Agreed. Machiavelli was not evil.

I had a similar thought as I work in the field of international relations and of course realist doctrine primarily pushed by Machiavelli's work is my primary theory of understanding. One shouldn't read it as a book of personal morality, but one on governance in an imperfect world. That was the main point, one of which aligns (in my view) with Biblical teaching. Glad to see someone go into good detail as this was one of the only books on this list to disappoint me greatly.

Ive also heard Machievelli was writing his book to protect good people from bad people. He knew that his prince wasnt an evil manipulator and he would be taken advantage of by others so he was teaching him how to deal with those evil people. IDK if this is true though.

Why women on the same list as money or property

Machiavelli didn’t believe or endorse his writings. He meant it more as a satire on Renaissance politics.

120 days of sodom 😅

Agreed.. another honorable mention, the satanic bible

'morals and dogma' by Albert Pike 'the book of the law' by Alister Crowley

Don't think it even merits a mention. Far too ridiculous.

@@bradleysmith9431 the secret doctrine by Helena blavatsky and a treatise on white magic by Alice bailey to add to your list lol. The new age isn't necessarily a religion as much as it is an amalgamation of many, with not all in agreement on numerous things...it's on the rise in an epidemic way, far more than a lot realize. It's especially dangerous when it comes to its current effects on the church.

Finally someone understands!

I do too. The church fathers and other evangelists would study many other religious works and the works of heretics and quote them often in their own works promoting and defending Christ's teachings.

As much as I agree, some books need to be erased from society - but that would be suppression of free speech ie; the First Ammendment. Which begs to question - how did the Holy Bible get banned from schools? For that is exactly when society threw itself, it's children, into a dark, demented downward spiral as far as morals are concerned.

Nah, you can’t let these sort of works just fester in your society

@@allisvanity...519 What books would you say should be erased? I can't really agree because even with books I find morally bankrupt and completely disagree with that book's content would have to be known for people to form their own objections to it.

Haven't read the book by Alexander Dugin. But according to your description, it doesn't sound bad enough to be on this list. Keep in mind that the rest of the world thinks VERY differently from people in the US. On many issues. The US being the empire of evil is a pretty widespread (and rather obvious) idea.

Crowley was one wicked spawn of Satan. Literally showed that the destruction of children through sexual abuse was a source of black magick. His work is still being used today. He taught the law of inversion to gain powers. Speak back words, do things backwards. Oprah’s business is named HARPO for a reason

Good observation. I've only found out about Crowley and La Vey in recent months. Both were Antichrist wannabes.

I guess you don't understand satanism, at least not La Vey satanism.

@@shad3215Let's see how much I don't understand about the beliefs that have taken over the world and are in the process of destroying it........ *,** 1: Self above all else. It's all about ME. Everything in the universe is secondary to the fulfillment of MY agenda, MY desires, and MY wishes, at the expense of all else. Your basic narcissism. *** 2:Moral relativism. What's good or bad is what's good or bad for ME. everything else is irrelevant and immaterial. If it advances ME, it's good, if it does not, it's bad. *** 3:Social Darwinism. Since it's all about ME, and since whatever is good for ME is the only thing that's good, then I must advance by any means necessary. Anybody or anything that stands in my way and is destroyed is merely collateral damage and worthy of no more consideration or concern than stepping on an insect, therefore, unrestrained application of "do what thou wilt" is standard procedure for everyday life. I want it all, I want it now, and I don't care who gets hurt or killed in the process. *** 4: Eugenics. Once I have clawed my way to the top and established myself as supreme, I now have the right to decide who lives and who dies, according to the extent that they are capable of profiting ME and furthering MY agenda and fulfilling all of MY desires. ........Does that about cover it? Would any of this help to explain how and why the world has become a demented slaughterhouse with 8 billion little tin gods destroying each other? Does this explain the total cold blooded lack of empathy or compassion for each other? Does it explain the depravity of taking pleasure in the suffering of others? Does it explain why virtue and morality are now considered by many to be defects and signs of weakness, and to be avoided, lest one be considered a chump? When you claim that I don't understand Satanism, you are partially correct. The part I don't understand is how anybody could see such a belief system as viable or how anybody could practice it and be able to sleep at night.

