Toyota CEO: "This NEW Engine Will Destroy The Entire EV Industry!"

Рет қаралды 1,919,098

Жыл бұрын

Although several engines have been around for a while, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are more efficient ways to provide the necessary power to transport our cars from point A to point B. Toyota believes that hydrogen power is the way to go and that its new engines will render electric vehicles obsolete. It's time to examine the development of Toyota's engines in more detail and discover some other factors that contribute to Toyota's position as a market leader. How does Toyota achieve this? Can Toyota's hydrogen-powered internal combustion engine replace electric vehicles?
Subscribe Here ➡ / @voyagerspace
Disclaimer:
Our videos are designed for entertainment, not academic research or reference. Though we aim for accuracy and creativity, they are not peer-reviewed and should be enjoyed as such.
To contact us visit our channel description ➡ / @voyagerspace
#Voyager

Пікірлер: 1 100

@MarkEkslee 9 ай бұрын

....... but hydrogen is 100% electric. It is not a fuel source, just a conduit.

@tobyyancy3546 Жыл бұрын

i wonder who paid for this ad.....opps i mean video

@fishingako 7 ай бұрын

The only problem is HOW EXPENSIVE hydrogen power cost ?????

@todlandis 7 ай бұрын

I don't see H2 working outside of construction. As for H2, you still need the electric grid to make H2. And fuel cells are still bloody expensive.

@kevinrobert224 9 ай бұрын

I was a lineman in the northeast for 35 years and ill tell you that during a heat wave the grid gets maxed out,fuses start blowing wires start melting and transformers start blowing up from exessive demand. 100 billion dollars to sufficiently upgrade the the entire US grid by 40% is a ridiculous pipe dream,it will cost way more than that. Prepair for insane electric bills coming in the next decade.

@HAIDARAVEN 9 ай бұрын

Sounds like a good investment to get into

@justinchop5531 9 ай бұрын

We just sent another 40 billion to Ukraine but we cant upgrade our grid…

@moorefacts6605 9 ай бұрын

The infrastructure has been neglected for decades because of tax cuts to the wealthy. They make profits off it at our expense. Upgrade for everyday Americans.

@snowranger69 9 ай бұрын

It's not mutually exclusive. The electric utility companies are monopolies and have no incentive to innovate

@moorefacts6605 9 ай бұрын

@@snowranger69 Some like Texas Utility have proven negligent. Columbia River Utilities have been pretty good.

@samirandrade1189 9 ай бұрын

You know its gonna be a banger when Toyota and Yamaha decide to work a project together

@user-cw2py6wh8l 9 ай бұрын

Remember the Hindenburg?

@churxa2011 9 ай бұрын

There is a reason why Toyota is the highest seller in the auto industry. This is the future.

@stancochran702 8 ай бұрын

Toyota and Yamaha have been partners for a number of years. The cylinder heads for a number of Toyota's were made for engines such as the 18RG in the late sixties and early seventies. It was used in the Celica exported to every country in the world except the US. Celicas shipped to the US had 18R, 20R and the 22R engines until they changed the car to front wheel drive. The 18RG was a twin overhead cam unit that was a beast to drive in that small of a car. Also look at the Lexus overhead engines, I believe they are Yamaha creations.

@mt2nv1 6 ай бұрын

Pipe dream.

@aloisopatz2957 9 ай бұрын

It’s not about carbon, it’s about redistributing the world’s resources

@allgoo196 9 ай бұрын

"It’s not about carbon, it’s about redistributing the world’s resources" == Rare metals to make batteries are called rare for a reason. How much of distribution do you expect?

@O.G.G.1974 6 ай бұрын

@@allgoo196lithium is not rare

@allgoo1990 6 ай бұрын

@@O.G.G.1974 "Lthium is not rare" == Proof? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium "Lithium is a comparatively rare element,..." "always in very low concentrations..."

@TechieTard 6 ай бұрын

@@O.G.G.1974wtf, it's not as abundant as copper or even silver lol

@iamtorrego 5 ай бұрын

@@allgoo1990also, lithium is not the only element that be used. Is it the most effective right now? Yes. Will it be the only one? Absolutely not.

@46bovine 5 ай бұрын

As we have noticed, anytime government gets involved in whatever it does it screw it up or makes it so complicated it becomes unintelligible!

@Ask-a-Rocket-Scientist 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen tanks become the long pole if you go that route. They are investing in tank technology but they currently cost $25,000 which is more than batteries. H2 is also not dense unless it’s cryogenic.

@thierryfontolliet7385 9 ай бұрын

The part I don’t understand is where the hydrogen is coming from? As far as I know, as per today, the two only way of producing hydrogen are to burn methane which produce an enormous amount of carbon monoxide or use electricity to extract hydrogen from water (electrolysis process). Based on their carbon footprint, both of these processes are considered highly inefficient.

