How could a 20 year constitutional law scholar submit something so juvenile? It's almost as if Chille has no idea how the law works.

This has Chile's fingerprints all over it: bad spelling, bad sentence structure and bad grammer. If Oram is actually writing this then Chile needs to get a refund after paying 10's of thousands of dollars for his services.

This is going be good. Thank you Patrick

"It's not a lie if you believe it" - George Costanza

If I wrote something this bad in the 12th grade my teacher would be livid and parents would be shocked. This is silly.

Chili deserves more jailtime!

The sad part of this is that his peers probably read his "legal' filings, view him as some kind of judicial super-genius, and will be copy-pasting this stuff into their own court cases.

I guarantee Chile believes this is the most intelligent, eloquent thing he has ever written.

As a retired LEO with 41 years Mr D’Arcy knows what he is talking about and has broke down this case in layman’s terms. This is a prime example why you hire someone with his experience and knowledge of the law. I’m sure he is extremely expensive but you’re paying him for his knowledge and experience in court cases such as these. Doesn’t guarantee you’re going to win but this is who you want on your side to argue your case. Very nicely done Mr. D’Arcy. Thank you.

Butt wait, Chilli is a constitutional scholar. How could he not triumph?

The LEO didn’t ask Chillr to step back 21 ‘. All he had to do was do a decent 4 it 5 feet. Chillr backed about at most two feet, then stepped forward. And Chilles interacting with the driver. No no.

He will appeal on the grounds that he had an idiot for a defense lawyer

I love that you corrected the grammar and format. It’s funny how some are so proud they can’t stop to see how incredibly ignorant they sound. Aannnddd. That’s why he’s sitting where he is. I hope like hell he keeps fighting his “good fight” and stays just this way so that he stays right where he is with the next case. And the next and the next because he “won’t stop” 😂😂

You are a fantastic editor/proofreader! Nothing gets past you. (Kudos from a retired English teacher.)

What a great analysis. I'm 99% convinced that Chilie himself made this reply and not his hired attorney. I feel like he he feels like he knows more than his hired attorney and has put his hired attorney in a hard spot.

Is there any chance you could find a different appeal brief filed by Oram and compare it to this? The prevailing theory is that team delete lawz drafted this as well as the other briefs and Oram has just been forced to file it to make their nonsense appear legitimate.

Thanks Patrick.

This is going to be real good, thanks for your videos, you do great work

I find it interesting that a white boy from Alaska ends up with the moniker he has chosen. de casteroil is phoney in every aspect of his life.

Chili is the king of word salad!! Lol This was either dictated to his lawyer or his lawyer wrote it and Chili was the editor! It’s awful as a document- let alone an appellate brief! Thanks for picking it apart- takes me back to my college days when I’d ask my dad, a prolific writer, to make corrections to my essays! He was brutal but had to be bc I was the queen of run on sentences. Miss you dad! ♥️

Seems like it lacks substance

Im pretty sure in none of the 200 other cases was the defendant so unremorseful. What a dick.

Little chileto will go nuclear upon the appellant courts rejection of this appeal. Then he'll want to add the appellant judge to his LOL cow suit against the original trial judge. The Decastro shit show of ignorance continues.😂😂😂😂😂

This was written by Chille. How can that lawyer put his name to it? I realize he’s getting paid a lot, but it’s his record.

Bunch of words - grandstanding - victim status - all part of the Chillie MO

I do not know who wrote that reply brief. I understand why all that BS filler annoys Mr. Darcy. I am in my 70s and practiced law for roughly 40 years. Back when I was a baby lawyer working in my first legal job, the various Bar journals were publishing articles urging lawyers to drop all the excess verbiage one sees in this reply. Back then and certainly it is the same way now, plagiarism is the greatest form of flattery in the legal profession. If one had to write a points & authorities or a brief on an issue, the first thing one would do was ask other attorneys if they had a successful brief on the issues you had to address in your case. Most law firms had brief banks with hard copies. When computers became standard in law firms, you could find all manner of briefs online. You could visit the law library and look at the templates in the forms and practice books. The problem was and still is, that this perpetuates that filler language. After all, if it worked for the guy who gave me this copy, it'll work for me. Some of it is based on old traditions and customs - like saying "Comes Now" etc. The one thing I do not understand is I have been told by several attorneys who practice in Las Vegas that Oram is a respected attorney who does good work. But that document was filled with conclusions and silliness. It reads more like something Chille would write using some form book from the prison law library. Or something I wrote when I was a summer intern after my first year of law school. Fortunately, the attorney I worked for just sat down and took my crap apart and explained to me all the mistakes I was making in my drafting.

