would love to see this but with the us against china instead, also would love too see the iver huitfeld class frigate in a video ;)

If you manage to intercept a hypersonic missile a few hundred feet from its target - the missile is still going to take your ship out. You'll just convert it into a massive fragmentation bomb which will tear everything important to pieces - sensors, RADAR, personnel. That 45 would be history.

In Real Scenario, they would launch barrage of YJ-18 missiles first, while firing YJ-21 wave after YJ-18 reach halfway. So they would arrive in the same time and the effects would be massive

The YJ-21 that was intercepted just next to a T45 would have inflicted a LOT of shrapnel damage on the upper decks. When u intercept a missile head on (ish) then bits of shrapnel may behave like a titanic shotgun blast.

8 Type055 already in service, and 8 more will be under construction

I can't wait to see if someone does the constellation class frigate from the U.S. against other frigates

The Type 055 is -by far- the most advanced and capable Destroyer Class in the world, according to most relevant Naval experts. They are NO MATCH against the British equivalents, which are not even in top 5 among Destroyers globally on most lists (2022-). Not even the latest Arleigh-Burke Flights are equal. Type 055s have anti/ship ballistic missiles etc. And the largest and most sensitive radar detection fields in the world, not to mention the type 055 is super hard to see on enemy radars due to their anti-radar stealth design - not even mentioned here. Also, not even all systems and capabilities on the type 055 are even known yet. You are quite funny to suggest they have a chance. 🙂 Thank goodness, we will probably never find out how this battle would end IRL.

In reality, Chinese Navy would send out >1000 drones through 075 type ships first to drain your air--defense missiles first before launching any YJ18 or YJ21 anti-ship missiles.

The type 55 and type 52 are built as group defense warship to protect carriers. Its amount of VLS is carries are the answers

Let's not say why Type055 and 052D come close to the range of SPEAR 5 can hit, YJ-21 can be intercepted? Over 10 mark missile strike vertically can not be intercepted yet on this planet

In real life the YJ-18s and YJ-21s would be timed so they arrive on target simultaneously. Same goes for the Spears and Naval Strike Missiles. The side that carries the most "tube" (most AAMs) prevail. But basically in a future peer-to-peer fight, no surface vessel is safe.

I dont think YJ-21 could be intercepted so easily.

CSIS War game shows YJ 18’s all fired first then YJ-21 fired at half way mark to overwhelm defense of ships like they were designed. YJ-21 is Mach 6 and terminal speed of Mach 10. You have it backwards and don’t have these Chinese ships programmed correctly.

the antiship SPEAR 5 looks like how the f104 would look like if it was a unmanned missile

I've seen a lot of discussion on Chinese websites about type26 destroyers, and the general consensus is that the ship offers too much space for sailors' comfort and too little for weapons, with some calling it a "luxury cruise ship with advanced weapons." type26 does a good job of form factor design and high-tech weaponry, but it is not an "go all out" warship, and usually a destroyer of this tonnage can have more weapons systems.

No self respecting Brit will ever turn down the chance for a sea battle.

In real combats, no one can adjust the parameters to give the losing side some decencies.

I like how each Spear 5 has 4 interceptors flying right at it in a line. The PLAN want to make damn sure they hit it.

This channel is the best. Good content posted everyday. Thank you Grim Reapers for killing the boredom.

UK please get out of pacific, we Taiwannese doesn't want have war with CCP, but US and UK try to let Taiwan becoming Ukraine. Very terrible idea. Taiwan people don't have any hate with Mainland China people. Actually, without Western, we can have peace life with Mainland China.

2 yj21s hit the same ship at 12mins btw. great video, happy 100 naval battles!

that first last ditch sea-scepter intercept was amazing, the way it TV'ed right out of the tube to interpose itself between the ship and the missile. IRL that would probably still have been a mission killed ship, at such short range the remains of the YJ-21 would have become mach 6 buckshot.

Good video :) we did better than I expected ☕ Love your work lads

*"the Type055 is incredibly expensive" Meanwhile the confused Chinese designer thinking less than half the price of an Arleigh Burke is supposed to be good...

12:16 In the immortal words of The Mighty Jingles, “If you throw enough shit at the wall, eventually some of it is going to stick.”

Bro I died😂😂 “it almost hit them, if that helps” and “god save the Qu…ing”

The way the AI is wasting the chinese SAM's is unreal. I don't know if there's some coding bias going on ( I don't think so ) but if they weren't so much stronger ships they would loose with the way they were wasting their missiles.

FYI RN warfare officer here they type 45 can get positive weapons lock on a US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer before said destroyer is able to detect the type 45. Then can guide in assets from the submarine fleet, feel air arm etc no way the chines out range the Americans the aster 30 have the highest success rate of any SAM battery and sea sceptre is even more accurate. The type 45s fire control computer doesn't get over saturated.

