Precise oscillations of quantum entangled particles was also theorized, but also disproven, as even delaying the detection of one of the entangled particles did not change the sister particle from displaying the proper spin. There is nothing left, there is no other mechanism left which could communicate the appropriate information. The only reasonable conclusion is, three dimensional distance is an illusion, and particles themselves exist on a higher plane of existence, at least partially, which was already predicted in other theories. This would allow them to exist detached from time, so the information could be communicated to it as it was able to communicate with it at one point in time. It's 'hidden variable' could simply be that it simply does not need to do things in chronological order. If you really think about it however, anything which moves at the speed of light, cannot have a concept of time in the first place. Time would stop at that speed. So this time restricted order of operations does seem to be foreign idea to something which exists outside of it in the first place.

@@rich1051414 Donald Hoffman is on this in interesting ways

In order to understand the experiment you really have to understanding the bell inequality, if you understand you will be shocked.

This comment didn’t age well 😂

I too didn't get the part of how it's actually getting entangled. How are the two artifical diamonds related to one another? And even if the other diamond is a perfect copy of the first one, why are they taking the collective electron spin induced by a missing carbon atom taking into consideration? As far as I know, quantum entanglement means the two objects will move the same way as one object does. And the distance can be infinite.

I thought the same thing. It does not seem very convincing to me if the entanglement happens just before the measurement ;-)

This video isn't really explaining exactly what's happening, it's just giving a basic explanation, it's not 100% accurate to what the experiment is, but the bare basics is correct.

+stevenmcl1 Thanks :-). I read the paper and I also read more on the entanglement swapping, and this to me is a really sore point :-). I see two possibilities: a) the entanglement swapping at C *does* something to A and B. If that is the case, and actually *causes* some change somehow (I am not even speculating how :-), then it should in principle be possible to check that something has changed later on. For instance, if we don't do C, then we get certain statistics for the spins of A and B. If we do C, then the stats for A and B are different - I mean beyond the experiments. If any of the spins was actually *changed* because of C, that could possibly later be verified, since the spins do not just vanish (maybe we measure the spin again at an angle of 0, which is obvious etc) (I doubt anyone is seriously claiming that hat is done at C is actually *causing* a *physical* entanglement at A and B?). b) the entanglement swapping is just used as a *filter*, that picks out the right photons to be measured (using the interference). In that case, there is no actuall physical change of any kind, no "real" physical entanglement (other than on paper ;-). Then to me it begs the question: if A and B had nothing in common before and C does not change anything, then is calling A and B "entangled" maybe a bit exaggerated ;-)?

Chantal Roth I'm not entirely sure about the process in itself as I'm not versed that greatly in Quantum Mechanics, but from what I'm reading if I'm looking at the diagrams and material correctly, that they're recording the outcomes in 3 separate locations. Two being with the diamonds themselves, and the final location being where the sensors are at C. So it may be possible that they're reading from A and B whether or not their spin is "1 or 0" and then recording the end result at C as both being "1 or 0" to correlate the detected information? I could possibly be reading this wrong, but I suppose that would make sense considering they were timestamping the results with a randomly generated number along with it. So I suppose in this instance, again if I'm reading this correctly, it's got in total 4 answers it correlates. To best explain what I'm thinking, it would be this: (A: Diamond 1 Emitter. B: Diamond 2 Emitter. Ca: Diamond 1 Receiver. Cb: Diamond 2 Receiver.) So therefor in example A: 1, B: 0, Ca: 1, Cb: 0 correlated would mean a successful recording with the timestamping? I don't see anywhere really how they matched up the data so that could be the case if I didn't overlook anything, but I'm just speculating at this point.

+casaamaril it's instant.

Two electrons at two seemingly different places are in singlet state. If you make measurement of polarization or spin on one particle, second particle will instantly change its state to give you exactly opposite result (law of conservation of momentum), no matter how distant those particles are. By measurement is meant any form of physical interaction from which can be state of the particle derived. But you still can't use this phenomenon to send any form of information by speed higher than the speed of light. It's hypothesized the way spacetime is created and basic geometric spacetime structure is in very intimate correlation with this action at a distance. And that it's responsible for existence of spacetime.

+Matúš Frisík Thank you Matús for your response!

You're welcome. And entanglement doesn't take place in 80% of experiments. 80% means correlation between measurements of entangled states. All electrons measured are entangled in this experiment. Otherwise, experiment would be useless. Mathematically, probability derived by Bell's inequalities says that correlation should be equal or less than 75%. If electrons have some hidden variables that determine result of experiments. But experiment proved it's 80% which is in accordance with theory and it proved that there are not hidden variables and particles are truly in quantum entangled state.

