This is one of the first video I shot with my new rearranged studio setup (the other is the 7Artisans 28mm f/5.6 review), do you like this setup? Or do you prefer my older studio setup?
@Tirolerbua-rl2yy2 жыл бұрын
Das neue gefällt mir besser👌
@0action8472 жыл бұрын
The character of the lens seems very much like the full frame TTartisan 50 0.95, which is one of my favourite lenses.
@mattstolzman2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your review. We need to compare this lens to the famous 50 1.2
@kaminobatto2 жыл бұрын
Great review as always, Richard! I see F2 as the sweet spot in many cases for this lens. F2 is still bright enough for a lot of uses, so considering the price tag and the performance at F2 I really think this is great value. I also love the flare patterns, very filmic!
@carlosandreviana94482 жыл бұрын
you can get the same sharpness at 1.4 from the 50mm 1.2
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching and support again ! @Yanen Zein!
@enshongmiranda2 жыл бұрын
Looks like a great lens for portraits on wide apertures and great for street from f/5.6!
@HikersRefuge2 жыл бұрын
Man I would love a side by side review of the 7artisans 50mm f0.95, seeing this...super curious on which to go for. Great review mate =)
@Xinrui242 жыл бұрын
Depends on your camera. I use sony a lot and heard this TTArtisan could cover full-frame too, so I can use it on my 6600 and 7RIV, very affordable. I got mine yesterday, the first impression is very good, still testing it. And if the Zebra design of TTArtisan is your thing, I think you can go for TTArtisan.
@hejakma46822 жыл бұрын
yes a comparison of 50 0.95 lenses would be very interesting.
@kornasteniker39392 жыл бұрын
Thx for the fast review, Richard! Looks like I'll stick to my Kamlan 50mm f1.1 Mark II for the moment.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
yeah if you already have a Kalmlan 50 1.1 then probably just stick with it :) having said that, I still haven't try that lens myself!
@kornasteniker39392 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealRichardWong you def should try the MK II (The MK I is pretty much subpar and not worth trying). Quite acceptable sharpness for a f1.1. The reduced contrast wide open gives portraits and street shots a slight vintage flair. I love my Kamlan 50mm f1.1 mk II. Only downside for me is the heavy construction (over 600g).
@hejakma46822 жыл бұрын
Nice informative review, Richard. I really have a faible for these exotic lenses. . I tested the 7artisans version and it behaved very similiar to this lens.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
those ultra fast lenses are fun!
@CamMead2 жыл бұрын
Nice one Richard looks pretty good!
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Hey Thanks OnCam31!!
@andrewcampbell31842 жыл бұрын
Another great informative review Richard! Thanks 👍
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much Andrew!
@muscleart39662 жыл бұрын
Nice review. Will you do a comparison with the 7artisans 50mm f0.95 APS-C ? Please.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
I will see if i have a chance to do that :)
@carlosandreviana94482 жыл бұрын
The 1.2 50 is still one of their best lenses. This one is not an improvement
@WVMUSIC_NL2 жыл бұрын
For sure! I don’t need this one. Btw I don’t like the design at all.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
@Carlos André Viana I want to compare with the TTArtisan 50 1.2 (which you really can't beat in terms of value for money) unfortunately my sample for 50 1.2 is micro four thirds and 50 0.095 is fuji apsc so can't really compare :(
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
@@WVMUSIC_NL I don't really like the design as well at first. but after a while i starting to like it
@Ajkiwi0012 жыл бұрын
God I'm tempted to take one of these out to Duder regional park and try for star photography. The softness in the corners worries me though, and 50mm is so tight for astrophotography. Hmmmm. Tricky. I'm having trouble thinking of another use case for me in day to day...
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Hey Andrew, it might not be the best choice for astrophotography. Probably best for portrait or anything doesn't need great corner sharpness/details at wide open
@Ajkiwi0012 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealRichardWong Yeah, agreed. Could be a lot of fun with an ND filter for headshots, actually!
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Yes exactly!!