There are 8 Type 055s already launched. Latest data shows another flight of n has begun construction.

Interesting to think that though the Type 45 will be fitted with 24 sea ceptors in the mushroom farm setup, it was originally ffbnw either 16 mk 41 strike length or 16 sylver a70 (its 48 current ones are a50), the 24 single cell sea ceptors are a budget option. Could have had 64 sea ceptors in a quadpack configuration. Although the best way of quadpacking sea ceptor is the exls that canada will use, which allows soft launch and is a lot smaller and less penetrative than mk 41. Wish that it was going to be used for type 26,

Ive not watched this yet so commenting blind, but ive tried all the naval combinations with the two CH provided RN boats and when its 2 on two it always ends in a stalemate. all the boats have greater defensive capabilities than offensive ones. Interesting to see how this plays out though.

I'm starting to like the naval battles, better than the air battles!!

Missile mass wins. The lesson from the Sherman tank needs to be remembered.

It is ridiculous that a 30mm gun can intercept several missiles at speed of mach 3.

I think"It just looks French" when Cap is instant saying "It looks nothing!" 🤣🤣😂😂

Love these videos. The thing about watching these is I was CIWS operator on a Cruiser and we operated them from Local control which is about midships and from CIC which is more forward. Almost all of these missiles look like they would have hit the Local control station. Feels bad.

Close in Naval Battles with guns is Best naval Battles ! Great video as always Cap

since the YJ-21 fly so much faster than the YJ-18, would it make sense for them to fire the YJ-18 first then the 21 so that the 21 would catch up and come from the top around the same time as the 18 approach from ocean surface?

Seems quantity of missiles still matters over quality if there is not much of a generational gap

Missile looks like a flying aircraft carrier lol.

the type 055 is not "incredibly expensive", one of these "cruisers" costs a bit less than a type 45, considering Chinas GDP its safe to asume China will keep producing these, in big numbers, making the unit cost fall even lower

"An officer with his sidearm". Lol. This is why you guys are great. Not just the simulations but the humor.

good news for the Brits, China is constructing a new batch of 8 055's at least and there will be upgraded versions in the future, let alone the 052D's and 052DL's. good luck out there in the sea

The range of YJ21 is about 1000km,and the terminal speed of yj18 is about Mach 3,range is 600km,there's no chance for British

YJ-21 isn't even the latest missile, YJ-21 is based on DF-21 which was developed in the late 2000s, wave-glider ASMs based on DF-17, which is actually smaller than DF-21 is almost guaranteed to be in development if not already in service.

Type 45 is more comparable to China's Type 054B frigate, similiar displacement, similiar or the same number of VLS (and ignoring China's VLS are multipurpose and bigger than Slyver), and both have a pair of rotating AESA on top.

In real life the missile salvos will timed and placed vastly different from this simulation.

054A ： am I a joke to u？

Well. We're screwed

This is the first batch of 055s 8 of 24.. continuously improving ... good luck .Great Britannia 😅😅😅

CH is a modding beast

type 55 is literally a cruiser, despite what the labelling would have you believe. VLS counts: Chinese: Type55: 112 , Type 52D:64, 176 total British: both Type 45 and 26 had 48 to start with, but are now waiting additional 24 cells upgrade, so realistically in between 96 to 144 total The Chinese have a clear advantage here to start with, which just isn't cricket

Apparently, China are building another 8 type 055's!😮

Did I hear the Spear 5 missiles will only be in service in 2030? In that case what kind of comparison are you making when the Chinese YJ21 and YJ18 are already operational?

The Type 26 has a third silo now where the hangars would be....bringing the missile count to 104

22:01 me when number 8 is not available

The Type 055 has 112 VLS cells ... why did you run them with a reduced load out?

Why is there such a professional military fan channel on KZfaq? It is much more professional than the military channel in traditional Chinese.

There seem to be something wrong with our battlecruisers today!!!

That first hyperosonic missiles that only got intercepted last second would have dealt some real damage irl. The debris would still have hit that ship with a loooooot of pwoer. I dont lile seeing the chinese win but they woyld have done significant damage with that opening volley, one ship being disabled would have meant less interceptors, imafter that and it would cascaded into a humiliatings defeat from there

The result is probably predictable, given the mismatch in raw numbers of missiles: RN: 240 SAM, 64 ASM CN: 320 SAM, 80 ASM

I think RN might have done better if only one type of "Spear5" was used so that they all arrived at the same time on target. Probably the cruise version as that seemed to get closer and would arrive similar time to NSM. Adjusting relative positions of T45 and T26 to achieve closer timing if possible

A day of infamy by jingo! Awesome video, CH is a genius.

America actually classifies the type 055 destroyer as a cruiser because it is in the size range of cruisers

上什么鹰击21，对付这几条舰，用鹰击18绰绰有余了，末端超音速突防它们根本拦不住

The NSM has a range of 160 kilometers, and the YJ-18 and 21 have a range of more than 280 kilometers, so if the distance between the two sides is 250 kilometers at the beginning. Then before the British could open fire, they were probably all sunk.

