You nailed it

As Robert Montgomery Knight once said their is no other word in the English language that has so many different meanings. I like someone who is comfortable is talking how they want to talk with zero fucks given. Ha.

Agreed. Switched off his video when all the crap talk started, grandkids don’t need to be hearing all that crap. Every other word was f this f that. He will grow out of it someday Hopefully

I was really interested in that Tuner but once the language became gratuitously foul I turned it off. Hope this isn't indicative of the young shooters that will replace us old guys.

100 yards. Standard distance.

Yup!

Why would it be on the front of the brake? EC tuner, ATS tuner, they all go behind the muzzle device. This one is no different.

@@Covertnoob5 The tuner on the EC tuner brake is in front of the brake.

@@echofoxtrotwhiskey1595 yes but the regular EC tuner goes behind the muzzle device. That’s what I was referring too.

I second Erick Cortina's EC tuner break. I have several and are the best I have found so far.

I can definitely try to do something like that. I like that idea. Same gun same everything. I might be able to get it done in a couple weeks. I just don’t want people to say I should’ve done 20 round groups or 30. Some people are just never satisfied.

@@Covertnoob5 Good test & all. Thank you for the effort & expense. It's not like this kind of testing costs didley these days. I do agree with The Longshot Project though. For me, it's not confirmation whether tuners have an effect or, that they can be made to work or not but, 3 shot groups really don't tell much of a story at all. Trouble is, guys put way too much inference on the group size changes between tuner adjustments, not realizing that a 4th or 5th shot is more likely than not to blow the group out. I don't think it's necessary to use 10 shots per during tuning however, I do think it very necessary to confirm the setting you have chosen.

@@rotasaustralis thanks for the watch! I can definitely do another smaller test as was mentioned and update the results in another video.

@@Covertnoob5 Thanks man. To clarify, if you do test the chosen setting with 10 shots, that is statistically far more robust than 3 shots. Also, with 10 shots, the group will almost certainly get larger but, this is not the issue &, it is definitely not a problem however, if the tuner setting is good, that 10 shot group will look very good when compared to your previous groups with that rifle before the tuner. Comparison to previous groups is in essence, comparing previous data & is perfectly valid. If the 10 shot opens up though, it's a sign that the 3 shot group you based the decision on wasn't so trustworthy as it appeared &, not to be assumed that the tuner doesn't work. Looking fwd to see the result.

I believe the methodology was sound given that he was looking for consecutive good groups at different settings just like can be done with velocity node. Consider that part 1. Now just set the tuner in the middle of node and go shoot a 10 shot group for validation.

Yes sir. This was filmed on the pistol side at 100yds

Video is literally labeled not for kids. And if their ears are too sensitive for certain words then good luck in life.

Kids hear worst crap on the street in School fool.

My same fuckin thoughts...

Lol completely false. Go out and actually shoot with a good tuner and you’ll learn something.

@@Covertnoob5 I have.

@@rotasaustralis and which tuners did you test? I’ve used this one, the ATS tuner, and EC tuner. They all work. I’ve taken the tuner off swapped for a regular brake then put the tuner back on same setting and it makes a difference. It’s not something I wanted to see, I say in the review if you actually pay attention, I was as skeptical as anyone. But it flat works. How do you explain consistent groups then big groups same rifle same load same shooter same range session. If you don’t see it in your setup, then look to your reloading practices, your rifle, or your ability as a shooter first. There’s a reason a good amount of top competitors are now running a tuner of some sort.

@@Covertnoob5 Used an F class style adjustable weight with no brake. The initial weight definitely changed POI & seemed to make a positive improvement in repeatability. After the initial weight effect, the small adjustments were statistically indefinable on target until the weight was all the way out which was a little over 1/2" where the POI changed again & the groups seemed to open up shooting multiple 5 shot groups. Although the number of groups was not enough to make a statistically valid determination, I fired more shots than most testing I've seen & read about &, that's really the point. There's little doubt that the addition of a substantial mass added to the end of a barrel has a generally positive effect as well as a measurable POI change however, the effect of movement of that mass due to tiny increments is difficult to believe given the miniscule difference in calculated reaction force on a cantilever beam &, my initial shooting results supported those calculated differences. I think it would be more beneficial to test different tuner weights rather than moving the mass a few thou at a time. That will be my next lot of tests.

You really don’t understand the physics behind a barell tuner. And don’t say you do, because you don’t. Your comment is IQ20

Poor little thing.

Lmfao OR you could actually try an EC brake and realize while the tuner works, the brake portion isn’t nearly as effective. Try actually shooting guns instead of your mouth on the internet you idiot.