Rc8+ is a best xD

@@h-noonyt9741 Other than capture or a check then?

AHAHAHAHAHA

@@Turalcar or an early game move

Dontlike it leave it at 666

That's why Gotham's and Hikaru's sub battles are so good when they get to sub 800. Pure randomness and anyone can win

Oh absolutely

@@justames5979 well I'm offended ☹

@@sonnyphillips9227 I was gonna say me too but then I remembered that I am 1800

@@justcallmekyri4238 well I don't appreciate the absolute slander of my 800-900 brothers

for once, the "lmao" is genuine lmao

Same hahaha

along with the rook movement

What does the bar signify?

@@dsnv6898 who's winning, based on computer evaluation

LMFAO

Well it’s not the only losing move it’s the thing you need to protect cuz next move it’s attack

Any move that doesn't move/protect the king or rook in this position is a losing move for black because it leads to this same check trap

LOL

Relatable tbh

for those that might not know it, thats standard chess notation and precedes chess bots

By the way, ? is worse than !?

@@joaomartins3367 Nope those are the bot's real time reactions to moves

?! = "Okay, that's an...odd move. Not what I would have done. But idk maybe he's going somewhere with this" ? = "That was pretty bad, but you can still recover from this" ?? = "Seriously dude??"

@@1funsun1 and "!?" Is an interesting/speculative move that is not sure to work out or be efficient

More like "oh no my entire board"

Should have played the Reverse Rosen Stafford Gambit

"Oh no my king"

oh no my bishop

Could someone explain to me why it was so bad that white trades queens? The game says it's a bad move, but I don't see any huge loss besides that black gets their rook out.

Yeah ikr

Yesss. We just go for piece grab and small tactics related to that. We never plan for complex and long term plans

As a 1900 i can relate

So true, so accurate haha

I've only just reached 800 rating (been stuck at 600) and won all my last 11 games. At least 4 of those were from my opponent resigning the minute I took their queen. Like if there's anything I've learned, at this rating people mess up and blunder all the time so you still have a fighting chance even if you lose your queen. Also I get the feeling that my opponents probably get super excited if I ever blunder my queen and then that distracts them for the rest of the game and I end up winning.

Me: "The problem with this AI... is that it just doesn't understand my strategies" **gets checkmated immediately**

If neither you nor the engine understand what you are doing, how could an enemy possibly do it?

“My goals are beyond your understanding”

そか A-chan

Baka

I reckon some GMs could learn a thing or two about clock management from them. This was a 20 min game and they took about 5 and 7 minutes. To an 800 rated player playing on the internet they might not come up with better moves with more time.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLuggJqrrKuzY6c.html

It leads to very unique positions, can be played in top level also

scandinavian is bad at this lvl

I played it when I was 700-900 elo , in blitz it's horrible but rapid it just simplifies position, central pawns don't play huge role so it's fine for me , I usually play gambits.

Can we all agree that people who play the Scandinavian are annoying

@@nathanielcopperfish912 lmao i spend an hour learning an opening and then all i face is the scandinavian honestly

And 800’s over the board would play a move after getting checkmated because they won’t have the computer guidance of what moves are possible.

I know right, but what you got to be real careful about... You see that pawn coming up, then the bishop then a knight or a queen. Thats the most used openings lol.

@@JordanMetroidManiac That's honestly a reason why I'm scared to play for real cause it's way easier on the computer I find

Dunning-Kruger effect

@@rykehuss3435 nope all low lvl chess players know that they are horrible but we play because its fun

It seems like they're acting more confident because it's sped up. If it was real-time then it would probably be easier to see the parts where they struggled.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLuggJqrrKuzY6c.html

It actually happened to me a few weeks ago 😅😅

What does the bar mean

@@justsomegoosewithinterneta4199 no, the bar is just an analysis of the current position by the engine

@@ThemightyTho it literally says how good your position is. if the bar is more black, black has a better position and vise versa. Computer only looks at the best possible moves though so it doesn't mean anything if you can't find those moves.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLuggJqrrKuzY6c.html

@AAYUSH MOHTA as a 450 i have made 1

As a 1400 I just made my first today and I still don't get why capturing a hanging piece was brilliant

As for me i blundered right after the brillant move and lost

@@magnusk.n.9472 Chess in a nutshell. You're completely destroying your opponent and the next thing you know you make 1 really stupid blunder and all of a sudden you're losing

Which moves were brilliant in this game? Ive only had 1 ever as 1400 and it was against a bot sadge

they'll always resign a game that they're certain to lose. It's just that if they assume their opponent is near their level then they've never found a game they're certain to lose. Even When they're 2 queens down stalemate is fairly likely.

