Oss!! Thanks Doug! Check out tritaccombat.com

Thanks man, its one of my favorites

Oss Thanks man!! Love the integrations!

Lynbrook NY and he sounds like Wisconsin or another Midwest transplant! Either way, the technique speaks for itself and the instruction is great!

😂😂😂

Awesome, Japanese Jujutsu is quite robust when trained for combat instead of a history lesson

Thanks man, so are you!

MORE coming, especially live classes

That’s what true “Mixed Martial Arts” is, seeing the beauty and usefulness in all martial arts, but fighting what ultimately works for you. … Sounds like something Bruce Lee might have said lol

Much appreciated man! Kote Gaeshi has become one of my favorites the more I understand it. Even learning over ... 25+ years ago, it still is something I have found great success in as I study it more.

@@tritacacademy amazing! 🔥

That's awesome! Glad to hear you're getting some great training ideas and techniques

@@tritacacademy Continue

We have a lot more to share!

Are shotokan kicks different somehow? We do a lot of kicks, both attack and defense in our MMA/Combatives classes

It's a common misunderstanding that they are impractical. Much of the jujutsu we see today actually comes from Koryu Jujutsu, which was taken from edged weapons systems. The throws (which were done a bit differently than demonstrated in this video) were done against armed opponents and came from actual battlefield use. The reason why most of the koryu jujutsu examples look weak is because it has mostly turned into a historical practice that hasn't adapted to modern-day situations. Some have adapted, however, and remain practical.

@@RWGeorge Koryu jujutsu, aikido, hapkido all have their place. They are legit. I saw more than one BJJ practitioners that confirmed that they work. However, are these styles effective by themselves? Answer would be no. Aikido has lots of similarities with koryu jujutsu. I saw an aikido master fight multiple times in an amateur mma (Strelka) against different styles. Any style based on koryu jujutsu will not work effectively even against strikers with no grappling background from what I saw. He was defeated over and over, unable to execute any techniques well, and the master even had trouble maintaining balance. Only time I saw aikido "defeat" boxing, tkd, mma was when either the other party sparred in slow pace to allow aikidoka to do his moves or when "mma" guy played in what it seemed like a worked match to lose to aikidoka, who did not even use aikido to win. I think the tma styles I mentioned have their place similar to what you stated, because they influenced other more effective styles that came later on, but those tma styles by themselves cannot provide effective form of fighting style nor self defense. Just coming from my research and observation.

@@alter5057 Well said. That's also my experience - they haven't adapted with the times in most cases, and thus do not have an answer for strikers. Aikido, having come from Ueshiba Morihei's study of Daito Ryu with Takeda Sokaku, has a semblance of that left, but that depends on the style and it has been greatly watered down since then. But the movement is not kori movement, nor is the philosophy oriented to combatives, weapons training, or effective striking and, as you noted, cannot provide an effective form of dealing with most situations in its own paradigm.

I say weird shit :)

Agree,first movement is a variant of ippon seoi nage

Stay tuned more content to come

@@tritacacademy thank you kindly

Awww thanks man! We do have a visitors program

The way I try to describe it to my students is that aiki is small joint manipulation, JJJ is more throws and standing grappling, while BJJ is focused on the ground. Though there is blending and mixing at all levels

@@tritacacademy thank you very much for the explanation

The real big difference is rule set. That's what I tell people when comparing judo and bjj. the rule sets determine which techniques are best suited for the situation. It's great to cross train, though.

Sorry Geoff, we'll do better buddy.

Some approaches to Japanese Jujutsu are more of a history lesson compared to actual combat, while many BJJ schools focus exclusively or too much on sport compared to combat. Nothing wrong with either, but when we train, we train all perspectives

@@tritacacademy hi I never meant any disrespect to you or your organisation I was just pointing out your use of the word combat and yes your right there are many styles of jujitsu some are true to the original and many are totally for sport I left my jujitsu organisation after it became soort orientated and had no street aplience at all I am traing with my sensei who was trained by meida and suzuki it's very brutal and effective all my respect to you and your videos I am enjoying watching them stay safe

I watch Daito Ryu, that the sensei said we usually dont throw there is no need to learn ukemi and do ukemi.

Aikido is an offshoot of Japanese Jujutsu, so you will see the same techniques

@Spodo bbb Different spellings same meaning.

Sounds like you figured it all out. I wonder what came first Japanese Jujutsu or Judo or BJJ or MMA.....

@@tritacacademy The way you are doing it, Judo.

We do wrestle, myself and all my coaches wrestled and is a big part of our TRITAC curriculum. But this particular video was on Japanese Jujitsu, not wrestling.