Other cops.

...... the courts.....

#LowIQrequiredForQI

I would guess protocol? Don't they get trained..and some protocol for what usually happen?..( or supposed to happen)

The jury decides what's reasonable. On top of that is the precedent system.

Most power to you! I feel you,same happened to me in my own home! Getting ready to fight it rn.

@@michealmonty686 godspeed brother. Ive beaten my own demons but its not over yet. I still plan on making a change. Even if it is not significant.

Happened to me as well

Know the feeling all to well,going threw it.

I feel your pain, I to was violated by police as a white man, they don't care about skin color, they just want your money no matter how they get it, it cost me well over $5k so far and several trips to jail, it has ruined my life and made me not wanting to be here as well, these public servants are all criminals living off the people like leeches, i was stopped by state trooper for my daytime running lights which are legal, i refused to give him i.d. until he gave probable cause to stop me, he arrested (kidnapped) me, impounded my private truck, he made up interfearing with government operations, resisting arrest, led violation and no d.l., the judge entered a plea for me (practice law from the bench), at trial i proved the trooper didn't have probable cause to stop me, the judge said by his opinion i am guilty of all the charges and sent me to jail 12 months interfearing 6 months resisting, my bondsman filed an appeal for me to get me out of jail, been over 2yrs since the illegal stop and arrest and i haven't had a jury trial yet, i lost all faith in this defacto government, Good luck to you and all who have been violated by this corrupt system calling themselves public servants.

with your info I see why you lost the case. I'm not knocking you. I'm here to help you. Read my long ass guide above to your freedom. Cheers Will

Correct A phone call is never probable cause.

not if its an excited utterance exception to hearsay!

@@dragonf1092 not true

@@mrsoul680 excited utterance is purely subjective. Do better!

remember if only one thing... Custodian of Records.. they hold the keys. If you wanna read a shit load more please read my informative guide above if it hadnt been removed already. I'm hear to help straighten some things out.

The federal courts have generally held that the right to consent is held by the person that controls the space. (What is known in landlord/tenant law as "possession of the premises"). Therefore, if I have someone staying in a room in my house that locks that room, only that person has the right to consent to a search, because even though I own the house, I have transferred "possession" of the room to the other person. Application of this doctrine in juvenile law has gone both ways- it depends upon which federal circuit you live in. The courts most often tends to consider the age of the child in attaching an autonomous privacy right distinct from the right of the parent, but this has not been the only determining factor. If rent is paid, it will always fall as a "landlord/tenant" transaction and as such would be no different than a landlord consenting to a search of a house (which has been rejected by the courts). Because the law is so murky in this area, it is best that law enforcement have the consent of the child or a warrant (as the Supreme court of the United States hasn't yet taken up the issue directly).

At some point, it has to be under the discovery rules- However, the identity of an informant doesn't root in search and seizure law- it roots in the right to confront witnesses and in the fourteenth amendment due process of law.

I agree. Before I complain to DOJ /IG I am gathering my info this was very useful. No One follows the law.

Dear Mr Operator if you follow that flow chart you too will be flowing in line at criminal court. Please read my long ass informative guide above. You can thank me later. Good day sir

They treason both the 4th and 5th and ALWAYS HAVE.....NO PROBABLE cause.

Google it. "An educated citizenry is a vital requisite for our survival as a free people."

would you say it it set up like lying to put in jail police officers all

the link to the flowchart isn't working

I would like this float sharp

Excuse me flowed chart

Ripon Research report them, file a claim, contact an attorney

I would personally be against the notion of a "good faith" exception for reasons of strict construction of the U.S. Constitution. The text of the fourth amendment doesn't appear to allow any "exceptions". Therefore, our exceptions to the fourth amendment in the classical sense that we've come to know them- is in my opinion- inappropriate judicial amendment of the constitutional text as opposed to mere interpretation of the text. Such is an offense to the separation of powers.

What about conflicting evidence in a probable cause statement? Times, dates and the validity of a witness?

Plain view.

don't kn ow what you are asking. law is same whether occupied or not

No

@@HM-sx6mg What is a hotep ???

sovereign citizen bs

Issued or shown to you?