@@davidwillis7991 I disagree some player at this level never paid attention to this button! When it arrives it isn't giving up it is a rage quit by closing the window

@@davidwillis7991 they really never do, even at like 1100

True 800: Waits until 2 seconds left on the timer, hoping you'll get annoyed/forget & just close the window.

@@orcahhh8017 i like getting checkmated xD

hahaha underrated comment

it should be allowed, those rules make no sense, cause the king can move after he's checked, so why not castle! no logic. and the stalemate makes no sense. i am a 2000 rated player

@@goldenbeardofficial8541 I know ur being funny, but apart from the check he had already moved his king

Lmao

@@goldenbeardofficial8541 I'm not sure but I think it's because castling is considered to be two move in one. Same as the pawn moving two squares forward, so that's why you can take _en passant_ When you castle during the "intermediate" move you can consider the king's still in check, so that would not be allowed. (I suppose that's also why you can't castle if a square between the rook and the king is threatened)

Then teach me you 800+ skill cuz i know you used to be in 800 as well

@@opfirefly6611 Wait Wait Wait!! Seriously? Obviously dude, that's exactly the reason why this is so funny!! It wasn't a criticism!

@@eddiebaca2660 I know lmao just tryna find someone to help me move out of 900

@@opfirefly6611 Here is an interesting idea. Grandmasters can try to teach little 900’s (pretty much the ordinary person) how to play better chess, but it’s super easy for them to make assumptions on how you think. An 1100 rated player would not make assumptions. They only know the difference between 1100 and 900. That’s because they know when the 900 makes a bad odor weird-looking move (an inaccuracy) and they sometimes know how to exploit it. So then the 900 gets advice on only improving to 1100 (which is a huge improvement to be honest, any +200 rating improvement is impressive). I’m not super good, just 1150 blitz on chess.com, but if you want to play me a few 5|5 games, I can tell you what I think about each move you played so you can see where it contrasts with what you think, even if you win the games or are actually more accurate in your thinking processes. It would just be to give advice on specific tactical and positional concepts that I particularly understand, which would generally be better than those of a 900. But then there are 1300’s (and better) who would crush me and could give me their advice, so know that my advice would not be perfect. I can only really determine what moves would be bad for you. Message me on chess.com if you’re interested in trying this. Username is NapoleanBlownApart.

Bro I’m 1200 and I make that mistake sometimes😂

@@somerandomperson8135 lol I'm 2400 and I make it once in a while

Lol i’m 10000 and I also make that mistake sometimes

Happened with me today😂

@@eeeesyywuwiz2836 1000 you mean?

just play hyperbullet instead LOL (i flag in 30+0 rapid matches lol)(2000 on lichess.com)

Yeah, he thought for only 19 seconds and then played G5?? lol

Idk man it took him 30 seconds to recapture a bishop

@Maurits chess is a game of pure analysis.beginners should play correspondence or 30 minute games and play with a physical board if they can (they should play with touch move rule). it will make easier to analyze positions without blitzing out dumb moves.

@@nebilm8947 Any time control that doesn't force a player not to think is fine. Clearly in a 20 minutes each game these players were not worried about the clock in the slightest.

Close enough.

the dude hung his rook, his only good piece left especially in an endgame, he's absolutely screwed at that point

@@loggites it says white won tho?