@andrefriisausend5405 9 ай бұрын

In addition to that the produced hydrogen will be needed mostly for industrial purposes. Up to now round about 90 percent of the used hydrogen is produced by fossile fuels or nuclear power.

@billhecht5291 9 ай бұрын

Toyota knows it has to create a safe, efficient, affordable vehicle before it will be sold to the public.

@lalatubby4836 9 ай бұрын

making money is number 1 tho

@user-ph4wi4sy2p 9 ай бұрын

if somebody can do it right it's toyota

@wynnszenn 9 ай бұрын

@@lalatubby4836that is applicable to China manufacturers

@moorefacts6605 9 ай бұрын

Their reputation is thelr brand

@AWMJoeyjoejoe 9 ай бұрын

@@lalatubby4836Yes because if they don't make money they'll go bust. That's capitalism.

@qing-jiang 7 ай бұрын

I have a 2011 Prius. I just bought a 2024 Prius Prime XSE. Color: Wind Chill Pearl. Beautiful, comfortable, powerful, excellent performance. I believe that the Plug in hybrid technology is the best for the foreseeable future!

@scoop-pm7lk 9 ай бұрын

I saw a VW TDI jetta with CNG ( compressed natural gas ) get 120 miles per gallon and runs cleaner than jist diesel or regular gasoline .. Plus when the CNG runs out the car still runs on diesel at around 50 MPG ..

@ceteo2528 9 ай бұрын

I thought producing hydrogen needs a lot of electricity. Transportation and transfer of hydrogen also pose safety concerns especially when equipment ages.

@flyingtortise2725 9 ай бұрын

China already invented new technology, which is solid hydrogen. Safer for transportation and lowest cost, but same efficiency. Ev will be out of market real soon.

@felipeschneider10 9 ай бұрын

Best feasable opción are e-fuels. Which are carbon neutral.

@rubenrodenburg4478 9 ай бұрын

Okay because the gas of hydrogen is highly explosive@@flyingtortise2725

@darrylglynn1557 9 ай бұрын

You may want to check out NEOM in Saudi Arabia. Hydrogen will be produced entirely from renewable sources. Wind, Solar.

@markpo5623 9 ай бұрын

@@felipeschneider10y😊 pi no mo kk😢

@johnwilletts3984 9 ай бұрын

Close to my home here in South Yorkshire England is an experimental ‘Gas’ station. A single wind turbine is used to power the electrolysis of ground water to fill large underground tanks with hydrogen. Here you can freely fill your Hydrogen powered vehicle. Then the surplus is used to power generators to feed the grid. So fuel for your car from wind and water. How will the taxman manage to tax air and ground water?

@katendra88 9 ай бұрын

They will find a way believe it.

@ruscador1 9 ай бұрын

road tax £4000 a year lol just like our log burner they can't tax the government hate us

@C.XRepairsMedia1 9 ай бұрын

Good point they try something for real

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

They won't tax air or ground water. The tax burden will simply be moved to actual road *usage* using a system of road tolls. It won't matter how your vehicles is powered, whether it be sunshine, oil, hydrogen or chicken sh*t, you will pay according to how much you use the roads, with a distance based system.

@petelineview9720 9 ай бұрын

Gotta love South Yorkshire 👍

@kmeintjes 6 ай бұрын

1. Where will the hydrogen come from? 2. Hydrogen will not need an "infrastructure"?

@kaufuss 9 ай бұрын

In denmark we have windmills that helps producing hydrogen. Atm they use surplus electricty from the windmills to produce, when the rest of the grid isn’t pulling energi

@flhong 9 ай бұрын

Japan government should keep & use their radioactive filter water for this engine.

@mikestanton571 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen i.c.engines are already in use, JCB, makers of heavy duty machinery are already using them.

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

But what advantage does a hydrogen engine - still with hundreds of moving parts to wear, break or require regular servicing have, over a typical EV, which has around 30 moving parts, requires minimum servicing attention, and can be fuelled at home for a fraction of the cost of using public refuelling stations (or for free if you have solar)?

@ricric9521 9 ай бұрын

LOL. According to the US EPA, the GHG emissions associated with an EV over its lifetime are typically lower than those from an average ICE vehicle, even when accounting for manufacturing.

@istvantoppler5999 7 ай бұрын

The statement that "windchill lowers the temperature below air temperature" is grossly incorrect.

@user-zi4ln3nm8b 9 ай бұрын

BMW introduced a hydrogen internal combustion 700 series back in the 90s. They had grandiose plans to build hydrogen refueling stations to support their new technology. They couldn't make it work. I see no difference here.

@vetsai8199 9 ай бұрын

California is currently building hundreds of them, starting in 2024. The money has already been allocated.

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

That's because there are none. Nothing much has changed.

@arby2348 9 ай бұрын

@@vetsai8199California democrats spending money they don't have thereby increasing California's deficit. Classic.