+Matúš Frisík Mat. I disagree with your hypothesis. I think it possible to transmit and receive information faster then light speed. As particals are entangled, a matrix of said could be amassed at different site anywhere within the universe. By encoding one group with the other, discernible information could be sent by changing one or the other matrix structures. The other would respond instantaneously. Not unlike Morse Code at its' simplest. Efforts are being made to build a quantum computer. Build two, separate them and they would be able to communicate over any distance instantly without any physical interface whatever.

+WeNDoRx I want to know as well............................

+WeNDoRx For those looking for the soundtrack: www.scixel.es/#soundtrack

+Enrique Sahagun Thank you verry much for the response :)

Enrique's link is dead, just goes to that site, nothing about the song :( What is it?

+Mark G I wanna know also...

+Mark G me too

+Mark G Me too!

Me too.

It's called "duh-duh-duh, duh-duh, dum-duh dum-duh.." (repeat to infinity)

Maybe this video can help you understand the 75% kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sJekqraLq5rKfIE.html

Not sure about these electrons, but if you have one in a atom orbital you can excite it to a different level and by doing so change its spin.

Exactly what I thought.

mioumitsou forces or any interaction in the universe is via force carrying particles which has a zero rest mass and travel at the speed of light.. also light is the force carrying particle of electromagnetism hence no information can travel faster than the speed of light

Information is any data which can be used to make any form of predictions or can be used for any form of analysis of a system as of currently we know any information can be sent only by use of some form of energy so no information can travel faster than light

Well i suppose if there is a causal link here that is operating faster than the speed of light than how can space be real? If any two things in the physical universe are to affect one another than the fastest that interaction should be able to take place is the speed of light. in quantum mechanics this is not the case and locality seems to be violated, that is why Einstein called this "spooky action at a distance". Personally my years of truth seeking have brought me to the reality of Idealism - reality is fundamentally mental, consciousness or being is what is real. Hence the soul exists

Because those particles that they travel just before they are measured they are waves of possibilities AKA have not yet become anything physical/solid, but once they are measured/bombarded with light/observed call it whatever you want to call it, they become solid/physical.... That's why Einstein didn't like the spooky action at distance, he said even if he don't look at the moon he can not accept to believe that the moon is not there just because he is not looking at it.... Welcome to Quantum Physics, the science that puts all religions to shame when it comes to weirdness.

Basically it like, conditional probability. Once Event E i.e first apple coming up Green happens it affects the probability of another one turning Red or Green.. so it is not that both end up being Green or Red Just probabilities change.. it becomes more likely ..

This is your connection outside of the matrix.

+eblanco78 No, it doesn't

The 'particles' are electrons, trapped in nitrogen vacancies (see video at 03:28)

lol

We didnt have the tech to construct quit in lattice, and probably Laser was not as strong to focus on single atom.

Wow, copy-and-paste works fine in the replies, but not in the comments... Here is the link: www.cnet.com/news/physicists-prove-einsteins-spooky-quantum-entanglement/

+bennie gek I am also interested in the question of why it's not 100%

+bennie gek Could be a certain margin of error with the experiment itself, are all sets of photons properly entangling when they are supposed to for example.

+bennie gek because relativity and quantum mechanics are not two theories that contradict each other. Einstein just didn't like the idea of something that happens at random.

+bennie gek This actually proves the things that Einstein showed in regards to quantum mechanics. However Einstein didn't like the implications of his own work and so he said there must be something else going on that we don't know about - the "hidden variables". He probably felt this was necessary because the speed of light is really a stand in for the speed of causality, and this "spooky action at a distance" breaks that limit. This experiment helps prove that the hidden variables don't exist and that Einstein's original predictions about "action at a distance" are correct.

no men, this actually proves Einstein was wrong.... Einstein thought that there is a some sort of a hidden force that predict what will be the variable ahead of time. Either way, whether Einstein proven wrong or wright does not take away the weirdness of how 2 particles communicate instantaneously at distances that our minds can not even grasp, and yet whatever happens on the macro level does not influence us not 1 bit in our every day life.

+Tyler Cole you can't patent the sun.. ahaha...

Ye's. Now I actually think I understand what U are talking about, but would U care to elaborate/explain, so the others do, too?

Oh I understood it just fine. That is why it could have been presented much faster.