@@jpalberthoward9 La Vey satanism is similar to pantheism, a velief that god is nature, also it's not about me, that's actually similar to christianity, the difference is it's everything about him, so still a bit similar, and in pantheism there shouldn't be that

Marxism is the worst plague ever unleashed on humanity.

Me before realizing that this is a Christian KZfaq channel: if the Bible is on this list, I call shenanigans. This is the first video from this channel I’ve ever watched, so I didn’t know it was a Christian channel.

@@christianali5431 same, I was really curious

I figured if the list was legitimate, the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf would be on it. But I expected Rules For Radicals to be on the list also. And the Koran. I was pleasantly surprised to see this video was Christian and biblically oriented.

lol same here

@Donkey Kong No it's not fact. It's just a theory, ( endorsed by Satan, I might add) but with no proof. But! If you want to believe your ancestors, came from apes, be my guest.What is amazing, you actually believe it?

@Donkey Kong Its more theory than fact

@@RuminantHairdo you know what else is still a theory : germ theory, the theory of gravity 😂🤣

@Donkey Kong It came from a racist Darwin that believed that blacks were a subspecies. How does it feel to embrace racist ideologies??

@Donkey Kong thats not how theories work

And yet there's so much evidence, so it is true. His theory has been refined over time, but the evidence is unmistakeable. Just like the evidence for an earth that's older than 6,000 years, just in case you're someone who believes that.

@Donkey Kong Exactly , I"m reminded of Richard Dawkins famous remark about how Christians could be made to believe evolution, and that is to show them the sequencing of DNA of any two animals you like. In the same clip (I hesitate to share the KZfaq URL here because some comment sections don't allow embedded URLS), he talked about Kurt Weiss, who has a PhD from Harvard in geology, who nevertheless said: "I am a young age creationist because that is my understanding of the Scripture. As I shared with my professors years ago when I was in college, if all the evidence in the universe turns against creationism, I would be the first to admit it, but I would still be a creationist because that is what the Word of God seems to indicate." He is like every other Young Earth Creationist - you can provide them with all the proof in the world, but if it contradicts Scripture, they'll just stick up their noses.

Evidence like the tooth from so called Nebraska man which turned out to be from an extinct pig, the monkey skeleton Lucy which turned out to be just a three foot tall chimpanzee, and Neanderthal man which turned out to be an old man suffering from arthritis. Closer examination shows no true evidence of one specific turning into another.

@@arthapeterson5239 “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭1:18-20‬ ‭

@@shrewdthewise2840 How can invisible attributes be seen?

And you know this so well because you've read it? LOL

Read it in college...horridly evil tome.

@@lawrencekagan8688 Yes, I read it and wrote a research paper on it. What a silly comment.

@@lawrencekagan8688 I also read Alasdair MacIntyre's scathing critique of Marcuse in his book entitled "Herbert Marcuse." And I read Robert Mark's biography of Marcuse, and currently I am reading Rolf Wiggerhaus' magisterial work on The Frankfurt School called, "The Frankfurt School." So, what is you point?

@@beaupierrebondurant5651 Truly evil

I f you read your bible ? God said don't bow down to no Man but me the one who begot you.

Nihilism is the only thing that coexists with evolution. If we have meaning and if the things we do have meaning, then its because it is given to us by something greater than us. Evolution makes no room for that. Time + Matter + Chance = do whatever you want because you were an accident anyway and not intended by Anyone to exist.

That is wrong.

Machiavelli: writes a satire, not intending it to be an instruction manual George Orwell: _sweats_

Wow! I’m familiar with those two names. Doesn’t seem like either writer should be teaching us morals.

Thank You for listing The Message. When I first picked it up in a bookstore to check it out, I had a visceral reaction that I was holding evil in my hands. It is an absolutely horrible perversion of the Bible.