@michealbeers777 9 ай бұрын

Toyota is Spot on!

@matsgardin8332 9 ай бұрын

A) How would the hydrogen be produced? There are two main options: Use electricity, which would demand 3 times more usage of electricity than an electric car. Use methane to make the hydrogen - it would have the drawback of not being much better than a petrol car. B) Anyone saying that the thrill of accelerating a muscle car is way better than an electric car with the same power can not have seriously tried an electric power car.

@HT-vd4in 9 ай бұрын

😂 They sound like Steve Ballmer talking about the iPhone

@thelifeofbatteries2603 Жыл бұрын

ah the famed Toyota Hindenburg.....if i can't refuel at home then i'm not interested

@vetsai8199 9 ай бұрын

There’s always compressed natural gas…you can refuel that at home! But it pollutes, too!

@earifin 9 ай бұрын

better can refuel everywhere in few minutes rather than few hours at your home.

@El-Ge 9 ай бұрын

The next energy technology is Tetrac owned by Loki and the Avenger, which is only in size of our palm but can empower a naval carrier for 1000 years.

@JMmini 9 ай бұрын

Solid state battery need to be updated with circuit board with capasitors to start the heat and insulation to sustain temp

@nckwok6463 9 ай бұрын

Question 1 : How many gas stations are willing to invest by installing a hydrogen pump to replace the old gas pump without having enough business initially ? Question 2 : Hydrogen is an extremely explosive fuel. Some underground parking lots or tunnels do not allow hydrogen vehicles to enter. As a new user, would you still consider buying hydrogen vehicles under so much inconvenient restrictions ? If it is proved not suitable in reality, it is also very difficult to resell it ! In reality, hydrogen fuel is only suitable for big trucks travelling along some highway (without tunnels) such that they only require a few fuel stations along the highway over a very long distance.

@thesarkive7746 Жыл бұрын

I will tell you right now electric cars CAN NOT FUNCTION IN COLD CLIMATE. I am in Canada and every single person Ive spoken to about their Tesla/electric car HATES it. They get maybe 40% of the advertised range due to the cold.

@walterrumohr7090 9 ай бұрын

Just need a warm garage.

@thesarkive7746 9 ай бұрын

@@walterrumohr7090 Just be the Human Torch

@TheEtbetween 9 ай бұрын

Total agree

@bcork595 9 ай бұрын

There are a number of people developing a solid state battery that will not be effected by weather.

@sdcoinshooter 9 ай бұрын

Yeah… The country of Norway has 90% new vehicle sales are EV. I guess in your world Norway is in the tropics right?

@jameswheeler6954 9 ай бұрын

Porsche's carbon neutral fuel makes a new fuel that’s clean made from air pollution and other stuff , it’s tested in Chile 🇨🇱 and it can be used in any old petrol or diesel car .. so getting very exited to drive old cars again 🎉 woo hoo !

@eleveneleven572 9 ай бұрын

Toyota is correct.....a mixed market of fuel typesfor different needs is the way forward. Horses for courses.

@riccaregio 9 ай бұрын

Very informative and well made documentary but please for that is sacred get rid of that intrusive flickering effect on the stock bits. Is extremely annoying, if I was epileptic I would have had a seizure for sure.

@jasperwright9237 9 ай бұрын

You Got it, Toyota! I don’t want no stink in’ EV!

@henrysymonds6531 9 ай бұрын

That great news from Toyota keeps it up it’s sound a lot better than battery

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

Please explain how it is a "lot" better?

@ramgolamroshan149 9 ай бұрын

I thought that I was mad in fact this is the real thing to do !!!!never leave the thermal engine !!!

@canadiannuclearman 9 ай бұрын

Good video. Electrical power is best to come from nuclear to do either make hydrogen from electrolysis or charge batteries. So when you drive an EV or a FC fuel cell vehical where electrical power comes from a nuclear power plant you are driving a nuclear powered car.

@RagicaltheUnhallowedKnight Жыл бұрын

Australia and Australia hmm? Geez them Ozzies really don't like normal cars ey with that double ban😁

@rickwhite4137 9 ай бұрын

Not a word about the energy it takes to produce Hydrogen.

@kimf.wendel9113 9 ай бұрын

Forgot a big part of the issue with hydrogen. In order to get 100 Wh of energy in hydrogen, you need 120 Wh of energy to create it. Now since a battery vehicle can move 1 km in 140 Wh, that means the hydrogen car needs to move almost 1 km in 100 Wh, otherwise it is energy inefficient. Starting to think about energy efficiency rather that miles per litre is much more useful in comparing systems. Lower energy consumptions, means less energy needed on larger scale.

@ronbo30 8 ай бұрын

In the 1970’s a guy created a car that runs on water. He met with some important people on the technology. When he left the restaurant, he told his brother before he died, they poisoned me! Hmmm….

