No video

Trinity Test HD Colourization - The First Atomic Explosion, 1945

  Рет қаралды 757,697

Glimpses Into the Past

Glimpses Into the Past

Күн бұрын

Incredible colourized footage of the very first atomic bomb detonation on July 16, 1945. The test was part of the Manhattan Project, a top-secret U.S. research project during World War II aimed at creating an atomic bomb.
At 5:29 a.m. local time, the plutonium-based implosion device, named "The Gadget," was detonated. The explosion released an enormous amount of energy, equivalent to approximately 25 kilotons of TNT. The heat fused the sand below into a green glass, as the mushroom cloud from the blast rose to a height of over 7.5 miles (12.1 kilometers).
The Trinity test confirmed the viability of the implosion design and the successful use of plutonium as a fissile material. The success of the test paved the way for the subsequent bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan a few weeks later, which had a profound impact on the outcome of World War II and ushered in the nuclear age.
RESTORATION
----------------------------------------
1. Sharpened and upscaled to 1080p (Topaz AI)
2. Colourised footage (Deep Exemplar Based Video Colorization)
3. Increased frame-rate to 60fps
----------------------------------------
If you enjoyed this video and would like to see more restorations, please like and subscribe. Much more to come, and you will not be disappointed.

Пікірлер: 1 200
@christianvennemann9008
@christianvennemann9008 Жыл бұрын
The fact that this is tiny compared to what we have now is utterly terrifying
@trenken
@trenken Жыл бұрын
This bomb really wasnt that big. It looks wayyy bigger in this vid bc there is no point of reference to see the scale of it. It wasnt very big. It often gets exaggerated by people bc of the amount of time that has passed. People have this mythical idea of it that wasnt reality. The 80,000 that died at hiroshima, that was a very condensed city. All those people that died were around the busy city center where it went off. Think of manhattan. Its not big at all, but it has millions crammed into it. It wouldnt even take a nuke that big to kill 100s of thousands. So 80k in a busy city like hiroshina doesn’t really say a whole lot about the size of the bomb. This was a primitive, small nuke. The crater was only 4 feet deep and 80 yards wide, smaller than an nfl football field.
@2148aa
@2148aa Жыл бұрын
@@trenken The fire bombing of Tokyo with early napalm that killed 80,000 don't get enough pages in the history books.
@Boombi_
@Boombi_ Жыл бұрын
The trinity explosion was around 20+ kilotons, the beyrut explosion which I believe is a good reference since we have so much recent footage of it with the buildings around it to have context was just above 1 kiloton, so yeah the "size" of the explosion would have been percieved as ~2.75 times as big, just when watching the Beyrut explosion imagine a 2.75 times taller and wider explosion.
@trenken
@trenken Жыл бұрын
@@2148aa yeah its become a footnote at this point.
@cntygrlby2006
@cntygrlby2006 Жыл бұрын
Does it truly matter regarding the scale, etc.... U're trying to writ it off-make excuses & so on in regards to the bomb. And please spare me of the argument of whether use it or invasion/fatalities of both sides, etc.... The effects are still on going to this day of the droppings, never mind of the world issues of the development of it. It wasn't right them & it's not now. How long til WWIII. Once the fuse is lit well go to ground zero-at best you'll just see the flash..... if that.
@user-tb2wz1tr8y
@user-tb2wz1tr8y Жыл бұрын
Just imagine putting all of this together, being a part of that team, and having no idea what you were about to witness ... and then seeing the actuality of it all. It has to be absolutely shocking.
@stysner4580
@stysner4580 Жыл бұрын
I think this must've been somewhat exciting. I think the real shock was realizing you were directly involved in the killing of >140.000 people later that year...
@aaaaa-nw8hc
@aaaaa-nw8hc Жыл бұрын
... and having no idea? Oh c'mon. It's not a child's play. 💥💣
@Simoneytj
@Simoneytj Жыл бұрын
Having no idea🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 sure bro
@codemechanic2024
@codemechanic2024 Жыл бұрын
Only few workers knew they were making a bomb. The rest were told their work can end the war in europe.
@user-tb2wz1tr8y
@user-tb2wz1tr8y Жыл бұрын
@@Simoneytj ... It had never been done and it exceeded their expectations, as stated. In other words, they saw something they had never seen before.
@danielpryor8492
@danielpryor8492 Жыл бұрын
Bro just spoiled the Oppenheimer movie
@Sammus_Miner
@Sammus_Miner Жыл бұрын
You can't really spoil it, considering that it's history
@localChaparrito4985
@localChaparrito4985 Жыл бұрын
​@Samus_Miner nah, really?
@Sammus_Miner
@Sammus_Miner Жыл бұрын
@localChaparrito4985 I don't know if your being genuine or sarcastic
@localChaparrito4985
@localChaparrito4985 Жыл бұрын
@@Sammus_Miner same as Daniel I'd say
@Sammus_Miner
@Sammus_Miner Жыл бұрын
@@localChaparrito4985 oh
@ihswap
@ihswap Жыл бұрын
For scale these cameras were placed 10k yards(5.5 mi) away. Go to Google Earth and draw a measurement line from your home to 10k yards in any direction and you get a really good perspective how gigantic this explosion was. Being this far and still having to pan the camera up to see it. It's insane and this is a "small" nuke. This was at least 25x more powerful than the Beirut explosion from 2020. Like imagine something the size of a basketball exploding 6 miles away from you and this is what you see? Nukes are straight out of science fiction I swear. Horrific yet Amazing.
@TbV-st8ef
@TbV-st8ef 11 ай бұрын
Omg stop being so freaked out yknow the sun is equal to billions of atomic bombs right? And there's still stars 1 million times more luminous than the sun
@leothehuman_9476
@leothehuman_9476 11 ай бұрын
@@TbV-st8ef Yeah. And we managed to get the sun on earth. And, the fireball of an atomic bomb could be even hotter than the sun if you didn't know.
@TbV-st8ef
@TbV-st8ef 11 ай бұрын
​@@leothehuman_9476 however the size and longevity of the nuclear fireball is nothing compared to stars or even the core of the earth, which is something like 2x10^31 joules or 4.78x10^15 MegaTons of TNT. tsar bomba's the largerst nuclear bomb ever built if you didn't know (you likely don't) around 50 megatons.
@TbV-st8ef
@TbV-st8ef 11 ай бұрын
@@leothehuman_9476 assuming that during the height of the cold war earth's total nuke stockpile is 100k (which in reality the number is smaller), and each nuke is 20 megatons (which is also larger than cold war era nukes), which would make the global arsenal's yield merely 2M megatons.
@TbV-st8ef
@TbV-st8ef 11 ай бұрын
@@leothehuman_9476 imagine liking your own comment lol
@iLikeTheUDK
@iLikeTheUDK Жыл бұрын
0:25 That second clip REALLY puts this all into scale. Imagine seeing piles of flying dust THIS TALL form before you in such an instant. You would forget to breathe for a good few seconds. This is as mesmerising as it is terrifying. Haunting, in both senses of the word
@dylannnnnnnnn
@dylannnnnnnnn Жыл бұрын
That’s a slow motion
@worsethanhitlerpt.2539
@worsethanhitlerpt.2539 Жыл бұрын
Im suprised the stumps of the tower legs were still there it was supposedly 25 kilotons at 100 ft. height there should have been a CRATER about 30 ft. deep
@kayemcee9967
@kayemcee9967 Жыл бұрын
what was the distance from the explosion for the 2nd clip?
@lifeisdead01
@lifeisdead01 Жыл бұрын
​@@kayemcee9967apparently the closest camera was about 2.85 miles away. Base camp, the closest observation point, was approximately 5.65 miles away
@iLikeTheUDK
@iLikeTheUDK Жыл бұрын
@@dylannnnnnnnn that makes it even more terrifying, imagine how fast it is IRL
@Snail2G
@Snail2G 8 ай бұрын
0:25 utterly insane to think that's an actual bomb/explosion, and not an animation, movie, or video game. The sheer power being unleashed there is just ridiculous. To see that amount of smoke appear so quickly and spread so far. Mind blowing. I would've loved to see one of these tests with my own eyes.
@briantaylor9285
@briantaylor9285 Жыл бұрын
The fact that this is considered "small" by today's standards shouldn't sit well with anyone. Little Boy was even "weaker", at 15 kilotons, yet its detonation killed around 70,000 INSTANTLY. 😳
@AverageAlien
@AverageAlien Жыл бұрын
Sits very well with me. We've stopped world wars forever
@briantaylor9285
@briantaylor9285 Жыл бұрын
@@AverageAlien uh...you sure about that?
@AXELVISSERS
@AXELVISSERS Жыл бұрын
​@@AverageAlien come back to this comment in a few months/years
@ericwilson178
@ericwilson178 Жыл бұрын
@@briantaylor9285 When was the last time we were at war with Russia?
@ericwilson178
@ericwilson178 Жыл бұрын
@@AXELVISSERS Mutually Assured Destruction. For almost 80 years that has kept everybody safe. I'm sitting about four miles from the Y-12 National Defense Complex. They maintain and upgrade nuclear warheads and have the largest depository of bomb-grade Uranium in the world.