It's been years since I've had to submit any sort of Appellate Brief but one thing I do remember is that they need to be sharp and to the point. Imagine a law school student (law scholar!) submitting this as a piece of assessment. Immediate failing grade.

I have a few questions: 1. Did Chillie write this? 2. Does a licensed lawyer's name have to be on a brief even if they are pro se? 3. If you answered yes to the first question; why in the hell would you let that man use your name on this brief? 4. Is there no spell-check in jail? (It's not that important. More of a thought)

Sentence interrupters are technically called non-fluencies. Add Chili's propensity for staccato sentences.

Hey Pat, I LOVE the notation you wrote at 3:36 "LMFAO!" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Good one!

I really enjoy these examinations and critique on writing style. It applies both to legal briefs and wider writing. Fascinating work!

When Chilli was a child, he was a chronic bedwetter. I wonder which bunk he's on in jail?

Patrick, Do you think Chille is drafting these and his lawyer is allowing Chille to use his name as if it was drafted by a lawyer? If yes, why would a lawyer allow it when it seems detrimental to his reputation?

Thanks again Patrick for another wonderful post.

There's no mistakes. The legal scholar spent weeks perfecting the answer and on his mind its a masterpiece. He probably had a dozen legal expert criminals proof read it for him.

Chille wrote this again. He canNOT stay out of his own way. This is just so perfect. For a Constitutional Law Scholar, he is a complete buffoon. Amazing that anyone follows this. f o o l !!

This sounds like Chille wrote this brief with all the typos, bad grammar etc and just had his attorney sign it. My personal opinion why would any lawyer allow anyone who wasn’t one of his staff type a brief loaded with mistakes and just sign the document. I would think that the lawyer would want to protect his reputation as an officer of the court.

Way to go “legal team” of team DLZ. You guys are really knocking it outa the park. 😂.

I find it almost impossible to believe that this was written by Oram. Everything I have read about him has said he is a well regarded, experienced, attorney. This is NOT the writing of someone who knows what they are doing. Some of these “mistakes” are so elementary, I’ve got to believe that Oram threw up his hands and let Chillie write this himself, or gave it to a law school intern he has working in his office. No experienced trial lawyer is going to make so many blatant misrepresentations. It’s one thing to argue the facts in favor of your client, it’s another thing to misstate the record.

I couldn’t help laughing when I saw that Chillie’s name is in all caps in the ransom note style appellate brief. 😂

Did someone duct tape Chito's mouth closed? It's been a long time since he's sent out one of his "Woe is me!" news from jail posts. I'm imagining him curled up, hugging himself, sobbing in a puddle of pee while hiding under his bed.

The constipational lost scallop is as useful to society as a white crayon.

I think Chilli wrote this, not a lawyer.

Many of my college students spent so much time trying to “sound smart” they seemed to forget the purpose of the assignment. I often read documents by people who think there is a trick to sounding educated. They never realize that people don’t “sound smart” they ARE smart. The document is simple a vehicle. Thanks again for another scholarly analysis.

Before my late Wife went into law, She 1st majored in English...we would call this document clumsy at best

I am disabled & my medication in the morning takes a while to kick in. It is hard to function at first no less laugh or smile. However, your ‘Ransom note’ WRITTEN across Chile’s brief, (corrected ‘’B’ capitulation 🤣🤣), made me laugh out loud! It’s a good thing I had swallowed my first sip of coffee or I would have spewed it out of my mouth and made a mess! Love your straight to the point deadpan style & we do sincerely appreciate your legal knowledge that, unfortunately for him, obviously still ‘hits that brick wall’ of Chile’s ego! The type of narcissistic displays that Chille has historically shown refuses to accept the excellence of your expertise and advise as we watch this ‘car wreak’ as his proclamation of being a Constitutional Scholar, while slaughtering any definition of such, in his entertaining yet ridiculous, wording in his appeals contradicts it has become comical ! Thanks for your time and willingness to educate us layman while giving us a good laugh, knowingly or not! ❤️🌟 Excuse errors as my one finger typing is still fighting to function😉😊.

My fourth grade papers never were this bad. Patrick, you have my deepest sympathy for reading this.

'The Land of Oz'. A perfect description 😂

Two words for Chille: Get. Bent. I wasnt gonna say the F word, but im still gonna laugh my arse off all yhe way home for every failure chille decastro has. TTU!

Not even Obi-Wan can keep him from having this conviction and sentence on his record.

I’d bet my bottom dollar that DeCastro INSISTED on drafting this reply himself! He always has to have the last word.