@jimegloff8550 9 ай бұрын

I have always been a H2 supporter. We need to work on H2 production. They have improved and lower production cost and I believe we will get there. The problem is when.

@mrthemoo 9 ай бұрын

Remember the Hindenburg?

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen's biggest problem is that it will still need to transported everywhere, just as petrol and diesel is now. Electricity needs no transportation. Plus you will never be able to fill up a hydrogen car at home on a cheaper rate than established public filling points. The oil industry desperately want hydrogen to succeed, so they once again take control of production, distribution and pricing, just as they did with oil based fuels...... And irony is that every single hydrogen filling point will need a supply of *electricity* to operate.......

@marsphoenix1359 5 ай бұрын

@@Brian-om2hh TBF, it'll still be cheaper than the electricity prices we pay now. That's the main reason I was put off buying an EV. Here in Australia we're paying about $1000 to $2000 (~$650 to ~$1300 US) per quarter. If we didn't have solar that'd be killer. As it is, we're still paying about $200 to $300. An EV would wipe that saving. We can't afford that. Heck, there are some people talking about going off grid with petrol run generators as they're cheaper day-to-day than the electricity prices. EVs are a rich person's car.

@KJ-md2wj 9 ай бұрын

I see sparse parking spaces in cities going to near zero to make room for charging stations. A catastrophe as they fine any non-EV parking there!

@vincecox8376 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen is very easy to produce right at the carburetor level, The trick is they vibrate the water (not oscillate, big dif!!), whether it be salt water or clear just a different filter system. Anyway , just so you understand in very basic tech, The center of a magnet is referred to as the "B" field (or Nutron), When you vibrate the water with the "B" field the water will separate the Oxy and Hydrogen at any rate you need to power your engine. LET's be crystal clear we are talking about a Sawtooth vibration at the correct frequency and were good.

@1001Balance 8 ай бұрын

Hydrogen has been dispelled over and over again. Some toyota engineer made a calculation mistake and now the company is stuck with expensive hydrogen.

@michaelstone3025 9 ай бұрын

Would it be possible to find a stabilizing agent to add to the hydrogen to make the storage of liquid, hydrogen, easier and safer and less volatile until the engine, consumed the fuel, and separated the mixture? If this could be possible, then we could store this know differently then we store gasoline, and pumping into our vehicles now

@allgoo196 9 ай бұрын

"Would it be possible to find a stabilizing agent to add to the hydrogen to make the storage of liquid, hydrogen, easier and safer and less volatile until the engine, consumed the fuel, and separated the mixture? ....." == No.

@TheLRider 9 ай бұрын

Do some research online and you will find that the answer is yes.

@allgoo196 9 ай бұрын

@@TheLRider "Do some research online and you will find that the answer is yes." == Why don't you post the link instead? Don't expect others to do a work for you. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_safety Excerpt, "Typically it will evaporate at a rate of 1% per day..." It's a nature of hydrogen, you can't stop it.

@sausagemcgregory 9 ай бұрын

Yeah they're called battreries 🔋

@allgoo196 9 ай бұрын

@@sausagemcgregory Do you know how much of improvement they have made in last 100 years? The answer: only twice.

@douglasthompson9482 9 ай бұрын

Very interesting. In my mind though, the use of the petroleum products are with us for decades. I collect cars, so do many others. I really can’t see at least in my life, gas powered cars becoming redundant.

@arizonahd 9 ай бұрын

You can still buy vacuum tubes. So I agree.

@randyclark6010 9 ай бұрын

It will be when gasoline is $20 a gallon.

@petelineview9720 9 ай бұрын

... or back to $2 per gallon due to lack of demand 😁

@AlanWilliams-su4bs 7 ай бұрын

Does that thought apply in heavily populated cities or near schools?

@etiennemyburgh5680 9 ай бұрын

This is a great subject. I wish to see this technology grow. The effects used in this video is dangerous to those with photo sensitive epilepsy. Please can you take such things into consideration?

@jasonjohnson6216 9 ай бұрын

I have solar panels. Solar is being installed everywhere. I like charging my EV for free

@hugogreen13 9 ай бұрын

Not entirely true. You have invested significantly in your own power gen plant. But that aside, it does give you self sufficiency

@topherut 9 ай бұрын

Will Toyta install a hydrogen distribution service worldwide as Tesla has for EVs ?

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

Can I fill a hydrogen car up at home on my drive from my solar panels?

@thedatajanitor9537 9 ай бұрын

It won't matter. Nothing is going to touch Tesla now.

@topherut 9 ай бұрын

Have you noted that Ford will be selling solid-state batteries? If this is true (stated by the CEO), then Tesla will lose their top spot @@thedatajanitor9537

@AlanWilliams-su4bs 7 ай бұрын

They are getting on for 200 billion dollars in debt and Father Christmas doesntb deliver there

@Banjoman17 9 ай бұрын

If I'm still around when Toyota introduces hydrogen powered vehicles, this will be my mode of transportation for sure.