@potato22222
@potato22222 Жыл бұрын
" We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and, to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." I suppose we all thought that, one way or another." - J. Robert Oppenheimer, 1965
@nuck-
@nuck- Жыл бұрын
One of the most awful things ever done in human history was dropping these on innocent civilian cities. I think we just look past how abhorrently evil it was just because it ended the conflict with Japan. We forget it would be like Russia dropping a nuke on newyork city to stop the conflict in Ukraine if USA put troops on the ground there. Its just untold levels of evil. Why do we give USA so many passes for the evils?
@creightonjason
@creightonjason Жыл бұрын
Didnt Oppenheimer mutter 'My god what have I done?' when it detonated
@thesenate8477
@thesenate8477 Жыл бұрын
​@@creightonjasonhe said he thought of the specific line from Bhagavad Gita and didn't rlly say anything
@oldpain7625
@oldpain7625 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't seem like such little plutonium should be able to irradiate such a large area. Incredible power. It's pretty wild we figured this technology out in WWII. What a leap in understanding.
@kitsachie.
@kitsachie. Жыл бұрын
We peaked as a civilization already, things are just getting worse.
@jaredf6205
@jaredf6205 Жыл бұрын
@@kitsachie.Oh yeah, things were so great in the 40s.
@kitsachie.
@kitsachie. Жыл бұрын
@@jaredf6205 American cities started to sharply decline right after the 60s. The US losing the Vietnam war was the start of the decline and 9/11 was the cherry on top.
@jaredf6205
@jaredf6205 Жыл бұрын
@@kitsachie. Are you talking about the crime rate increasing in the 60s? You think crime in one countries cities is a measure of how well man civilization is doing lol? Get some damn perspective my dude. Also, crime in US cities dropped to where it was before in the 90s. Once again, the 40s was terrible for everyone everywhere.
@oldpain7625
@oldpain7625 Жыл бұрын
@@kitsachie. Your history is fucked if you believe that.
@b1rdsh0t80
@b1rdsh0t80 Жыл бұрын
Can’t believe Josh Peck was there to witness this
@iand4374
@iand4374 Жыл бұрын
ITS SPHERICAL!! all i could think when they were assembling the bomb
@GMOTP5738
@GMOTP5738 7 ай бұрын
Cringe
@Theman26642
@Theman26642 Жыл бұрын
Wish the one in Oppenheimer looked more like this. Looked more like just a fireball instead of a mushroom cloud.
@Gemnist98
@Gemnist98 Жыл бұрын
That’s because the camera zoomed in to emphasize the flames. In wide shots, like the ones where people are laying on tarps, it looks extremely accurate to the real Trinity Test, and I think the one in the film was actually spliced from the shot at 0:50
@F1derful.
@F1derful. Жыл бұрын
@@Gemnist98sorry no it looked so such smaller. The clod dust on the ground gives you a sense of scale. The explosion in the movie is also not bright enough. Obviously you can’t replicate a real nuke, but there’s no way to recreate the same sense of scale without using CGI.
@henriquevalverde7179
@henriquevalverde7179 Жыл бұрын
This isnt Trinity bro. Its footage from a different test.
@F1derful.
@F1derful. Жыл бұрын
@@henriquevalverde7179 video title literally says trinity test though
@ALLROY240
@ALLROY240 Жыл бұрын
@@henriquevalverde7179 I think it is Trinity test. If you can prove other wise, fine.....
@Silentsilo987
@Silentsilo987 Жыл бұрын
If you look closely, you can see a flash of lightning at 0:46, similar to what sometimes happens during a volcanic eruption
@MetroCop2077
@MetroCop2077 Жыл бұрын
How was it created?
@joshualeung5772
@joshualeung5772 Жыл бұрын
Yet a volcanic eruption is far more energetic than an atomic bomb, or even the largest nuke ever created in some cases. "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to destroy a planet, or even a whole system, is insignificant next to the power of the Force." - Darth Vader, Star Wars: A New Hope, 1977. Well, the Force is the power of nature in this case.
@trashcompactorYT
@trashcompactorYT Жыл бұрын
I think that it's probably a film artifact
@facundoschachtner7087
@facundoschachtner7087 Жыл бұрын
but also notice that a second before something appears running from left to right. Then more objects like that appear. What are they? If the wave is directed from the center outwards, there cannot be things moving in another direction.
@203VIDEOS
@203VIDEOS Жыл бұрын
@@facundoschachtner7087 Animals running
@huangjun_art
@huangjun_art 11 ай бұрын
Everyone likes to quote the one line "now I've become death..", when there's an even better and more fitting quote: "When I came to you with those calculations, we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world... I believe we did."
@asims1988
@asims1988 8 ай бұрын
I just watched Oppenheimer and I would have been happier if they used this footage and with some add sound
@HaveyoumetKen
@HaveyoumetKen Жыл бұрын
the way the oppenheimer movie really only showed the equivalent of that first mushroom…but i did not expect it to suddenly expand like that. and todays nuclear arsenal is even more horrifying.
@AverageAlien
@AverageAlien Жыл бұрын
It's not horrifying at all, it's brilliant
@sobanked-3734
@sobanked-3734 Жыл бұрын
@@AverageAlienman shut up
@kyuubimitch
@kyuubimitch Жыл бұрын
@@AverageAlienif you don’t find the ability to kill more then a quarter of a million people at a buttons press horrifying, you have a serious problem with empathy.
@macklenk5326
@macklenk5326 Жыл бұрын
@@AverageAlienstupidest comment I’ve ever seen
@dsdy1205
@dsdy1205 Жыл бұрын
the sudden expansion is actually a cut in the video to a more zoomed in shot, not a progression of the first shot
@JG-gn9oq
@JG-gn9oq Жыл бұрын
wow so surprised the 2nd half of this is very close to the oppenheimer scene, just wished the start of the explosion was shown more and brighter in the movie
@davidw.2791
@davidw.2791 Жыл бұрын
If it’s abt Brightness, you gotta consider we’re just mere mortals sitting in a darkened room
@PackOfWolves928
@PackOfWolves928 Жыл бұрын
I agree! For some reason the scene with the trinity test felt underwhelming
@JG-gn9oq
@JG-gn9oq Жыл бұрын
@@PackOfWolves928 the No CGI might be the cause. as they cant replicate an actual nuke, they can just make the biggest non nuclear explosion they can make, it might be underwhelming to us but upon seeing this, it was really close to real life
@JG-gn9oq
@JG-gn9oq Жыл бұрын
@@davidw.2791 also they mightve not been able to replicate the initial part of the explosion so they darkened it out.
@davros_adl8155
@davros_adl8155 Жыл бұрын
@@JG-gn9oqit's important to consider imo that it was shown from what it looked like to people on site- flash of brightness was looked away from and they were miles away, so it would have looked like it did in the movie in person (clusterfuck of words i know)
@anthonypineda3388
@anthonypineda3388 Жыл бұрын
Crazy part is you don’t even need an HD camera with sound to observe how violent and devastating these explosions are
@jonathanseymore2770
@jonathanseymore2770 Жыл бұрын
They used film...
@summerlove7779
@summerlove7779 11 ай бұрын
Film has better resolution than digital cameras.
@bunnyban5365
@bunnyban5365 9 ай бұрын
Absolutely clueless comment and likes lol man… go back and search apollo 11 70mm footage and watch the movie
@xxxsnoopdawgxxx1220
@xxxsnoopdawgxxx1220 8 ай бұрын
Gotta say Nolan should’ve just used this footage the real deal is a lot better than practical effects to which I still don’t how it was all pulled off but I give them credit for the effort and attention to detail that they put in.
@ItalloBehring
@ItalloBehring 8 ай бұрын
Nolan values image quality, using this image, no matter how much treatment it might have, would clash with the general quality with which the film was recorded... That said, Nolan was correct in using practical effects, it looked incredible in theaters. That scene wasn't meant to be an epic explosion, but rather a portrait seen through Oppenheimer's eyes...
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker 8 ай бұрын
​@@ItalloBehringso oppenheimer saw a petrol explosion instead of the real behemoth the trinity test acrually was? Damn so why was he so preocupied.
@okankyoto
@okankyoto 8 ай бұрын
@@spinosaurusstriker Yeah, its a case where if the only way to do it right was to use CG (which is used elsewhere in the film) they should've just focused on making it look as authentic as possible.
@CarlosAM1
@CarlosAM1 7 ай бұрын
​@@ItalloBehringIt looked small and dissapointing. Garbage choice
@peg2legs90
@peg2legs90 4 ай бұрын
@@CarlosAM1 I bet thats not the first time you've heard "small and disappointing"
@FederalBureau.of.Investigation
@FederalBureau.of.Investigation Жыл бұрын
Terrifyingly beautiful in a way. I’m not sure how to describe it.
@seanyoung743
@seanyoung743 Жыл бұрын
You already did perfectly...."Terrifyingly beautiful".