The Message is incredibly overrated, but it is not evil. It is a paraphrase that is widely respected by scholars. It is not the best, but it is certainly not evil. That being said, if you pick up any book and feel a check in your spirit, I would encourage you to trust your conscience.

Queen James bible too.

3. The New World Translation

@@Kblog777 Yes, removing the sin of homosexuality by changing only eight verses. What you may not know is that the New King James Version (NKJV) has done the same thing. The authors of the Queen James Bible (QJB) tell you what verses were changed and why they were changed and there is nothing in the NKJV to warn you. The QJB is a much better bible than the NKJV because there is much more changed in the NKJV than in the QJB.

Well said, I'm glad that someone else understands him. Take care.

Machiavelli was a sycophant stumping for a job. The Prince was his cover letter.

Precisely….rather careless effort to place him in this category

I think the problem with it is what it may inspire in others

That’s why he’s so low down on the list.

Neo-marxists (of the critical theory denominations) make a similar argument about the constitution and bill of rights. They were written by slave owners, racists, and misogynists, therefore we should discard both documents and repudiate what they assert. After all, "free speech", "freedom of religion" and "liberty" are beliefs widely claimed by unabashed and self described racists. See how this style of argument is bad yet?

Margaret Sanger was racist too, she was all for eugenics, we know Hitler was racist, and on and on it goes. The left today accuses their opponents of doing what they themselves actually do. They are double standard, hypocrites.

Even if Darwin was a racist (and given his era and class it would be almost shocking if he wasn't) it wouldn't have any effect upon the accuracy of his hypotheses. That's not how science works. The character of the scientist is irrelevant. All that matters is the evidence.

@@ttthttpd A person's beliefs do matter. The evidence is in the effects of what they promote. Because of Darwin's beliefs, scientific AND moral, people were reduced to just evolved animals and thus killing millions was justifiable. The Founders and authors of our nation's great documents, on the other hand, believed the complete opposite. Few, if any, held racist beliefs (though I grant there were some, especially in the Confederacy, who did). They actually saw the discrepancy in the free society they dreamed of and the one of slavery that they were living in. Thomas Jefferson believed that "all men are created equal" in their nature, as image-bearers of God, though they may not share the same status or wealth. The Founders also knew slavery couldn't be eradicated in a second; the entire economy depended on it at the time. But they foresaw a day when it would be done away with. That's why there is nothing about slavery in the Constitution. They wanted that system of oppression and degradation to be erased from our country's existence. The effects of these men's beliefs brought about the free nation of equal opportunity and enterprise that many people, of all skin tones, have long enjoyed. Darwin and Karl Marx brought about Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Religious beliefs are part of every ideology. And I must add that Christianity is the most UN-racist belief system ever. The Bible says that we are made in God's image; it says that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, black nor white, male nor female; it says God is no respecter of persons. And if Jesus loved everyone enough to die for them and offer them eternal life, we who have taken the name of Christian can show no less love. I am trying, anyhow! So you can bet that a person who professes Christ and yet is racist is either just misled or is not truly a believer. In God's eyes, there are no races except the human race. I hold to that too. That's why I never term people by race. I always describe them as a people group. My point with all this? Any ideology that is anti-God will always end horribly. No humanist or Communist government ever achieved peace, unity, or freedom. The moral side can never be separated from the political side.

