Wow didn’t realize that!

there are two, but the other one is being sold as used with barely any miles

2.0l was a joke anyway.

Thanks for watching them!

it also needed a manual...funny enough, BMW offered a manual with thay engine in the Z4 before Toyota brought the manual to the inlone 6

For being so front heavy they're the only ones I see on track

The 2.0 Supra sucks, just get a GR86 for cheaper

​@carsaregood911 The GR86 sucks, just get a Miata.

Wdym tuner friendly the b58 is the new 2jz. And ya I'll take my sports car without an LSD thank you very much

Can’t you buy it used tho?

FCA is garbage Hellcat are some of the most overrated cars in existance

Do you have a source for that (aside from the click bait AI generated KZfaq vid)? And why would Stellantis invest money in bringing back a dead brand for a product in a dying market segment?

@@gww730 Blessing I seen my clickbait b******* video and it's not based on that it's based on them bring something out that could be a 6 cylinder cheaper than a mustang and they can tell now whether or not they do it I don't know it seems pretty far-fetched but I don't know if you're trying to be facetious with me but just to let you know my friend I've been in the car business for over 45 years I did everything from being vice president of roaster Wheels to being vice president of North American sales for a bounty motor cars to owning race shops to building cars for celebrities and people that have more money than celebrities big casino owners here in Las Vegas and the people that I hang out with Peter Brock look him up employee number one at Shelby America when they first started I hung around with Carol Shelby the last 24 years of his life on a daily basis Annie always had me around cuz he knows I know what I'm talking about when it comes to cars

I haven’t heard any reports of the Barracuda coming back but I’d love for it to return in that form, I’ll have to look into it, thanks!

@@MattMaranMotoring yeah man it's an article that came out on some Chrysler publication whether or not it's going to happen I find it fairly doubtful but if it does it's supposed to have the the straight six twin turbo and it's supposed to be sort of a competitor against like the EcoBoost mustang whether or not it happens I don't know I said I wouldn't hold my hopeless up for it you can look at a TK's garage OC motivator and butter the insider have talked about it

I’d guess late this year or early next year.

💯 agree with you Utopia looks ugly

If beaurocrats didn’t abuse their power to create law aka the atf for example, chevron wouldn’t have needed to be overturned

@@bradenmchenry995it’s not an abuse of power

@@laxmitty21you are extremely ignorant to chevron deference in court. It’s ok most people are. Good thing it’s gutted and the power comes back to the people

@@laxmitty21would you say the Covid rules in 2020 and 2021 were not an abuse of power?

@@Whereismyname34 🤑🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Thanks for watching and have a good weekend!

Agreed. A 4 cylinder Supra was never a good idea because one never existed. That was where the Celica came in. They could bring back the Celica but it will cannibalize GR86 sales at this point.

Congress never really makes any good decisions for the people unless it aligns with corporate interests.

@@apocalypse487 most of the time you're right however at least we can vote them out The ATF or EPA or other organizations can't be held accountable from the public

Congress aren’t experts in the things these agencies deal with. That’s like me deciding what everyone should wear for a fashion show. You can put the decision in my hands but I’m not going to make a good decision because I’m clueless on fashion lol.

@@MattMaranMotoring Hi Matt thanks for replying to my comment keep up the great videos, regarding Chevron deference My thought is if I elected you to make the decisions on laws then I wouldn't want the fashion agency making those decisions without your approval because your the boss for lawmaking and I elected you. I do agree that Congress are not experts You're 100% correct however they are the lawmakers not the agencies. When Congress makes a decision we don't support we can attempt to vote them out (doesn't always work but I do support term limits that would help). When the agencies make decisions that the populace doesn't like The only thing we can do is sue them which has helped a lot over the past year with many of the recent rules that were released however it takes a really long time and is extraordinarily expensive. Getting rid of Chevron defference gives us more of a say and respects the the separation of powers in the constitution more than having the agencies directly release rules that have the penalty of law. Well then you consider is Chevron difference was initially intended just to interpret the law to make it easier for everyday people to understand not to actually release a rule that has the penalty of law. Overall I think this is a really good thing and while not perfect Congress will listen to the people more than the agencies will and if the agencies do their job and brief Congress appropriately on the topics at they want to change then I think overall Congress should have the information needed to make appropriate decision at least in a perfect world I know it doesn't always work out that way. Thanks for the respectful conversation

Bourbon is great, but it has nothing on a great taquila, especially anejo taquila

It's not gonna do too much because the world market still exists. You should be more concerned about how this sets back everything in terms of safety for the workers. More people will die from work related injuries.

@apocalypse487 yes, that's why I said it's a tightrope. Probably not the best analogy thinking on it

​@@apocalypse487It will do a lot for American market cars, especially ones made by Ford and GM.

Then shit will never change cause so few people would willingly undergo change. It also stops people on the fence from purchasing because it stops all the development of the EV network we are pushing that is forced due to regulation. So overall worse for the average consumer

@@laxmitty21so your argument is that the government should force people to buy ev’s? You really want the government of all people to control our ability purchase transportation

Government already controls your ability to buy transportation. The point of EVs is to eliminate CO2 emissions that's causing global warming.

@@laxmitty21don’t be dumb, let the consumers choose what they want instead of the government pushing dumb shits on us

@laxmitty21 it's not going to stop companies from innovating. If the product is good people would buy it. Look at the first iPhone. People could have stayed with the flip phone but the iPhone was better and people bought it. The government didn't force it upon anyone.

The overturn of the Chevron doctrine is the worst thing that could have happened. You know how judges can get bribed into whatever the huge corporations wants them to do. And it's not just on car emissions. Letraly every aspects on registration everything can be overturn by our judges

Our food, water, our jobs. Everything

⁠@@armycorpexactly, judges bought and paid for, at the detriment of what is beneficial to the population. Mouth breathers only understand this as “Great! Bring back all the V8’s and get rid of electric vehicles” Also, the move to electrification is, in theory, to help move away from our dependence on fossil fuels and limit greenhouse gases. I consider myself an enthusiast, but also for a wide selection of vehicles, from ice to hybrid to full EV.

You actually think Congress is good at getting things done? You’ve seen their record right?

​@@armycorpI wish it was only for cars...protect our food and water plz

Yea, I bet he watches fake news.

@@Whereismyname34 the way he explained the end of the Chevron Doctrine all-but confirmed it.

I understand it just fine. No need to be condescending just because you feel differently Glenn.

Yeah! Let's prioritize cars that make loud noises over the health of the global population! Great idea! What a juvenile, selfish, mindset.