@user-vh5eh1fu4l
@user-vh5eh1fu4l Жыл бұрын
Well, a start would be to compare the description to me hairy Assed drunkinole Irish Mammy☘☘☘
@teamok1025
@teamok1025 Жыл бұрын
You cant describe it because you alredy describe it
@Kimber123
@Kimber123 Жыл бұрын
Agreed! It was simply one of the most brilliant innovations we've ever seen, bar none - and as many like to forget or either don't know, ended up saving millions and millions of lives on both sides.
@Champmeister91
@Champmeister91 Жыл бұрын
As Ian Malcom put it in JP: "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they never stopped to think if they should"
@jpthescott5793
@jpthescott5793 11 ай бұрын
they did tho, the government and every power that was just pressured them into finishing it
@lauristonbrewster9097
@lauristonbrewster9097 Жыл бұрын
They should've just used this footage in the movie.
@lawrencebrooks8697
@lawrencebrooks8697 Жыл бұрын
This was a big thing Chris Nolan Got Wrong. Everyone at the Trinity site who witnessed the explosion's light was so incredibly bright that it turned the nighttime desert landscape into DAY (briefly). The desert suddenly appeared as it normally did under the noon day sun. And in OPPENHEIMER the explosion never did this. I wish someone would ask Nolan if this was his artistic decision or.... again, his psychological aversion to well-made CG effects. CG could have fixed the opening of the sequence (of a real gasoline-plus-other-chemicals explosion) and bathed the desert briefly in noon day light for a few seconds. Which, to my mind, would have been better than what is in the film. For all the film's incredible accuracy of the account, he left out this one aspect that astonished those present - no one had ever seen anything that could light up a landscape of hundreds of miles.
@nikhilsharma1535
@nikhilsharma1535 Жыл бұрын
I think the flash in the movie was quite bright, just the scale of the explosion was a bit underwhelming as compared to this
@lawrencebrooks8697
@lawrencebrooks8697 Жыл бұрын
@@nikhilsharma1535 I think the opening flash should have been a blinding White flash (which it was not). And I certainly agree with you that the scale of the explosion was a bit underwhelming.
@worsethanhitlerpt.2539
@worsethanhitlerpt.2539 Жыл бұрын
Maybe the Daytime image would have dampened the dramatic effect I think Nolan wanted it to be shocking rather than super-realistic also not all the observers had their eyes open at the flash
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
@@worsethanhitlerpt.2539 how is a gas explosion more shocking than the real footage? should have used cgi at least
@Ziqohth
@Ziqohth Жыл бұрын
yeah i felt that way too, and i think why not just using the real original footage of the explosion and combine it.
@stevefick3919
@stevefick3919 Жыл бұрын
Did you see the lightning generated by the dust cloud at around the 45 second mark? Just left of center in the lower part of the frame. Just like a volcano.
@marklimbrick
@marklimbrick Жыл бұрын
Something looking like diagonal line. I can't frame creep. Would have been nice to pause. Also the two rockets at right leaving smoke trail as vertical references.
@bill392
@bill392 Жыл бұрын
John: We're not gonna make are we? T-800: It's in your nature to destroy yourselves. John: Yeah, major drag huh.
@Andre-hm6qf
@Andre-hm6qf Жыл бұрын
Tens of thousands of residents of New Mexico have never been compensated for the cancer causing nuclear fallout… my grandma lived in those areas and died of a really aggressive brain cancer the doctors had never seen before. Please spread awareness!!!
@lj5190
@lj5190 Жыл бұрын
No one lived anywhere near the test.
@Andre-hm6qf
@Andre-hm6qf Жыл бұрын
@@lj5190 wrong.
@redshift6251
@redshift6251 Жыл бұрын
@@lj5190 That's not how nuclear fallout works chief. It's a moot point anyways, the last atmospheric nuclear test was in 1962, sixty years ago.
@lj5190
@lj5190 Жыл бұрын
@@redshift6251 I know how it works, champ.
@VodkaUSMC
@VodkaUSMC Жыл бұрын
Don't care.
@MerchantIvoryfilms
@MerchantIvoryfilms 6 ай бұрын
Nolan dropped the ball so badly during this scene. 6 barrels of gasoline looked just plan awful, this footage edited with the best VFX in Hollywood would have made this such powerful moment.
@louise_rose
@louise_rose Жыл бұрын
"Operated this morning and the results already look promising. Dr. Groves pleased."
@NathanDudani
@NathanDudani Жыл бұрын
I love the smell of atoms splitting in the morning
@TheLinuxYes
@TheLinuxYes Жыл бұрын
@@NathanDudani it smells like...........victory for the murcan empire.
@lowyieldbondfunds
@lowyieldbondfunds Жыл бұрын
Should have used this footage in Oppenheimer
@daneparsons725
@daneparsons725 Жыл бұрын
I wish Nolan used this footage for the nuke in Oppenheimer, it was UNDER..WHELMING!
@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead
@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead Жыл бұрын
Considering the way you spelt that I can tell your neurons overheat just waking you up in the morning 😂
@daneparsons725
@daneparsons725 Жыл бұрын
@@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead they do, I have mild autism and full blown ADHD.
@AynenMakino
@AynenMakino Жыл бұрын
This blast made me realize something: At first, there is a rapid expansion and increase in energy as a sphere quickly forms and pushes everything out of it's way. This takes maybe less than a second. After that, there is no more energy coming into the system from fission. The fission is over in the first second. From 12 seconds in to 13 seconds in. the rest of the footage in that shot is the dispersal of that energy. That dispersal happens at a much slower rate. The same would describe the beginning of the universe the way we currently think of it. There's a quick burst of sudden expansion which then slows down a lot. Quick addition of energy, slow dispersal of energy. the third dimension came into being this way. First there was a singularity. 3 Dimensional space cannot exist there. Then suddenly it comes into being quickly, receiving lots and lots of energy. Then that energy slowly disperses until the heat death of the universe. The universe is functioning exactly like a nuclear explosion does. Or any other explosion for that matter.
@geminix365
@geminix365 Жыл бұрын
Except the observable universe keeps increasing its speed of expansion
@joshwingate1717
@joshwingate1717 Жыл бұрын
​@@geminix365I was thinking the same thing. Expansion is happening at 1.4M light years to every million years and that pace is increasing every day.
@khandmo
@khandmo Жыл бұрын
the universe as soon as the big bang occurred had within it all the energy the universe has today. There was no reception of energy, it all was packed inside
@AynenMakino
@AynenMakino Жыл бұрын
@@khandmo How can we tell from available data that this is true?
@khandmo
@khandmo Жыл бұрын
@@AynenMakino because energy can neither be created nor destroyed it’s one of the bedrocks of physics
@jimfarmer7811
@jimfarmer7811 Жыл бұрын
One clarification. The first bomb dropped on Japan was an uranium bomb. The uranium bomb had never been tested because the highly-enriched uranium was so difficult to make. The physicists were so confident that they felt testing of the uranium bomb was not needed. The 2nd bomb dropped on Japan was a plutonium bomb like like the bomb used in the trinity test.
@humansrants1694
@humansrants1694 Жыл бұрын
Little boy's design was far more straight forward and guaranteed to work but fat man there was a risk it would not fully detonate and give the wreckage of it to Japan.
@Kimber123
@Kimber123 Жыл бұрын
@@humansrants1694 Though I think both were brilliant executed, to put it mildly, there were some hiccups with Fat Man including some wiring that went off while airborne that had to be reconnected. It was also dropped a couple miles from where they wanted it, but hey, it was an incredible feat of American ingenuity to say the very least.
@BlobB-kn9ww
@BlobB-kn9ww 8 ай бұрын
@@Kimber123 Fat Man had to be plugged in after take off to protect the the base.
@Kimber123
@Kimber123 8 ай бұрын
@@BlobB-kn9ww Not sure what your point is. They had an issue with its wiring that could have been very problematic, but they averted any problems.
@Ms314159265358979323
@Ms314159265358979323 8 ай бұрын
Lol now look at Nolan's gasoline fire-cloud... it looks nothing like it XD
@simplyawesome7720
@simplyawesome7720 8 ай бұрын
The Oppenheimer movie depiction did not meet the expectations.
@Cajesxavi
@Cajesxavi Жыл бұрын
I’m kinda glad they didn’t use this exact footage in the movie. Seeing the human reaction is almost more compelling than footage you can find on KZfaq.
@Yxtztdydyd
@Yxtztdydyd Жыл бұрын
He Made the explosion so meh imo tragic
@jabberwolf7348
@jabberwolf7348 Жыл бұрын
The real explosion on screen was needed, in order to JUSTIFY the horror by the people. Nolan should have used the footage and embellished in it. WASTED opportunity to justify a director's ego.