@@annahenderson2155 If satan himself told you a demonstrable fact, with the express intent to harm you with it, does it cease to be a fact? Obviously not. Neither the beliefs nor intent of those demonstrating empirically verifiable facts has any bearing on the factualness of those facts. Though it does imply need for greater scrutiny for bias and sleight of hand. Its a bit how some postmodernists and SocJus types are trying to argue that science had outright racists and sexists back in the day, so the very scientific process should be scrapped and replaced with a system that doesn't care about facts but the consequences of asserted beliefs (they dont believe in objective facts). Also, how does acknowledging humans are animals reduce us to *just* animals? Admitting that humans are mammals is not degrading in the slightest, it's an obvious fact regardless of belief system. Likewise to admit humans are apes, whether made that way or evolved as such. I hold humans being evolved, or "just an animal" is actual a positive belief in one regard: every species has a nature, a means of survival. Thus we arent simply "socially constructed" souls, disconnected from our biology, as the gender theorists and dialectical schemers want us to be. No amount of mass killing and campaigns of terror will ever be able to transform (via the dialectic) that nature into what utopia demands. No amount of screaming and tears will decouple sex and gender. Just like neither will make humans breathe underwater or subsist off sunlight. As to what that nature / means of survival is, we are the rational animal, and a tribalistic animal. The means of escaping the dark side of this later trait is revealed both in your last reply and in the core structure of your holy book: universalization of the tribe. The book starts with a couple, then a family, then tribes, a nation, then Jesus opens up the church to all humanity. Likewise, classical liberal (small L, not commie/progressive hijacking of the word) philosophies have pushed universalism via their own approaches to natural law and inalienable rights.

Don't read their books if you can avoid it. You can understand their concepts without reading the book. I wouldn't say reading one of these books is sinful, but unless you need to for a specific assignment or because you are writing a thesis, you can learn the truths so many other ways. If you do read the book this is a good warning to know that what you are going to read is evil and the ideas should be rejected.

In that case I encourage you to read the book of Mormon.

Christian Freedom seeker, finally someone gets it! We're the minority among the worrisome crowd of bigots.

The New Testament says repeatedly to “test everything and hold on to what’s good”

@memphis diplore where is racism justified? Moses married an Ethiopian, Cushite, African, Black woman and was defended by God when his family criticized his decision. And if you are one of those people who claim that his wife was Midianite, not African, Moses sent Zipporah home and took another wife.

Not minus the obvious.

