He was Nothing till Hendry retired

He's got an OBE

@@GormlyKeep not enough

My exact words, doing this left handed whilst on a 147 is beyond skill it take balls the size of wheel barrows.

100% mate he said it in his interview with Stephen Hendry I believe. Amazing shot 👍👍

Agree with you about not taking these compilations seriously and this compilation in particular and it isn't necessarily the order...#50 through #1...nothing is said about the circumstances of the match and his position in the tournament, etc. But the thing that really got me - and this is the most stunning example - that of all the shots you could have found to display (and you didn't have to even have 50 of them), is that you had to include a fluke shot. There are a thousand shots you could have used to find 50 and I just don't understand when you're trying to show off his skills and shot-making ability WHY would you use number 7, which was a dead-straight UNMISSABLE plant? And, for God's sake, why would you use flukes (numbers 32, 24,10 and 3) and WHY would you possibly use number 9, in which Ronnie FOULED???!!! SMH!

Thanks

Thanks a lot

Yeah No Dount Yesterday Ronnie Lost To Vafai But I wanna appreciate Vafai because He played very Well . Ronnie Also Give Him Tough Time But Unfortunately he Lost.

​@@Kashitech543 You can't win them all I say.

Only AFTER Hendry retired!

Nothing wrong whatsoever with that 😂 what a shit take

The escape from the snooker on the last red in the final frame of that match also must be close to being number one.

@@markmaudling8237 oh yeah I definitely agree. Especially given that most of us watching expected him to whack it like the prior few snookers he was in.

Why?

🙃

Thanks for your feedback

It’s automatic voice

❤️🤣

The one at 7.48? Because he played for it, it was the best option, it was the best shot, it was sort of on and he knew it. And so did John Virgo commentating as did Ricky Walden, hence the smiles all round. I would say at 14.35 wasn't a fluke.

@@fontyyy No, I don't mean the one at 7:48, that's a famous shot where he deliberately played for luck to break the record and got the luck. No-one begrudges him that one. The one at 14:35 was absolutely a fluke. Pool players like Reyes can play those shots, with the smaller table, large balls and huge pockets, but no snooker player can deliberately do it. Plus he holds his hand up to his opponent in apology, i.e., he's saying it was a fluke. Plus the commentator -- a professional player -- labels it a fluke. So, I'm saying it shouldn't be included, and I don't know why you'd say it wasn't a fluke.

Only flukes are 32 & 24 .. other shots were intended. P.s I stopped watching at shot 20

:D

Seting 4:13

Two and a half flukes out of 50 can't be considered "many".

7 acasos eu contei. E a maioria dos tiros aqui, nesse vídeo, não retratam o melhor de Ronnie. Várias jogadas excepcionais que ele fez, para os leigos nem são percebidas. Já vi vários vídeos que exaltam a lenda, mas em nenhum deles foram relatados as jogadas mais geniais desse mestre inigualável. Por exemplo, na semifinal do Mundial de 2020, em que o Selby foi o adversário, ali, naquele jogo, tem pérolas, diamantes, do Sullivan. Mas só quem treinou muito jogar sinuca entende o que eu estou falando.

I counted 5 flukes, and 2 shots that anyone could have played (no. 8?!?!)

32 is a fluke, and no place in the compilation 24 is a fluke, but also a famous hit and hope. 10 was a fluke, but he made the great safety shot he was attempting. 3 is a fluke, but the impressive part is that he hit it. Could have gone anywhere, probably doesn’t belong. That’s still only 32 and 3 that I wouldn’t have included. 2 shorts out of 50

Whatever you say about Ronnie he is Mr entertainment