@Yxtztdydyd
@Yxtztdydyd Жыл бұрын
@@jabberwolf7348 preach
@Yxtztdydyd
@Yxtztdydyd Жыл бұрын
@@jabberwolf7348 like 3 hours wasted for the most meh nuke ever like they advertised tf outta it I wanted to see visuals of the nuke like in the VERY beginning of the movie that went hard like the quote about Prometheus set the tone and the movie was that lol
@davidw.2791
@davidw.2791 Жыл бұрын
Look at those galaxy brains look at this real footage and claim the film’s version is somehow uniquely puny-fied. There are literally people in this comment section denying that the Trinity Test is fake news footage. Perhaps because I dunno this real thing sure looked puny and underwhelming than what Cameron cooked up for T2
@EinSofQuester
@EinSofQuester Жыл бұрын
Well, thanks for posting a spoiler for the Oppenheimer movie. Now I know how it ends. No point paying to see it now!
@darkangel2347
@darkangel2347 Жыл бұрын
The Trinity test did film with color film. But the color film was so solarised by the radiation and brightness of the blast that it was useless. So it was thrown away with only a few still shots being saved. These shots are famous. But with 21st century image processing it is now possible to colorize it now.
@jackpackage4278
@jackpackage4278 Жыл бұрын
Not gonna lie I think Nolan should’ve done the nuke scene with CGI instead of practical. I admire what he was able to do with practical but the real trinity test explosion was way bigger than what we saw in the movie.
@cd7071
@cd7071 Жыл бұрын
I agree. I was not impressed with the test footage in the movie, although I did like how he kept it accurate with the time difference of the sound and shock wave.
@jackpackage4278
@jackpackage4278 Жыл бұрын
@@cd7071 I was hoping he was going to do a sequence inside of the bomb showing all of the particles colliding until it forces an explosion, or at least something with a little more showmanship. I’m guessing Nolan didn’t view the movie as being that much about the A bomb and so didn’t find it necessary to spend a lot of effort on it.
Жыл бұрын
i agree mate, it was quite dissapointing. But the film itself is incredible, no doubt on that, its a masterwork. But that explosion seemed so small. Did you know an atomic bomb mushroom cloud goes 12 KM (7.5) Miles into the sky? That explosion in the film didn't even feel like it went a kilometer or a mile high lol.
@jackpackage4278
@jackpackage4278 Жыл бұрын
@ right?? He had a chance to show us something really crazy and beautiful but you’re right the movie was still amazing.
@pedroaleb
@pedroaleb Жыл бұрын
​@@jackpackage4278kinda expected that also. I was mesmerized by the abstract imagery of the atomic world he crafted for the movie but I was kinda hoping for it to get realistic in a way. I know it is close to impossible to represent atoms breaking realisticaly but he was already in the verge of doing that with what he accomplished. Also I strongly believe they should have used the original footage of the test, enhanced, like in this video, and blended with the practical explosion through cuts. In this way you actually show the dimesion correctely while also avoiding CGI
@PWN3GE
@PWN3GE Жыл бұрын
Minor mistake in the colorization, that eerie glow surrounding the cloud at 0:56 was actually blue- a result of the radiation ionizing the air.
@Actinide5013
@Actinide5013 Жыл бұрын
Cherenkov, maybe? That would be terrifying to witness. Especially in the air.
@tpbfangirl
@tpbfangirl Жыл бұрын
...there's something horrifically mesmerising about this and I'm not sure what it is. Something so destructive but so powerful you can't look away
@Yonkage-ik5qb
@Yonkage-ik5qb Жыл бұрын
Colorized footage as best as cameras could have captured them, but nothing like how the real thing looked. A real nuclear detonation is brighter than you can imagine. Like a welding spark that fills your entire vision. In early tests, soldiers stationed dozens of miles away who did not have the special protective goggles were directed to face in the opposite direction, shut their eyes, and put their hands over their face; some reported the flash was still so bright that they could see the outlines of their own finger bones.
@Sephirothskr
@Sephirothskr Жыл бұрын
I met a guy who witnessed the bikini atoll atomic bombs and he said the same thing.
@Names_buck
@Names_buck Жыл бұрын
They should’ve just used the actual footage for Oppenheimer. Ngl the explosion in the movie isn’t that big, kinda underwhelming. But this? … even watching it on my phone, you can tell that is a massive explosion.
@josephastier7421
@josephastier7421 Жыл бұрын
I thought that for the movie maybe they would do a really nice cleanup of these old films and maybe show us something we had never seen, but in the end they hardly used the real footage at all.
@Daiin0
@Daiin0 Жыл бұрын
1:20 is straight up terrifying
@jarrajoseph-mcgrath9142
@jarrajoseph-mcgrath9142 Жыл бұрын
It's just bewildering to me that Nolan didn't use this footage. The PR around it alone would have been fantastic! "Nolan works with Peter Jackson to breathe new life into blah blah blah... never before seen blah blah blah... I saw Peter's work on 'They Shall Not Grow Old' and knew right then and there blah blah blah... When we brought Kip in to work on Gargantua blah blah blah... Asking ourselves how we could top that blah blah blah... 2000 hours compute time and AI 12K interpolation diffusion control morphology big words blah blah blah... What could be more real than real blah blah blah..." Like DAMN... What a missed opportunity!
@khaleesi4210
@khaleesi4210 Жыл бұрын
Eyewitnesses to this test described seeing every color in the rainbow and several incredible shades of purple. This one is all yellow and red. Suggestion is to research what eyewitnesses said about it and go from there.
@colinsmith1092
@colinsmith1092 Жыл бұрын
went to the trinity test site a few years ago, very interesting place to visit......great history
@Transformers_nerd_stop_motions
@Transformers_nerd_stop_motions Жыл бұрын
They should've used CGI to make the explosion bigger in the film to make it as seen here
@vashsunglasses
@vashsunglasses Жыл бұрын
This footage was from cameras that were much closer than the humans were. In the movie we see what people saw in the moment from miles away.
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
@@vashsunglasses Thats not true , in fact it looks closer and still doesn't look anything like an atomic bomb , do you think a lion and a cat look the same if you see them at different distances?
@AdamBorseti
@AdamBorseti Жыл бұрын
I was so let down with the explosion effect in Oppenheimer. It looked like "Atomic Train" with those awful close-up shots of a gasoline fire. The film itself was fantastic, but the explosion was a stain on the experience.
@volkovedits
@volkovedits Жыл бұрын
Probably the point. Having a bigger bomb would make people just go for the bomb when the movie isn't even about it.
@AdamBorseti
@AdamBorseti Жыл бұрын
@@volkovedits Meh. I think he could have just used the original footage here and that would have been fine. I know the movie wasn't supposed to be about the explosion, per-se, but it's the only reason I went to an IMAX theater to see it instead of a normal theater. To me, this movie would have been just as good at a regular theater.
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
@@volkovedits Well the point is stupid because then its difficult to feel the seriousness of the situation when the supposed end word weapon is a oil tank explosion
@dgordon2991
@dgordon2991 Жыл бұрын
A force of nature! I visited the site in the 80’s at the time I worked on the range within 10 miles and lived in nearby Socorro. Fascinating area, would like to go back one day.
@Condor1970
@Condor1970 Жыл бұрын
I really wish Nolan had just used the original footage, and gone through the process of refining it with the best enhancement technology to date, in order to maintain its integrity.
@boxkid759
@boxkid759 Жыл бұрын
No
@ReviveHF
@ReviveHF Жыл бұрын
Nolan likes CGI but chose practical effects for the sake of the art.
@channelthechannel
@channelthechannel Жыл бұрын
@@ReviveHF He chose... poorly. In this instance at least, as it was not convincing.
@ReviveHF
@ReviveHF Жыл бұрын
@@channelthechannel You're right. This actual footage looks more menacing than what we saw in that movie. The ones from that movie looks like Mother of all bomb explosion.
@rodtaylor5476
@rodtaylor5476 Жыл бұрын
@@channelthechannel He could have used CGI to add the mushroom cloud.
@bronson9953
@bronson9953 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely amazing that not even current Hollywood magic could even compare to the reality as filmed in the 1940s
@chadkirchmann5564
@chadkirchmann5564 Жыл бұрын
Part of it is Nolan stubbornly refusing to use cgi. When that gas air explosion hit the screen it made me genuinely mad. Like we have actual footage why settle for that.
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
They can , is just nolan being stupid
@GozUnlimited
@GozUnlimited Жыл бұрын
​@@chadkirchmann5564There's no way they could replicate the effect of a nuclear explosion just with practical effects, and it was stubborn to reject CGI for that scene. I'm all for practical effects, but the explosion in that film was just wrong. It had sparklers in it for crying out loud.
@mgman6000
@mgman6000 Жыл бұрын
I agree I just saw Oppenheimer today and the nuke was underwhelming he could have just used this video and got a better result
@TheLachsta
@TheLachsta 8 ай бұрын
I watched it last night. The only part of this that wasn’t in the movie was the opening shot. Which what everybody wants, which is stupid.
@xybrpnk8904
@xybrpnk8904 Жыл бұрын
saw Oppenheimer on IMAX and maybe it was the big screen but the explosion didn't feel very big, the countdown scene and the sound was perfect. But the visuals of the explosion was't what i was expecting from a Nolan movie. Maybe he should have just used stock footage from the real explosion would have been much better that what we got.