CIVIL LAW SUIT WIN

inevitable discovery doctrine probably screws ur case

Not engaged in commerce? Not carrying passengers and or freight for hire? No plates tags needed....no subject matter jurisdiction because no underlying statutory enactment. Sure, you can find the "law" that says "we can bust you if you got no plates". but that is a penalty statute...where is the underlying legislative enactment compelling you (not engaged in commerce) to present yourself to the dmv to get signed up? they are prosecuting with a penalty statute. Presumptive jurisdiction. Huge due process problem

No legal lawful search warrant then they are guilty of illegal unconstitutional search and seizure and kidnapping. They should be sued and charged personally and officially under title 18 U.S.C. sections 241,242. And title 5 U.S.C. section 7311 Ex. ORD. No. 10450 subsection 5, title 18 U.S.C. section 1918 in a federal court of law.

4th amendment only protects you against police not landlords

You have this all wrong. Common law is actually that part of law which is judicial-made as opposed to legislature-made. Statutory law is that part of law which is made by the legislature. Both may involve criminal and civil - where criminal law involves what are considered transgressions against the public in the name of the government and civil law generally encompasses those wrongs against individual private persons. Things like Admiralty/Maritime, etc. are actually specific practice areas of law. Some practice areas may be one or the other, or some can overlap criminal and civil. This is largely dependent upon statutory law.

No. Have them show the warrant and call the police on the police.

@@minniepenny7793 thanks 😊

illegal and all the evidence gets thrown out

Probable cause is only to get a legal lawful search warrant. And no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause.

All that is unconstitutional therefore null and void.

You were armed robbed and carjacked by a treasonous felon in violation of the 4th and 5th amendments.....

So o had court for the no license last week and I took my license to prove I had it and they dropped that charge. I went to see if I could get my phone back and was told they're holding it for evidence and was waiting for judge to sign warrant. What gets me is if the judge thought there was some major things that could bring some serious charges against me he would've signed a warrant already.

@@6StimuL84 I like your attitude Mr. Bond If you have some time next visit to the lu please read my informative guide that will no doubt sharpen everyone's mind. Its long but so is waiting on PO officer. Good Day Sir

A k9 is a officer therefore no legal lawful search warrant it was a illegal unconstitutional search and seizure.

"Reasonable" means applying the common sense of a prudent person, pretty much.

i want you to think about that "the coming constitutional convention rewrites" pollution's and top public servants (governed by the 1%ile) rewriting the constitutional protections of the general public the 1 percentile just pay their way out of things even to have no record of those things so what protections are they going to remove those people are the ones making laws to justify the removal legally of those protections those people doing the reviews will be the same people pushing for lessened protections. how can anyone believe constitutional changes are a good thing???? the "reasonable" will weakened to become something like suspicion if they get their hands on the constitution no one should be allowing change to the constitution if i was american i would be fighting constitutional rewrites