@Aayush2614 9 ай бұрын

Then checkout Toyota Mirai, its available..

@georgebrehm8622 9 ай бұрын

My Lexus RX 300 ,46 k still new can’t use it Ulez zone.swap for Nissan diesel automatic,this car stored for 15 years due to I.ll nes,starts on the button looks drives like new,who wants it

@kfcmalaysia5580 9 ай бұрын

Save my words, thank you.

@tonyshergold6023 9 ай бұрын

And where are you going to get hydrogen to fill your car? Building an infrastructure of hydrogen filling stations will be super costly and totally impractical, and it has to be done across the world. Sorry but it won't happen...

@aboothie 9 ай бұрын

Do you think the oil companies are going to let their "grass get cut"... when they can pump Hydrogen?@@tonyshergold6023

@exuexuexu 9 ай бұрын

So, hydrogen is simply an energy storage system. Where does the energy to separate and isolate H come from? Electricity?

@keithloucks7167 9 ай бұрын

Most of the hydrogen comes from processed natural gas or hydrolysis from water. Water vapor from the tailpipe can freeze on the roadways. A heavy storage tank is required. It however can be part of the solution. 100% electric is impossible and will lead to a small percentage of the population having access to cars.

@alfeeman 9 ай бұрын

I thought toyota already gave up hydrogen car😂 this video from few years ago?

@williamkinnell79 9 ай бұрын

Well done Toyota ! The only sensible company.

@mt508 9 ай бұрын

Actually, a company who is seriously lagging behind their competitors when it comes to EV's.

@reglockyer9234 9 ай бұрын

Too little too late.Hydrogen was touted as the saviour over 20 years ago but nobody,including Toyota would run with it,which included investing in a hydrogen infrastructure.Nothing has changed,just needs a safe infrastructure.

@FirstClass- 9 ай бұрын

@@reglockyer9234 Although EV’s are getting a bad wrap for car fires, ICE cars catch fire nearly 300% more. But have you ever seen Toyota’s Hydrogen car collision tests by NHTSA? One look at that and no one will buy into Hydrogen fueled cars…. Besides, the gas is too volatile, filling stations won’t be able to insure themselves… therefore it’s DOA

@Brian-om2hh 9 ай бұрын

@@reglockyer9234 General Motors were blowing hydrogen's trumpet 40 years ago....

@Magnum_Express 9 ай бұрын

@@mt508 and? ev's are dead end technology and they know it. They sell to 200 countries worldwide. Countries that would even entertain the idea of an EV only market, number in the single digits, maybe low teens. They might just stop selling cars in North America and Western Europe if they are forced to make EV's exclusively for those markets, and i wouldn't blame them. They cant just overhaul their entire company and manufacturing facilities to cater to the whims of some tree huggers in a different hemisphere.

@user-jy8mo5fi5q 9 ай бұрын

The article mentions the need for armour plated hydrogen gas tanks which I presume will be the main safety factor in such a vehicle therefore can we see the need for certification of such tanks every 3 yrs or so just like with steam engine boilers requiring frequent certification.

@johnwilletts3984 9 ай бұрын

Many years ago I watched a test on TV here in U.K. A bullet was fired into a petrol (gas) tank. The burning petrol spread around the car and totally destroyed it. Then they fired a bullet into a car with a Hydrogen tank. A jet of flame shot high into the air, but left the car with just a small black mark around the bullet hole. In practice Hydrogen should prove safer.

@teds93e96 8 ай бұрын

@@johnwilletts3984 This is an interesting observation from this test... I would expect with how combustible hydrogen is that ignition in the tank itself would actually cause a massive explosion like you would see in movie. Along with this a ton of metal would have to reinforce the tank to prevent the entire tank from giving out at the same time. Which is far more recourses....

@Nick41622 9 ай бұрын

1:47. You said Australia twice.

@Zetler 9 ай бұрын

Even if the infrastructure issue is resolved, nobody is going to by a hydrogen car unless there is a performance advantage.

@alvirjee 5 ай бұрын

There would be

@marsphoenix1359 5 ай бұрын

Or cost advantage. Electricity prices are soaring and not everyone can afford to install solar.

@MonteVanNortwick Жыл бұрын

it takes a lot of hydrogen volume to make a car go 300 miles between refills. Unless you use hydrogen in fuel cells.

@robertduarted 11 ай бұрын

They can make it more efficient

@vetsai8199 10 ай бұрын

That IS what they do!

@peterhazelwood9325 9 ай бұрын

They don’t tell you that the membranes between 400 cells in fuel cells need replacing every 10,000 km or twice a year.reselling the fuel cell could also be a problem as hydrogen molecules are the smallest know to man and will leak through just about anything.