@edwinadrianta94552 жыл бұрын
Will you do a comparison with the 7artisans 50mm f0.95? Thanks for the insightful video as always.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Thabks Edwin, at the moment I have no plan to do that comparison review. But if more viewers are interested I can try get one done
@hejakma46822 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealRichardWong yes please😊
@filipmichalsaffray4412 жыл бұрын
Hi Great review and nice background music...Thx to you I already every TT avaible for MFT what about their other 50mm lens which cost 100$ less worth the upgrade? I am mostly a videografer and love Zhongghie Spedmaster T1 trio...which is in the warmer side and I was looking for 50mm T1 0,95 to match them do you think it could be an alternative? Yours Fil
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Filip! The TTArtisan 50 1.2 is great value for money, if you already have that, i will just keep using that. Unless you really want the 0.95, which does look quite a bit different to the 1.2. The picture quality of this lens is really decent for it's price, but the problem using this 50 0.95 for video is that the focus ring has quite a short focus throw, so it might be a bit hard to nail the focus compare to the Zhongyi Cine lens.
@malcolmcog2 жыл бұрын
I tend to evaluate lenses with my Panasonic/Leica Summilux f1.4 25mm.Which is unfair to compare a TTartisans lens with a Panasonic/Leica $500 equivalent. My TTartisans lens so far are excellent ! However even though this is a fast 50mm lens for me a micro 4/3rds is not my fixed lens of choice.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
yeah pretty much all the TTArtisan lenses I've tried are very decent and great value for money! And yeah choose a lens by looking at the focal length you need instead of just because it's a nice lens :)
@hauke36442 жыл бұрын
I don’t fully get the point of lenses like this. Looking at the characteristics, they seem most suitable for portraiture, but with such a shallow depth of field I really prefer to have AF. So I would advise to save a little more and get the Sigma 56mm/1.4
@edwinadrianta94552 жыл бұрын
for me, the f0.95 helps when I want to keep the ISO low during the low light shooting. In addition, I really like the character that I get from the lens. Every picture becomes unique and challenge you. Sigma 56mm f1.4 is brilliantly sharp if that's what we want to achieve.
@ahirschb2 жыл бұрын
Your reviews are simply amazing. I havr noticed you have used the GH6 for this review. Which means you've kept it:-) How do you like it so far? Does it pair well with this lens for video? (MF of course).
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
hey Amal, thank you Yes i've switched to the GH6 for my youtube videos now, i like it more than the S5. Better quality and more features. It should pair quite well with this lens if you want a short telephoto lens for low light or shallow DOF.
@halfalligator65182 жыл бұрын
Looks good value... but i'd probably rather get a 50/55/58mm vintage lens for half the price. Better optics but no auto-focus of course.
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
I love vintage lenses too! But a nice condition clean fast vintage is not cheap. especially 0.95 one. And would be much much bigger than this TTartisan, even before you add in an adaptor
@halfalligator65182 жыл бұрын
@@TheRealRichardWong Not sure about that. A good F1.4 Takumar lens could be found for less than half the price and they're pretty small even with an adapter. But yeah... each to their own. Depends how important that F/0.95 is I guess. If you need it, you need it and brand new is a great incentive too. This Artisan lens does look like a great buy - I'm not denying that.
@KenKthulhu2 жыл бұрын
how is it for APS-C and M43 ? I thought these were different shutter sizes? nice video and well done with the GH6 ! liked and subbed
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
Hi Ken, this lens is designed for APS-C camera but TTArtisan also release it with a m43 mount version so it's available for both. Thanks for the sub!
@forfilmssakeUK2 жыл бұрын
Hey Richard, did you need to do calibrating on the lens before being able to use it? I read that everyone who gotten this lens, needed to do so, least for the version of this lens made for Leica mount?
@TheRealRichardWong2 жыл бұрын
No need. For mirrorless camera because we just usually focus by looking through byhe evf/LCD to check focus, so you just adjust the focus until your subject is in focus. For Leica M lens that supports rangefinder coupling, it's a bit different as you are usually not using the evf/LCD to verify focus so you need to calibrate to make sure the focus preview through the optical rangefinder matches what you will get