When holy men of God write or speak by the power of the Holy Ghost, their words “shall be scripture, shall be the will of the Lord, shall be the mind of the Lord, shall be the word of the Lord, shall be the voice of the Lord, and the power of God unto salvation” (Doctrine and Covenants 68:4). The official, canonized scriptures of the Church, often called the standard works, are the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. The principal purpose of scriptures is to testify of Christ and to guide the children of God so they can come unto Him and receive eternal life (see John 5:39; 20:31; 1 Nephi 6:4; Mosiah 13:33-35). The Book of Mormon prophet Mormon taught: “Whosoever will may lay hold upon the word of God, which is quick and powerful, which shall divide asunder all the cunning and the snares and the wiles of the devil, and lead the man of Christ in a strait and narrow course across that everlasting gulf of misery which is prepared to engulf the wicked- “And land their souls, yea, their immortal souls, at the right hand of God in the kingdom of heaven, to sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and with Jacob, and with all our holy fathers, to go no more out” (Helaman 3:29-30). God, who is the same “yesterday, today, and forever” (2 Nephi 29:9), continues to reveal scripture in modern times as He did in ancient times. Latter-day prophets counsel people everywhere to study the scriptures daily, including the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price. They encourage individual and family scripture study. They encourage us, as Nephi encouraged his brethren, to liken the scriptures to ourselves, finding ways that the sacred accounts of old apply in our lives today (see 1 Nephi 19:23-24). They exhort us to “search the scriptures” (John 5:39) and “feast upon the words of Christ” (2 Nephi 32:3). Daily, meaningful scripture study helps individuals be receptive to the guidance of the Holy Ghost. It builds faith, fortifies against temptation, enlightens, and helps individuals draw near to our Heavenly Father and His Beloved Son. The Bible The Bible is divided into two parts: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament is a sacred record of God’s dealings with His covenant people in the Holy Land. It includes the teachings of such prophets as Moses, Joshua, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Daniel. The New Testament records the birth, mortal ministry, and Atonement of the Savior. It concludes with the ministry of the Savior’s disciples. Because the Bible has been translated many times, it is printed in different versions. In English, the King James Version of the Bible is accepted as scripture by the Church. In The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, we revere the Bible and its sacred teachings. We can receive strength, comfort, and guidance from the biblical accounts of God’s dealings with His people. The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ The Book of Mormon came forth in this dispensation by the will of the Lord. It is a record of God’s dealings with the people who lived in the ancient Americas. Prophets of the Lord engraved the original records on gold plates. The Lord declared that the Book of Mormon contains “the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ” (Doctrine and Covenants 20:9; see also Doctrine and Covenants 42:12). On September 22, 1827, an angel named Moroni-the last Book of Mormon prophet-delivered these records to the Prophet Joseph Smith. By the gift and power of God, the Prophet Joseph translated the record into English. Since then, the Book of Mormon has been translated into many other languages. The primary purpose of the Book of Mormon is to convince all people “that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God, manifesting himself unto all nations” (title page of the Book of Mormon). It teaches that all people “must come unto him, or they cannot be saved” (1 Nephi 13:40). Joseph Smith said that the Book of Mormon is “the keystone of our religion, and a man [will] get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book” (introduction to the Book of Mormon). The Book of Mormon is another witness for the truths taught in the Bible. It also restores “plain and precious” truths that have been lost from the Bible through errors in translation or “taken away” in attempts to “pervert the right ways of the Lord” (see 1 Nephi 13:24-27, 38-41). The Bible and the Book of Mormon “shall grow together, unto the confounding of false doctrines and laying down of contentions, and establishing peace” (2 Nephi 3:12). Near the end of the Book of Mormon, the prophet Moroni teaches us how we can know the book is true: “When ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost” (Moroni 10:4; see also Moroni 10:3 and Moroni 10:5). The Doctrine and Covenants The Doctrine and Covenants contains revelations given to the Prophet Joseph Smith. It also includes a few revelations given to other latter-day prophets following Joseph Smith. This book of scripture is unique because it is not a translation of ancient documents. It is a collection of revelations given by the Lord to His chosen prophets in the latter days. The Prophet Joseph Smith said that the Doctrine and Covenants is “the foundation of the Church in these last days, and a benefit to the world, showing that the keys of the mysteries of the kingdom of our Savior are again entrusted to man” (section heading for Doctrine and Covenants 70). The Pearl of Great Price The Pearl of Great Price contains the book of Moses, the book of Abraham, the Prophet Joseph Smith’s inspired translation of Matthew chapter 24, and some writings of the Prophet Joseph. The book of Moses is a small excerpt from Joseph Smith’s inspired translation of the Bible. It is a more complete record of Moses’s writings at the beginning of the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. It contains many doctrines and teachings that were lost from the Bible and gives additional information about the plan of salvation, the creation of the earth, and the Lord’s dealings with Adam and Enoch. The book of Abraham is a translation of ancient records written on papyrus that came into the possession of the Church in 1835. The Prophet Joseph Smith translated the records by revelation. This book contains truths about the premortal Council in Heaven, the creation of the earth, the nature of God, and the priesthood. Joseph Smith-Matthew is an excerpt (Matthew 24) from Joseph Smith’s inspired revision of the Bible and adds to our knowledge of the Savior’s teachings about His Second Coming. The writings of Joseph Smith in the Pearl of Great Price include: Joseph Smith-History, which is an excerpt from the Prophet’s history of the Church. It is a narrative of the events leading to the restoration of the Church, including the First Vision, the visits of Moroni to the Prophet Joseph, the obtaining of the gold plates, and the restoration of the Aaronic Priesthood. The Articles of Faith, which the Prophet Joseph Smith wrote as basic statements of belief and doctrine.

As a Christian I worry about this inclusion. Just the concept of bias leaves you vulnerable to argument.

You misspelled biased.

Especially the Talmud.