@vetsai8199 9 ай бұрын

They have made them go 430 miles between fill-ups. I think Honda has the fuel cells.

@trixiepickle8779 9 ай бұрын

I have an EV and very happy I am with it. My neighbour has a hydrogen/petrol car. She likes the car, but the size of the hydrogen tank means that boot space is very, very limited. Plus recharging it is difficult. Toyota is in the pocket of the gas/oil industry so hardly unbiased imo. Shall wait and see but think it'll be a while.

@AlanWilliams-su4bs 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for that opinion which mirrors what I think.

@keatingaaron 9 ай бұрын

Where will Hydrogen come from? Who will produce it? How much energy will it take to make - will it be economic? How will it then get to my neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia where I can buy it? What about when I want to visit my sister inter-state? Will it be available where I need it? A lot of questions...(similar ???'s pertain to the electrification dream). Can't see any of this any time soon.

@rdsieben 9 ай бұрын

1) Hydrogen is extremely flammable. 2) Hydrogen engine is still an ICE that has many moving parts. Less moving parts means less maintenance

@hydrorix1 Жыл бұрын

The fewer the parts the better. Right? Reduced probability of failure, right? Easy math. The typical ICE has ~2000+ moving parts. An EV drivetrain has about 20. You do the math. Solid state batteries are imminent. No fire hazard. Shorter charging time. Longer range. Be patient. It's still a relatively new industry/market niche. Thanks, Elon!

@vetsai8199 9 ай бұрын

Yeah, but the Wankel engine didn’t work either!

@ronch550 Жыл бұрын

Such sensationalist titles from these KZfaqrs. Sheesh.

@Jodyrides 9 ай бұрын

This is not a video exclusively about the hydrogen engine that is going to make Evies seem obsolete. Could you get on with it in the remake of this video?

@nicholasturton9267 7 ай бұрын

Good for Toyota rejecting EVs for the very same sane reasons and objections raised by most sensible and thoughtful people world wide

@himinghii1597 9 ай бұрын

China will be the key factor here! If the battery powered car becomes 90% of the market, it will be not feasible for the hydrogen powered to catch up in term of costs, infrastructure and innovation. If CATL sodium battery can further improve the range to 600Km per charge with the new concept of condensed battery, what is there left for Toyota hydrogen car ?

@allgoo196 9 ай бұрын

"If CATL sodium battery can further improve the range to 600Km per charge...." == Keep dreaming.

@MrMoonunit67 9 ай бұрын

When they can take a fill up of water and extract the hydrogen on board...... that's there end game

@StormWalker101 9 ай бұрын

The biggest problem with Hydrogen is transportation, refuelling and storage. Without these sorted out, hydrogen engines are not going to likely survive. The idea itself is the right way to go but the problem is the governments needs to put more funding in to hydrogen infrastructure instead of joining the bandwagon and forcing everyone to get electric.

@Hammydavis 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen is equivalent to high gas prices Where to go 300 miles on electric is about $19 dollars and that’s in California where gas and electricity are very expensive .

@paulkasputis5978 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen is also incredibly explosive.

@StormWalker101 9 ай бұрын

@@Hammydavis That’s because electric cars only make 1% of the total no. Cars on the road. Imagine a 100 times more load on the grid than what it is experiencing right now and then watch the prices go up. And the prices won’t just go up for charging cars but it will go up for residences and businesses alike. Right now it works it’s a very short sighted plan. Unless they make fusion energy feasible I suppose, in which case they would have made the most profitable decision.

@franciscouderq1100 9 ай бұрын

Major plane mfg are searching ways to use hydrogen as well

@adelinomorte7421 9 ай бұрын

***let markets decide, not governments, just leave gov´s only for safety, you will see that EVs will win the race, but there will be market for any other method.***

@joelellis9621 9 ай бұрын

Remember when Blue Ray and HD DVD competed ? Hydrogen will be HD DVD , why are they even bothering. Most major companies are already investing in electric, as is the government.

@donswank6920 7 ай бұрын

Key statement: "It requires a lot of fossil fuel to produce hydrogen."

@johnjdumas 9 ай бұрын

Huge hidden costs not accounted for: One subsidy dollar takes about $20 in economic activity to generate which in turn produces 20 times more carbon. Also to give out tax dollars an equal tax or inflation must also be compensated by increased production. Also, a huge percentage of our electricity is generated by burning coal, and wind and solar have a huge amount of dirty subsidy dollars as well.

@bobbydaniels7263 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen does not produce carbon.

@johnjdumas 9 ай бұрын

Splitting water produces more carbon than burning the fuel directly@@bobbydaniels7263

@alexanderchaihorsky4605 Жыл бұрын

If they had good arguments, they would not repeat each several times and they would not hire actors with dramatic voices to deliver the soliloquy. They are trying to sell us their enormous investment into hydrogen, but they don’t believe in it themselves.