@@howlmma2666 In the last position shown, the black king is in check and has to move, so white’s next move is to take the rook. And after that the endgame should be losing

@@stephendonovan9084 what? I dont understand, you are saying black will capture whites rook? You probably mean the other way around. Blacks king has to move so his own rook is exposed and whites rook will capture blacks rook. Also is the game really over at this point? Black still hs his bishop and an equal amount of pawns

@@nou2500 blacks forced move with the king counts as a move so white basically won

yes

its called a skewer

Also white resigned

It was at this moment, he knew, he fucked up

@@potatoheadpokemario1931 no, white win, black resign

Scandinavian Defense is great if you're a good and precise player.

@@phrog8728 exactly

Correction: never play the Scandinavian defense when your ELO is 800

@@phrog8728 i am a hard stuck 2000 and scandinavian is my main weapon against e4 (and grünfeld against d4) because i don't like caro-kann sidelines

@@danlorett2184 it is just center countershot thingy thrown over 2 knights defense lol. these guys know nothing about pawn structures and color-complex play.

I don't even know openings I waste 2 min of rapid on my second move.

@@user-vi3pi9rf7w Learn the London, and you won't have think at all before move 10 in 90% of your games. Alternatively, learn the Italian, as most people at your level will play against it in almost exactly the same way.

@@maxkho00 lol how is that so true, I only play Italian with white and kings Indian defense with black. Will check out London system.

@@user-vi3pi9rf7w I play the exact same openings lol. Italian (Evans Gambit) as White, King's Indian (Grunfeld/neo-Grunfeld) as Black. I've been playing the Italian since 1000 (I'm now 1800), and it has served me well ever since. It truly is the best opening for amateurs of all levels.

@@user-vi3pi9rf7w the London got me to 1300, it’s a great opening.

The worst part is: there are lower elos than this

@@suezuccati304 Don't disrespect people of lower elo rating

@@ashishsam I have a circle of friends where we constantly joke about being bad, sorry, it was force of habit. Im also an 800 so i have no authority to trash talk people in chess

@@suezuccati304 no problem

@Bad Dream I'm also 1200, i meant that one shouldn't take it as a "worst past". Chess exists mostly because of these people as audience.

*every single John Cena match

PiztoLice)))))))

lmao tnx I only made it for fun anyways

@@piztolice3459 was that a karaoke version of bakamitai you used as background music?

@@landmaster2074 it's the one that everyone was using for those deepfakes a few months back kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mtp8Z5am09bbZI0.html

@@goosewalk7457 yes but i thought that the singer here isnt the original singer

@@landmaster2074 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bdKYfZN9v9raY6s.html found it

U don't understand chess or music?

Basically he was losing, but then he won the tower, because the king was defending it

@@brysiek5579 I know chess rules, but I don't understand much here either. The moves happen so fast and there's a lot of extra bits and zooms. What do those icons in the round bubbles after a piece moved mean? Why are there so many arrows everywhere, what am I supposed to look at? What does that black/white bar represent?

@@MrZerodaim The icons are what stockfish (chess bot) thinks about your play, like if you do a very stupid one (like me) and then you ask for a analysis of the game he will show that “??” The black and white bars are the points, if white is bigger than black so white is winning the game The arrows are the moves that can be made, is a visual way to think, like: “hum, if black’s king moves there I move my queen there and I win the game. You are supposed to look to all of this, but the main joke is that there’s a very good play from white that wins the tower (the king must move and the king is blocking the attack in the tower, so when it moves the tower becomes exposed)

@@Mr_PotatoMaster Thanks. Getting the blunder is easy, but there was so much info during the buildup. Makes it even better.

KZfaq always recommended masterpieces

Same

I didn't hear it

@@Takeo.Athlie anata ga

@@ihatetobethatguybut7175 i think its "ieta no" 言えたの

@@Takeo.Athlie 0:54

I’m rated 1400 and fight to the end. It wins me about 30-40% of the games that I blunder early in. Don’t resign if you aren’t playing over the board against a master.

You can be surprised at lower level how people fuck up their advantages.. Leave resignation to the experts and above

White won black's rook at the end. When white checked black, on black's next turn he is forced to move his king or block. Since he can't block, and black's king cant move to defend black's rook, white will win the rook on the next turn. Black knew this, so he just quit the game. This is why you have to pay attention for pieces that are on the same line or diagonal. That evaluation bar gave white +5.9 after that play, which means that it's about the same as being 6 pawns ahead, and should be an easy win. But when you and your opponent suck at chess, it's not worth resigning because someone will probably fuck up again later.