@hablemosde1950
@hablemosde1950 Жыл бұрын
Nah, was amazing film,.and an amazing bomb Sequence. Maybe, needs some clouds in footage but explosión was amazing
@wmsstuff271
@wmsstuff271 Жыл бұрын
The explosion in the movie looked like what it was. A pyrotechnic squib. A very big one yes, but still a practical effect. It looked nothing like the scale of the real thing. Anyone saying it does is daft or lying to themselves.
@hablemosde1950
@hablemosde1950 Жыл бұрын
@@wmsstuff271 AND still Is the Best explosión that Ever exist on cinema.
@mistertagnan
@mistertagnan Жыл бұрын
@@hablemosde1950far, far from it. Even the CG fireball during Apollo 13 looks better than the bullshit in Oppenheimer
@subtleprelude2400
@subtleprelude2400 Жыл бұрын
Real explosion > CGI or stock footage And I commend Nolan for his practical desire to not take the easy route to production.
@YouCantDeleteDenzelL
@YouCantDeleteDenzelL Жыл бұрын
Oppenheimer really did the trinity test justice IMO by nailing the vibe that I usually get from watching videos of atomic explosions: they're utterly gorgeous, yet terrifying at the same time. I kinda took a crash course on watching atomic explosion videos before the movie came out and that's the one thing that always stood out to me- how something so utterly horrifying in what it could cause could be so beautiful at the same time. And that's exactly what Oppenheimer perfectly nailed.
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
My dude it looked like a michael bay explosion, don't lie
@pablosrf3881
@pablosrf3881 Жыл бұрын
@@spinosaurusstriker yeah the explosion on Oppenheimer was terrible. It looked like gasoline, small, didnt passed the huge dimension that real nuclear explosion footages transmit.
@FelipeGonzalez-xn2mj
@FelipeGonzalez-xn2mj Жыл бұрын
@@pablosrf3881hated the "nuclear" explosion in the film, it was a dissappointment. they should have gone CGI, with a good budget and digital vfx team nowadays they could have done something awesome, maybe not perfect, but near.
@pablosrf3881
@pablosrf3881 Жыл бұрын
@@FelipeGonzalez-xn2mj Yeah they should've used the original footage and restored it with CGI, adding some extra effects and cleaning it, it would be perfect.
@OriginallyJack
@OriginallyJack Жыл бұрын
@@pablosrf3881 Nah. I think the explosion was probably the best explosion in any movie TBH. I can't think of ANY movie that did an explosion anywhere near as well as Nolan did.
@Unicornpirate
@Unicornpirate Жыл бұрын
Lol just because of Oppenheimer movie I'm getting all these recommended videos of nuclear bomb explosions 😅
@darhergraficos
@darhergraficos Жыл бұрын
"Now I have become death, the destroyer of worlds"..
@user-gk3lu1gg9t
@user-gk3lu1gg9t Жыл бұрын
This bomb is tiny compared to what we have today
@CharlesStevenage
@CharlesStevenage Жыл бұрын
It a gasoline explosion in slow motion, so not remotely anything huge, poor camera foolery lost its power in 2023, ps I would laugh at your bigger so called. Hilarious
@degenetron7590
@degenetron7590 Жыл бұрын
​@@CharlesStevenageis buddy literally denying the trinity test is a hoax?
@yusufkhan-ig7dv
@yusufkhan-ig7dv Жыл бұрын
@@CharlesStevenagewait so do you not believe in any sort of nuclear power or weapons
@ldull2765
@ldull2765 Жыл бұрын
@@CharlesStevenagehe meant actual bombs we have now not the movie clip 😂
@David_7171
@David_7171 Жыл бұрын
It’s tiny compared to what Russia had 60 years ago
@MrNikeGolf1
@MrNikeGolf1 Жыл бұрын
When you see this, it makes you realize Christopher Nolan did a great job depicting the bomb. The first bomb here was not the atomic bomb people see in movies today. The ones we see in movies today resemble more of the Castle Bravo and the Tsar Bomba nuclear tests. The first Trinity test is tiny compared to what we have today. Hundreds of times smaller than modern warheads. It would have been inaccurate for Nolan to portray a bomb that flew over the mountains and whose mushroom cloud extended beyond the cloud line.
@HenryWeakman
@HenryWeakman Жыл бұрын
I think he did a horrible job, it looked nothing like a nuclear explosion. He should have just used CGI. You can’t replicate atomic bombs with practical effects
@kasperimatias8744
@kasperimatias8744 Жыл бұрын
I think it was good but not perfect. I absolutely respect Nolan's artistic choice of not using CGI, but personally I think a better approach would to use it when it is truly needed. When I saw this scene in the theatre, I wasn't underwhelmed, I thought it was good. Only after so many people on the internet said that it suck did I start to see that it could have been done better. But either I think it was well done in the movie
@AdamBorseti
@AdamBorseti Жыл бұрын
​@@HenryWeakmanme too. It was arguably the most important scene in the fuckin movie and the explosion reminded me of the corny practical effects in the movie "Atomic Train". I went to the IMAX theater to see it and I found it to be pretty lame looking. The sound was great though!
@kurtdewittphoto
@kurtdewittphoto Жыл бұрын
Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb.
@dbsql6238
@dbsql6238 Жыл бұрын
Adam West Batman. Lol.
@bill392
@bill392 Жыл бұрын
na na na na na na na na NAH NAAAAH
@TheYoyozo
@TheYoyozo Жыл бұрын
I find it rather heartening that the U.S. only used these weapons twice after this test. If it had been Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia that had developed this weapon, I doubt there would have been such incredible restraint shown.
@willevensen7130
@willevensen7130 Жыл бұрын
Incredible restraint and still 200,000 people lost their lives almost instantly. It’s crazy the magnitude of these weapons. Hope they are never used again.
@mgman6000
@mgman6000 Жыл бұрын
We only had 2 or 3 nukes available
@sirtristram8297
@sirtristram8297 Жыл бұрын
​@@mgman6000 Apparently a third bomb would not have been available for another two weeks after Nagasaki.
@letusgather...7820
@letusgather...7820 Жыл бұрын
I went to elementary school in SoCal and vividly remember nuclear bomb drills.... We had "duck and cover" as if our hands over the back of our heads under a flimsy desk would have afforded any protection. I was in fear for many years of The Bomb. I just imagine the teachers must have been terrified.... I didn't really understand but no doubt they did.
@mistertagnan
@mistertagnan Жыл бұрын
It would’ve helped from flying debris such as glass, or if the roof were to partially collapse. But it would’ve done nothing if you were too close to it
@jmcd21182
@jmcd21182 Жыл бұрын
Imagine being there in person only to see this in black & white because color wasn't invented yet...
@matiasdevaglia4541
@matiasdevaglia4541 Жыл бұрын
Color was already invented and used to film this explosion, but the footage was damaged by the radiation.
@gljm
@gljm Жыл бұрын
There is actually only one real color photo of the Trinity blast and that was taken by Enrico Fermi's daughter.
@user-xg6tv5hl6s
@user-xg6tv5hl6s Жыл бұрын
Not using CGI was not really good idea . This scene in the movie could've been 100times more bone chilling
@layzabullit
@layzabullit Жыл бұрын
i respect him for it but yeah i feel like the film explosion was kinda underwhelming
@ALLROY240
@ALLROY240 Жыл бұрын
@@layzabullit It was quite a big smaller.
@ravereviews6853
@ravereviews6853 Жыл бұрын
That's how they created these original shots 😉 nuke footage is fake af so he probably used the same methods they did to fake it back then 😅
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
@@ravereviews6853 then why it doesn't look the same , dimwit
@josephastier7421
@josephastier7421 Жыл бұрын
The movie is about Oppenheimer. I think they dumbed down the bomb scene so it wouldn't steal the show.
@jackmidd123
@jackmidd123 Жыл бұрын
Bomb’s a lot quieter than I expected
@user-vh5eh1fu4l
@user-vh5eh1fu4l Жыл бұрын
@K1OIK
@K1OIK Жыл бұрын
because it is all CGI.
@shockwave2291
@shockwave2291 Жыл бұрын
Honestly, Nolan should have just used this footage instead of the (much more tame) gasoline explosion we got in the film. It's technically still "practical" and its far more effective at hitting the message home for the audience at the terror unleashed.
@angadchanna658
@angadchanna658 Жыл бұрын
I thought the same. The lead up to the blast in the movie was so intense but as soon as the fireball erupted, I was left disappointed. I wanted to be scared by the image of the bomb on 70mm IMAX screen in front of my face but it turned to be underwhelming. I even thought the shockwave could have been louder to make people jump off their seats.
@Mistygio
@Mistygio Жыл бұрын
No because this footage is like 1080 or something. Nolan wanted something in 20k resolution for 70mm film. His footage was exactly what I wanted. Something in really really high quality. I think Nolan delivered.
@shockwave2291
@shockwave2291 Жыл бұрын
@@MistygioThe footage is upscaled to 1080p, and Nolan could easily upscale it to the resolution he desired. Given that the Bomb scene didn’t actually show the bomb that much (it focused far more on the characters’ reactions), I think it would’ve been fairly easy to touch up the footage and superimpose it into the scene.