@stevec9470 9 ай бұрын

The key problem of using Hydrogen is building the H2 gas station infrastructure. Hydrogen is extremely dangerous to handle as a storage due to its explosive nature. EV is ahead of the Zero emmission race because electricity infrastructures are already available at homes. Plus there is efficiency loss to covert water as Hydrogen as fuel from electricity.

@user-zs9ek1bx5z 8 ай бұрын

Yes.. do not be RESTRICTED on SINGLE solution.. GO to innovate HYDROGEN and NEW TECH. ❤❤❤

@Fiskaba 9 ай бұрын

I wonder if the Japanese government will bail them out when they go bankrupt? I reckon Toyota might merge with other Japanese auto makers.

@vetsai8199 9 ай бұрын

They ARE falling behind!

@paull3179 9 ай бұрын

It will have very little impact. It costs about the same as gasoline to fill up versus about$6 to $8 to fill up an EV at home. The worst part is they charge over 100k to replace fuel cells so you have to scrap the car versus for electric the battery is 10k to 25k.

@rhett7716 6 ай бұрын

What does a new horse cost ?? 😂

@rhett7716 6 ай бұрын

@russozelinskyright on. They need to address the cause of the problem 👍

@aminsaleh6252 9 ай бұрын

hey boy it is not a negetive point for electric cars that dont make noise, it is a positive point.

@istvantoppler5999 7 ай бұрын

The one item NO ONE talks about with regard to EV's is ROAD USE TAX needed to build and maintain roads.

@nicholasprince1063 9 ай бұрын

I think the last statement in the video is the bottom line, they both have to co-exist as the both have thier pros and cons Imo, gasoline powered automobiles will take longer than expected to phase out in some parts of the world cause the infrastructure for their alternatives haven't been established globally just yet

@johncaporale6069 6 ай бұрын

Hydrogen is feasible for large trucks, not cars. The rest of this is just spin. 70 years ago almost 0 homes had a/c. Now 85% have a/c, and yet, the grid kept up.

@sausagemcgregory Жыл бұрын

What is easier to distibute... electricity through cables in a distribution network that mostly already exists or hydrogen in massive storage tanks and tankers travelling all over the country ?

@sidallen685 Жыл бұрын

There is no way the electric grid can handle that demand.

@sausagemcgregory Жыл бұрын

@@sidallen685 And you didn't answer the question, which is easier ?

@trinsit Жыл бұрын

@@sidallen685 we're upgrading everything, not just throwing millions of EVs on the road. The electrical grid is gonna have a lot more, smaller, modular nuclear builds that have a much smaller footprint, way higher safety standard, easier maintenance, etc. That's on top of renewables already replacing coal peaker plants.

@trinsit Жыл бұрын

@@sidallen685 if each house was built out with batteries and solar, it would spread the demand and put less stress on the system.

@kiae-nirodiariesencore4270 Жыл бұрын

@@sidallen685 Wrong. Google 'Six myths busted about EVs'...it takes you to the people who run the grid in the UK, they will explain why the transition away from ICE to electric motors will not be a problem.

@rajvamsi 9 ай бұрын

Hydrogen powered is good but instead of thinking about it try to improve EV tech like sodium batteries and hydrogen transportation is a huge problem

@alan4019 8 ай бұрын

my favorite part is when narrator starts shouting at 10:19

@krisam12345 9 ай бұрын

In the USA and Asia countries, people are slowly moving to Solar energy for power. so whoever has EV cars, they mostly get power from Solar energy. Currently, EV cars are mostly used for local commutes not for long distances.

@routmaster38 9 ай бұрын

Solar is limited to daylight and sunny weather.

@thomasviet8370 9 ай бұрын

@@routmaster38 Batteries are already invented

@AlanWilliams-su4bs 7 ай бұрын

EVs are capable of extended journeys not just local journeys. Go for a rest drive and see for yourself.

@whawkins88 9 ай бұрын

An alternative/backup for plug in EVs would be solar panels in the vehicle roof. Not much use in the UK though!

@wooster1414 8 ай бұрын

A full sun day would get you 3 to 5 miles from solar panels lol

@t8polestarcyan22 7 ай бұрын

Possible but in generally not feasible.

@bastiaanstapelberg9018 9 ай бұрын

Great done Toyota.....we love you. Best car in the World

@jmanke6057 9 ай бұрын

Maybe I should have said NH4 need safer batteries perhaps fuel cells may be better choice or INC with clear fuels

@playo4203 Жыл бұрын

This is pretty cool. We are half way thru 2023. I say bring the innovation. But to fight carbon emissions EVs and hydrogen vehicles alone is not enough. We fight carbon emissions by talking money out of politics. If you take the ability of politicians to be able to take money from big corporations to do their biting… then maybe we can get people in the government that is going there to truly represent us. It shouldn’t be that hard to move forward and switch to cheaper renewable energy. But the millions of dollars that big oil spends to keep using fossil fuels will make this switch impossible.

