Das neue gefällt mir besser👌

you can get the same sharpness at 1.4 from the 50mm 1.2

Thanks for watching and support again ! @Yanen Zein!

Depends on your camera. I use sony a lot and heard this TTArtisan could cover full-frame too, so I can use it on my 6600 and 7RIV, very affordable. I got mine yesterday, the first impression is very good, still testing it. And if the Zebra design of TTArtisan is your thing, I think you can go for TTArtisan.

yes a comparison of 50 0.95 lenses would be very interesting.

yeah if you already have a Kalmlan 50 1.1 then probably just stick with it :) having said that, I still haven't try that lens myself!

@@TheRealRichardWong you def should try the MK II (The MK I is pretty much subpar and not worth trying). Quite acceptable sharpness for a f1.1. The reduced contrast wide open gives portraits and street shots a slight vintage flair. I love my Kamlan 50mm f1.1 mk II. Only downside for me is the heavy construction (over 600g).

those ultra fast lenses are fun!

Hey Thanks OnCam31!!

Thank you very much Andrew!

I will see if i have a chance to do that :)

For sure! I don’t need this one. Btw I don’t like the design at all.

​ @Carlos André Viana I want to compare with the TTArtisan 50 1.2 (which you really can't beat in terms of value for money) unfortunately my sample for 50 1.2 is micro four thirds and 50 0.095 is fuji apsc so can't really compare :(

@@WVMUSIC_NL I don't really like the design as well at first. but after a while i starting to like it

Hey Andrew, it might not be the best choice for astrophotography. Probably best for portrait or anything doesn't need great corner sharpness/details at wide open

@@TheRealRichardWong Yeah, agreed. Could be a lot of fun with an ND filter for headshots, actually!

Yes exactly!!

Thabks Edwin, at the moment I have no plan to do that comparison review. But if more viewers are interested I can try get one done

@@TheRealRichardWong yes please😊

Thank you Filip! The TTArtisan 50 1.2 is great value for money, if you already have that, i will just keep using that. Unless you really want the 0.95, which does look quite a bit different to the 1.2. The picture quality of this lens is really decent for it's price, but the problem using this 50 0.95 for video is that the focus ring has quite a short focus throw, so it might be a bit hard to nail the focus compare to the Zhongyi Cine lens.

yeah pretty much all the TTArtisan lenses I've tried are very decent and great value for money! And yeah choose a lens by looking at the focal length you need instead of just because it's a nice lens :)

for me, the f0.95 helps when I want to keep the ISO low during the low light shooting. In addition, I really like the character that I get from the lens. Every picture becomes unique and challenge you. Sigma 56mm f1.4 is brilliantly sharp if that's what we want to achieve.

hey Amal, thank you Yes i've switched to the GH6 for my youtube videos now, i like it more than the S5. Better quality and more features. It should pair quite well with this lens if you want a short telephoto lens for low light or shallow DOF.

I love vintage lenses too! But a nice condition clean fast vintage is not cheap. especially 0.95 one. And would be much much bigger than this TTartisan, even before you add in an adaptor

@@TheRealRichardWong Not sure about that. A good F1.4 Takumar lens could be found for less than half the price and they're pretty small even with an adapter. But yeah... each to their own. Depends how important that F/0.95 is I guess. If you need it, you need it and brand new is a great incentive too. This Artisan lens does look like a great buy - I'm not denying that.

Hi Ken, this lens is designed for APS-C camera but TTArtisan also release it with a m43 mount version so it's available for both. Thanks for the sub!

No need. For mirrorless camera because we just usually focus by looking through byhe evf/LCD to check focus, so you just adjust the focus until your subject is in focus. For Leica M lens that supports rangefinder coupling, it's a bit different as you are usually not using the evf/LCD to verify focus so you need to calibrate to make sure the focus preview through the optical rangefinder matches what you will get

多謝支持！有機會我會試下做個廣東話嘅review