@RoyalDog214
@RoyalDog214 Жыл бұрын
@@shockwave2291 Considering he had $100 million budget, what was he spending his money on? Most of the scenes were courtroom antic.
@redshift6251
@redshift6251 Жыл бұрын
@@RoyalDog214 A large portion of movie budgets actually go to marketing & advertisements, not necessarily the cost of production.
@anthonytimpson4975
@anthonytimpson4975 Жыл бұрын
Nolan completely failed to make his explosion look anything like this.. his looked like a big gasoline explosion nothing more
@supremeleadersmeagol6345
@supremeleadersmeagol6345 Жыл бұрын
Finally glad to see someone talking about this
@anthonytimpson4975
@anthonytimpson4975 Жыл бұрын
@@supremeleadersmeagol6345 in the movie you see debris being blown in a fairly short arc away from the explosion, it instantly betrayed the scale of the movie bomb... i was actually shocked that they left that debris in and didnt erase it in post production. an A-bomb very efficiently vaporizes everything within the blast radius and there is really no debris bigger than atoms left to fling away from the center
@mistertagnan
@mistertagnan Жыл бұрын
The thing that really annoyed me was the movement. The fireball of a nuke moves in a very distinct way - it moves in an almost “uniform” way. It’s a singular event - a singular explosion. And because of that, it reaches its maximum size in an instant with almost no variation in shape. And then it begins tumbling at a near consistent size. The explosion in the movie did not do this, it was very clearly multiple different charges firing off at slightly different times - it created a very segmented look. In other words, whereas a real nuclear fireball acts almost like a single object, the explosion in the movie was very clearly multiple different explosions.
@AdamBorseti
@AdamBorseti Жыл бұрын
Literally looked as bad as Atomic Train. Should have used CGI.
@anthonytimpson4975
@anthonytimpson4975 Жыл бұрын
@@AdamBorseti had to go look up the explosion scene from atomic train (ripoff of broken arrow?).. That was a bad explosion.
@roykey3422
@roykey3422 Жыл бұрын
I was born in new mexico, my dad grew up there. He said after the war the government bought up hundreds if not thousands of head of cattle on the down wind side of this test that mysteriously were dying, losing their hair, etc. The range was 200 to 300 miles. Go figure.
@buzaldrin8086
@buzaldrin8086 Жыл бұрын
The first Downwinders were in NM.
@raguram9343
@raguram9343 Жыл бұрын
I guess it's for researching about radioactive poisoning
@buzaldrin8086
@buzaldrin8086 Жыл бұрын
@@raguram9343 They researched animals, but not the people affected.
@roykey3422
@roykey3422 Жыл бұрын
My dad said that they bought them to hush everything up. At the time of the test they didn't realize the consequences. They also bought up whole ranches because the people were having side effects just like the animals. Just a big hush program. Nothing to see here .
@willevensen7130
@willevensen7130 Жыл бұрын
@@buzaldrin8086well that would mean they would have to take responsibility for them which I’m assuming the US gov and Military did not want to do 😂
@Kaotix_music
@Kaotix_music Жыл бұрын
I love how i tell my friends about how Oppenheimer was and they go "DONT SPOIL IT FOR ME!!!" Like bro, how can i spoil a movie thats based on a story everyone in the world knows about? lol
@user-vh5eh1fu4l
@user-vh5eh1fu4l Жыл бұрын
Like the Titanic, it is not real just a good Movie.
@chrome6449
@chrome6449 Жыл бұрын
@@user-vh5eh1fu4lthat’s literally not true
@user-vh5eh1fu4l
@user-vh5eh1fu4l Жыл бұрын
@@chrome6449 It is a Movie OK. You probably think the Titanic Ship was real!!! and not a Brilliant Movie made by James Cameron.
@scrappycoco7428
@scrappycoco7428 Жыл бұрын
extremely shallow way of looking at spoilers holy shit, why did you go to see the movie? to see what happens despite knowing or to see how it happens?
@rutgerrichard5175
@rutgerrichard5175 Жыл бұрын
They meant they didn’t want to know how the movie was going to present the facts the movie is based so that they actually are surprised by the film and enjoy the experience. So with the next biopic shut yer yap anyway ;)
@Bruno-xi7qz
@Bruno-xi7qz Жыл бұрын
Looks more intimidating than in the movie i think..m
@kahisawheel
@kahisawheel Жыл бұрын
Horrifying.
@user-yl4lf9mh1w
@user-yl4lf9mh1w Жыл бұрын
why did the one in Oppenheimer look so lame?
@jimsagubigula7337
@jimsagubigula7337 Жыл бұрын
Because it was a gas explosion
@JasperVlas
@JasperVlas Жыл бұрын
I really don't get Christopher Noland didn't put these shots in the Oppenheimer film. They wouldn't have to use science experiments to recreate it (no CGI in this film exept for Eastern regions to censor something) and it would be the most historic accurate.
@Balnazzardi
@Balnazzardi Жыл бұрын
Agreed. If Nolan didnt want to use CGI, then he should have atleast swallowed his pride and use already existing footage of Trinity test and perhaps further digitally enhance it. The re-creation using ordinary explosives didnt look like nuclear blast at all, which I felt was really disappointing but not surprising, because there is no way to replicate what nuclear fireball looks like without using CG... Anyhow even that I could have forgiven, but sadly the last 30 minutes of the movie was just a drag, I wasnt one bit interested about the political schemes and backstabbing thing, I would have wanted the ending to focus on how the world changed afterwards with the arms race and the whole feel of the threat of nuclear annihilation/war, especially since Oppenheimer was still alive at the time of Cuban Missile Crisis, but the movie only scrapped the surface of it.
@NotMythicWaffle
@NotMythicWaffle Жыл бұрын
The fact that people are getting mad about the explosion not looking good enough just goes to show that they only watched Oppenheimer for the explosion and not for his life.
@PWN3GE
@PWN3GE Жыл бұрын
People only know Oppenheimer's name _because_ he created that explosion. It was the single most important moment in his life. Nolan could have at least done it justice.
@huangjun_art
@huangjun_art 11 ай бұрын
@@PWN3GE He did do it justice. The movie is about the rise and fall of Oppenheimer, that goes way beyond just an explosion. And no, people actually know Oppenheimer because of his scientific achievements in quantum and nuclear physics as well. Only children and people who failed basic WWII history only know him because of an explosion. Nolan made a historically accurate biopic. What you want is a Marvel movie.
@markmeridian3360
@markmeridian3360 Жыл бұрын
Too bad the movie "Oppenheimer" did such a poor job of reproducing this. Their decision to use minimal CGI ruined the Trinity shot for all of us who have seen this film.
@Balnazzardi
@Balnazzardi Жыл бұрын
Agreed. While I can admire Nolan's dedication to not use CGI, the Trinity test in Oppenheimer still looked likee just one big regular explosion instead of nuclear bomb. It just didn't look convincing in any way to pass for nuclear explosion. If there was one place to use CGI in his movie, it was this. All Nolan would had to do was to take the original Trinity test footage and remaster it with help of CG and AI perhaps
@marvelian9519
@marvelian9519 Жыл бұрын
This stunning footage made me really disappointed in how Nolan presented the Trinity test in the film. I was expecting a scientifically detailed recreation. He's managed to deliver something truly fascinating in 'Interstellar', but he's really done something anti-climactic in 'Oppenheimer'. Personally, I would have preferred that he used very-well-done CGI to show the explosion. Test witnesses described interesting details of the explosion. Ralph Carlisle Smith says that he saw a rare purple and green color in the beginning. The silica soil was reported to have turned into radioactive green glass. The explosion narrative felt too anti-climactic.
@Balnazzardi
@Balnazzardi Жыл бұрын
Indeed. Everything leading up to it was great, but I had my doubts that they would ever be truly mimic the nuclear blast with just regular explosives, and after seeing the film...well Nolan should have swallowed his pride for just once and use CGI or even digitally restored footage of the Trinity test, like how its restored here. immediately my reaction in theater was "well thats disappointing" because it honestly didnt show at all the terrible force of nuclear blast. The size and the shape of the fireball was not right at all. Even more disappointing was that afterwards Nolan used 30 minutes or more with the whole political side of things to wrap up the film which I thought was way too long. He should have instead focused on the aftermath of nuclear arms race and the threat of nuclear war...heck I mean Oppenheimer was even alive during the Cuban Missile Crisis... I mean all respect to Robert Downey JR for great role, but I was not one bit interested about his character or his grudge toward Oppenheimer. I know its part of Oppenheimer's story, but in my view it took way too much room in the movie when that time could have been used to focus on the nuclear arms race, how Edward Teller became farther of hydrogen bomb and how eventually it all lead up to Cuban Missile Crisis where world came close to nuclear war. Overall to me this was most disappointing of all Nolan's movies. Not a bad movie, but could have been so much better.
@wsattler
@wsattler Жыл бұрын
Oppenheimer's trinity test is disappointing in comparison
@surferpam1
@surferpam1 Жыл бұрын
The fact that we have not yet all perished is amazing to me.
