thought he was going to lose it all but ended up making them lots of money and himself. There is much more to it than that and there are more perspectives through out the movie but it is a great film that I would highly recommend

Is this from somewhere, like another film or something. Why is there for likes for this?

The first quote is a famous Einstein quote. But yeah, that's probably a quote that quoted Einstein in a movie

@@severusrogue259 Well the first one is pretty well known, was not really unfamiliar to me, it was the second part that I never have heard before. so yea, what does it even mean, as there are several ways you can understand the statement, like are you claiming momentum can be a form of buoyancy, or is the sentence just incorrectly formed for the intention of what the person who said it was trying to get across? So yea, it is an interesting sentence, but more so why is it i getting to many likes, people are either reacting to the first part, and ignoring the second, or they are likely reacting to the second, as the first is so well known to almost be cliche...?

It's probably meant to illustrate that intellect is superior to too great an imagination after all.

he kicked it with his left leg

That's what happens when a gladiator become a nerd

Definitely a racism

And that is important how? You know who he is. The fact that he is brown makes no difference rather that he was not mentioned on this list that doesn't affect you one way or the other. Oh, and nice try, trying to race bait people in to the geopolitical climate and start a frenzy over something so miniscule as a color. Yes a very intelligent man, and a promising glimmer of hope to the mind, and even as I am typing this I am slowly realizing that you haven't read passed a certain line and have decided that I am a racist, bigot, Pepsi can, Bologna sandwich, window pane, Einstein brain fart, cocoa butter toe jam.

Etha e vanam

The Man Who Knew Infinity is mentioned in the Description box. Chill bruh, it's an honest mistake.

@@reviewersreview8483 😂😂😂

He said he worked for a doctor but was put in positions were he had to do medical procedures by himself, he was explaining how he works well under pressure

in what circles would snowden be considered a genius?

Raging Bull came out in 1980, but it was a 1981 the news cast about the Rubik's cube

No but it's a plot point, Will Smith has to do a runner later because he can't afford it

Watch the whole movie b4 u comment some dumb shit like this again

He did.. eventually

R3xClutch nah people were kind and helpful and answered.

Diego Piedmont aren’t*

you're an idiot.

Its always an exaggeration

@@jeremydyar7566 From what I remember, the exaggerations are pretty huge. From what I remember reading, the dude had a crippling drug addiction, cheated on his wife excessively, and was abusive. The Rubics Cube scene was also not real, which they used in this video to give credence that he's a "Genius". The dude also sold his company, putting hundreds out of work, to make millions.

"The man who knew infinity"... Based on the life of S. Ramanujam.

@@solandge36 tyy

Yea, it was a 16x16 cube

Lmao same here

He does

Methos he literally went on interviews during this time just to solve rubriks cubes

It's easy , u just need practice and the algo.

you mean how he holds and twist the cube?

@@victorzodinmawia7880 that's method acting.

@@kalvinwarren-mccarthy8561 Einstein is that youuu

I think he does as he did it in an episode of Fresh Prince

Fyi he lived.

Agreed... it’s actually not hard at all to master once you learn the moves.

but the rubrick’s cube one was when rubick’s cube was new

alexandra x the movie takes place when rubicks cubes were new and the guy figured out the pattern on his own

easy to learn - impossible to solve intuitively

The man who knew infinity

Are you a coprophiliac?

@@alanstenglein6999 ya 100%

it's a top 5. if the creator includes that scene, then s/he has to remove another one, and then another moron like you will complain. just take it for what it is and move on.

Pretty sure hes not a real person

Quenten Abbarno do you like apples?

REAL PEOPLE! Good will hunting is phenomenal but it’s not based on a REAL person. Read the video name...

Na I like Oranges

Thanks, Private Obvious.

@@EgbertWilliams you have two spaces between "Private", and the comma. Also (im not sure) if military personnel say "thanks" to each other, more likely they say "thank you", but idk

@@gegdeg1250 the fuck are you on about? The military aren't a new species of human they talk the same as us