This was a great and brutal battle. The next naval battle should be the PLAN flotilla against a Russian flotilla.

cost for one Type 052D Destroyer: $505 million USD per ship cost for one Type 055 Destroyer: $866 million USD per ship cost for one Type 26 Frigate: $318 million USD per ship cost for one Type 45 Destroyer: $1.333 Billion USD per ship cost for one Arleigh Burke Destroyer: $1.843 Billion USD per ship Basically, China can trade two Type 055 for one arleigh burke class and still have some leftovers in terms of build price exchange it will be terrifying when China becomes the same size as the US and have the same amount of budget to play around with military toys, all their forces are concentrated near China cost vs the US navy that's scattered around the globe, with only US Pacific fleet can make it in time to defend Taiwan when a war breaks out. only 8 years to go before China takes over the US in terms of GDP.

Bad news: 4 more 055 upgraded version are under construction. Good news: The Royal Navy doesn't have the balls to risk their the entire destroyer fleet(only 6 Type45😂)

You need combined arms to beat that thing or more ships. Call the USAF!

Aaaaaaaand of course the Chinese ships all have that 11-barrelled CIWS from Hell..... 😖

The mushroom farm is the ugliest thing ever created in the history of human weaponry😭😭

I'm excited to see if FCASW has it's 50kg Independent submunitions modeled! 🤤

CH is my fav person you have on here

You just need one hundred and something per cent anti ship missiles vs the number of enemy anti air defence.

General Pao thinks everyone is chicken

Luv CH's new stuff!

2022 VS 2028 and lost😂

Make a sim battle from the Opium Wars era, so that the Brits can win against the Chinese.

I don't understand why the UK is spending money on CAMM. Makes no sense when they have access to ESSM which can be quad packed into mark 41 VLS cells. As I understand it ESSM doesn't need to be networked with AEGIS as the Zumwalt class has shown. The type 26 has 24 mark 41 cells which can give up to 96 ESSMs. We seen that ESSM can knock down the YJ 18 and 21s pretty well. What do you guys think? Also when is CH going to model in the Zumwalt? 😃

10:58 its because when the Spear-5 is launched vertically, the Type 055/052D radar can get a targeting solution, but since the missiles go down to 18ft above the ground - they lose that solution and the missiles go dumb

For tests like this, you need to somehow program the destroyers/ships to have a Time on Target (TOT) synced up. Ships firing their missiles in a line like this allowing missile defenses to react as they come in one by one are tactics that were only used way back in the 60s and 70s. In reality, these ships would be arcing the trajectories of the hypersonic missiles to all come in at the same time, while the subsonic missiles would make small turns and changes in their flight plan to come in as a line abrest. The results you would get from using real life tactics vs dumb obsolete tactics from 70 years ago are going to be completely different. Honestly doing tests like this without the proper TOT planning is a waste of time.

Looks like the RN just got junked.

I know it’s not gonna be 100% accurate but it’s kinda worrying that present day Chinese Ships massively outmatch RN ships/capabilities still a decade away.

Those two point blank interceptions should mission kill all the radars and sensors , the shrapnel from Mach 10 missiles detonating at 100 ft would shred the ship

I am really looking forward to the Canadian Type 26; SPY 7 with Aegis and Lockheed's Combat Management System, a bit longer, torpedoes, NSMs, SM series missiles (SM2 for now), Tomahawks, ESSMs, seaceptors. The things seem to be pretty stout for a "frigate".

You forgot that China has Hypersonics that cannot be stopped.

Great vid Cap! Looking for a video that could show the power of F-35 hive mind via Link16. For example, 2 F-35s traveling in stealth ahead of a handful of F-15/F-18 missile trucks that share the F-35s radar via Link16 vs a Russian air wing with 2 Felons with equal amount of gen 4 missile trucks. I'm guessing you would need to use AWACS to simulate Link16??

Everytime it's a chinese vs british vid type 055: HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TEACH YOU THIS OLD MAN?

Good news ...building more Type-55 😊

There goes 1/3 of the Royal Navy😅

i cant to wait to see the PLAN NEW frigate 054B, vs the US constellation.frigate

this needs to be updated to include the new dragon fire system

Royal Navy need moar missiles 😢

can just take into account that the 055 has more than twice the tonnage of a type 45? the brits were outclassed here not necessarily because of technology, but because they were punching well above their weight class;

Interesting. I didn’t notice any effects of soft kill measures, chaff or decoys. Great graphics!

nice to see we have a 100% kill rate vs hypersonic missiles as long as we have a missile to answer :S

Frigates vs destroyers? Good luck with that

bro almost said god saves the queen @8:48 lol

Canada is scheduled to get Type 26 in the future.