Chille and Jeremy Dewitte should be cell mates. A "Law Scholar" and a "State Agent". Pure entertainment!!!

The biggest omission in this writing is Chille failed to state that he is a Constitutional Scholar. Then the appellate court would know they are reading something that is new law.

This is written like a freshman essay when you need 2000 words

Thank you Counselor. I always learn something from your videos.

Hey there he is.Hey patrick👍

Damn, you just ripped it apart. He could get several lessons just from those fifteen minutes, good basic lessons. But he won't.

Chile has almost 100k in dummy donations and he decided to write his OWN appeal instead of hire an appelate lawyer. 😂 Cue dunce cap!

Could Chili actually be doing any of this garbage on purpose?

In Nevada the judges always say no phones except for court officers.

All this from a " Constitutional Scholar". He manages to make a fool of himself more and more all the time.

Cholo DeCastro cant help but wow them for a win now

I don’t understand the strategy of talking about the right to film when he wasn’t arrested for that. It almost begs the question of whether or not these appeals are truly important to the defendant.

Throwing everything against the wall, hoping something sticks. This cannot be the work of a seasoned attorney.

Well, Pegleg Finance calls DeCastro “ Captain Conclusory”. If the shoe fits…😂

This looks like one of my Year 12 papers looks like after I have finished trying to grade it 🫠

Thank you for making that quick and painless - I want to hear about it, but it's so awful to read through.

I think Chili us trying to do this himself so he can pocket most of 70 thousand that his gullible veiwers sent. But Chilli at least show he is trying or people would be pissed knowing he didnt use that money on a lawyer.

What's really sad is that most of his followers will think it's brilliant.

THAT’S APPALLING.

His prison law degree didn’t pay off this is fourth grade grammar. lmao. Ok, I’m laughing at chille’s appellate brief.

As usual Pat shuts down this ridiculous appeal...lol 😂😅

This is an embarrassment to the lawyer. How could any lawyer allow this drivel? I guess Chille is paying so an exasperated lawyer let's it go.

Well, this aged like fermented goat milk. 😂😂😂👌

I wish people would go back to yelling Rodney King when they get arrested instead of I can't breathe.

You have to admit for a 20-year constipation law scholar, it isn't that bad. It is writing in exactly what he deals in with his constipation law.

Thank you, as always Patrick! You stopped quickly! Thought my WiFi had dropped out! 😂😂😂

Watching this video it was amusing to have an advert break for "Grammarly". Much of the writing style appears to be similar to previous Chille submissions. As a lay person the document appears to be written to impress his fans not reverse his conviction.

CLEARLY!

Fancy language makes chili dog feel important. 😂

I'm with many other subscribers here Patrick & reckon this is Tiny Chilleto's work for sure.

Looks like he won the appeal now and got the sentence overturned.

All this is missing is being written in crayon.

Nothing but a fool...😅😅

My morning fix from the great Patrick

Oram actually filing this shit convinces me even further that he's just another ambulance-chaser.

Maybe you mentioned this before in your previous videos about Chille DeCastro, but who is Christopher R. Oram, Esq.? Is he really a lawyer? I can't believe a "real" lawyer would allow his name to be put at the end of this "brief" that Chille DeCastro, the "law scholar" that he claims to be, actually "wrote." I can't believe any lawyer would risk possibly losing their law license or getting sanctioned for including his name on this piece of crap. Please comment.

He's too arrogant to not interfere in the briefs, he thinks he's smart. The attorney must really enjoy dealing with the fusspot.

Chile’s attorney does not appear to understand what “brief” means.

If a length of space is decreed in law, all a police officer need do is to continuously approach the "defendant" and thereby invoke "distance" from him or her to the defendant, as a breach of law.

Ouch, chillito just failed lawyer class with a huge F.

If Oram really did write that brief , he should be ashamed as an Officer of the Courts. His presentation of the Last Word. It truly resembles what a 1st year law school student would submit

Thank you Patrick for taking time to help explain all the legalese! I would never understand all of it if you didn’t explain it!

This did not age well. The constitution is more important than grammer.

These videos are also excellent writing refreshers. Thank you!

How can his attorney allow him to submit this ? I thought he was locked up in a dungeon? How does he have so much freedom to write an appeal ? 😂

What do you mean? Chile is a "Constitutional Scholar", he was rail roaded LOL

Looks like Chillie's I Can't Believe It's Not a Lawyer is doing him no favors.

I thought Chille was a self-proclaimed constitutional legal scholar and analyst... How can you, a real lawyer, possibly be qualified to do such an analysis on filings of such a brilliant mind like Chille's??

the judge needs to look at the charges and increase them