At first. I also struggled to see where Chung's unique vision was in the film. Then, I started seeing how "polite" this film was. Minari director who grew up in Arkansas knew the setting of the film well. He depicted the Southern people and their culture with affection and made a film whose storyline was wholesome and good, nothing offensive to any Southern moviegoers. In addition, being the good Christian, he emphasizes unselfishness and dedication to saving lives throughout the film. These are all traditional and old values, but in today's day and age, seeing these on the forefront of a major blockbuster film's storyline is so refreshing. I thought Chung did solid work with a good amount of his personality quite visibly sprinkled.

Shame about the images because it was shot on film

I'm seeing Twisters in theaters on Friday. I just want to see Daisy Edgar-Jones on the big screen

I've just seen Twisters on IMAX and is a blast and spectacular! I was surprised by how thrilling it was! It was as good as Twister from 1996! I just missed the flying cow from the first movie!😅 I recommend to see Twisters at cinema for convincing special effects! I give it a 7 from 10.

I think nobody had the expectation to be an Oscar contender… I personally liked this one better than the first one. The first movie is too repetitive in my opinion, all the tornado chasing are for the exact same purpose. This one has more character development, and explores more reasons to chase a tornado despite getting information about it. And the performances were better too…. I gave 6/10 to the first one and 7/10 to this one.

Just saw it. Better than average blockbuster entertainment. Definitely not the best but there's plenty of place between the average and the top

Brother bro getting HYPED for the Angry Birds sequel

I haven’t seen it yet but I get the vibe that they’re only reviewing it and interested in it because Isaac Chung also directed Minari, even though this is clearly a summer action movie and not an indie Oscar darling. Just doesn’t feel like they’re meeting the film on its own terms

You guys aren't wrong about flat modern cinematography. To be fair it isn't too far off what Top Gun looks like, but that had a warmer palette. no one wants to play with color and contrast anymore and it drains the energy and visual interest out of everything.

Looks spectacular

Spoiler warning. I must say. It's a hit and miss with me. It didn't give me the original vibe. The action was good but also made no real scientific sense. Even when the heavy Ram 2500 planted itself in the ground, it made no sense that it didn't get picked up inside the twister while buildings were being ripped apart. The casts acting was great but the script and some action scenes just fell short to me. Better than half the movies that came out this past year but just doesn't live up to the original for me.

Other than the lead woman character, I did not like the characters in this story but I did like the plot and the emphasis on helping people and spoilers her experiment working at the end.

Lee Isaac Chung grew up where Twisters is set. The choice of locations alone is very personal to him.

The Golden Age has started as confirmed by Dr Pillai in one of his Live Guru Purnima sessions. He just consecrated in his fire ritual centre The Seven Saptarishis statues They are actually our forefathers. They are represented as seven bright stars in the Big Dipper constellation. Their light when brought down to the Earth Plane is auspicious especially in this Golden Age.

As long as we’re seeping into the era of Daisy Edgar Jones SUPREMACY I’m good. I love her and where was her Oscar nomination for “Where The Crawdads Sing”?

Totally agree with your reviews on this. Although, I thought Mark Mancina's score in the original with electric guitars and choral voices was a God-tier score up there with Jurassic Park, and that paired with the growling of the tornadoes in the original gave it suspense and dread and awe. De Bont knew he was making a monster movie - essentially JAWS with tornadoes. It felt inconceivable to be a filmmaker who gets access to a film franchise with that Mark Mancina music as part of the IP and then to just ignore it. Madness.

Not sure what you expected but you might have taken it a bit to seriously? Same as the 1st it's a bit of Craic.

For the Achana with prayers. Remember to Touch the flame of the lighted lamp and put it on top of your head This is to get the divinity, in this case Babaji, into your body and raise your consciousness. This is Haarti For any flowers they throw at you, catch them and place on your shoulders. Flowers catch the dignity messages from the spaces and they directly transmit to you as a participant of the video For the food offerings, raise your hands to take the food. This is Praasad. This is to mentally enact as if you are taking the food so that you are enriched spiritually. Use your right hand always For completeness sake sometimes they take the water in a pot that has been prayed and sprinkle it towards you with a sprig. You are to catch it and drop on your head. It is not applicable here. The water helps to purify you as a divine being

How similar is this to the classic?

Keep it on boys💥💥

3:50 timestamp - ooooohh yeeees cole😏😏😏 PS. Oscar animation preds need to be posted ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!! dammit

Glen Powell is getting typecast as “charming handsome guy”. Would love to see him in a darker/more serious role

With this Golden Age upon us, although intuitive thinking is stressed straight from the heart where the doul resided, you still need the logical mind to manifest through word formation and sounds ,(different. Or same set of mantras). Then you need to gotm words in your affirmation. Do spinf creates light which in turn gorm words which we utter and project out innrr selves to the outer environment for manifestation. How soon you manifest depends on how evolve you are over many past lives For details and initiation and immersion, you cann participate in Dr Pillai's course. Also to get his blessings.

The lead actress in this was gorgeous. I couldn't take my eyes off her.

where was your rating ? 😂

Wwisters

It's Twisters, I'm not sure what you expected. And bullshit you like The Eternals more then most Marvel films.

To be honest I've never been excited for this film. I'd prefer to watch _Minari_ again.

I had a feeling this movie was going to be rough from the very first scene when one tornado expert says to the other tornado experts "no, overpasses are the worst in a tornado", seemingly only for the benefit of the audience. It is funny that Kiernan Shipka has two films out right now that she's in for only one scene. I'd been defending this as a fitting choice for Lee Isaac Chung's jump to blockbuster filmmaking given the similar setting and imagery to Minari, but I was very disappointed. The romance? Daisy Edgar Jones and Glen Powell's characters don't even kiss once. The score was indeed really strong though.

i thought it was fun

Great opening sequence. The rest is a bore. Rewatched the original right after. Such a great blockbuster flick.

Spin Spin Sugar

Hello there is tahar rahim coming with à film called monsieur aznavour he is playing the icon charles aznavour and I think hé deserves to be in you list guys and I think it will be a second win or nomination for french performance since marion cotillard and first for french actor for people who dont know who is charles aznavour he is the french frank sinatra variety annonce that last year it will be realsed 23 october this fall

Everything about this movie looks so corny and like they're trying to bank on boomer nostalgia. Glen Powell's whole "schtick" is trying to replicate an almost obsolete culture of movie star that doesn't exist anymore. I never believed this movie for the Oscars, and I hope Lee Isaac Chung goes back to indies lol

I was on the fence and waiting for a few reviews to come in today, and you have sealed the deal… skipping it