As the Bible was compiled, organized, translated, and transcribed, many errors entered the text. The existence of such errors becomes apparent when one considers the numerous and often conflicting translations of the Bible in existence today. Careful students of the Bible are often puzzled by apparent contradictions and omissions. Many people have also been curious about references by biblical prophets to books or scriptural passages that are not currently in the Bible. Latter-day Saints believe in an open scriptural canon, which means that there are other books of scripture besides the Bible (such as the Book of Mormon) and that God continues to reveal His word through living prophets. The argument is often made that to be a Christian means to assent to the principle of sola scriptura, or the self-sufficiency of the Bible. But to claim that the Bible is the final word of God-more specifically, the final written word of God-is to claim more for the Bible than it claims for itself. Nowhere does the Bible proclaim that all revelations from God would be gathered into a single volume to be forever closed and that no further scriptural revelation could be received. The Bible is not God’s final revelation to humanity, however, and neither is this collection of sacred writings complete. The Bible itself speaks of other authoritative books of scripture including books of Jasher, Nathan the prophet and of Jehu and Enoch, the prophecy of Ahijah, the visions of Iddo the seer, and even missing epistles of Paul (see 2 Chronicles 9:29; 13:22; 20:34; 1 Corinthians 5:9; Jude 1:14).

I nearly snapped my neck and died whipping my head 180 behind me to see what kind of aberration made that sound.

what did he do?

Agree. 'Justine' is a perverse mind-twister. It tries suck you into the mind of a degenerate and if you're capable of self-reflection, it will make you sick after only a few chapters. Never succeeded in finishing this.

I don't think his book was influential enough on society in general to make the list. A top 10 list isn't big enough to include every evil book ever written. Although I think Rules For Radicals and L Ron Hubbard's book should be on the list.

Remember that it's in his opinion

Marx was a despicable human being. He wouldn't work to take care of his wife and only communicated with his parents to ask them for money. He couldn't even be bothered to go to their funerals.

The Quran is as dangerous as it gets

Having typed this, I need a response on why you wont allow comments on some topics?? you're not the be all end all on any topic. I must unsubscribe if i cant trust you.;

That book isn't nearly as bad as the least offensive book featured on this list.

What's wrong with God Calling?

Basis of the sexual revolution yes, modern gender theory, no. That would be John Money and Queer Theory. Money's experiments were morally bankrupt, and showed the opposite of the conclusions he drew. For christ's sake, the subject eventually comitted suicide after finding out they were transitioned as a child and made to "role play" sexual roles with his siblings. He identified with his biology, not his medically altered anatomy or social upbringing. Queer Theory's founding papers advocate "cross generational relationships" and has degerated from sexual marxism to a critical theory against normality in any form. And what is more if a norm than gender? The theory has its roots in Gramsci and all the other dialectical usual subjects, in the usual chain back to before Marx. (James Lindsay has quite a bit of material on all of this)

@Prey R it's not a misunderstanding of Darwin, he even said himself "the civilized races[that is the causations] will exterminates the savage races[ig. the acifrans and Australasians]"

@Donkey Kong Again, what's the point in that except as an exercise in avoiding reality? And what kind of depraved or more likely, childish, mind seriously wants to imagine God out of existence? Where does he think he came from then? Cosmic jibber jabber. There is one who is true and his problem is he didn't distinguish between the true and all the false. He fell for that.

@Donkey Kong It's a fallen world. You can't fix it by imagining things. Imagine there weren't so many gullible and naive people. People who think globalism, technology, and singing vapid songs will fix it. Besides that it's a boring, droning song in general.

What's wrong with Ode to Joy?

I take it satire is intended by all that, just as when I watched this video I thought the guy must be joking except for the bit about Mein Kampf. What exactly is satanic about Beethoven's 'Ode to Joy'?

🎶 "Imagine Chapman had no bullets. It isn't hard to do". 🎵

The world

Because heavens above, imagine for one minute God gave intelligence, told us to make our own choices, and created science. Let's blame Darwin for wars etc which in reality were actually caused by religion.

@@alexandrasmith7682 Darwin was a quack. There is no evidence to support his theory of evolution like fossil evidence of intermediate animal species.