@SH1974 11 ай бұрын

I agree in many points, especially about the limited ressourses to build batteries. Hydrogen is the fuel of the future. But one question is still there... The energy to produce all that hydrogen, where does that come from? We need more electricity anyway to compensate the fossile fuel(s), no matter if we drive electric or with hydrogen! Recuperation (shound be used in any vehicle, electric or combustion!) does not necessarily be made electric, it can also be made mechanical! (with a fast spinning flywheel in a vacuum cylinder, like the KERS that was used 2009-2013 in the F1.)

@theairstig9164 7 ай бұрын

Hydrogen is the fuel of the future. Not today. Not this year. Not this decade

@bcap5311 9 ай бұрын

Looking like E.Vs are starting to destroy themselves without Toyota .😮

@routmaster38 9 ай бұрын

Two negatives,1,Carbon is life giving and dosnt need reducing,2 Hydrogen is a poor power element being very expensive to produce and store.This "new" engine is just a regular IC engine converted to run on hydrogen.

@jimo680 Жыл бұрын

This is why I'm shopping for a Toyota. They've been my heroes ever since their creation of Lexus. They have more than proved their superiority in engineering, character, and ethics. …

@quantumfx2677 Жыл бұрын

I 100 percent agree! I'm embarrassed and ashamed for the others, we are in 2023.

@nunyabidness117 9 ай бұрын

I agree. My 2004 Tacoma has 300k miles. Original clutch, no engine work, and it uses less than a half quart of oil every 5000 miles. I have no idea how American auto makers stay in business.

@marknagle-vi7og 9 ай бұрын

My wife and I bought our first Toyota Avalon new in year 2000 ever since then we’ve bought nothing but Toyota and Lexus cars. Their quality workmanship is second to none.

@HepCatJack 9 ай бұрын

Germany has come up with a Magnesium Hydrogen power paste that could power a Hydrogen fuel cell to power EV's so EV's need not mean a lack of H2 use. I think H2 tech should be used to power aviation and shipping. The thermal energy building up in the ocean can be converted to electricity using the tech being used to produce geothermic electricity (like the plant using Volcanic heat to produce electricity in Hawaii. If H2 Aviation routes are first used above areas experiencing drought, the water exhaust may help increase rainfall.

@t8polestarcyan22 7 ай бұрын

Good idea! However how many units of electricity/fuel/materials are need to make ONE unit of Hydrogen or even Magnesium Hydrogen?

@theairstig9164 7 ай бұрын

Germany or one shonk at IFAM who claimed to be making 4 tonnes of PowerPaste (TM) by 2021. They were planning to use this stuff to power electric scooters, not cars

@Gazette-O-Matic 8 ай бұрын

I think Toyota caught their appendage in the door, Any businessman knows that if you're not first to the market, you might as well never tried. Hydrogen power is too difficult to maintain. Hydrogen has to be produced, it has to be "canned" under high pressure and unlike solar panels that provide electricity to EVs it takes machinery to use outside energy to make. It's sad to see them try to promote it. You lose guys. Not to mention that if a canister of hydrogen gets punctured it'll be like 100 sticks of dynamite are going off. Somebody at Toyotat is trying to preserve their job until they can find a new one. Sad.

@samnavona 9 ай бұрын

Nothing comes quick , the battery technology is getting better and better, now we talking solid state battery, it’s an organic evolution, combustible engine is dinosaurs technology 👍

@ingopinkowski1091 9 ай бұрын

The Biggest Question is, are these governments still in power to implement EVs in 2040. Why? Because people are really pissed off with their policies.

@HardRockMiner 9 ай бұрын

I figured the whole child slavery in the Congo digging for Cobalt would have been enough to do it.. Sadly, I was wrong.

@yukelalexandre8885 9 ай бұрын

Except LFP doesn’t have that issue, and your phone/laptop still will. Go figure eh

@ferozahmed5846 9 ай бұрын

Child labor sounds harsh. Do you know that hunger is more harsh than child labor?

@HardRockMiner 9 ай бұрын

@ferozahmed5846 - So child slave labor is ok then because kids are hungry too ? Quite the logic you have there.

@kimf.wendel9113 9 ай бұрын

@@HardRockMinerit is better, and just see what it did to China. Also do keep in mind cobolt is used in Gasoline and diesel cars aswell

@HardRockMiner 9 ай бұрын

@kimf.wendel9113 - Child slave labor in The Congo is out of control because of the demand needed for EV, cellphone batteries, etc. The amounts needed to refine gas are minimal and would be nowhere near the demand needed to drive the slavery happening to get Cobalt today. You're 1 of those problems for every solution type people. You probably drive an EV, and you need to justify it to yourself by pretending that my 2 gas vehicles are just as responsible for supporting slave labor as your EV is.