Lucliano Pavarotti.

0000000000000000

At minute 1:25 you can see that on the video only a small part of the area can be seen. Time is money and the bigger the machines the faster he can work :)

In reality even such a field likely doesn't warrant having this kind of tractor and size of plough on hand unless there are several other fields and this perhaps being not the largest either. Money is also money.

P*Funk you're absolutely right. This tractor has ~4000 more hectares to work.

Rejoneo

Vgg

William Whittle

I fix that by opening kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r5xhZZOCtNLXlok.html in second tab.

Parapemte

No music, good. Great ploughing.

bin auch der meinung

Amigo por parte baja unos 120mil dólares o más

+dontflamenogame große trecker fahren ist viel einfacher als kleine bzw ältere trecker zu bewegen, nur auf einer engen straße oder auf dem hof bzw halle wirds ein wenig unübersichtlich. etwas xerion fahren zu lernen braucht man nicht mal 2 tage.. pflügen ist natürlich neben drescher fahren die königsdisziplin

naja mittlerweile ist dreschen fahren auch nicht mehr grade schwer, gps an und fertig ^^

%%0

τσώντα

+Tractorspotter GoogleTranslate is my friend :-) I try multilanguage video description

TraktorVideos torki satlik ekince el tiraktor

TraktorVideos 0

Fiets

Mo@@maxschulte6849

+philipp krueger Mir wollten sie erzählen der Xerion schafft das nicht aber wie ihr seht, ist das gar kein Problem :-)

Benoit-Joseph Berteloot

Benoit-Joseph Berteloot

Benoit-Joseph Berteloot

Un Français

Hello P*Funk, in Europe we still like our planet and nature a little. More chemicals are required for minimum or no tillage. The crop rotations are also so often not observed. Unfortunately, more and more farmers in Europe are not working the soil because it is cheaper. This is not a good future for our planet. Opinions differ, this is mine. Greetings from Germany

What about the effects of soil erosion due to agitating the earth this much? I recognize that in America and Canada chemicals are seen as far less an issue. Everyone seems to love Roundup in the states. Monsanto can do no wrong for many farmers. Skepticism of the chemicals is far less pronounced. Are there not better alternatives to chemicals to help minimize the required amount of chemicals with reduced tillage?

That is a very good question to which I unfortunately have no answer. Some approaches of the movie "Tomorrow" (Demain) to see on Amazon Prime, I liked very much but the solution is not either. And now that Monsanto belongs to a German company (BAYER), the problem with Roundup will be solved all by itself, the first complaints are already in preparation. Do other users have a suggestion?

There is one difference between what you see here and much, but not all of Europe and what is commonly found, but again not right across the country US. It is to do with the type of climate each area has. Much of Europe is classified as having a temperate climate. As such, it tends to have a cooler summer and milder winter, particularly compared to the US. Combined with this is an rather regular if not high rainfall. But the crucial aspect of this is that all the available rainfall tends to get fully utilized. With dry conditions and few and hard rain, much of it is wasted, while really dry conditions mean the soil won''t even take it up. Prolonged periods of this means a difference in the type of plant you get and what levels of organic matter you get. Then there is mono-cropping versus a healthy crop rotation practices used in Europe. Unfortunately different techniques mean different yields and margins, but it can pretty well be established that years of max gain is less sustainable than 70 % of max margin which equals only 70% nutrient mining. Rotating what you grow can be done with specific crops in mind that have different requirement and can even include nutrient replenishing crops. Cover crops are now grown to reduce moisture loss and if you're clever, some leguminous element to that cover crop will benefit the soil. The wisdom and knowledge is all there, but many American growers are content with the relatively low cost of being mechanized of but a few crops that can be combine harvested and be done with it. It is part of why The US Mid-West is also called the dust bowl. No wind breaks between the fields and nothing was done about the diminishing quality of the soil, soil moisture retention and so on. No till tech is an answer to this, but farmers were convinced by people with vested interests, as they always have been, to go the chemical route. Unfortunately, Roundup doe not bring back organic matter nor nutrients. Europe does not believe in mono cropping, for one thing, what happens if your one crop fails, or alternatively yields really well but since everyone did really well, there is oversupply and it is worth bugger all. The plough is still the best tool for burying trash, but not so long ago an alternative arrived in the for of top down cultivation. The plough causes a hard pan in the soil over prolonged use at same depth and any form of cultivation probably does this. But subsoilers/rippers cut through that layer. If root crops are in your rotation, then you will need a plough as part of your seedbed prep. Agitating the soil is no problem in itself, it is leaving it exposed to the air means moisture loss and that is very bad. Not such and issue in the area shown here, Holland. Rolling soon after is common, as a means of minimizing the loss. High rates of evaporation are bad. Europe has problems with this in the Mediterranean region, but much less of an issue. In dry areas, no cultivation should occur with considering the moisture loss potential.

That was a fantastically insightful post Alex. So much in such a short post. Thank you very much.

Looks like a white stork :-) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_stork

Yes it's an stork, we call it "Klapperstorch"

Rusty White ile

Rusty White💤💤💤💤💤 ☁☁☁💤☁ ☁☁💤☁☁ ☁💤☁☁☁ 💤💤💤💤💤 ☁ Sleepy ☁

@@TraktorVideos bociek (bocian polski)

+Christoph Arnold Es geht dahinter noch ein ganzes Stück weiter. Auf dem Video ist nur ein kleines Stück zwischen den Häusern zu sehen. Und hey, time is money :-)

Ich pflüge meine Felder ab 30 bis 200 Ha Stücken in Russland mit Traktor 306 PS und Pflug Cairos XS 950-6V (6-Scharige). Insgesamt 460 Ha Ackerflächen. Ich schafe bis zu 50 Ha pro Tag (20 St.). Früher hatte ein großerre Pflug (8 Scharige) maximal 38 Ha pro Tag. An die Stelle verstehe ich nicht: wo spart man Zeit und Geld mit 10 Scharen auf diesen Gärten. Besser wird so sagen: hey, Jungs! Hört auf! Ich mag doch Große Spielzeuge.

Qqqqaqa

это единственный конкурент Русскому трактору к-700 и к-701 ))))

Влад Бульбашь какой конкурент? Кировец рядом не стоит ,присутствовал на соревнованиях в Германии ,открыл дверь ,по смотрел ,да ну на х.......й и закрыл ,от него дым копоть и шум а работы нет

ЕСЛИ ОТ НЕГО ДЫМ И КОПОТЬ И РАБОТЫ НЕТ ))))))значит тракторист мудак к-700 и к-701 отличные трактора для своего времени ибо давайте не будем забывать в какое время они выпускались в отличии от этого красавца из видео ролика )) а про Германию мне рассказывать не нужно я здесь живу и рабою и регулярно бываю на подобных соревнованиях и не всегда там к-700 проигрывает а чаще всего выигрывает )))

а если нае...этот лощеный буржуй вот будут там танцы с бубнами)

Всегда приятно остановиться :-)

MrPummi88 Schon mal was von festgefahrenen Vorgewende gehört?

MuZika

Disco polo

Germany, MV

ghhhhuhn

66gʻ koʻk koʻp Meni hjjhhhhhhuʼ

0

0

9

ʼʼʼ

Ja kein wunder wenn man einen so langen karrenpflug so um die ecke reißt

Mrb

سس 888

5

martin jeffery that's a stork.

Ford traktor