@@alexandrasmith7682 …can you clarify your point? I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not. Sorry.

Alistair Crawley is the spiritual father of Anton LeVey. He helped move the democrat party to the heart of satanism.

you realize you sound crazy right? Any burning or destroying of any literature sounds like every totalitarian tyranny in history. Let people believe what they want to

If you own any of these and no longer want them then as a free person you can dispense with them however you see fit. I would not advocate book burnings as a salemic solution to society’s ills

@@erl00558 the book burning isn't a solution to societies ills, it's just a solution to a bunch of evil books floating around. I believe book burning should be reserved for truly evil books, NOT Harry Potter or something. Like there's absolutely no reason for the Necronomicon to be floating around. I would also encourage the burning of Ouija boards, but that's a bit different than books, and largely stems from an unpleasant supernatural experience i had.

Never harm any book. Stick with education.

@@sixkicksfightertricks949 even if the book is about how to be a serial rapist and get away with it? Sorry, but I'd be burning that book. But i guess if you want it, that's your choice...

@Franci Lauda Every make of car looks as though it evolved from a previous model. Yet we know that they were all independently designed and created. Appearance of similarity across species proves nothing.

@Franci Lauda Notice how fewer words I used to demolish every argument in your overuse of language? I don't think you want me to start listing the names of scientists in the last hundred years , who say evolution is only within kinds?

@Franci Lauda All I know is that in every science. When a new discovery is made old theories are conveniently discarded. You have no reason to believe that it won't happen again with all the scientific so called evidence we now have. Besides how is science doing to cure the common cold?

@Franci Lauda I never claimed Religion has all the answers. Scientists do seem to believe that if science can not answer any question it means we need to search more. No theologian who has dedicated His or Her life to study beliefs will ever say that doctrines aren't subject to change. No amount of science will ever solve the problem of the eventual heat death of the universe.

I was thinking the same! But honestly, they can fall under #1, other "religious" books

@@AJ-ForGodsGlory thats true, but it doesnt clam to be from God but says its from satan

@@peaceman7072 a book doesn't have to claim to be from God to be religious. Satan IS a god to those who follow him. The bible also states that he is the god of this world.

@@AJ-ForGodsGlory Thats true but I think his reason for all other divine books is because they claim to be from god but are not. Im pretty sure he says that in the video

You have proposed an extremely difficult question. Part of me says - Burn them all; but we have to look at the books being banned right now, under the guise of racism, hatred, or even white privileged and do we want to be like God's enemies. Tough question.

@@Freed98 I understand where you’re coming from, but I truly don’t believe it is Biblical or Christ-like to destroy our opposition. We have to remember that every action we perform is a reflection on Christianity and I don’t think much soul winning would occur if our solution to disagreement is to burn what we disagree with. Just my opinion though.

Agreed. In Acts 19:19, people VOLUNTARILY burned their own magic books. No coercion. No confiscation. Just conviction.

@@braden_kurtz I'm so glad there are at least a handful of people here with some sense. All books are sacred.

@@braden_kurtz Good thing Christ isnt coming back to literally destroy all his enemies by casting them into a pit or anything... oh wait. Good thing God didnt command the Israelites to destroy their enemies either... oh wait. Good thing God didnt demand that the Israelites destroy all the idols either... oh wait. Good thing God didnt destroy the world in a flood... oh wait. Good thing God didnt destroy the cities of Sodom and Gammorah with heavenly fire... oh wait.

Was that written by ghost writing? They call it several different terms but I'm sure you know about it. Its were the authors let the demon guide them by getting into a trance thru occult practices and basically having the demon dictate to them either knowingly or thru the false belief it is a spirit guide ect. So he knowingly knew he was receiving the information from a demon?

That's the one I was thinking of. I couldn't quite remember the name. Yes it should have made the list.

@NAVUSMCVET ---> Wrong! Garbage In - Garbage Out. Do NOT waste your eyeballs on anything mentioned in the list compiled by "Wretched".