J may right! What may be considered “reasonable” to me may not be “reasonable” to you. I remember being pulled over for a failed inspection sticker traffic stop; then immediately being told that because of me having that failed inspection card (even though it was just given to me that day and therefore in my state I had 30 days to make my repairs) the police offer so called had “probable cause” to search my vehicle because he received a phone call that my passenger and I were distributing narcotics. So he had to search my vehicle. Now #1: in my opinion, people are legally allowed to drive with a failed inspection as long as the date on that card is within the time frame repairs need to be made to pass. I had no other reasons to be pulled over besides that LEGAL pink card in my window. I know SMELLS LIKE CACA. Then after that fool seen my passenger, not me the owner and operator of the vehicle my passenger, who was convicted of cds charges in the past, he lies to me and says that he has to search me warrant less cuz he got a call we were riding around selling drugs. The stop was illegal from the start! Unless he knew that inspection card was expired; having a feeling iS NOT PROBABLY CAUSE! That’s just like me saying just because someone is tall they must be good at basketball! People drive around with regular inspection stickers EXPIRED AF! You can’t pull over EVERYBODY! They are using the US constitution which is supposed to protect WE THE PEOPLE, to cover their asses! If I ran into this cop; I would SUE THE MUSTACHE off his psychic ass! Phone calls and rumors from anonymous people are not probable cause either! If some stranger randomly called you and said it was raining donuts && coffee, you cannot say well: it rains sometimes; plus I like donuts && coffee so it MUST be true! Random people could just call the police and say ANYTHING! Especially a person that doesn’t like the person or is a “rival” as you said. Honestly I see why they have police offers who regularly give tickets out and then they have detectives. If every cop was a detective we would be in trouble! Plus just like that fool that illegally searched plus arrested me && my passenger THERE WAS NO FLOW OR ORDER OF OPERATIONS To the search. Hell I wasn’t even asked consent to search I was told that he had the authority to! He found nothing && then called dogs! Yet he didn’t see anyone doing nor selling drugs! There were no physical drugs or paraphernalia in sight even! Next if his ass didn’t find anything; he would be calling a female cop to strip me naked && that’s exactly what he did after still finding nothing. Yeah I had a convicted ex repeat offender. Yeah he still was paying his probationary fine. But what did ANY of that have to do with me? I never had any drug charges! Conveniently they found an empty tiny weed bag. The dog sniffs it out in a place not even in plain view && not near my passenger nor I... (hmmm interesting. Much have been another one of these “feelings” for probable cause!) I don’t even believe it had residue in it! I don’t even remember any tests done to prove it was even paraphernalia! No finger prints or DNA samples taken from the bag to prove it was even mine! No drug tests taken from me to prove I was even under the influence! But because it was in my car and someone called and said we were up to no good; it had to be mine! Like someone couldn’t have planted it in there to frame me while I had my back windows down and was in the store??? Could’ve been this “callers” paraphernalia. But did they care to investigate it??? No my stupid stupid self didn’t even stop them while I was ahead. I could’ve went to jail for 3 to 5 years for this CACA. THE BEST PART IS I CANT EVEN GET A JOB AT MY LOCAL MCDONALDS OR MOVE INTO AN APARTMENT THANKS TO THESE CRIME THIRSTY ROOKIE NEW JERSEY HONKEES! Everybody thinks I get High now! Thanks to these idiots! I cried cuz I’m trying not to be an exotic dancer anymore which was my job. Tryina take care of my 4 year old son && thanks to these ugly human beings; I cannot even get a job in my state! Can’t even dance cuz of the corona virus now. Got denied 5 good state job positions; got my background check back and BOOM! I’ve got a possession charge...I was so happy to not go to jail my naive ass didn’t even get a laywer. Ohh noooo. I’m not gonna let these Cracker Jacks be the reason my son goes hungry && homeless! I mean seriously! This is people’s lives these cops are fucking with! And no, not every cop is bad or stupid but damn it if this is not taking advantage I don’t know what is! PLEASE LETS TRY TO DO MORE PROTECTING AND LESS SERVING IF WE WANNA BE HEROES! GOOD PEOPLE DONT GIVE FIRST TIME OFFENDERS WITH NO RECORD FELONY CHARGES! That’s only something a sadist would do. They know the law and we don’t! I’ll never let a police offer or anyone for that manner make a fool out of me again! Or block me from reaching my goals! Boy this is a long ass rant but I had to say something because this WHOLE ENTIRE BS OF A VIDEO gives these sadists the permission to ruin lives && make false accusations with little or no proof. Unless a car commits an accident or runs a red light (not yellow) you people shouldn’t even have the right to pull us over! I don’t care that you wanna prove to your boss that you’re working so you’re giving out as many tickets and arrest as you can! People are losing their jobs; licenses and whole lives because of power tripping self entitled no warning on a first offense giving ego maniacs like you so called police men! To hell with the government and these judges && prosecutors in these racist towns that back up this non sense too! It’s not our fault that there is no crime in your area! That doesn’t give you the right to make up crimes! Just because you know the wording of the law and we don’t!

ALWAYS RECORD THE COPS

Archas1000 You haven’t lived in Amerikka for very long, have you?

The Terry Stop literally includes "suspicion of a crime" in it. #OverturnTerryvOhio #DeleteLawZ #JusticeBerzerker

Excellent breakdown brother... simple and plain,,yet separating the narrative without delay💯

GeckoProductions the whole point of the fourth amendment is to protect us from the whole reasonable suspicion b.s that's the very point of the fourth amendment, if all they needed is reasonable suspicion then we would not have a fourth amendment because there would be no need for it.