@aaronguo5128
@aaronguo5128 10 ай бұрын
I have to be honest and say that the end result in the Oppenheimer movie is really underwhelming. That tiny napalm fire ball is nothing close to the majestic scale of a true nuclear mushroom cloud. Nolan should've just used CGI. First Man already proved that well-made CGI can fully restore the magnificence of historical moments. Considering Nolan did use some VFX and removed the artists' names in the credits, the Trinity test explosion in the movie is just inexcusably bad.
@tymursydoruk
@tymursydoruk Жыл бұрын
Amazing and terrifying!
@prenticehammond2003
@prenticehammond2003 Жыл бұрын
Are there any records (I assume there are) about what people in the surrounding area (I assume for many miles) thought woke them up? Could they see a glow? Was the area evacuated for those many miles? If so, was there a pretext for it?
@Andre-hm6qf
@Andre-hm6qf Жыл бұрын
No, they didn’t warn the citizens at all tens of thousands of people lived within 50 miles of the blast zone. Since then tens of thousands of people have died to cancer in those areas and the government does not provide any sort of compensation or recognition whatsoever!!! Only New Mexico uranium miners are compensated but not the other victims
@i_am_vigilantee8438
@i_am_vigilantee8438 Жыл бұрын
I believe so. The glow seen and explosion heard was blamed on an ammunition storage explosion
@PrimitiveAK
@PrimitiveAK Жыл бұрын
yes the military released a statement indicating it was an ammunition storage explosion. it wasn't until after the bombs were dropped that people put the puzzle pieces together that it was a nuclear test.
@davemiller6055
@davemiller6055 Жыл бұрын
"Why was the area evacuated for so many miles?" It's pretty obvious why the area was evacuated.
@prenticehammond2003
@prenticehammond2003 Жыл бұрын
My question was, was it actually evacuated, and I do assume it was. Just what was the official reason. Someone may have answered this.
@b0ls0nar0
@b0ls0nar0 Жыл бұрын
The movie oppenheimer really doesnt do it justice.
@Slapslap12
@Slapslap12 Жыл бұрын
The bomb in the movie is extremely disappointing, if anything it downplayed the dangers of nuclear weapons
@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead
@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead Жыл бұрын
🧢
@spinosaurusstriker
@spinosaurusstriker Жыл бұрын
@@ICantSeeYourRepliesDickhead ?
@JavierRios-sq7sp
@JavierRios-sq7sp Жыл бұрын
This was better than the whole film it self lol 😅
@subtleprelude2400
@subtleprelude2400 Жыл бұрын
If you came to Oppenheimer just for a bomb, I don’t know what to say. The title is named “Oppenheimer” for a reason. It’s a film biography.
@JavierRios-sq7sp
@JavierRios-sq7sp Жыл бұрын
yes i came for a damn bomb if i wanted to know the history i wouldve watched a shorter documentary nobody understand what they were talking about only old white politics that sit all watching CNN hahaha@@subtleprelude2400
@filipezanini413
@filipezanini413 Жыл бұрын
Nolan could have replicated this with current computer techniques, maybe even blend real footage with cgi or enhance the real thing with computer effects. It would have been much more accurate than the gasoline explosion he pulled off in the movie, which for me was the most disappointed part of the movie (I watched it 3 times already)
@user-sf4zc3wh1c
@user-sf4zc3wh1c Жыл бұрын
It was meant to be a terrifying scene of realization but the explosion kinda killed it
@francescosidoli5833
@francescosidoli5833 Жыл бұрын
I’m a barbie girl in a barbie world
@blockpq
@blockpq Жыл бұрын
“And now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.”
@CONNELL19511216
@CONNELL19511216 4 ай бұрын
The important aspect of nuclear explosions is that they start as brilliant white - almost blue-white - with no yellow tones at all. At this stage the human eye is completely overwhelmed by the brilliance anyway
@Highbudget
@Highbudget Жыл бұрын
It’s in our nature to destroy ourselves
@Lei_Cobra
@Lei_Cobra Жыл бұрын
Sim
@brent4770
@brent4770 Жыл бұрын
I used to own a piece of the green glass it made from the sand a long time ago.
@alp-1960
@alp-1960 Жыл бұрын
Trinitite? Neat. It's been illegal to remove anything from the Trinity site since 1952.
@brent4770
@brent4770 Жыл бұрын
@@alp-1960 I was out there in the 1970's and it ample to get.
@abaronofchivalry5176
@abaronofchivalry5176 Жыл бұрын
0:20 - "Damn that's a big bomb" 0:26 - "WHAT THE F*CK?!?!"
@TheCrossroads533
@TheCrossroads533 11 ай бұрын
Nice work on the colorization!
@russellwest8767
@russellwest8767 Жыл бұрын
Oppenheimer is a great movie and the build up to the explosion is incredible directing, but the choice to stay 100% practical with the bomb was a mistake. Even if he kept it practical but included this footage somehow it would have made a huge difference, but using cgi for just this one scene would have still kept it classy and timeless. Nolan succeeded in making an impressive fireball, but it’s the half second of light and energy before the fire and smoke which makes the a bomb so terrifying. Nolan almost gets away with it except for one or two unforgivable shots, but it doesn’t do this justice and seeing something like this even for a few seconds would have made the whole movie even more powerful. Cut the first sex scene, and incorporate this footage (or use limited cgi). Otherwise no notes, loved the movie
@billybatts8283
@billybatts8283 Жыл бұрын
Oh my god JC a bomb!
@jtgd
@jtgd Жыл бұрын
0:19 is the best they could recreate in Oppenheimer, but a skinnier part
@skidamerica
@skidamerica 7 ай бұрын
Oppenheimer movie could have use this clip instead of the nonsense they produced
@resistdisinformation9931
@resistdisinformation9931 Жыл бұрын
Although I have not yet had the opportunity to see the timely and relevant Oppenheimer film as yet, I would appreciate the opportunity to share a few thoughts about the "nuclear age." Given that the Cuban Missile Crisis took place in the latter half of October, 1962, this event thereby occured while I was six months developing in my Mother's womb. Within a mere three additional months, in April of 1963, I was soon to be jettisoned into a continuously and rapidly changing world of increasingly dangerous and risky situations. I have often wondered what my Mother might have experienced during those frightening and threatening days in October of 1962. Sadly, I didn't have the opportunity to ever ask her prior to the confrontational dissolution of our relationship. I regret both. I have also wondered what effects her higher stress levels might have had upon the growing human settled relatively peacefully within her abdomen. Was I affected in some way? Obviously, I will never know. What I do know, however, is that I was undoubtedly impacted at the cellular level by the residual isotopes present in the Great Lakes Basin released and spread to this area by the earlier atmospheric nuclear testing by the American Government, and additionally those of the Soviet Union. A recent article suggested that the previously understood area of North America that was contaminated, albeit at relatively low levels, was far broader in scope and area than previously understood covering three quarters of North America! Most or all of us carry within us tiny traces of radiation encountered through various avenues of dissemination to this day, or such is my current understanding. Nevertheless, having been born into the nuclear age at an earlier stage of its continuing development, the first earlier years of my life were built upon foundations of knowledge and experience untainted by the realization of the potentiality of instantaneous nuclear annihilation. It was only when I arrived at the latter end of my childhood prior to the beginning of my adolescence, that I vaguely recall seeing a movie which portrayed a nuclear war crisis. I am unable to recall much more than that. Suffice to say, that it caused me quite a stir, so to speak. I was never quite the same again. My previous perceptions were altered, in some ways, in fact, extinguished by the realization that reality was not as it had previously appeared to be. Following this, my then already disordant and unpredictable family situation grew yet more chaotic and difficult. My parents separated and I was mostly left to my own devices in my attempts to make sense of it all and to cope with the unfolding personal catastrophe. The earlier comprehensions pertaining to the frightening possibilities surrounding the existence of nuclear weapons in increasing numbers within the context of the "Cold War" were soon forgotten for many years. It was during my later years of university studies that I came across a conflict related philosophy course. It opened my eyes in new ways to understandings of such things heretofore unrealized. It was also disturbing. It was then, that I became utterly incapable of overlooking the reality of such weapons and their potentially horrifically destructive effects. Through the years during times of considerable distress, I would sometimes experience nightmares where, while in the middle of something, usually outside, during the daytime, a blue sky sort of day, there would be a strangely mechanical "whooshing" sound in the sky just prior to a bright flash and a subsequent loss of vision but at the same time, a deafening silence given the variation between the speed of light and the speed of sound. As a result, the concussive waves arrived simultaneously with the loudest bang to ever be heard momentarily prior to being instantaneously incinerated. I would always wake up from these visions of a singular reality within my overwhelmed mind's eye in a state of utter torpidity and terror. It was usually difficult to fall back asleep with any ease. Since such times, I have watched several films incorporating story lines and narratives showing the horrific possibilities if ever such weapons were to be again used on large populations of humans. As a result, there are images of monstrous destruction from such films as Terminator 2 that have often revisited me since. It is a rather unusual and strange aspect of life when, aside from the conventional "ups and downs" of life, that one is continuously aware of the possibility of having everything suddenly interrupted by the actions of an insane person within the ranks of an insane government somewhere who thought that the utilization of such a weapon could somehow be momentarily beneficial to their cause. It is conjecture surely to be proven invalid and entirely one of the worst decisions in human history. Continuous stress, while remaining almost invisible, can nonetheless be damaging to both the human physiology, but sadly, and more congruently, the healthy functioning of the humanly aspirational mind. This I have known for far too long. It broke my spirit, in some respects. But it also clarified my inward comprehension of the reality within which I found myself to reside in. It both weakened me, and yet, also inspired me to pay closer attention to "moments of time." They are always fleeting and momentary but always interesting if one can learn to "slow down enough" to readily observe them, either through meditation or some such activity or by simply paying sufficient attention to them. In any case, my resultant sense of fragility of existence itself has never left me. The existence of nuclear weapons created this within me. It brought me closer to Nature in ways that I never could have imagined. Strangely enough, they strengthened me. I have never really "accepted" them, per ce. But I have learned to never forget that they are out there sitting in silos or in submarines or on land transport vehicles, always ready to do the unthinkable. I find it rather intriguing, the seeming similarities between how humans treat each other in terms of the potential usage of such horrific weapons and our treatment of Nature. There is a particular callousness synonymous with both phenomena, a certain shroud of darkness lingering in the air, and a pall of unpredictability impossible to shake off. We deny the existence of nuclear weapons and of the climate crisis at our peril. Denialism can be a pain of supreme proportions. Thus, I can only remain vigilant, always slightly anxious, but also always aware of the magnificent beauty of Life itself, its poignancy, and its fragility. How briefly we are here in this Earthly Paradise that we threaten with our maleficent technologies and our egotistical tendencies. Whatever shall we do? Heartfelt respect and hugs all around to each of you during these challenging times.
