It cracks me up how the plaintiff sits there all smug, but he put himself in this situation 💯

“I did this out of the kindness of my heart! I had nothing to gain.” Moments later: “well we were gonna start a business and I wanted him to……”. There it is lol

Happy Friday Everyone. Celebrating my 50th today. 🎂🍾🥂🛍🙏🏾

This has nothing to do with the case AT ALL, but what type of hair care regime does the defendant have?? Geesh! His hair is so healthy and shiny lol

I hate people who fake niceness, a lot of people do something because it's in their interests but then pretend that they did it for charity, or people who give someone money/things because they want to date them then say, "it's because I'm nice"😂 this is one of my biggest pet peeves because it comes from a complex of superiority, they want to be applauded for "being nice," yet they're in court asking for it back, also true kind people aren't acknowledged in our society enough because fake kind people go around publicizing their charity, it's also true for all these billionaire philanthropists, they never pay a decent wage and make money from others poverty yet they're so kind that they donate billions to charities for tax exemptions and control over society.

At times there is a silver lining behind someone's kindness. In this case the Silver Lining was tarnished

Lol that was funny at the end. I can't see John losing his cool 😂

I just feel like the plaintiff is up to something that doesn’t come out in this case. He needs to sit eye level with the camera because his smug look, looking down his nose may just be “positional”, but to me he looks very much up to something.

Love the trucker headsets lol true truckers!

Good morning everybody!! 👋

CASH BEFORE DELIVERY! Never let the car leave your property until it is 100% paid for. Especially with friends and family. I am not a bank.

Doug the Bailiff looks like such a nice man.

Defendant gets his truck for Half Price! Glad no money came outta his pocket.

u cant claim u did something to help a person who is down on their luck and then sue that same person to get back what u gave to help that person . so the truth is that the plaintiff never did one thing for the defendant to help him because he was down on his luck . he got him a truck as an INVESTMENT for a business that didnt pay off like he had planned , so just like any other investment its a risk so why did the judge give the plaintiff any money back ? the agreement was that the truck would be paid off IF there was enough business and there simply was not .

HMMMMMM BUT THE PLAINTIFF STARTED OFF LYING I DO FEEL FOR THE DEFENDANT BUT I'M HAPPY THAT HE GETS TO KEEP THE TRUCK BUT JUST FINISH PAYING IT OFF {DOUG IS MESSY AF SMDH BUT HE'S HILARIOUS}

Happy Friday y’all

That plaintiff is so smug.

And here we have an instance of Judge Milian herself declaring that the plaintiff will not get the judgement from TPC but will have to get it from the defendant himself. But of course that's just for the audience's benefit. Everyone, the judge, Doug the hall guy and all the defendants, are just acting as if. (/snark)

"I'm the lien holder! Who are you going to believe, me or the official paperwork?"

I would bet that the original agreement was along the lines of, we need someone with a truck so we'll get you the truck and you can work it off. Then when the work didn't come in they changed it to you have to pay us. The biggest question is if these guys were starting a business, why didn't they put the truck in the business name or one of their names? Why did they want it in an employee's name?

She always gets her digs in always gotta make you feel like a child. Not every gentleman’s agreement turns out like this. I understand it’s for entertainment, but go easy JM. These guys ain’t happy I’m sure.

Well the show pays the winning litigant right?

Happy Day Sunday Davis!!

This is why you never sell a car on payments......-people always find a way to wiggle out of paying esp if the car breaks down.

Uh I'm betting that the plaintiff is manipulating things to win. There's more than they are telling.

She should of gave him 1000 because he is a liar and a thief

Paying little by little isn’t a good idea, pay up dude

The plaintiff selling a truck and the defendant buying the truck, they both went into it like it was something they did every day, I mean no writing anything down, stating payments, or how long it would take for the truck to be paid off, I mean buying or selling a vehicle is a big deal. No wonder it came to be a real mess.

so we are spelling the word with a TR now? when did they stop spelling it with an F? LOL!!!

The plaintiff did buy this truck for him so they could start a business. Unfortunately the business probably didn't happen. Plaintiff tried to pull a fast one

The fact that this woman can't fathom people helping those in need without profiting from it says EVERYTHING about what a selfish, greedy person she is. I pray she finds God, a REAL relationship with God, and does better. The Bible tells us to help those in need. The Bible says to give money to those who ask. She may claim to believe in God, but she does NOT Know Him or His word! She needs to quit telling people to stop helping those in need!

There’s a full story that we don’t seem to get with this story

I also don't believe that the plaintiff did not fill out the lien holder agreement, why would he not fill it out knowing that the defendant has his truck and that it's not fully paid for, that doesn't make an ounce of sense, if the defendant went to the DMV by himself maybe he filled out another document and forged it without the lien holder agreement, that's a big possibility, the defendant is a lucky man he gets to keep a truck that he did not fully pay for after how much time, I really hope that if the defendant does not pay the Judgment that the plaintiff follows through on putting a lien against his property.

The plaintiff is a jerk. He was trying to intimidating the defendant. He shouldnt have been arrested.

The plaintiff camera set up ! OLD PPL 😅

Maybe I need to watch this one again... didn't the defendant originally say there was no agreement and that the Plaintiff just handed him the truck only to later exchange text messages which prove that he agreed to monthly payments??? Why would u nake payments on something that was given to you? Maybe I missed something.

The judge is demeaning to her husband sometimes, but he takes it in stride. He really must love her and he's obviously a very confident man to not let that kind of thing bug him. I suppose her multi-million dollar tv contract helps to ease any lingering discomfort.

JM gives off masculine energy while her husband is more feminine.

cracks me up how the plaintiff sits there all smug, but he put himself in this situation Lol that was funny at the end. I can't see John losing his cool

Daniel has weird hair 😳.

Short advocat 90

Pure pumpkin 91

Неплохо

🥂

This judge really gets on my nerves sometimes, she questions the plaintiff as to why he thinks the defendant should have to pay $500 a month when even if that wasn't the original agreement the defendant text the plaintiff saying I can pay $500 to 1,000 a month I think and neither of them objected to that agreement, so at bare minimum the defendant should be paying $500 a month. Then the judge asks the plaintiff why he thinks he can legally repossess the vehicle, how about the text message that the defendant sent telling the plaintiff that if he felt he wasn't being done right he could come and pick up the truck at any time, that's his legal reason to be able to repossess the truck not only that but the truck wasn't paid for after a long amount of time, No good deed goes unpunished, even if the plaintiff was getting some benefit out of the deal it was still nice of him to do that for the defendant.

1st!

Oftentimes, Milian fails to take into account that everyone's not a judge/lawyer when presiding over these case. People do make the mistake of making verbal agreements or a written and signed contract because they're in a place where they don't think anything untoward will happen. If I were ever to be in her courtroom I would remind her of that as soon as she even tried to chastise. So her shenanigans would never work with me. Nonetheless, people do not think things will go left in the beginning of a business arrangement. Not everyone has a mindset or mentality of a judge or lawyer. Milian's days have come to and end because she just doesn't do her job thoroughly these days.