Ultimate Web Server Showdown: LiteSpeed vs Apache vs NGINX

Рет қаралды 997

Күн бұрын

.......
In this comprehensive video, we dive deep into a detailed performance comparison of three of the most popular web servers: LiteSpeed Enterprise, Apache, and NGINX. Using rigorous testing methods, we evaluate their capabilities under various traffic conditions to determine which server reigns supreme for high-traffic WordPress sites.
Visit official Litespeed Website at www.litespeedtech.com/ and get your licenses at www.litespeedtech.com/pricing .
‪@litespeedtechnologies‬ ‪@quiccloud‬
#WebServerComparison #LiteSpeedEnterprise #ApacheVsNGINX #WebHosting #HighTrafficSolutions #WordPressHosting #PerformanceTesting #ServerScalability #QUICcloud #Webnestify #CostEffectiveHosting #techreviews
* *RELATED LINKS **
👉👉 Blog post with results: webnestify.cloud/in-depth-web...
👉👉 Why is LiteSpeed a Superior Web Server? webnestify.cloud/why-is-lites...
* *WEBNESTIFY RECOMMENDATIONS **
🔥Hetzner - Get 20€ in cloud credits to get started with GDPR compliance!
wnstify.cc/hetzner
* *SOCIALS **
👉👉 LinkedIn - / webnestify
👉👉 TrustPilot - www.trustpilot.com/review/web...
* *ABOUT WEBNESTIFY **
Established in the heart of Slovakia in 2021. Webnestify is more than just a cloud solutions provider - it's your strategic partner in digital transformation. We believe that businesses, irrespective of size, deserve the best when it comes to technology. And, we're here to ensure that your company doesn't just keep up with the digital age but thrives in it.
Webnestify offers high-performance dedicated LiteSpeed Enterprise web servers tailored for any project. As a proud official LiteSpeed Solution provider, Webnestify is committed to delivering top-tier hosting solutions.
www.litespeedtech.com/partner...
🤝🤝🤝Join Webnestify, and let's redefine success together. Apply today for exclusive access at 👉👉👉webnestify.cloud/webnestify-a... .🤝🤝🤝
* *TIMESTAMPS/CHAPTERS **
0:00 - Intro
2:49 - Preparing Server Environment (TIMELAPSE)
4:15 - Web Server Installation (TIMELAPSE)
7:51 - Creating Test Targets (TIMELAPSE)
8:39 - Preparing Tests & Explanation
11:17 - Test #1 Apache & NGINX (TIMELAPSE)
12:43 - Test #1 Litespeed Enterprise (TIMELAPSE)
14:05 - Test #1 Results
17:38 - Finding Bottlenecks Test #2, #3
21:23 - Test #2, #3 Results (TIMELAPSE)
26:12 - Cache Enabled Test on Apache & NGINX (TIMELAPSE)
29:01 - Cache Enabled Results
31:26 - Wrapping Up

Пікірлер: 11

@webnestify 6 ай бұрын

Webnestify offers high-performance dedicated LiteSpeed Enterprise web servers tailored for any project. As a proud official LiteSpeed Solution provider, Webnestify is committed to delivering top-tier hosting solutions. We invite you to visit our application page for exclusive access to a wide range of Webnestify Services, ensuring your website’s performance is not just optimal but exceptional. 🤝🤝🤝 Join Webnestify, and let's redefine success together. Apply today for exclusive access at 👉👉👉webnestify.cloud/webnestify-application/ 🤝🤝🤝 🤑🤑Get 20€ in cloud credits to get started with Hetzner at wnstify.cc/hetzner. 🤑🤑 👉👉 Blog post with results: webnestify.cloud/in-depth-web-server-performance-comparison/ 👉👉 Why is LiteSpeed a Superior Web Server? webnestify.cloud/why-is-litespeed-a-superior-web-server/

@RobCooper 2 ай бұрын

fascinating

@TheSchokl 6 ай бұрын

Thanks again for your new webnestify video. Which tool do you use for your web server installation? How is the best way to get the Litespeed Enterprise license and what are the costs for that?

@webnestify 6 ай бұрын

You are welcome! You have many options on how you can deploy LSE. Docker, Cyberpanel, Enhance, Standalone binary, Cpanel, Plesk, etc. I have used Enhance platform, which I will also cover in series later :) You can get licenses via Litespeed website www.litespeedtech.com/pricing .

@pixtweaks393 6 ай бұрын

Interesting video, I wonder how many connections will handle LS and is there any difference between LS and OLS. Thanks!

@webnestify 6 ай бұрын

Yes, there are some differences. I will update blog post with OpenLitespeed also.

@nchomey 6 ай бұрын

Why didn't you disable lscache in the first test? You're comparing apples and oranges... And why are Apache and nginx even slower in the 2nd test? Either the caching plugin is misconfigured or its an inappropriate plugin that isn't doing caching at the webserver level. Moreover, if you're testing caching, why not do a test with a cdn in front of each server? Clearly it would be far better (and equal) performance than all of them...

@simongajdosik5105 6 ай бұрын

As is stated, I tested out of the box experience, no tweaks. That's what most users will get. CDN for proper testing is not good idea. Indeed, it will make better results, but it will not show the capabilities of each web server.

@ivansalloum3924 6 ай бұрын

This is not the right way to compare web servers. You can’t compare a pure NGINX server with Litespeed plus cache. First of all, there is no web server better than NGINX when you know what you are doing and configuring NGINX the right way. NGINX well configured plus FastCGI caching always wins. If you run Litespeed for your business, it doesn’t mean comparing it the wrong way with other web servers just to advertise that you are using the best stack, which is not. And are you really installing WP fastest cache and you have FastCGI cache? Do you know what server level caching means? Good Luck!

@webnestify 6 ай бұрын

As I said at the beginning. Everything is out of the box without any tweaks and configuration. I have done testing with FastCGI on NGINX. media.webnestify.io/DeFe9/Dumenedu76.png media.webnestify.io/DeFe9/GaxukARA06.png media.webnestify.io/DeFe9/GedOqALI66.png Unfortunately it failed at 1 - 2400 test.

@webnestify 6 ай бұрын

Also you can visit test results. loader.io/reports/8c2dd6aa1f9ef33e9f2e1182c38e86cc/results/6c6b59c89913d68050fd27b5edbf3bbf loader.io/reports/8c2dd6aa1f9ef33e9f2e1182c38e86cc/results/91260047167382d0cf00ec832ce32edb With FastCGI it is big improvement, but unfortunately still behind default LSE. Indeed, if you disable server caching on Litespeed, NGINX is clear winner even without FastCGI. Results are almost the same like Apache. But who goes into the admin interface and deliberately disable cache and remove LS Cache plugin? Also one advantage is that FastCGI does not require any plugin.. And you have option to configure LSE to work without plugin --- docs.litespeedtech.com/lscache/noplugin/