GeckoProductions The real truth is, and he’s subversively explaining it, the 4th amendment is a facade. It was a barricade and the authoritarians broke it down long ago....

Actually, The actual facts litigated in Terry v. Ohio make it more of a "hunch" that was at issue in that case as opposed to "articulable" reasons specific to the person per se. In Terry, the issue was whether or not the officer had a right to search for weapons where there was no reason to believe that the specific individual had a weapon but from officer experience there was the knowledge that weapons are frequently encountered on traffic stops. It was the court in it's opinion that took things a step farther from there and slightly expanded the doctrine to include articulable as well as semi-articulable suspicions.

Yea cops like to target some ppl.

The supreme court has ruled that mere suspicion is not enough for reasonable cause

29:15 ✌️💞

Youre in for trouble. Read my guide to freedom above. One day when it pays off you getting to the bottom of it, coffees on you. Cheers Rene

what

standing is a theory of law that states the person bringing a case must have suffered personal injury in fact. NO prosecutors have it, locus standi is the latin look into and get back to me.@@mrsoul680

if they found it abandoned yes if they stole it no

Give them credit for at least being interested in learning

CarsonRay Martin we that comment are capable of comprehensive cognition , whereas your deficiency is what is laughable .

Stephanie Zemblidge probable cause is the fact or the evidence of a crime, not the suspicion of a crime, if it we're the suspicion of a crime we wouldn't need the fourth amendment. It would be pointless. Lol

that's what i'm here for

if they have pc they can search vehicle

nope

wrong

I agree @Stephanie zemblidge, I was a victim of a false accusation something that I was never part of. and bc someone decided to retaliate against me the police used the person's allegations to arrest me without asking questions even after repeatedly saying I have proofs that shows me somewhere else. They ignored me completely. I never had problems with the law I dont even have a parking ticket.

no sir he's a professional liar that will say what ever the hell he needs for you to incriminate yourself. If asked you been to jail before, sorry sir I CAN NOT ASSIST YOU in your investigation. that whole part of the what ever you say can and will be...blah blah is a trick... as it should be read is, every word that come from your mouth will likely lead to your imprisonment... You too may want to read my guide above...

all truth with out the fat. Cheers sir. Take a lu break and read my long ass guide above..

no it doesn't have you read it

The flow chart essentially breaks down what the law is- The phrase "reasonable person" essentially means that one considers the experience of the world as might be told by an average person on the street. Fourth amendment law is very much still alive. All we have to do is look at the recent U.S. supreme court term to see this.

@@Harlem55 the supreme court isn't what is taking you to jail. After violating your 4th amendment. That's totally different Than written in the constitution. The cops being allowed to lie they're not manufacturing let's be real. They lie as the integrity and honor of a police officer is nowhere near what it once was.

@@wethepeoples6349 The thing is that the constitution says NOTHING about lying. However- lying about certain things affects substantial due process of law- which IS mentioned in the constitution. That is where the distinguishment comes in.

Well none of it matters anywsy we have no rights any more courts are about money or commerce theres no such thing as justice accept maybe thru the supreme courts the police do what they want and the judicial systems allow it because all they see is dollars. You cant evan get a commonlaw court now its all admeraltyand commerce give them your trust and you may walk or fight it believing in your rights and in justice they win both ways they get your trust and you get locked up, thats how living in a country based on lies and ran by a secret satanic society the only rights we have is to try and give them equity for our freedom, and all of the people especially the cops will lie out there ass to get what they want satan has no concience thats how these evil people can go to sleep at night they are satanic and they have no concience the c.p.s are the most evil and the cops.

@@gwencooksey2091 Don't blame the devil or Satan or any other evil you may conjure up. Man was given the knowledge and has taken full advantage to be as bad as he wants to be. Every story in the Bible, where the idea of evil comes from, does not show or have a story of evil except for what God allowed to happen to Job and his family. Man is evil period. Don't blame it on the Satanic forces. They know and don't do it but watch man do it to their brothers and sisters. It is hilarious. If not sad. Hope for a second chance.

no sir it's not the war on drugs it's the war against us ALL. Me included. Find useful long ass informative guide above. Cheers and Good day Mr. Brown

How so?