@@TwenOalley Oh so that’s what it meant when the bar turned nearly all white lmao

I blunder more than 10 times every game.

As a 1900 oh I'm 1800 already I've been playing like that for the past couple of days...

I like how I’m a 1600 that played with 2 accuracy for one game it looked like I was drunk

The 2 accuracy came from book moves btw

@@strenngth2024 That's actually pretty impressive, I've never seen any of my opponents below that atrocious accuracy before. Even if I tried using the Crab Opening, it's hard to go for low accuracy.

White gave black a chance to develop his rook and an open file by recapturing the queen. He could've just castled.

Ok, thank you

@@alambicco9914 more importantly, white could have used the queen to fork the bishop and knight with Qf3, winning free stuff instead of just a trade.

@@J7Handle couldn't black do Nc3 having white to trade a knight for a knight or a knight for a bishop

@@bromatath4901 Yes, but black’s bishop is still pinned to the king after recapturing the knight with the pawn. Either black unpins by moving the king back to the 8th rank (in which case the bishop is taken), or black defends the bishop with a pawn (in which case you play g4 to take the pinned bishop with the pawn), OR black moves the king to the 6th rank to unpin and defend the bishop at the same time (but that’s just leaves black’s king wide in the open). In either outcome, black is at a disadvantage of some sort, which is why Qf3 is among the best moves white could play instead of trading queens. I didn’t know Qf3 was the best move until I read it here. But I can easily see why it’s best now that I know 😂

level? all i know is ELO man

Yeah you seem like a man of chess when you say *level*

@@Anonymous-hj7yv I started playing when charlie started playing then I started watching hikaru on KZfaq. It's pretty fun

@@jadenshah next time use the word ELO rating😉

I didn’t realize the puzzles affected your rating, so now I’m a 1002 elo and lose 80% of my games :/

Ikr XD

Except this meme showed the entire game, and you don't need to think any number of moves into the future to understand it.

@@maxkho00 You do though? All he did was get the king in check, not even checkmate. You have to thibk ahead about how now he made it where the rook has to die, then he can wipe out the pawns with the rook before anything can stop him, ruining the opponent's chances at winning

@@fuwafuwa2299 Bruh he is up an entire rook. Regardless of whether he manages to wipe out Black's pawns (which he will not be able to do immediately due to Kf7 followed by Kg6), he will win the game simply because he is up an entire rook. No calculation required to understand that whatsoever. Also, going for Black's pawns with the rook in that position is a bad idea as it just wastes time and achieves nothing. What White should do is simply push his a pawn towards promotion, which Black can only stop by sacrificing a bishop. So much for your "thinking three moves ahead", right?

lol he’s up an exchange and some pawns which for 800s is basically nothing

@@maxkho00 lol u sound like a redditor

Yeah good Gambit for bullet game

Can you explain botez gambit joke? I'm 250 elo so I don't get the video entirely...

@@mapron1 A "gambit" is where a player sacrifices material in order to get a better position or a lead in material (a queen's gambit for example is where you lose a pawn for control of the centre), however when a player accidentally blunders a piece they will often joke that they have in fact "gambited" rather than losing it outright. Alexandria Botez is a famous chess streamer who gained infamy by blundering her queen a few times (she's a Women's FIDE master), and so coined the term "Botez Gambit" for when a player blunders a queen. As for the video the player didn't actually gambit they just traded queens, but in the final move black blundered his rook as it was about to be taken once black got out of check.

@@yetanotheryoutubechannel6290 Thanks, I heard about Botez, but did not follow her or heard about her play! I knew about "gambit" term.

yeah but then he immediately traded the queen, so he just threw away the bishop for nothing

It's the shun Akiyama version of baka mitai :) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bdKYfZN9v9raY6s.html

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bdKYfZN9v9raY6s.html&ab_channel=SitiNurliana from yakuza 5 (good game)