@D.H.1082
@D.H.1082 Жыл бұрын
Hey there. I'm only a quarter-century old, born in 1998. I took my time to read through your comment here. It was well thought out, and a good look into the world before my time. I can't say I entirely share your view of the world. I know that "mutually assured destruction" is entirely theoretical. And with the Russian government doing what they are doing, I understand people's apprehension. But it's not all bleak. As for the problems we are causing for the environment, news is good. Every day, we extend the deadline we have before things turn bad for humans, thus extending deadlines for less adaptable species. More and more is being done to save our world, and the rate has increased exponentially since the turn of the 20th century. That's the great thing about humans. We adapt in extraordinary ways. You yourself are evidence. I am as well. You and I share tragedy in our childhoods. I am sure you fought hard to get where you are today. I know I did. Keep on keeping on. The other option isn't as appealing. 🤟
@EinSofQuester
@EinSofQuester Жыл бұрын
I share your timeline. I was catapulted into this illusionary existence, without my consent, in October 1963, the same year of your tragic expulsion from the garden. I have a vision of the true nature of reality that hides behind the curtain. It is a vision of the oneness of all that exists. I've written a poem about this vision. I fervently hope you find little morsels or nuggets of wisdom in my poem that feed your soul. We Are One I reminisced of a time long ago when I was only twenty years old. I was studying English 101 at the University Of British Columbia in the summer of Eighty-Four. It was at a summer session because I had failed English 101 two years before. A failure due more to my citizenship in a different realm than to the failings of my intellect, aptitude or the magnanimity of my core. “You have such a poignant and evocative writing style,” wrote my teacher on the short-story I had submitted the week before. I had written about a lonely sojourn on a desolate beach in the pregnant moment, When sunset injures day's abandon and grants night the freedom to roam. I had written about the mighty North Shore mountains, Hoary with age and reverberating with an energy ineffable to the mind, But savored by the soul. I remembered how exhausting of mind, but above all of my soul, writing that short-story had been. I tried to reveal my spirit bare and exposed. I tried to destroy the ramparts and blow open the heavy gates shielding my secretive core. But through my exhausting efforts I had only succeeded in weakening the facade between me and the world, Usually held at arm's length, But through my story then, only slightly nearer yet still remote. There is an essence within everyone hidden in a chamber far beneath the veneer that encrusts our core. We seldom allow it expression beyond just its fractured shadows dancing on an external wall. But if we all dig deep and reach into this secretive chamber, We will, to our astonishment, discover we are all reaching into the same chamber, Not a separate one for each within the all. And then we will grasp each other's same-hand. We all share the same soul. I knew that in the novel of my compulsion I would have to expose this chamber, Ramparts and heavy gates destroyed once and for all. And my novel would then cry out from this collective chamber, And speak for my left and for my right with one voice for all. It would be the ineffable ground of being reaching out to humanity from the navel of Creation, Proclaiming the dawn of a Third Age. It would announce the sunset of the Second Age before this coming dawn. A moment pregnant with change that will forever be remembered in the annals of the Civilization of Man. It would herald a paradigm shift far greater than the Renaissance, Not just an age of reason, but of reason and divinity intertwined as an inseparable whole. I envision the Third Age to be promoting the two primordial dancers, The abstract magical and the other its complementary whole. To engage in the Dance and thence unshard into the Eternal Garden from whence we all came forth. They are in Eternity entwined, but sharded into the realms of space and time. They are shards of the divine. Would composing such a novel be an arduous journey, Exhausting my body and above all my core? Would I be as a drowning man, Gasping for breath, Kicking and screaming while with futility grasping for shore? But would every paragraph and page exhaust me, Yet also leave me yearning for more? It would I am sure. This arduous compulsion will also uplift and invigorate me with waves of catharsis and frisson. And I pray dearly for the same in my reader, of soul-piercing joy. If I fail to evoke the same in my audience then I would have failed to breach the ramparts and the heavy gates shielding my innermost chamber, Our collective soul. Only within this innermost shared sanctum can I truly touch someone's soul. And by touching one, I will be touching them all.
@resistdisinformation9931
@resistdisinformation9931 Жыл бұрын
@@EinSofQuester Wow! Thank you so much for sharing this with us here. I shall need to re-read it several times to both understand the more subtle aspects of it but certainly I can say without hesitation that your imagination seems to be virtually limitless!
@EinSofQuester
@EinSofQuester Жыл бұрын
@@resistdisinformation9931 Thank you. It's an excerpt from my novel Shards of Divinities
@coomr419
@coomr419 4 ай бұрын
Imagine being one of the people involved in this. You could have been proud or ashamed. I do not know which one will.
@Blind_Hawk
@Blind_Hawk 10 ай бұрын
I realized a lot of people do not know how the trinity test footage looked like... one was arguing that the "black smoke" in Oppenheimer was nonsense... but here I see this: 0:51
@OliverWalker1
@OliverWalker1 Жыл бұрын
but instead we got a gasoline explosion
@aimansyarizuan7139
@aimansyarizuan7139 Жыл бұрын
What’s the difference between the first explosion and this one 0:26 ?
@dougcrawford6967
@dougcrawford6967 Жыл бұрын
i was wondering the same thing. maybe the second explosion is actually a different, closer shot of the same explosion.
@MrBUBBAKY
@MrBUBBAKY Жыл бұрын
All Trinity, multiple camera views.
@heavybattle6650
@heavybattle6650 Жыл бұрын
The second shot is much closer to the blast. That massive circular blast is visible in the first video at the very base of the bomb.
@Cos93
@Cos93 Жыл бұрын
Just to inform everyone this is footage from two different cameras using different lenses and not a progression of one explosion. At 0:24 there is a cut to a different camera.
Hiroshima - Short Film
9:38
Hashem Al-Ghaili
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
💣💥 COMPARISON of the most DESTRUCTIVE EXPLOSIONS 💥💣
7:12
MetaBallStudios
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
CHOCKY MILK.. 🤣 #shorts
00:20
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Get 10 Mega Boxes OR 60 Starr Drops!!
01:39
Brawl Stars
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
Meet the one boy from the Ronaldo edit in India
00:30
Younes Zarou
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
WORLD'S SHORTEST WOMAN
00:58
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 200 МЛН
Castle Bravo Disaster - A "Second Hiroshima"
19:50
Kyle Hill
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Nuclear Explosions Demolish City (2024) 4K Scene | FALLOUT
3:30
MovieGasm.com
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
How Radioactive Is The First Atomic Bomb Site?
19:06
Radioactive Drew
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Hiroshima: Dropping the Bomb
4:36
BBC Studios
Рет қаралды 46 МЛН
Falling Into Jupiter (Simulation)
5:04
Stargaze
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
Tsunami: the moment when everything changed - Full documentary in English
1:22:28
Investigations et Enquêtes
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
Trinity Test Preparations (Full)
1:00:19
AtomicHeritage
Рет қаралды 40 М.
What Happened to the Nuclear Test Sites?
21:12
Curious Droid
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
We RECREATED the Nuclear Explosion from Oppenheimer with ZERO CGI
13:59
William H Baker
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
CHOCKY MILK.. 🤣 #shorts
00:20
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН